No products in the cart.

News

No Democrats have looked at the Mueller report provided to Congress

by Tyler Durden  –  5/12/2009

If there’s one thing that suggests Congressional Democrats are not acting in good faith amid their new obstruction crusade, it’s this;

House Judiciary Chair Jerry Nadler (D-NY) held Attorney General William Barr in contempt on Wednesday for failing to turn over the full Mueller report and its underlying evidence – yet not a single Democrat in Congress has elected to look at the 99.9% unredacted ‘volume 2’ section of the Mueller’s findings provided to Congress by the DOJ, which specifically covers the obstruction portion of Mueller’s investigation (Section “A” of the report covering alleged conspiracy with Russia was offered 98.5% unredacted).

On Wednesday, White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders told reporters “Not a single Democrat has even taken the time to go and look at it,” adding “They’re asking for information they know they can’t have. The attorney general is actually upholding the law,” referring to a recent ruling by a federal judge which requires that Barr redact grand jury material.

Attribution:Zero Hedge

7

nancy.larned

Oath Keepers Merchandise

4 comments

  1. The creeps say Oath Keepers is anti government, but I say it is anti criminally corrupt government. An honest government keeping to the Constitution is good.

  2. ““Chairman Nadler is asking the attorney general of the United States to break the law and commit a crime…”

    Admittedly the Democrats are the worst, but what I find “funny” is that no one cares that ALL who serve within our government is constitutionally required to take the Oath to “Support and Defend” the US Constitution, except for those who serve within the Office of the US President who are held to the higher requirement of “Preserving, Protecting, and Defending” the US Constitution. Yet many running, who already serve within our governments are OPENLY against our constitutional republic, so why are they not being charged and prosecuted? They cannot lawfully serve, if for no other reason then that they cannot take and KEEP the Oath of office. Any who are serving and are not keeping the required Oath have actualy renounced, refused, and abjured the Oath, or are breaking it, felonies, perjury being ignored by the sworn defenders of the US Constitution.

    It seems that almost all who serve within our constitutional republic tend to ignore the US Constitution, the contract that they serve under, plus required constitutionally to be Oath bound to “Support and Defend”. No person who serves within our government can change the US Constitution’s requirements for those who serve within government, as only the US Constitution is supreme, is the supreme law that requires that all other law created by in Pursuance thereof it. It can only be changed by a LAWFUL amendment.

    It is still *criminal, literally, to break the Oath. Why do Oath takers not bother to understand that the oath requirement is another part of the different ways the founders tried to protect our constitutional republic from those who would destroy it? Why is the meaning of the Oath not being taught or given its true importance before the actual taking of the Oath? When those required to take and KEEP the Oath do not do so, should we not be bringing the charges, or at least educate them so that they can decide to either keep it or renounce the Oath, then leaving the position they no longer meet the requirements of? Why are we NOT holding those who serve at any level accountable for those crimes since just that one action would start “cleaning up the swamp”?

    ALL oath takers are require to do the actions required of the Oath before anything else, and in the order listed.

    “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

    What is the first thing required by the Oath? Is it not to “support and defend” the US Constitution from enemies that are domestic and foreign?

    What does “support” mean? Support – furnishing funds or means for maintenance; to maintain; to provide for; to enable to continue; to carry on. To vindicate, to maintain, to defend, to uphold with aid or countenance. To provide a means of livelihood.

    What does “defend” mean? Defend – To prohibit or forbid. To deny. To contest and endeavor to defeat a claimor demand made against one in a court of justice. To oppose, repel, or resist. In covenants of warranty in deeds, it means to protect, to maintain or keep secure, to guaranty, to agree to indemnify.

    What about the words “true faith”? FAITH, noun [Latin fides, fido, to trust; Gr. to persuade, to draw towards any thing, to conciliate; to believe, to obey. The object of belief; a doctrine or system of doctrines believed. Faithfulness; fidelity; a strict adherence to duty and fulfillment of promises. Word or honor pledged; promise given; fidelity. Sincerity; honesty; veracity; faithfulness.

    Is any of the above definitions being upheld by those serving within our government? If one believes that they are not, then the Oath is broken, and crimes have been committed.

    Since government is all about force, is this not *Domestic Terrorism on the part of those who enforce all unconstitutional acts? Those unconstitutional actions are also destroying our constitutional republic, and a lot of it is deliberate. Is this not also treason? Terrorism, domestic?

    How are we letting admitted communists, socialists, and all others that are against our constitutional republic run for, serve within our governments – state and federal? There is no way that they can espouse to their beliefs and still take and KEEP the required Oath. They do NOT meet the requirements of the office/position when they do not support our constitutional republic. How is this being ignored when their very words make them not eligible to run for, be hired for, etc any governmental office/position?

    Hello, any Americans still alive? Or is our nation already destroyed by the disinterest of the people who are its citizens, its sworn defenders?

    Was not what Bertrand Russell did, his very words and possible actions in 1953 treasonous, yet those very actions are still ongoing : “… Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible…” (“The Impact of Science on Society”, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1953)

    The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of this nation, and the only crimes that were assigned to the federal government in the Constitution for Law Enforcement purposes are Treason, Piracy, Counterfeiting, and International law violations, yet they are actively creating/created agencies that are enforcing different types of law beyond that delegated, is this not *domestic terrorism? (All other law enforcement matters beyond those listed above are the purview of the individual states per the 10th Amendment).

    Is not what we have today for a “government” a legal fiction?

    Dr. Vieira: “This has nothing to do with personalities or subjective ideas. It’s a matter of what the Constitution provides… The government of the United States has never violated anyone’s constitutional rights… The government of the United States will never violate anyone constitutional rights, because it cannot violate anyone’s constitutional rights. The reason for that is: The government of the United States is that set of actions by public officials that are consistent with the Constitution. Outside of its constitutional powers, the government of the United States has no legitimacy. It has no authority; and, it really even has no existence. It is what lawyers call a legal fiction.”

    The requirement for all Federal and State Civil officers to give their solemn and binding Oath is established in Article VI, Section 1, Clause 4. Those that serve within our governments – state and general – are bound by their Oath to support the US Constitution.

    “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

    Once given, the Oath is binding for life, unless renounced, refused, and abjured. It does not cease upon the occasions of leaving office or of discharge.

    Solemn: “Legally binding, Common legal phrase indicating that an agreement has been consciously made, and certain actions are now either required or prohibited. The other requirement for an agreement or contract to be considered legally binding is consideration – both parties must knowingly understand what they are agreeing to”
    .
    Bound: “Being under legal or moral obligation; to constitute the boundary or limit of; to set a limit to; confine”

    Legally Binding: Common legal phrase. Lawful action, such as an agreement consciously agreed to by two or more entities, establishing lawful accountability.

    Consideration: “Consideration in a contract is a bargained for exchange of acts or forbearance of an act.”

    Require, Requirement, Required: Mandated under a law or by an authoritative entity.

    Contract: “An agreement between two or more parties creating obligations that are enforceable or otherwise recognizable at law.”

    Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials – state and federal – is divided into four parts along with an executive order that further defines the law for purposes of enforcement.

    5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office the three branches of our government, the military, all law enforcement, the heads of the States, all federal employees are required to take before assuming office.

    5 U.S.C. 3333 requires the three branches of our government, the military, all law enforcement, the heads of the States, all federal employees sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office.

    18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath of office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1) removal from office and; (2) confinement or a fine.

    5 U.S.C. 7311 explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense for anyone employed in the United States Government to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”.

    The definition of “advocate” is further specified in Executive Order 10450 for the purposes of enforcement supplements 5 U.S.C. 7311. Executive Order 10450 provision specifies it is a violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311 for any person taking the oath of office to advocate “the alteration … of the form of the government of the United States by unconstitutional means.”

    It is important to realize that our form of government is defined by the Constitution of the United States. That according to Executive Order 10450 and 5 U.S. 7311 any act taken by government officials who have taken the oath of office prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 3331 which alters the form of government other then by amendment, is a criminal violation of the 5 U.S.C. 7311.

    Brookfield Construction Company V. Stewart 284 F Sup. 94: “An officer who acts in violation of the constitution ceases to represent the government.”

    28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.
    Section 802 (Title 18), “Domestic Terrorism” is defined as involving “acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;” which “appear to be intended–to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (or) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion”.

    Treason – Article III, Section 3 of the Constitution of the United States provides: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
    The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
    Three key elements are necessary for an offense to constitute treason:
    – an obligation of allegiance to the legal order,
    – intent to go against the legal order, and then
    – action to violate that obligation.

  3. Anything to create a problem. These people “strain at a gnat and swallow a camel.” Do you recall who said that? The Lord Jesus Christ, who is “truly God and truly man.” He knows what is in men’s hearts. He taught that out of the heart comes lies, deceit, and those things that defile a man before God. The Lord loves it when people do righteousness (see Psalm 33). Serve God as He has said, persevere in doing good, watch, pray and faint not.

Leave a Reply