No products in the cart.


Socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez The New Face Of The Democrat Party?

Socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez recently upset Cong. Joe Crowley in NY Cong. District 14. She hasn’t been elected to office yet, but some are already calling her the new face of the Party. Interesting.

None other than Tom Perez, the Democratic National Committee chairman proclaimed this in an interview.

Of course, Bernie Sanders, a self-avowed Socialist, also proclaimed her to be the new face of the Party. That wasn’t surprising, as she had been an organizer in New York for Bernie’s Presidential primary campaign against Hillary Clinton.

Like Obama, she is well-spoken, and also like Obama, she talks in glowing generalities about ‘change” and Social Justice.

Here is an interview she did with Now This:

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is a Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) member. The DSA is the new face of the Socialist Party of America. The DSA is no longer a political party, but rather an organization promoting socialism. It works mainly through the Democratic Party.

The DSA is anti-capitalism. Period. Vox has a useful article on Ocasio-Cortez and the DSA here.

It isn’t surprising to see Bernie Sanders supporting her, nor to see Tom Perez gushing over her. Both are Far Left in their political beliefs. Now we can see, with Crazy Maxine Waters (Mad Maxine), Nancy Pelosi and Elizabeth Warren, (among others), that the Democrat Party is drifting further and further towards socialism, even as the country as a whole is becoming more conservative. Thus it isn’t surprising, at least to me, that Ocasio-Cortez is indeed being called the new face of the Democrat Party. Sad, perhaps, but true.


Shorty Dawkins



  1. “Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is a Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) member. The DSA is the new face of the Socialist Party of America. The DSA is no longer a political party, but rather an organization promoting socialism. ”

    Okay all here, tell me how she can run for office, take and KEEP the constitutionally required Oath to Support and Defend the US Constitution (and whatever state Constitution if it applies) if she is working against our Constitutional Republic? How many different counts of felonies & Perjury are we going to let her make? As many as a lot of those who now serve within our governments commit, plus other crimes?

    Guess I shouldn’t mind, look at the Clinton’s, Obama, their administration, the “intelligence”agencies who all worked against the US Constitution, the American people, our nation – you know, TREASON, and not one thing is happening to them. Sitting still for this or at least going to DEMAND that those who SERVE us within the governments press charges, arrest, prosecute?

    I mind, I mind greatly. As Oath takers and Keepers, you should mind also.

    God Bless All! Stay Safe!

      1. Ahh, but Dale, WHO does the US Constitution assign the duties of enforcing the Supreme Law (and supreme contract for those who serve within our governments – state and general) of this land, the US Constitution, plus each state’s Constitution? Is the answer not found in Article 1, Section 8, Clauses 15 & 16? Is it not ourselves as the Militia of the several states? Is not Clause 16 listing the duties that those who serve within our state and general (federal) governments have to those Militias of the several states?

        So to hold those who serve within our governments accountable, including the Clinton’s, Sessions, etc, etc, etc (almost ad infinitum) we need the Militia. Because veterans are the quickest to be the Militia (already trained as the Congress requires the military to be trained, and all they need is basic Constitution lessons so that they KNOW, actually KNOW what is allowed to be done, must be done, etc by those who serve within our governments.

        Since it is the Militia that has as its constitutionally assigned duties to:
        Enforce the US Constitution (supreme Law of this nation requiring all other legislation be in Pursuance thereof it to be Lawfully binding on the American people and on this nation) and each state’s Constitution (highest Law of the state),
        Enforce and keep the “Laws of the Union” (which are constitutional laws ONLY),
        Protect the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
        “to suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”,

        And it does, it is in writing. Why is there federal and/or state governmental law enforcement?

        Because those duties are assigned to the Militias of the several states, it is forbidden to any other group, agency, etc to do them. Since the only crimes assigned to the general (federal) government in the Constitution for law enforcement purposes are Treason, Piracy, Counterfeiting, and International law violations – that is the only jurisdiction that I see within the US Constitution – and it is the Militia of the several states that is to enforce the Constitutions, the Laws of the land, etc why is money being spent on them to do duties that they Lawfully cannot perform here in the USA? Should they not all be taught the US Constitution, their own state’s Constitution, trained as the Congress requires the Militia to train, then learn to be LAWFUL Militia?

        What about the Rule of Law? IF the rule of law has three elements to it, and it does. Those elements are
        — No one is beneath the law’s protections
        — No one is above the law’s requirements
        — No one can be a prosecutor or judge in his own case

        How could those that serve within the federal, or state, governments monitor themselves and be honest about what is going on? They cannot. THAT is why it is a requirement that the Militia is used, and NO, a Militia cannot be a part of the military LAWFULLY.

        Richard Henry Lee, 1st Senate: “A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves …”

        George Mason, Co-author of the Second Amendment: “I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few public officials. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.”

        Tench Coxe, Delegate to the Constitutional Convention of 1787: “Who are the militia? are they not ourselves. Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American… The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.”

        Some education: The Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654 (Dick Act) broke the militia down into three groups.
        The three Militia classes H.R. 11654 provides for are:
        — the organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia;
        — the unorganized militia and
        — the regular army.
        But that is unlawful, there is only one (1) constitutionally recognized militia, the Militia of the several states. The National Guard and the regular army are “standing” military organizations.

        — > John Smilie warned: “Congress may give us a select militia which will, in fact, be a standing army–or Congress, afraid of a general militia, may say there shall be no militia at all. When a select militia is formed; the people in general may be disarmed.”

        Cockrum vs State: “The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the high powers delegated directly to the citizen, and is excepted out of the general powers of government. A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power.”

        *Obligated to provide

        1. Our freedom appathy has allowed this unconstitutional behavior by those elected who have violated their Duty and Oath.
          At this point I have my reservations about elections reversing the work of those elected that have either through ignorance or design subverted our Constitutional Republic.

Comments are closed.