No products in the cart.


Illegal Aliens, Socialist Democrats & Cloward-Piven

By Mark Landsbaum  –  February 9, 2019

The next time you see thousands of illegal aliens massing at the border demanding to be allowed to enter, or marchers demanding more of your tax dollars to pay for their wants and needs or politicians insisting you owe it to others to pay for their necessities in life, remember these two words: Cloward-Piven.

So much of what the Left (and progressives and Marxists and wannabe socialists) seek to accomplish isn’t intended to improve conditions. It’s intended to destroy. Many of them don’t know enough to understand this. Some do.

Many of these advocates are like the “useful idiots” described by Vladimir Lenin. He said useful idiots were non-communists in the West who supported the communist agenda thinking it would improve life without really understanding what it was they were supporting.

What useful idiots still don’t understand is that their schemes – government-run welfare, government-run medical care, government-administered retirement systems, government building and work projects, etc. – are doomed.

As Margaret Thatcher explained:

“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money.”

Those schemes are inherently doomed because none of them creates new wealth. They all just spend existing wealth with a negative return on their “investments.” It’s like throwing cash into a furnace to keep warm.

Worse, they also each have built-in breaking points – the points at which they run out of other peoples’ money.

Useful idiots like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York demand such programs be established, then demand that taxpayers pay for them, then demand the benefit levels be increased, then increased again, then again, and again.

The logical extension of this is programs that create no wealth eventually spend everyone else’s wealth. Many productive people eventually will choose to no longer be productive because they understand the futility of creating wealth when the government will only take it from them to give to someone else.

AOC and many on the Left are too ignorant of economics to see the inevitability of the failure. That’s why they never will have enough of other people’s money – 50% taxes will give way to 70% taxes which will give way to 90% taxes. If you think this is unlikely, you have forgotten that the tax-and-spend crowd increased the top federal income tax to more than 90% from 1950 through 1962. In 1944-45 the top tax rate was 94%.

To use one of the Left’s favorite words, this is unsustainable. Dim bulbs like AOC don’t understand this. But the people who put these schemes in motion understand it perfectly. They know the arbitrary patchwork system of the Western welfare states is built on sand and must eventually collapse. It’s meant to collapse.

In 1966 this underlying scheme was publicly advanced by a pair of sociologist-activists named Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven.

The Cloward-Piven strategy called for purposely overloading the U.S. public welfare system expressly to collapse the system. Once the system and economy had crashed, the true motive could be realized.

Cloward and Piven foresaw rising from the rubble a national system of guaranteed annual income for everyone administered by the government. They said by doing so, poverty would be eradicated.

As anyone with even a passing familiarity with economics understands, however, what such a redistribution of wealth actually would accomplish would be universal poverty.

Attribution: BARB WIRE




One comment

  1. I’m glad to see this being discussed openly, we need more of this. Many have called the folks pushing these ideas “useful idiots” but since our schools no longer teach in-depth social studies or history, it’s really meaningless to them. It’s said so often it’s lost it’s meaning. We need to explain what that means, and why we say it. It’s not a “conspiracy theory” it’s fact, concepts that have been put down on paper and are part of history. Thank you Oath Keepers for keeping it in the forefront of discussion.

Leave a Reply