No products in the cart.

News

How Much Blood Would Leftists Be Willing To Shed…

…To Disarm Patriotic Americans?

by Kurt Schlichter – Dec. 6, 2018

My question for Congressjerk Eric Swalwell is pretty simple: “How many Americans would you murder to achieve your goal of disarming us?”

It’s a fair question.

Swalwell is the MSNBC stalwart who recently wrote an op-ed advocating that the government confiscate the guns that make people like him wet themselves and imprison those of us who decline to surrender them. Millions of Americans own these basic tools of freedom, which the ignorant call “assault weapons,” and these loyal citizens keep and bear them to protect themselves, their families, their communities and their Constitution. But Rep. Swalwell would make these citizens felons, though these patriots are only a threat to criminals and aspiring tyrants.

Of course, he wants to make these patriots felons because they are a threat to criminals and aspiring tyrants. After all, that’s what leftist Democrats like him are.

Now, we know that some Americans would resist this kind of tyranny. People all over the world are resisting the elite’s commands. The Brits Brexited. The French are rioting because they don’t want to sacrifice their livelihoods on behalf of the global elites’ weird weather religion. And a decree that the Second Amendment is not a thing anymore would certainly provoke some serious pushback here.

That’s why it’s fair to ask Rep. Bloodlust how much blood he’s prepared to shed to achieve his goal of disarming Normal Americans.

Rep. Swalwell, some people are going to fight rather than cave in, so what’s the number of bodies you would be willing to pile up to win? Let’s put aside the right or wrong of resistance; it’ll be a thing. It’ll happen. You’re from near San Francisco, so you don’t know any real Americans, but even though I am from that hellhole too, I’ve met a few Americans in my travels. They are an ornery people who don’t give in to the kind of bullying you advocate. So, you’re going to have to kill some people to do what you want, and I just want to know how many you’re prepared to off to achieve your goal.

After all, it’s not as if you Democrats don’t already have a history of killing people for having guns you disapprove of.

Remember Waco? The raid on David Koresh’s compound was because his weird band of misfits allegedly had scary, outlawed guns. That’s why Democrat Janet Reno initially decided to send in the troops. The government got four of our ATF agents killed, then slaughtered the resisters, including women and kids.

Was it worth it? Maybe these creepy cultists were violating the law, but was making sure they didn’t have guns that were scary worth shooting or burning alive about 80 people, including four cops?

One?

One hundred?

One thousand?

One hundred thousand?

More?

How many corpses would Eric Swalwell and his blue state buddies accept because they don’t think some law-abiding citizen in Oklahoma should be allowed to choose what kind of weapon he has, because they think they should choose for him, and that that choice should be “None?”

Read more here:

Attribution: Townhall

22

nancy.larned

Oath Keepers Merchandise

14 comments

  1. Simply Amazing, politicians at the highest levels just can’t fathom that their oath is to upholding the Constitution… To many politicians on the left, the oath is just a formality for the position applied for….. so, when a politician makes the law that goes against the Constitution… And in this case the Second Amendment, that law should never be written or never enforced… I for one understand that swalwell is a trader to the Constitution… I’ve read numerous articles about the reason why our forefathers gave us the Second Amendment… And it is specifically to fight tyranny in government… swalwell and other politicians who want to fundamentally change this country… They are the enemy!… I also have as strong of an opinion against his policies as he has for his policies!… I’m tired the politicians doing anything they want… and what will always stick in my mind is, shall not be infringed!

    1. I do not understand that if a person publicly takes an oath to defend the constitution and then violates that very oath from the day they take office on false pretenses, why can’t they simply be removed from that office with a new local election? Violating their oath to do the very thing that they are called to do as a representative of the people, that this wonderfully crafted document outlines, is reason enough for them to be removed! Incidentally, these fools do not seem to grasp that there are many who will die to protect that document, and the rights that it guarantees.

  2. Let’s discuss this particular “problem

    Congressman Eric Swalwell was REQUIRED to take and KEEP the Oath to Support and Defend the US Constitution, as was ALL who serve within our government. At this time he has committed 2 felonies plus Perjured himself both when he accepted the Office and when he took the Oath. No one will charge him with those crimes, why? Because he serves within our government? That is when it is most needed to be done. Accountability, that is the people’s right.

    So WHY did our framers put the REQUIREMENT of taking and keeping an Oath into the supreme Law of this land? As one more safeguard from a usurping government.
    What does the Oath do? It makes the Oath taker PERSONALLY responsible for one’s actions while serving within our government at any and all levels of service. That is why one can be held accountable for that Oath and their actions.

    The other thing within the Oaths is that the requirements to the US Constitution comes before everything else, orders from superiors – including a US President, before the duties of the position occupied. This means that supporting and defending the US Constitution comes BEFORE anything else.

    Yet Oath takers that are in positions to press charges refuse to do so.

    “… wrote an op-ed advocating that the government confiscate the guns…”

    The op-ed he wrote is criminal BECAUSE he wrote it.

    Now let’s take it a step further. Let’s say that this DOMESTIC ENEMY (traitor in my book) passes this “color of law”, pretend law. So Law enforcement will enforce it, making them at the very least also domestic enemies, felons, perjurer’s – they are also REQUIRED to take and KEEP the Oath. Add to that *TERRORISTS, yes domestic terrorists. No actions that they will take in order to confiscate guns here in the USA will be Lawful.

    Preserved in the National Archives, with the rest of the original hand-written copy of the Bill of Rights prepared by scribe William Lambert: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

    “A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed” is pretty clear in its meaning.

    1800’s Dictionary http://webstersdictionary1828.com

    INFRINGE, verb transitive infrinj’. [Latin infringo; in and frango, to break. See Break.]
    1. To break, as contracts; to violate, either positively by contravention, or negatively by non-fulfillment or neglect of performance. A prince or a private person infringes an agreement or covenant by neglecting to perform its conditions, as well as by doing what is stipulated not to be done.
    2. To break; to violate; to transgress; to neglect to fulfill or obey; as, to infringe a law.
    3. To destroy or hinder; as, to infringe efficacy. [Little used.]

    Support – furnishing funds or means for maintenance; to maintain; to provide for; to enable to continue; to carry on. To vindicate, to maintain, to defend, to uphold with aid or countenance. To provide a means of livelihood. http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/support

    to agree with or approve of (someone or something); to show that you approve of (someone or something) by doing something; to give help or assistance to (someone or something) http://thelawdictionary.org/support-n/

    Defend – To prohibit or forbid. To deny. To contest and endeavor to defeat a claimor demand made against one in a court of justice. To oppose, repel, or resist. In covenants of warranty in deeds, it means to protect, to maintain or keep secure, to guaranty, to agree to indemnify.
    http://thelawdictionary.org/defend/#ixzz4NNnomOcl
    to promote the interests or cause of; to uphold or defend as valid or right; to hold up or serve as a foundation or prop for; to keep (something) going http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/support

    Here is the definition of *terrorist/domestic terrorist.

    28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.

    Section 802 (Title 18), Domestic Terrorism is defined as involving “acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;” which “appear to be intended–to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (or) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion”.

    So the Congress critter and those who would enforce what he wants to make into legislation against the American people would all qualify as terrorists.

    LEA’s already enforce much which is unconstitutional, unLawful, color of law and aids much by doing so in the destruction of our nation, our legitimate government.

    Color of Law: “The appearance or semblance, without the substance, of legal right. Misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because wrongdoer is clothed with authority of state, is action taken under “color of law.” Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, page 241.

    LEA’s are not alone in the crimes they are committing against our country – knowingly or unknowingly, so are those who serve within the military because there has NOT been a congressional declaration of war, the ONLY body who serves within our government that can send Americans to fight.

    US Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 11, the Congress shall have Power: “To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water”.

    But it goes even deeper, those who actually serve within the Congress are also only allowed to fund a LAWFUL, constitutional military for two years before reviewing to see if they will continue funding, and they (military) can ONLY be used for the actual defense of our nation.

    Clause 12, the Congress shall have Power: “To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years”.

    *War defined: ‘Open and declared conflict between the armed forces of two or more states or nations’. http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/war

    Nor can those who serve within OUR governments give away/trade/loan/etc the powers that were delegated to the branch or named office within a branch as those powers are theirs to be able to use ONLY if they do the duties as constitutionally assigned, take and KEEP the Oath and those powers are already there where they serve.

    Is there an area of our government where there is no crimes against the US Constitution being committed? I don’t know. Is it not time for us to actually stand for our country? For the US Constitution to which most of us are Oath sworn? Will not enforcing the supreme LAW of this nation clean out the swamp we all dislike so intensely?

    Understand and KEEP your Oath! Stand for this country as is required of us.

    God Bless All and Stay Safe!

  3. swalwell is off his rocker, along with 98% of the democratic and republitard parties, neither have a hint what this country is all about. What strikes me is the insistence of calling them “assault rifles”, which they most assuredly are not. As with everything, rifles, cars, clothing, glasses, everything evolves over time. The so called assault weapon is merely a modern sport semi automatic rifle. So if it is not in fact an assault rifle, and you are requested (told) to turn it in, why turn it in. After all, there are cell towers that look like trees, but that doesn’t make them trees, there are statues that look like humans, but that doesn’t make them humans, etc, you get the picture. I understand that gov can do pretty much what it wants, reference Waco, Ruby Ridge, Malheur Wildlife Refuge, etc. But you need to understand the Constitution, and abide by it, as well as hold those elected to office accountable to abide by it. If any law is made contrary to the enumerated powers allowed under the Constitution, it is not in fact a law, and is null and void. As we are speaking of illegal laws agains our 2nd Amendment I reference the following videos. Please learn and understand The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, hold yourselves and others, especially elected officials, local, state, and federal, accountable. This is the only peaceable way in which to wrest our Country back from the jaws of tyranny. Or, it will be the American Revolution all over again, and this time the results will be worse than any of there great wars.
    https://freedomoutpost.com/all-federal-gun-laws-are-unconstitutional/

  4. Leftists are perfectly willing to murder half the population of this country if it means they can move their agenda forward. In their eyes – anyone supporting or defending the Constitution IS the enemy. They would like nothing better than for every Conservative to be murdered by the government – thus leaving “their” hands clean. The left will not ever recognize “cause and effect” or take responsibility for their “unintended consequences”, because that isn’t what they “feel”. The utopian society they seek is not, and will never be “reality”. They simply know what they “want”, even if it can never actually exist. But they are willing to kill millions to try and get there.

    The only real question is how many people will be killed before it’s recognized as an actual war?

  5. Please make sure you follow the link to this article on the Townhall website and read the ENTIRE article. It’s excellent. (Thank you, OK, for placing this article on your website!)
    Mr. Schlichter makes many good points and asks the questions we’d like Eric “Nuke ’em” Swalwell and his fellow domestic Communists to answer. Indeed, what weapons in our military’s arsenal ARE on the table for use against law-abiding American gun owners? I’d like to include an additional 2 paragraphs from the article here, if I may:
    “Now, Congressman Strangelove properly took a lot of grief for suggesting nuking fellow Americans, but even if you accept his backtracking about how this was a joke – nothing’s funnier than suggesting the mass murder of fellow Americans! – he only put nukes off limits. What killing systems are still on the table? Infantry? Artillery? Bombers? Because his answer assumed that he would support prosecuting a war against those who failed to obey and submit to arrest.
    So, Congressman, what means of destructions are still on the table to use against fellow Americans who refuse to allow you to strip them of their Second Amendment rights because you Bay Area liberals want to show those hicks in Jesusland who’s boss? Is shooting them okay? Shelling them? Bombing them, just not with nukes?”

  6. Focus.

    A government that has militarized it’s agencies with full auto weapons, billions of hollow point ammo, and offensive war machinery, and simultaneously plans to disarm it’s citizens of similar armament is exactly what took place in the 20th century to 270,000,000 civilians; not counting military casualties. They are dead by the hand of murdering government agencies. The dark state operatives has a list of virtually every gun owner. These are your neighbors who live amongst you.

    Now, when those of us who lived in those days pass, the resistance to disarming will also pass, and the young will undoubtedly cave in to disarming. Hundreds of millions will be executed via bio, chemical, nuclear, and lead poisoning.

    Any wagers?

    I repeat: Do unto them before they do unto you. Or is that just too uncivilized? Watch every documentary on 20th century exterminations of the unarmed. It’s real.

  7. My concern is that everyone is dismissing the comment of Eric “We Got The Nukes” Swalwell as a sick joke because they are thinking only of large multi-megaton nuclear bombs. That’s what I see pictured in articles and on videos about Swalwell’s twitter comments. They talk about the devastating destruction of a 10-megaton bomb. But the U.S. military has tactical nuclear weapons in its arsenal.

    These include neutron bombs which are designed to emit a large amount of radiation to kill people, rather than a huge blast to destroy buildings and infrastructure. They were designed for this specific mission: kill residents in a city while leaving the buildings. At the time, it was thought this weapon would be an effective means of repelling a Soviet invasion of Western Europe.

    I believe that tactical neutron bombs could potentially be employed by the Communists in our country against small American cities which are comprised of mainly Conservative patriots. Especially if such cities are out in rural areas far from the large population centers. As an example, my small city votes approx. 70% Republican and we have a mostly Christian population. Same for my State Assembly district. In 2016 some of our precincts voted more than 3:1 for Republicans. In the 2018 mid-terms another small city in my state went approx. 80% Republican. If the domestic Communists dropped a tactical neutron bomb or left a suitcase nuke (which is a very small neutron bomb) in my city, they know they’d wipe out mostly patriotic gun-owning Bible-reading Conservatives. I’m sure any killed libtards would be considered acceptable collateral damage to these Commies.

    An important consideration is that much fewer traitors (in key positions, and with others unaware of the true nature of the flight missions) would be required to drop a few dozen tactical neutron bombs on small cities of resistance than the manpower needed to go door-to-door to confiscate guns within these cities. I think the Communists here know that they can not count on sufficient numbers of American troops to do their bidding. Personally, I just don’t see infantrymen kicking in doors and killing women and the elderly just because we refuse to turn in our guns. If so ordered, our troops might just take on a different enemy.

    In other words, I’m not so sure that Swalwell didn’t give us an insight into what the domestic enemies of our country have up their sleeve, and I wouldn’t automatically assume that nukes are off the table.

  8. The leftists would be willing to spill the blood of every single Conservative in the country to move their agenda forward. They would especially like it if they could get the government to do their dirty work for them. They do not understand “cause and effect” and absolutely refuse to acknowledge “unintended consequences.” The utopia they seek does not exist, and they refuse to recognize the failures of all other governments and countries that tried for the same – using the same methods. They would bring about the downfall of the entire country if we simply rolled over and let them do as they please. The scary part is that they KNOW we are not the “roll over and take it” kind of people, yet they continue to push anyway.

  9. I think the title question is a fairly stupid question. Everyone of them is the obvious and correct answer. How many Jews was Hitler willing to murder and how many Christians was Stalin willing to murder? A better question might be to ask how many Americans are willing to get murdered? My hope would be that some would just say no to being murdered.

  10. The left are socialists. The goal of socialism IS communism. The Soviet Union, was called the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, not communist republics. Stalin, one of the most vicious murderers of the 20th century, other than Mao Tse Tung and maybe Lenin, ( Not even Hitler murdered as many of his own people) was a socialist. The communists in Russian were called Bolsheviks before they declared that they were indeed communists. In America Bolsheviks control the democrat party. Bolsheviks were cruel, heartless, and lacking in any moral principals in Russia. They are the same here in America. Lenin was a Bolshevik. Lenin had millions of his people murdered. If you think that the Bolsheviks in America wouldn’t do the same thing here if given a chance then you are very foolish. People in Russia did not think such things could happen there either. Russia was a Christian nation in large part, but the Bolsheviks were small but organized and huge liars. Their goal is always to lead the revolution, and they will say anything and do anything to get there. They mislead the people of Russia to the peoples detriment and got into the power positions. In other words Bolsheviks are very much like Obama, wolves in sheep’s clothing. Obama tried to overthrow our government and our country. His coup is being continued under the guise of investigations of Russia. The only thing that prevented a complete overthrow of our country under Obama was the second Amendment. Obama left his traitors in the government to keep the revolution going.

  11. Not just the USA… all Western civilization is under siege by tyrannical forces using internal traitors and foreign barbarians as an invading force to divide and conquer Western people. The threat is real. Our existence as on-line and real-world patriots proves that we are engaged in the war for hearts and minds… as the elite-owned tyrannical media, entertainment and other industries are.

    The propaganda and indoctrination spewed by tyrants reaches every cohort, including Western youth during their formative years when life-long attitudes are developing. Our individual and group efforts are minute in comparison to the tyrannical elite’s abilities to influence thoughts and behaviors. We are doing what we can but the enemies of freedom are vastly more powerful in the thought/behavior influencing abilities than are patriots.

    Will revolt eventually be the only method to save the USA and Western civilization? During World War Two there was fear that if the Axis won the USA would be surrounded by enemies. If some to all of Europe falls to tyranny and the invading barbarians embed themselves… a fearful thought.

    Shall we limp along this same old path where nothing of substance is being done in our political system to curtail the tyrants and the monolithic corporate entities they use as weapons against We, the People? What CAN we do? Is a New Dark Age our fate in the long run? Where are the best and brightest assembling to form a cohort of New Founders to guide the patriot forces? Are they too busy amassing wealth within those monolithic corporations withe more wealth thus power than some countries?

    What CAN we do?

  12. A lot of blood, a lot of poor people genocided. All wars are banker’s wars by General Smedley Buter. Below Civil War Casualties per www. NPS.gov

    The 642,427 total Union casualties have been divided accordingly:

    · 110,100 killed in battle

    · 224,580 diseases

    · 275,174 wounded in action

    · 30,192 prisoners of war

    The 483,026 total Confederate casualties have been divided accordingly:

    · 94,000 killed in battle

    · 164,000 diseases

    · 194,026 wounded in action

    · 31,000 prisoners of war

Leave a Reply