No products in the cart.

News

How Will Mass ‘Migrant’ Crossing Not Be an Unprovoked Foreign Attack?

How Will Mass ‘Migrant’ Crossing Not Be an Unprovoked Foreign Attack?
“Somos Resistencia…” Just what we need — foreign nationals who say they’re dissatisified with their culture to come here and “resist” ours. The world has seen the raised fist before and it’s never stood for American freedom. (Pueblos Sin Fronteras/Facebook)

“Migrant ‘caravan’ at U.S.-Mexico border prepares for mass crossing,” Reuters reported Thursday. “Hundreds of Central American migrants from a caravan that crossed Mexico reunited in Tijuana on Wednesday and planned to cross the border together this weekend in defiance of threats by U.S. President Donald Trump to repel them.”

If allowed to happen, the criminal invasion – and ultimately that’s what it is – will be a direct result of a chain of circumstances aided and abetted by the Mexican government in violation of its own laws.  Mexican law requires foreign nationals be in their country legally and that their presence be beneficial. It is a criminal offense there to aid and abet illegal immigration.

Pueblo sin Fronteras, coordinator of the “caravan,” solicits donations via Paypal but is not listed as a nonprofit on Guidestar. It does not show up on the California Secretary of State business search (Paypal locates them in La Crescenta). Its website domain registrar is hidden behind a proxy. To find out more, we can turn to supportive ”mainstream”  puff pieces, or alternatively, to sites alleging indirect Soros ties.

The other and more significant player on the U.S. side of the border is the state of California, with its sanctuary policies and its opposition to federal enforcement efforts. What happens if leftist federal judges on the 9th Circuit issue an injunction forbidding enforcement? What the options will there be if the state decides to intervene with more than rhetoric?

Chances are this will play out for the cameras and be exploited to feed a meme that further smears those opposed to open borders as violent xenophobes and racists. There are those who wouldn’t mind at all if this results in a bit of for-the-cameras violence — or more than a bit.

Global humanitarian crises will not be solved by subverting U.S. law and culturally terraforming the Republic. But the “organizers” have brought things to the point where an honest, humane desire to solve the plight of such people is used against those who would help, meaning there are those who are cynically exploiting “refugee” pawns and domestic useful idiots to advance a political agenda.

The government of Mexico knows this, and there need to be serious repercussions taken against the ungrateful, in-bed-with-the-cartels officials if they force this on us. They need us a lot more than we need them.

More importantly, this country needs to start acting like one.  But the differences between open borders subversives and political opportunist /cheap labor sellouts vs. Americans who want their country back are irreconcilable.

A rational U.S. policy for admitting foreign nationals could not be simpler: Look to the Preamble to the Constitution.  If government policy — on anything — fails to “form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity,” then government is violating “the supreme Law of the Land.”

If oath-breaking representatives weren’t ignoring and subverting the Second Amendment every chance they get, we’d have the border problem pretty much solved peaceably via “a well regulated militia” standing guard to discourage and deter things getting out of hand:

“The supposed quietude of a good man allures the ruffian; while on the other hand, arms like laws discourage and keep the invader and the plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property.”

But that’s the last thing those who would fundamentally transform the Republic want to see happen, with “the security of a free State” via an armed citizen populace being the thing they fear most.

Also see: ‘Caravan’ a Deliberate Attempt to Exploit U.S. Laws and Undermine National Sovereignty

—–

If you believe in the mission of Oath Keepers, to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, please make a donation to support our work.  You can donate HERE.

—–

David Codrea’s opinions are his own. See “Who speaks for Oath Keepers?”

0

DavidC

David Codrea blogs at The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance (WarOnGuns.com), and is a field editor/columnist for GUNS Magazine. Named “Journalist of the Year” in 2011 by the Second Amendment Foundation for his groundbreaking work on the “Fast and Furious” ATF “gunwalking” scandal, he is a frequent event speaker and guest on national radio and television programs.

Oath Keepers Merchandise

36 comments

  1. ” What happens if leftist federal judges on the 9th Circuit issue an injunction forbidding enforcement?”

    It is the CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY of any person who serves as a US President to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,”

    That is word for word found in the US Constitution, Article 2, Section 3. Judges do NOT have the authority to override the US Constitution. Nor are they to “interpret” it. The US Constitution means exactly what it meant when written and accepted. The tools of enforcement changes, but NOT the duties and authority delegated to the three branches and to named in writing offices within a branch.

    “What the options will there be if the state decides to intervene with more than rhetoric?”

    It is an INVASION. The People of the states have the authority and duty as the Militia of the several states to stop invasions. BTW, Gov. Brown can be charged and arrested for not doing his LAWFUL duty as the Gov of California thereby putting the other states who all are part of the union and ALL (including the traitorous Gov Brown) Oath bound to the US Constitution, to “support and DEFEND” it. It is at least two felonies for going against the supreme Law, and the highest Law; add in two more for breaking the Oath to each, the US Constitution, and to the state of California Constitution.

    John Adams, “A Defense of the Constitutions of the United States”: “To suppose arms in the hands of citizens, to be used at individual discretion, except in private self-defense, or by partial orders of towns, countries or districts of a state, is to demolish every constitution, and lay the laws prostrate, so that liberty can be enjoyed by no man; it is a dissolution of the government. The fundamental law of the militia is, that it be created, directed and commanded by the laws, and ever for the support of the laws.”

    Alexander Hamilton, Federalist 28: “The militia is a voluntary force not associated or under the control of the States except when called out; [when called into actual service] a permanent or long standing force would be entirely different in make-up and call.“

    US Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15 [The Congress shall have the Power]: “To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel invasions.“

    This clause is very straightforward. The militia of each state is entrusted with the defense of the USA and her people, not just with the defense of their state; and they are to be armed with weapons that can repel any invasions bearing modern weapons of war. Congress is required to provide those military grade weapons for the militias. The Militia has as its constitutionally assigned duties to:
    — Enforce the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution,
    — Enforce and keep the “Laws of the Union” (which are constitutional laws ONLY),
    — Protect the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
    — “to suppress Insurrections and REPEL INVASIONS”.

    Article 2, Section 2: The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States;…”

    Article 4, Section 4: The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican form of Government, and shall protect each of the against Invasion;…”

    The Supreme Law of this land is very clear on the subject. A rogue Governor who breaks the Oath of Office can be, and should be, removed. But make no mistake about it, the US President better also KEEP HIS OATH OF OFFICE., any and all of those who so serve.

    Consider this, that this problem can be used to start enforcing the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution as is REQUIRED in writing. Just an idea.

    Richard Henry Lee: “A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves …”

    George Mason, Co-author of the Second Amendment: “I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few public officials. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.”

    Justice Story, Associate Justice, Supreme Court wrote: “The next amendment is: “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”.
    “The importance of this article will scarcely be doubted by any persons, who have duly reflected upon the subject. The militia is the natural defence of a free country against sudden foreign invasions, domestic insurrections, and domestic usurpations of power by rulers. It is against sound policy for a free people to keep up large military establishments and standing armies in time of peace, both from the enormous expenses, with which they are attended, and the facile means, which they afford to ambitious and unprincipled rulers, to subvert the government, or trample upon the rights of the people. The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them”.

    I’d say that the US Constitution is very clear on that matter,

      1. Well, in the immortal wisdom of Burgess Meredith, “you can crap in one hand, and
        wish in the other, and see which get’s filled
        first.”

      2. It is NOT THE ARMY the President needs to send to the border to repel this invasion, it is the MILITIA which is you, me, and all other (non-government officials) citizens of our nation. We must be prepared to use our arms in defense of our country in the manner the Constitution and its writers intended. If not us, who? If not now, when?

    1. As usual, Cal makes many good and valid points. Thank you sir.
      One of then too often gets overlooked though, so allow me to repeat it. I’ll use different words in the hope that all can get the message.
      The constitution is a contract. More precisely, it is a “Compact”. a compact is a contract made between governments, in this case the united “States”. Not the federal government, the states. Why? Simple, because the general, “Federal” government did not exist until it was created by the contract drawn up between the states. Therefore the federal government is NOT a party to the contract.
      Even a basic knowledge of contract law will show that the ONLY ones allowed to “interpret” the contract are the parties involved in the contract. In this case that is the states, or “We the People” Not that which was created by the contract.
      Say for example that you and your neighbor draw up a contract to build and maintain a privacy fence between your two properties. Stating clearly what the function of the fence is, and what it is not. Does the fence somehow magically acquire the power to tell it’s creators what it’s function is to be? Well, that is no more absurd than what the feds are doing. The monster that was created has grown so large, it has become dangerous. It is well past time, in my opinion, for the masters to put the dangerous monster back on it’s leash.
      The Supreme Court is nothing more than one branch of the three branches of the federal government. So that means that the SCOTUS is one part of that which was created by the contract, and thus has NO authority to be the “Arbiters”, final or otherwise, of the contract known as the Constitution for the united States of America.
      Notice how they always decide in favor of their sister branches? Of course they do, because every time they do, and the dumbed down people blindly accept it, they are in reality giving the federal government, (meaning themselves), more powers than they are given in the constitution.
      Furthermore, courts DO NOT make rulings. Kings make rulings!
      Courts, be they big or small, give opinions, make decisions, and settle disputes. They are NOT supposed to, nor can they legally “Make” ANY laws. That is known as: “Legislating from the Bench”, such as their decision that forbidding gay marriage, or preventing men from using the “Ladies” room, is unconstitutional. That, in and of itself, does not make any law. The states are under no obligation to pass any laws just on the suggestion of the SCOTUS. Both of these issues, (and many more), are things that are delegated to the authority of the states. The constitution gives the federal government no authority in such matters. In fact it forbids it.
      The recent statement, alluding to the Civil War changing things, really means that: “Might Makes Right”. That even though they do not have authority under the constitution to do a thing, unless we relent, and let them do as they please, that they are willing to once again use military force to gain our compliance. I don’t know about the rest of you, but I don’t take kindly to threats.

      When in doubt, always remember Norton v. Shelby County. 118 U.S. 425 (1886), “An unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties. It is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.”
      Any, and all such edicts that have, or may be passed that infringe on our natural right to keep and bare arms, are precisely that. They: “Confer no rights; Imposes no duties, and in legal contemplation, are as inoperative as though they had never been passed.” Yes, ALL of them.
      I for one, will not comply.

      FtR,
      David

      1. David, This was really well written, and you say it so much better then I do.

        God Bless and Thanks for such a well written and informative comment!

    2. Cal, As you point out, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15 [The Congress shall have the Power]: “To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel invasions.“
      Where is this body of the People? It has been made irrelevant by not only the State, but also by those who profess to be patriots.
      In my State, I petitioned the last governor for a position in the Constitutional Militia, citing our own State Constitution, and statutes. I received the typical ignorant response regarding “unorgainzed”, and National Guard.
      I intend to do the same for this new governor. Of course I’m doing it on my own because the pretend pro-2nd community wants nothing to do with the duty imposed by the Constitution.
      I am also of the mind to create an organization that will push for the revitalization of Militia so that we can reclaim our nation.
      How many do you think would be willing to step up to help promote the Law?

      1. Nick, Neither the Governor or the President (or any other government servant) can create the Militia, they can only call them forth. The Militia is created by the people of the state, but those who serve within the federal government and state governments have duties to those Militias. (Verify this with Dr, Vieira as I may have missed something, but this is as I understand it.)

        The Militia, when created MUST be trained as the Congress requires the military to be trained – assigned to the state governments to do, plus the Appointment of Officers; while those that serve within the federal government is REQUIRED to organize, arm and discipline all the Militias of the several states, plus govern the Militia that may be employed in the Service of the United States (federal). (I am taking the dictionary meaning of “Govern” here, to “control and direct”).

        This is all found in Article 1, Section 8, Clauses 15 & 16 for feds. In your own state’s Constitution for states.

        Clause 15: “To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel invasions.“

        Clause 16: “To provide for organizing, arming and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress”.

        It is very important, critical even, for all Militia to remember that they are directly under the US Constitution, then their own state’s Constitution, and can receive orders directly from the President when working for the feds (to the Militia officers – and always remember that the civil is above the military when in service to either or both; and directly from the Gov when in service to the states.

        But the point is that you can create a Militia of your own state – named as such. Then petition for the training, or if ex military, train your own. Then inform the Governor and the US President that the Militia meets all requirements and are available for service to the state and/or federal government where needed.

        Example:
        Militia; Standing Armies; Military Subordinate to Civil Power: That a Well Regulated Militia, composed of the Body of the People, Trained to Arms, is the Proper, Natural, and Safe Defense of a Free State, therefore, the Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall Not be Infringed; that Standing Armies, in time of Peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in All Cases the Military should be under Strict Subordination to, and governed by, the Civil Power, and are under the Militia as it is civil in nature.

        Persons Subject to Militia Duty: All able-bodied Persons, Residents of this State, between the ages of Sixteen and Sixty-five Years (health/etc issues will not allow fulfillment of this duty), shall be enrolled in the Militia of ????, paid training for ten weeks, and after training Perform such Militia Duty as may be required by Law once a year for two weeks, paid; but No Person having Conscientious Scruples against Bearing Arms, shall be compelled to perform such duty in time of peace. Every person claiming such exemption from service, shall, in lieu thereof, pay into the state Militia funds, an equivalent in money, the amount and manner of payment to be fixed by Law.

        There shall be XXXXX full time Militia to fulfill specific needed Duties such as Maintenance of Vehicles and Weapons, Technology, Guard Duties, Armory Duties, various Clerical work, Training of the People, Housekeeping Duties of all types, Carpentry, Gardening, Animal Husbandry, and whatever will be needed to keep the Militia Well Regulated.

        Legislature to Provide for Enrollment of Militia: The Federal Legislature shall provide by Law for the Enrollment, Equipment and Discipline of the Militia, to conform as nearly as practicable to the Regulations for the Government of the Armies of the United States, and pass such Laws to Promote Volunteer Organizations as may afford them effectual encouragement.

        Armory Houses for Storage of Weapons Provided by Those who Serve within the Federal Congress as Required by the US Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 16: All Weapons of War, etc must be checked to the Central Armory for processing, then distributed to the outlying Armories according to their need as required by Law.

        Selection and Commission of Officers: All Militia Officers shall be commissioned by the Governor, the manner of their selection to be provided by Law, and may hold their Commissions for such period of time as the Legislature may provide.

        Preservation of Records, Banners, and Relics: All Militia Records, Banners, and Relics of the State, except when in Lawful use, shall be Preserved in the Office of the Adjutant General as an enduring Memorial of the Patriotism and Valor of those who serve as the Militia of ???; and it shall be the Duty of the Legislature to provide by Law for the Safekeeping of the same.

        National and State Flags only to be Carried: All Militia Organizations under the Laws of this state shall carry no other device, banner or flag, than that of the United States, the Gadsden Flag, and/or the State of ???.

        Importation of Armed Forces Prohibited: No armed Police Force, or Detective Agency, or Armed Body of Men, shall ever be brought into this State for the suppression of Domestic Violence except upon the application of the Legislature, or the Executive, when the Legislature can not be Convened. (end of the example)

        Took a lot of this from the Constitutions of the states, starting with the first, and from Dr. Vieira’s writings, lectures, books, etc. Hope this helps. Isn’t it a sad thing when something that is REQUIRED by the US Constitution has gone this far that we must research to be able to know how to start it up, to use it, etc. Thinking we could do much more with the FORBIDDEN Federal Reserve, etc when we get each state’s Militia back up as is required.

        1. Thank you for quoting all that information, but it was unnecessary. I am well aware of what Militia is, or is not. I’ve written on the topic before, and I am quite aware of Dr. Vieira’s work, and his thoughts on the subject.
          After you’ve posted all this information, I’ll once again ask the question. Where is this body of the People?
          Militia is, after all, a State institution, and it cannot exist because you wish it so. It must be operated within the statutes that are acknowledged by the State. Doing otherwise risks the expected evil of government thugs.
          However, Militia has no obligation to abide direction of either the federal or state governments should the body decide the orders to be unconstitutional, or contrary to the well-being of the People. Witness the acts of Captain John Parker and the Minutemen on Lexington Green, and for that matter the Militia Act of 1792.
          The question I posed was not for an explanation of law, bur rather points to the proper execution of the Law as defined by the People. Where is the body that has the Constitutional duty “to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections, and repel Invasion”?
          This is a nation of Popular Sovereignty, and as Dr. Vieira has explained in great detail in “The Sword and Sovereignty”, a nation where the good People maintain the proper lawful authority.
          You cannot simply form a Militia. You must take all the steps necessary to revitalize it, as it is a body of the state, before you can muster in a lawful manner.
          I posed the question here, as I’ve done so to the NRA, GOA, and NJ organizations, in order to promote a lawful discussion designed to re-vitalize the Militia, instead of running off performing acts that do more to divide than they do to enlighten, and educate the People as to the deliberate agenda to disarm the only lawfully recognized body with the ultimate power to contain and control a corrupt government, and by doing so, dramatically decrease crime on the streets.

          1. “I’ll once again ask the question. Where is this body of the People?
            Militia is, after all, a State institution,”

            No you’re incorrect. The Militia, like the Grand Jury & Grand Jury Investigations belongs directly to the PEOPLE of the state. The state boundaries mark the divisions between the Militias, and each Militia – for clarity – should be named XX State Militia or some such. It is NOT a governmental agency.

            So, like minded people who want to create a constitutional Militia puts together the people, then petition the state and federal governments to perform for that state Militia the duties that they have to them. If it is refused by those that serve within our governments that are Domestic Enemies or Traitors, then one can fulfill a big part of what is required by having a person who has been trained as the Congress requires the Military to be trained, then take up the training portion of the state’s Militia.

            There must be someone who know the US Constitution, and/or another person who knows that state’s Constitution who can teach that to the Militia members. That, BTW, was quite often how it happened in our history, though (I believe) that it was mostly because of the distances being traveled.

            Once again, it is the people who creates the Militia, but it is the state and those in the federal governments that do other things FOR the Militias as is Lawfully required of them. Militias seek not those who serve within our governments to LEAD them, order them. What they do is see to it that any orders that (are required to) come from the US President, or from a state’s Governor is constitutional in its entirety and if so, then they carry out those duties. If not constitutional, they then point out those unconstitutional parts requesting that the orders be made constitutional. If that request is refused, then the Militia may press charges – felony and Perjury – for that “wanted” unLawful action.

            Make sense now?

        2. Good information Cal, I’ve read all of it before of course, in different places, but not all put together. Good job compiling it all. Thank You.
          I am also a follower of Dr. Vieira and his work, and for what it’s worth, I found no errors here. Perhaps himself will grace us with a comment to ease our minds. Hint, hint.
          It makes a lot of valid points, and (in my mind), raises some questions too. For one, the issue of equipping the militias. While reading your comment, I started thinking about how all of the surplus military gear and weaponry that the feds have been giving to police departments all over the country, could, and should be re-directed to the state militias instead. That would solve two problems. Would it not?
          Here in my home state of Missouri, as I understand it, we have all of the necessary and required paperwork done, but the project it stalled for a lack of funds, and appointment of officers.
          I’m now thinking of how to “Nudge” this part of the process along. I’ll be looking into drawing up a petition, and possibly filing a civil suit to demand that the state start collecting funds from all who do not choose to serve in the State Militia. As required.
          That should get interesting as politicians love to find more ways to take money from the people, and I have no doubt it would raise the hackles of every liberal in the state. However, since the legal framework is already in existence, bringing the issue to the forefront should at least generate some kind of action. Also, as a bonus, it would give them a taste of their own bitter medicine, (forcing them to pay for something they oppose), as they do to the rest of us constantly. That would make my day.
          Since they would likely ALL decide to have “Conscientious Scruples against Bearing Arms”, this would afford them a way to not have to touch a scary gun, and at the same time, start providing the means for those who do choose to serve, the chance to do so.
          On another note, I would welcome the change to converse with you and exchange ideas on a plethora of similar subjects and interests. If you are open to the idea, we should explore some means of exchanging email addresses. I am cautious however, of listing it on such an open forum, as I suspect you are as well. I do however, list my real name on here at times, and I’m not too hard to find, should someone desire to contact me. In fact, I’m so old that I have a house phone, and it’s listed in the white pages.

          Thanks for the “Food For Thought” brother. Be well, and watch your six out there on the Left Coast.

          FtR,
          David E. Burden

    1. You’re absolutely correct Doc, if we don’t deal with these criminals before they are inside our borders we’ll be fighting a guerrilla war within our borders because they have millions of supporters, advocates and apologists among our own. We have states like California with a large segment of the population don’t think they’re Americans who should be loyal to our Culture, Constitution and leaders.

  2. David is absolutely correct. This is an invasion by a foreign force and should be repelled by U.S. Military forces. Anybody aiding this force is a traitor and should be tried for treason. Even US judges are not exempt from treason charges.

  3. Well this is what we’v been Training and saving ammo for , foreign enemies invading our country! That’s how I see it. Now our government will force us to pay for them to live here! I’m confused to who the real enemy is??

    1. The same NWO enemy that put Communists into Russia, creating the USSR. The same NWO enemies implementing the current Muslim Invasion of Europe. All the same NWO enemies implementing the S.American/ Central American Reconquista Invasion of the USSA. Ultimately the NWO=No Borders.
      It will not occur, but the current emergency requires martial law declaration of the US Southern border, deployment of active duty military to the border, and suspension of All immigration law and former Obama & former Homeland orders/memos. Federal Courts are deactivated within the declared border zone of approx. 10-20 miles to the interior..
      So……WTF? Effective Militia isn’t going to occur either. Furl the flag, Gen.Lee had to face that fact and so will we. Our enemies are Domestic, and despite the election of President Trump, their pogrom moves “ProgreSSively Forward”.

      Reconquista of SW USA.

      1. “… but the current emergency requires martial law declaration of the US Southern border, …”

        There is NO Lawful martial law here in the USA, what you describe here is treason. Did you take the Oath to the US Constitution? If so, why did/do you not study that document since you are Oath bound to it. If you are not/were not governmental in anything you did, you, as an American citizen should have read and studied it. (Harsh words i know, but if you (generic “you”) do not understand our government, then you can/probably have been told anything and will believe it. Do not take my word for things either, because I, too can be wrong. But I do try to back everything I write up with sources, etc.)

        Our US Constitution REQUIRES the Militias to defend our borders until it gets too difficult, then, and only then, can the military be brought into play. Those that serve within the military are trained to “just follow orders” and “just do their jobs” even though they are also REQUIRED to take and keep the Oath. Yet, from past history we know that when a governmental controlled military (by any name) is used within their own borders for almost any reason they are sooner or later used against the people. Why do you thing that targets were changed into pregnant woman, children, old people etc for both LE and military of our nation?

        Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15: “To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and REPEL INVASIONS.“ (caps are mine)

        Thomas Jefferson, 1st inaugural, explained that: “a well-disciplined militia” is “our best reliance in peace and for the first moments of war, till regulars may relieve them” and also a guarantee of “the supremacy of the civil over the military authority; [and] economy in the public expense.”

        Justice Story, Associate Justice, Supreme Court wrote: “The next amendment is: “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”.
        “The importance of this article will scarcely be doubted by any persons, who have duly reflected upon the subject. The militia is the natural defence of a free country against sudden foreign invasions, domestic insurrections, and domestic usurpations of power by rulers. It is against sound policy for a free people to keep up large military establishments and standing armies in time of peace, both from the enormous expenses, with which they are attended, and the facile means, which they afford to ambitious and unprincipled rulers, to subvert the government, or trample upon the rights of the people. The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them”.

        Remember that the “unlimited power of the sword” is required in writing to be in the hands of the people. That is why the Congress is REQUIRED to arm the Militias with military grade weapons of all types. They, by that written requirement, are FORBIDDEN to give/sell/trade/etc them to LEA’s, foreign governments, foreign entities, foreign groups, etc. They LAWFULLY, constitutionally belong to the Militias of the several states.

        Justice Story, Associate Justice, Supreme Court wrote: “The next amendment is: “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”.
        “The importance of this article will scarcely be doubted by any persons, who have duly reflected upon the subject. The militia is the natural defence of a free country against sudden foreign invasions, domestic insurrections, and domestic usurpations of power by rulers. It is against sound policy for a free people to keep up large military establishments and standing armies in time of peace, both from the enormous expenses, with which they are attended, and the facile means, which they afford to ambitious and unprincipled rulers, to subvert the government, or trample upon the rights of the people. The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them”.

        “Federal Courts are deactivated within the declared border zone of approx. 10-20 miles to the interior..”

        There are many unLawful and unconstitutional declarations/etc, but that does NOT make them Lawful, it only makes the enforcers of those things *terrorists, and often **traitors in our own nation. It was Joseph Stalin, who in 1933 told those who served within our governments that they must: ”The United States should get rid of its militias”. Look at our nation now. We have more military then before, we have LEA’s – fed and state, and we are now in a “police state” by anyone’s definition of those words. Why? Because LEA that were “freeing up the American people” from their onerous Militia duties, and now do NOT follow the US Constitution as they are required to do, they just “follow orders” and “just do their jobs”. The (used to be) US military is under the UN, and fights in unLawful wars of aggression which are forbidden. There is not one of high military rank who has not broken their Oaths multiple times.

        *

  4. I guess the time has FINALLY come for “The well regulated Militia” (meaning WE ARMED U.S citizens) to step up and take it upon OURSELVES to protect our borders, our property, towns,cities,neighborhoods, and villages from these foreign enemies,that have been DUMPED ON US (usually in the middle of the night) because “law enforcement” seems to REFUSE to do so and have been ORDERED to allow these “Invaders” in to run amok and terrorize this country and WE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

    1. Cliff……Good comment….bulls eye… this is an outright foreign invasion on American soil. Anyone that does not believe it needs to come to the Houston area (only one example of countless thousands of cities) and survey the cesspool they have created. The small town I live in is totally overrun with illegals and they do as they did in their own country and trash out everywhere they go. They throw their trash everywhere and could give a rats @$$ about our environment and laws. Bozo let it run wild for his 8 years and the results are quite obvious. I’m not a “quitter” by any means, however, we are very close to losing our Independent, Sovereign, Constitutional Republic to the hoards of illegal invaders…..I’m a Korean vet and puke every morning when I check the news out and stop at my local coffee shop to witness the invaders trashing everything out……Personally, I feel that if this is not stopped immediately, I think there will be another civil war. I see no other options if we are to survive.

  5. You come to this country lawfully peacefully with just cause to be here as there is a path otherwise forcible entry must be met with forceful repulsion. As far as I’m concerned this is our Rubicon. To these people I say go home fix your problems in your own country!!! You are owed nothing here .

  6. With all the warnings that have been posted and the with the law of our country being very explicit this action can be deemed as an invasion by foreign terrorists . We should act accordingly to prevent any of these people from entering our country illegally, use any method! Do not take prisoners as we them must then feed , cloth, care for, if we do this they have accomplished their mission and we now have another bunch of freeloaders on top of the thousands now in our country.

  7. Citizen-traitors are assisting the invaders and the ongoing invasion of the once-sovereign USA. A powerful force assisting the invasion is the elite-owned media that has much influence upon the masses of common folks. Tyrants are trying to alter the USA into an easily-controlled bickering mass of divided conflicting ideologies. This war against We, the People is using a divide-and-conquer tactic commonly referred to as diversity and multiculturalism.

    Fighting against illegal alien invasion is but one prong on a multi-forked battle that an elite tyrannical class is forcing upon us. The heart of tyranny must be cut out to end the madness being forced upon us.

  8. This is an invasion just like Europe. It is an outrage and must be stopped now. Does any sane person let just anyone at any time barge into their home? How about you Jerry Brown? Are you on the GeorgeS dole? I have been in calif since age 7 and now multiple decades later it’s time to leave, for many reasons. Too many traitors running the state …. big swamp. Patriots on alert … we cannot let this happen.

  9. If we don’t stop the first one we have no chance of stopping the ones that will follow, encouraged by our lack of resolve. Either we’re a country with borders or we’re not a country, can’t have it both ways.

  10. SO are we getting a go fund me going or something to help people form a living, and possibly armed, wall against this or anything? cause no offense it is past time we formed or organized something to physically protest and deflect this kind of nonsense.

  11. If illegal immigrants are in Mexico now then it is their responsibility to take care of them not ours. I like how when they step in our country they think it is our responsibility. No if they are there now it is theirs and by Mexico letting them cross is allowing an invasion. It is an act of war. If a bunch of our people ran across to their border they would be put in jail.

  12. This is my last ditch effort. It has nothing to do with this article. I have been trying to get a membership to Oath Keepers. Also, I watched the movie REVELATION on the e-mail you sent me and I would like to purchase the physical package with the dvd’s for the special price of $119.00. The problem is about 10 to 15 years ago a friend had his credit card hacked and his account was drained. I got rid of my credit cards and have not used one since. I would be more than happy to send you a check for the membership and REVELATION the movie. However, I have been unable to contact you. Have you any suggestions?

    GOD Bless and keep up the good work.

    1. Sorry writing a check has been such a hassle. For the membership, we would need your name, address, phone number, email address, whether you are prior military, peace officer, fire or other first responder for a regular membership. If not, you would be an Associate member like me. The various memberships are explained at the JOIN tab at the top of the website.

      Oath Keepers
      5130 S. Fort Apache Rd. Ste 215
      Las Vegas, NV 89148

      For ordering the movie Revelation, please contact Anita at:
      team@revelationthemovie.info
      Please tell her you’re with Oath Keepers.

      Thank you for your interest in both Oath Keepers and Revelation.
      God Bless you as well, and Welcome!

  13. Blah, blah, blah………. Just exactly what good do all these articles accomplish? We are supposed to be the “well armed militia” of the United States, but all we do is bitch, moan, whine, and complain. What good does it do for us to constantly complain about, and defend our rights under the 2nd Amendment when we don’t use the 2nd Amendment to defend our nation from this foreign invasion? Why keep our guns if we are not willing to use them for the purpose the founders even included the 2nd Amendment in our Bill of Rights? Sit on our asses and watch the televised invasion of this large group of foreign scum into Commiefornia.

Leave a Reply