No products in the cart.


Send In The Clowns

Day two of the Brett Kavanaugh hearings began as day one began: the clowns took center stage. Protestors once again attempted to disrupt the hearings, with at least 36 being removed. Democrat Senators, meanwhile tried to gain as much TV face time as possible to promote themselves and their possible Presidential aspirations; re: Kamala Harris and Corey Booker. It was a sideshow worthy of P.T. Barnum.

Too what effect? That Harris and Booker momentarily energized their Far Left bases of support was evident, but in being viewed as the obstructionists that they are, and driving those who are not as Far Left as their bases, both Harris and Booker lose in the long run.

The Globalists are terrified of the Supreme Court being shifted to the conservative Right for years to come. It is the Globalists that are using the Left to achieve their long-term goal of a One World government that is, on the face of it, of a democratic  socialist bent, but if it suits them, that democratic socialism could swiftly turn in favor of a “socialist oligarchy“, which it is showing signs of doing.

The dreamed of Utopia that the Globalists embrace is an oligarchy. Whether it is Plato’s oligarchy of intellectuals, or a more Maoist version of socialism run by a group of technocrats, it will be an oligarchy: the Constitution be damned. In either case, the Common Man will be just a cog in the machine of oligarchy, to be used, abused and discarded. That is what oligarchies do. They use people for their own benefit.

The Kavanaugh hearings are a circus. The Democrats know they will lose, but choose to make fools of themselves in front of America. They opposed Kavanaugh before he was even chosen, because Trump was the man doing the choosing. They are fully under the sway of Trump Derangement Syndrome. They offer America nothing but obstruction. They offer nothing but a circus and virtue signalling. That is not enough.

If the Democrats (and the Never-Trump Republicans) want to be taken seriously, they must act seriously. I’m not seeing anything of the sort, as the “Russia did it” mantra and the endless talk of impeachment falls flat and empty.

The Globalists are seeing their dream evaporate in front of them, but still think they are in control. So what if Twitter, Facebook and Google censor anti-Globalist messages? The forum for those messages merely shifts. A paradigm shift is under way. They cannot stop it; try as they will. It is global in nature, which is ironic as it opposes Globalism.


Shorty Dawkins



  1. ALL of this…Niki/Kapernick…Kavenaugh disruptions…NYT Anonymous Op-ed…We are witnessing an $18bil Soros-funded Globalist Full-Court Press. Expect pure insanity from here to mid-term. ANYTHING is possible as they desperately try to shift public opinion…without bullets. After they are crushed in November with nothing left to lose? Keep your powder dry…and as our modern-day Joan of Arc likes to remind us…we do not have enough ammo. Keep on it Shorty…you are a Pit Bull/Blood Hound brother!

  2. Look real hard here, and what is REALLY being discussed? Seriously? It is Democrats vs Republicans, correct?

    What is supposed to be involved here but is pretty much entirely ignored?

    THIS, That unmentioned reason I brought up in the sentence above is WHY WE ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO HAVE POLITICAL PARTIES. Because they destroy our nation from within, bring in foreign influence, and get the US Constitution ignored. Because the US Constitution goes pretty much unmentioned yet IT is the supreme Law of this land, defines our governments, separates the different powers, delegates authority – defining and limiting it. Yet, when “elections” are here, of any type, one only hears “this party”, that “that party” not the words “the Constitution say/requires/etc.

    We have the DOMESTIC ENEMIES mentioned in the Oaths serving within our governments. We have outright enemies of our constitutional republic OPENLY running for office in a government they do NOT support and work to bring down, all in the name of apolitical parties. WE have those who can NEVER KEEP the required Oath, who if the “win”, will take office anyway. All of this and more is because of political parties. Even our elections are not constitutional in makeup any more because of political parties. READ THE US CONSTITUTION because it IS up to us if we are going to allow this all to continue while it destroys our nation from within.

    George Washington, Farewell Address, Sept. 17, 1796 referring to political parties: “Let me… warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party.”… “And of fatal tendency … to put, in the place of the delegated will of the Nation, the will of a party – often a small but artful and enterprising minority. … They are likely, in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the Power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government; destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.”
    And “The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism.”

    John Adams: “There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution.”

    Thomas Jefferson: “The happiness of society depends so much on preventing party spirit from infecting the common intercourse of life, that nothing should be spared to harmonize and amalgamate the two parties in social circles. (Thomas Jefferson, To William C. Claiborne, July 1801) again Jefferson: “You will soon find that so inveterate is the rancor of party spirit among us, that nothing ought to be credited but what we hear with our own ears. If you are less on your guard than we are here, at this moment, the designs of the mischief-makers will not fail to be accomplished, and brethren and friends will be made strangers and enemies to each other.” (To James Monroe, March 1808)

    Alexander Hamilton: “Nothing could be more ill-judged than that intolerant spirit which has, at all times, characterized political parties.” (Federalist 1, October 27, 1787)

    Alexander Hamilton: “We are attempting, by this Constitution, to abolish factions, and to unite all parties for the general welfare.” (Debates in the Convention of the State of New York on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, Tuesday, June 25, 1788. In: Henry Cabot Lodge, ed., The Works of Alexander Hamilton (Federal Edition), Vol. 2, New York, 1904, p. 57)

    Federal Crop Ins. Corp v. Merrill, 332 U. S. 380, 384 (1947): “Whatever the form in which the Government functions, anyone entering into an arrangement with the Government takes the risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the Government stays within the bounds of his authority. The scope of this authority may be explicitly defined by Congress or be limited by delegated legislation, properly exercised through the rulemaking power.”

    Harry Browne, 1996 USA presidential candidate, Libertarian Party: “…The Bill of Rights is a literal and absolute document. The First Amendment doesn’t say you have a right to speak out unless the government has a ‘compelling interest’ in censoring the Internet. The Second Amendment doesn’t say you have the right to keep and bear arms until some madman plants a bomb. The Fourth Amendment doesn’t say you have the right to be secure from search and seizure unless some FBI agent thinks you fit the profile of a terrorist. The government has no right to interfere with any of these freedoms under any circumstances.”

  3. Cal is absolutely correct in this. The two or more party system is a cause of strife, only causing allegiance to a party and subjecting our Constitution to second place status. Very much like owing allegiance to the one who feeds you. When you depend upon other entities, whether gov., private companies, individuals, or other, for any portion of your welfare, you have to abide by their rules.

Leave a Reply