No products in the cart.

News

Dem. Candidate Bankrolled Effort to Curb ‘Irresponsible Breeding’ and Tax Families With 2+ Kids

From PJ Media:

Scott Wallace, a Democrat running in Pennsylvania’s 1st Congressional District against Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) and endorsed by Planned Parenthood Action Fund and the National Organization for Women, has used the Wallace Global Fund to give nearly $7 million to population control groups since 1997.

Between 1997 and 2003, Wallace gave $420,000 to Zero Population Growth (ZPG) — now Population Connection — an organization co-founded by “Population Bomb” author Paul Ehrlich, Fox News reported.

From before its inception, ZPG had announced its intentions to tax large families for the “privilege of irresponsible breeding.” A 1968 brochure advocated abortion to stabilize population growth and claimed that “no responsible family should have more than two children.” Therefore, “irresponsible people who have more than two children should be taxed to the hilt for the privilege of irresponsible breeding.”

Scott Wallace is a population control zealot. That much is clear. That he supports Planned Parenthood, and is supported by them in return, says a lot about him. If he still supports the goals of organizations he has donated heavily to in the past, then one can rightly assume he would continue to have population control on his agenda.

What you will not hear from people like Scott Wallace, is that the birth rate in the US, and in many Western countries, has dipped below the replacement level of 2.1 children per woman. In fact, the US birthrate has sunk as low, (by some estimates), as 1.6. If the birthrate is below replacement level, then the population begins to shrink, (which is the goal of the Globalists). If it weren’t for immigration, the US population would be shrinking, (hence the desire for more immigration from the very people who encouraged fewer births).

Globalists don’t want to stabilize the population, they want to reduce it. Globalists like Ted Turner, Henry Kissinger, Bill Gates and the late David Rockefeller have called for population reductions of from 60% to 90%!

Since the 1960s, “progressives” have sought to indoctrinate women into not having children, in order to achieve the population reduction of the Globalists. The Women’s Rights Movement was, in part, about population reduction, which is one reason the National Organization for Women, (NOW), supports “progressives”, like Scott Wallace.

The Globalists, and their “progressive” minions have sought to destroy the family, and to denigrate women who wish to be mothers, in order to achieve their goal of a reduced population. Their efforts have been, until recently, very successful in Western cultures. Japan, Poland, Russia, Georgia and even Germany, France and the UK, all had birthrates of less than 2.1, meaning below the replacement level. While Western Europe and the US remain below that threshold, the Eastern European nations are increasing their birthrates, by encouraging, not discouraging, births.

2

Shorty Dawkins

Veteran’s Day Membership Drive

3 comments

  1. This is why the Democrats going to start losing more more races… the world is not overpopulated this is just another rotting plank on the Democratic platform (their rotting platfom is about to collapse completely)… candidate Wallace is promoting a culture of death bye promoting population control and probably gets a lot of campaign money from Planned Parenthood… I believe Wallace truly believes in overpopulation as do many Democrats… This is dangerous because when you start seeing people as a problem you cheapen life…looks like Wallace and thinks like an elitist and has an elitist viewpoint… look up and read the paper called the global 2000 report and you’ll see what I’m talking about.

    Google the following

    1. “Origins of Global 2000: depopulation warriors” May 12,1981

    2. “Carter Global 2000 report”

    3, “Club of Rome Global 2000 report”

  2. Well, how about we do this the right way? Let’s stop immigration and give a tax CUT to families that have at least 2 but not more than 4 children? That way our population levels remain high enough for replacement rates, and we don’t have to import half the third world. Prob sounds cold but would be better for us than this nutjob’s agenda.

Leave a Reply