No products in the cart.


NJ Sheriff and Former Chief Show Contempt for Oaths with 2nd Amendment Infringements

NJ Sheriff and Former Chief Show Contempt for Oaths with 2nd Amendment Infringements
Sheriff Saudino insists men like those he controls should be the “Only Ones” allowed to have “weapons [that] are designed to take out mass amounts of people…” (Bergen County Sheriff’s Office/Facebook photos)
Extensive quotes from two New Jersey law enforcement officials leave little doubt that they would gladly support any and all citizen disarmament edicts. Opinions expressed by Bergen County Sheriff Michael Saudino and former Tenafly Police Chief Michael Bruno in Monday’s Pascack Press appear representative of predominant command attitudes in the Garden State. (Note the story is not online so there is no link to offer—I was sent a photo of the April 16 page 3 story “Mental health ‘highest priority’ for public, school safety” written by Michael Olohan. I have not received a response from the paper to an inquiry I sent them yesterday. This post will be updated if a link becomes available. )

Sheriff Saudino says it’s “fortunate” that New Jersey has draconian infringements and hopes to see them become a “model” for the rest of the country. And naturally, he repeats the same lie many prominent gun-grabbers offer while they’re doing the direct opposite of what they say.

“I don’t say it very often, but I do believe in the Second Amendment,” Saudino protests.  “However…”

Who didn’t see that huge, in-your-face “but” coming?

He doesn’t think the “average person” should have the very weaponry the Second Amendment is supposed to guarantee. To underscore his point, Saudino smears those who disagree as “the NRA and some gun nuts.” And here’s the kicker, a talking point getting moldy it’s growing so stale:

“Those weapons are designed to take out mass amounts of people, for the military to use, for the police to use, should they have to…”

First of all, both the military and Saudino’s tactical police teams have access to full auto. And note he doesn’t define when his sworn duties will require him to issue the orders to “take out mass amounts of people.”

If taken literally, and I would, the oath-breaking maniac is talking about making war on American citizens. Naturally he doesn’t want those who would defy tyranny also being able to resist it.

Former Chief Bruno, no longer in a position to actively take anyone’s guns, has his own way of harassing edict-abiding gun owners.  He wants gun-grabber sympathizers to “contact their local police chiefs and ask to see the firearm files of legitimate registered gun owners in town.

“The hot topic today is guns,” Bruno asserts. “Everybody’s talking about guns, restricting guns, eliminating guns, taking guns.”

Wait a minute – for years the antis have been calling gun owners paranoid, insisting “No wants to take your guns.” Does this mean they were lying?

That was a rhetorical question. And Bruno ignores that some of us are talking about protecting our guns.

“I guarantee you it will be an eye-opener for you, because when you talk about that person who snaps and can go right into their own home, take a weapon go out and do something with it—you have hundreds and hundreds, if not thousands of guns in your communities,” he bemoans, insulting citizen trustworthiness by insinuation while being part of a system that protects and rewards enforcer misdeeds.

Like the problems come from “legitimate registered gun owners” who strive to comply with all prior restraint mandates, no matter how offensively oppressive.

Still, in order to keep their lucrative double-dipping gigs going, New Jersey sheriffs like Saudino need to sell out their countrymen and parrot the narrative expected by their masters. Besides, he and Bruno are taken care of as LEOSA beneficiaries, “eligible to carry a concealed firearm in any jurisdiction in the United States or United States Territories, regardless of state or local laws…”

It’s the “Only Ones” loophole. They have their seat at the table, so why should they care if you’re outside looking in. Still, Mr. Mason’s “except for a few public officers” observation comes to mind.

The sad thing is it hasn’t always been that way, even in New Jersey. Those of us who have been around a while well remember this 1993 quote from the testimony of Trenton Deputy Chief of Police Joseph Constance before the Senate Judiciary Committee:

“Since police started keeping statistics, we now know that ‘assault weapons’ are/were used in an underwhelming 0.026 of 1% of crimes in New Jersey. This means that my officers are more likely to confront an escaped tiger from the local zoo than to confront an assault rifle in the hands of a drug-crazed killer on the streets.”


If you believe in the mission of Oath Keepers, to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, please make a donation to support our work.  You can donate HERE.


David Codrea’s opinions are his own. See “Who speaks for Oath Keepers?”




David Codrea blogs at The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance (, and is a field editor/columnist for GUNS Magazine. Named “Journalist of the Year” in 2011 by the Second Amendment Foundation for his groundbreaking work on the “Fast and Furious” ATF “gunwalking” scandal, he is a frequent event speaker and guest on national radio and television programs.


  1. Evidently he’s banking on the people having short memories. Like, we wouldn’t remember the government’s purchase of literally millions of rounds of ammunition, many for agencies like the Dept. of Agriculture and the Dept. of Housing and Urban Development. Who’da thunk that zoning employees need to go armed, or meat and dairy inspectors? LOL, gotta watch out for those radicalized Jersey cows, huh? This oath-breaker in the article hasn’t answered the pertinent question, I’d wager, and likely won’t. Why the police are behaving more like door-kickers in Fallujah than the peace officers we used to have….THIS is why more and more Americans are saying “molon labe”! This attitude of “us against them” has to stop. These sheriffs and public employees must be constantly reminded that they work for us.

    1. i live in NJ and boy owning a firearm is tough. w/the new gov it is now tougher
      saudino needs to be shown the door next time he is up to be reelected

      1. Edward, unfortunately you guys consented the day you elected this sheriff. You are not the first to be duped. It’s happening all over this country. To solve the problem vote in a Constitutional Sheriff next cycle.

    2. I disagree with FormerWAC, respectfully of course,-for all she wrote is spot save her last sentence, which read “These sheriffs and public employees must be constantly reminded …” No, instead, for breaking the OATH of Office they (and we) all took, the outcome should, and ‘ must be hung by the neck until dead for treason against “We the People” of these United States’…. THAT would be Justice.
      If not America is in serous trouble for not enforcing its own laws and constitution. Which I greatly fear has already happened many times over… Now what? ….The “R” word?

    3. Ya got my vote of approval Former WAC. What kind of semi smart person could or would believe any of this,The ones taking an oath should be ashamed.

    4. Cops, like most professionals, are a somewhat insular group. They formulate their opinions more-so from their comrades than their constituents. And so, I think, cops’ attitudes will change ONLY from within active-duty members of the profession. Do cops with anti-gun attitudes converse with cops holding the 2A dear? Probably so in Right-to-Carry States. But in Won’t-Issue States anti-gun cops are immersed in a sea of other anti-gun cops; or, at best, cops who obey orders to advance their carrears. This is a dangerous situation. Cops in – say rural PA – don’t realize how close the nation is to incidents perpetrated by anti-gun cops in urban NY/NJ/DE/MD. Recall, as merely a single example, the Shaneen Alan arrest. What-IF a governor of NY/NJ/DE/MD gave an order to start “kicking-in doors” in HIS State? Could the fall-out become a resistance movement vaguely akin to the Bundy ranch incident? Once it starts, will it spill out of the Blue States into the Red? Cops depend vitally on the support of law-abiding gun-owners. Cops can’t risk turning this constituency against them. Should they do so, it will hurt cops’ interests economically, politically, and ultimately, threaten their own safety. Somehow, 2A-supporting cops need to communicate (cop-to-cop) to their comrades-in-blue who are hostile to civilian gun-ownership that their path is perilous. I think the problem is figuring out how to get cops in Red States to publicly support the 2A and to privately communicate to their colleagues in Blue States how important it is for American gun-owners to see cops uniformly – even in Blue States – as advocates for the 2A.

  2. Question: Why would Sheriff Saudino want to be able to kill “mass amounts of people” and more importantly, just who are the people he intends or desires to kill in “mass amounts”?

    1. Agreed. Unfortunately we are seeing this virus spread into other states. We, here in NJ are making a stance for whatever it takes. If we turn and run, they will follow!

  3. He, and those who follow his orders (Stalin/Lenin/Mao/etc) orders are committing at least four felonies (US Constitution, state Constitution – both are the LAWS, supreme LAW and highest LAW of the state which are both their highest contracts), breaking the two part Oath. Add to those charges multiple counts of Perjury.

    Isn’t it time that our supreme LAW and the highest LAW of the state be enforced?

    1. Yes it is…”Best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago; Second best time is right now. – Chinese Proverb

    2. This sounds to me like a man that #1 defied his SWORN oath of office, and should be REMOVED.
      #2. Should be thrown in his own jail for inciting mass murder.
      It is MORONS like him that cause the mentally-Ill to run out and commit killings because in their OWN “minds” they think they are “following orders”

      1. If a citizen made these comments about mass murder..guess what would and should happen…so why not to this guy. Stripnhim of his POWER

  4. Sounds like this SOB is mentally unstable .If I even mentioned killing mass amounts of citizens don’t you think my guns would be confiscated along with terroristic treats charges ?? Again the double standard for them vs us. And this ahole brags about it and still has his concealed carry rights along with tax payer paid pension and no seized guns from his residence. Unbelievable!!!

  5. “Those weapons are designed to take out mass amounts of people, for the military to use, for the police to use, should they have to…”

    Imposter Bath House Barry of the recent rainbow house occupier, campaigned he would have a civilian military… yep…as pointed out above, billions of hollow points for the militarized agencies to use on their ememies list = us.

    Enter this asshole sheriff…big surprise? Who is this coward afraid of? His neighbor? Probably a paramoid sheriff, but he has a disease: psychopathic narcissist, unfit to be any LEO. People like him get away with their gestspo attitude because they never suffer a consequence for the evil they spread and surround themselves with. Sure would be a disappointment if he is a vet. It’s going to be the vets that end up carrying us through this. I don’t see enough LEOs who believe in any oath past the paycheck.

      “… Billions of dollars in military equipment has already been handed to municipal police departments and county sheriffs’ offices nationwide under the rapidly expanding federal schemes,…”

      “… Obama administration apparently stockpiling weapons of war for domestic use. Estimates suggest, for example, that the federal government has committed to purchasing up to 2 billion rounds of ammunition …”

      And a sheriff who delights in his dreams of terrorizing the citizen. In his words “I guarantee you it will be an eye-opener for you, because when you talk about that person who snaps and can go right into their own home, take a weapon go out and do something with it—you have hundreds and hundreds, if not thousands of guns in your communities,..” However, the government can be trusted? Governments murdered 262 million+ more civilians in just the 20th century….more to come.


  6. Stay active and be vocal with your state represntives, people are moving out of NJ and many are trying to bring this BS here to PA and other free states. NJ IS a Police State?.

  7. I live in Randolph, NJ and am retired from the US military. When I moved back to NJ, the then Rockaway Twp. police chief told me he would not be issuing me a purchase permit because as retired military, he was certain I was a PTSD case and a danger to the community.

    NJ is NOTORIOUS for infringing 2nd Amendment Rights and most of its police forces, to include the NJ STATE Police (aka the SS) are very fascistic. The current governor, PHIL MURPHY is a leftist as is the new Attorney General who vows to make guns even harder to get than they are now.

    1. What part of the Second Amendment do you not understand? It is NOT what gives you that natural right to own any weapon, any amount of weapons and ammo, etc; it is what REQUIRES those who serve within our government to PROTECT and DEFEND those natural rights of the people, all of them, exactly as written and understood when the document was created. Registration requirements are a criminal action against the people, at least 2 felonies, and 2 Perjuries. You LAWFULLY need NO permission from anyone who serves within our government to own any type of weapon.

      Daniel Webster: “We may be tossed upon an ocean where we can see no land – nor, perhaps, the sun or stars. But there is a chart and a compass for us to study, to consult, and to obey. That chart is the Constitution.”

      Thomas Jefferson put into writing within the Declaration of Independence, that each of us is born with “Unalienable Rights” which are not properly subjugated to any man-made government, because they are given us freely by “Nature, or Nature’s God”. “Nature, or Nature’s God”, is a higher authority than any man-made government or corporate entity.

      George Washington: “A free people ought not only be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.”

      George Washington: “A FREE PEOPLE ought not only to be armed, but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well-digested plan is requisite; and their SAFETY AND INTEREST REQUIRE THAT THEY SHOULD PROMOTE SUCH MANUFACTORIES AS TEND TO RENDER THEM INDEPENDENT OF OTHERS FOR ESSENTIAL, PARTICULARLY MILITARY, SUPPLIES.”

      Richard Henry Lee: “Whereas, to preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them; nor does it follow from this, that all promiscuously must go into actual service on every occasion. The mind that aims at a select militia, must be influenced by a truly anti-republican principle; and when we see many men disposed to practice upon it, whenever they can prevail, no wonder true republicans are for carefully guarding against it.” (Initiator of the Declaration of Independence, and member of the first Senate, which passed the Bill of Rights.)

      George Washington: “It may be laid down, as a primary position, and the basis of our system, that every citizen who enjoys the protection of a free government…, but even of his personal services to the defence of it, and consequently that the Citizens of America (with a few legal and official exceptions) from 18 to 50 Years of Age should be borne on the Militia Rolls, provided with uniform Arms, and so far accustomed to the use of them, that the Total strength of the Country might be called forth at Short Notice on any very interesting Emergency.” (“Sentiments on a Peace Establishment”, letter to Alexander Hamilton; “The Writings of George Washington”)

      Wilson v. State, 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34 Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878): “To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm … is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege.”

      Cockrum v. State, 24 Tex. 394, at 401-402 (1859): “The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the “high powers” delegated directly to the citizen, and `is excepted out of the general powers of government.’ A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power.”

      President Andrew Johnson: “Outside of the Constitution we have no legal authority more than private citizens, and within it we have only so much as that instrument gives us. This broad principle limits all our functions and applies to all subjects.”

      Once again, those who serve within our governments have absolutely, positively NO, NONE, ZERO LAWFUL authority over the American people and weapons. Zilch! Nada! And that is IN WRITING.

  8. The enemy has breached the wire… good OATH KEEPERs in this AO need to prepare FPF lines. Vote this tyrant out….

  9. if they are violating their OATH of OFFICE then they should be charged with the CRIME, now the public is the VICTIM .. the oath is a sworn statement and they have committed perjury. Fire them and treat them as criminals as they would charge you.

  10. Time for the Constitutional State of America to separate from the former United States of America. Hopefully peacefully. Give everyone 5 years to decide where they want to live, after that immigration laws apply.

  11. When you see the mass corruption embedded in our government agencies and congress you have to be nuts not to want guns so that we the people are in fact a deterrent. I mean someone needs to stand up for our constitution and mean it.

  12. According to Paul Craig Roberts, over 1000 people were shot and killed by police in 2017 with no convictions for wrongdoing on the part of the police. However, at least you cannot call them PIGs, because the police no longer have any Pride, Integrity, or Guts!

  13. Obviously these two “Officers” have some type of mental disorder and they do not need to bee public servants. Also, they have shown, thru hate speech, their utter contempt for the Constitution for the United States and its amendments and their total disrespect for the human condition and not recognizing man’s dignity and worth. Because of this and more it is now required that the NJ Police chief and the former need to be rounded up for a very tough physiological evaluation for their continuation to be the NJ Sherriff. Men like these are seriously fighting with their mental abilities because they no longer can determine what is the truth and what is a lie. I propose that since the NJ Sherriff is an “Elected” public servant, the people of that State need to initialize an “Emergency Election Recall Vote” and get him and the others out of office before you can’t. The people of NJ has this authority to remove the NJ Sherriff from public service any time if it can be proven he is incapable, both physically and mentally to occupy the position. Since he has already demonstrated he cannot because of the tremendous stress he can no longer handle the responsibility and therefor needs to be arrested for oath violation and other charges and be admitted into the hospital for some needed R&R. Once the doctor and evaluated the sheriff is fit for duty, then he can run for sheriff again and get his owl spot back.
    But the people needs to get off their butts and start the paperwork and get it notified and start the reelection campaign to have him removed. If the people do not do this then they get what they deserve. Remember, the people elected him into office and they can, at anytime, elect him out of office. Don’t let them or a judge, or anybody else say to you cannot do this when in fact you can and keep pushing it.. All that is needed is somebody to run against him, it doesn’t matter if he is qualified or not, just get somebody to run against him. You can always elect a new Sherriff at anytime who has the qualifications to fill the position. So, to the people of NJ make history and do it!!!


  14. This is the same Sheriff that swore to the County Committee that he would NOT disarm the citizens. That he was with the people not the politicos. In fact I engaged with him and informed him of the stance that Sheriff Mack took in Arizona. He said he was with us. Again Action speaks louder than words but now this Sheriff has turned on the people of Bergen County, New Jersey andd America.

    1. I am getting old and not afraid to die. I took the hint from Solzhenitsyn and am mentally prepared to make sure these fascist Bolshevik trespassing oath breakers don’t go home happy. Comprende ?

  15. Although I suspect too many of our “Law Enforcement” officials may be willing to violate their oaths and the constitution, we still need substantiated proof of these comments. There are quotes with no available links to articles of interviews with these guys. Although it is claimed they will be made available once received, why no direct attempt to contact the Sheriff and Retired Chief for this article? This, I would think would still be a good idea. Why not go directly to the source for this article?

    On the point allegedly made by the Sheriff about the average person should not have a military style weapon, because they are for mass killing and for the military. Well this is exactly why we have them. Who will defend against a rogue military under a corrupt president and congress?

  16. There has never been a government that banned it’s own ARMED FORCES from “Keeping and Bearing” ARMS.
    Find one government in the history of humanity that felt a need to document a “RIGHT” for it’s ARMED FORCES to possess ARMS.
    Oppressive Governments are ALWAYS banning the People’S RIGHTS to arms.
    The claim that the Founding Fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment to give Our ARMED FORCES a “right” to keep and carry ARMS is S-T-U-P-I-D.
    The only reason for the Second Amendment is to clearly spell-out the GOD GIVEN RIGHT of INDIVIDUALS to keep & bear ARMS.
    The only reason for the BILL(list) of RIGHTS was to codify INDIVIDUALS’ GOD GIVEN RIGHTS.
    Has there ever been a government that was not chock full of it’s “rights” up to and including declaring itself to be the Lord God Almighty?! (Rome, Egypt, Israel,etc)
    Does the 1st Amendment mean the GOVERNMENT is allowed to give speeches? Try shutting up any Politician. But THEY would LOVE to shut YOU up, hence the FIRST Amendment.
    Anyone who tells you the 2nd Amendment applies to the Army or State Militia, is telling you they think you are STUPID.
    There has NEVER been a government that felt it had to codify it’s army’s/soldier’s “RIGHT” to “Keep and BEAR ARMS” because there has NEVER been a government that refused to allow It’s own soldiers to KEEP and BEAR ARMS!
    The Second Amendment was written for the People, like the other 9 Amendments in the Bill of Rights. This was confirmed by the SCOTUS in the DC vs Heller decision, where they stated that the “People” in the Second Amendment were the same “People” that are mentioned in the First and Fourth Amendment.
    The 2nd Amendment clearly guarantees the “right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms”, and certainly not “the Militia”.
    Why would “the Militia”, a type of army manned by citizen-soldiers as opposed to full-time “regulars”, need a constitutional amendment to guarantee they have the right “to keep and bear arms”?
    Is there any specific statement anywhere in the Constitution that the army Congress is empowered to raise has the “right to keep and bear arms”? Of course not. …………. That is assumed.

    the 2nd amendment,, specifies that the RIGHT to bear arms is the right of the people,, NOT the militia,,,, it is the people who will make up the militia,, but the right is not the right of a “well regulated militia” it is the right of the people,

    It is implicit in the nature of all kinds of armies —- be they militia or regulars, volunteer, conscripted, or mercenary — to be armed.
    They are all “armed forces”.
    They all “bear arms”.
    They all carry guns.
    That is what they do.
    It certainly no more requires an amendment to the Constitution to state that “the Militia” has the RKBA , than a specific statement that the army Congress is empowered to raise may be manned by armed troops.

    “The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals … it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government … it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen’s protection against the government.” Ayn Rand

  17. So, what? Vote ’em out? God forbid! NEUTRALIZE ‘EM ALL!!! Traitors’ Lives DO NOT matter!

    Amendment II: USE it or LOSE it!

    p.s. The second amendment is about OVERTHROWING tyrannies and KILLING tyrants. It is NOT a revocable incentive to OBEY government, or else.

    1. The Second Amendment does NOT give you the right to self defense with any weapon of your choice, it requires those who serve within our governments to PROTECT your natural rights, and reminds them that they have NO, NONE, lawful authority concerning the people and weapons.

      1. No kidding, Cal. I didn’t claim 2A ‘gave’ us anything. I said it ‘is about’ overthrowing tyranny and killing tyrants – which it IS – as alluded to by the wording ‘security of a free state’ contained therein.

        That said, Amendment II [when duly observed and enforced] protects the absolute and unalienable Right of the People to defend ourselves, our property, our state and our nation by use of ALL arms [from sling & stone to Howitzer to Death Star; whatever a person can afford to either produce or purchase], without qualification OR disqualification. And any person or agency that subverts or breaks the Supreme Law of Amendment II [or who obeys such unconstitutional regulation] should be summarily executed as traitors and enemies of America.

        Sic Semper Tyrannis [with a bullet to the head]

  18. The Constitution is still the LAW OF THE LAND. The Second Amendment is vital to FREEDOM. I agree with background checks; but upstanding citizens should enjoy the freedoms of our laws. Those who think they could subvert it or do not uphold it should leave the country or be imprisoned!

    1. “The Constitution is still the LAW OF THE LAND. The Second Amendment is vital to FREEDOM. I agree with background checks; but upstanding citizens should enjoy the freedoms of our laws.”

      What you are saying is that you DISAGREE with the supreme Law of our land. That it, and certain – if not all – things within it only applies to certain special people. Basically the same thing as Bergen County Sheriff Michael Saudino and former Tenafly Police Chief Michael Bruno says and stands for, except maybe you all disagree on WHO is to be ALLOWED constitutional protection of natural rights.

      Sorry, but here in the USA, like it or not, EVERY AMERICAN is LAWFULLY under our constitutional republic, and if you wish to change that then fight for an amendment – which I will fight against. It is a Constitution for everyone, it is the duty of the families to decide who will be allowed what, not yours, not governments, etc. Freedom comes with responsibilities that we all share. The first level of that responsibility is each and everyone of us.

      BTW, the biggest single thing that has been found to be involved in those crimes is Big Pharma drugs that cause all kinds of instability. So when a drug manufacturer lists all the “side effects” what they are really saying is that the drugs causes those things. The term “side effects” is really just a way to make it seem like that drug is healthy (ier) then it really is. Billions of dollars for those corps rest on the American people to not use their minds and figure that out for themselves. Take a real LOGIC class, because that was the first thing that they worked so hard over decades to remove from the American people.

  19. I enlisted in the military to escape the Peoples Republic of New Jersey, that was back in 1975. It was the same back then with the law enforcement agencies and that was when you could show up to school with a shotgun stowed in the easy rider rifle rack in you Pickup Truck during hunting season.
    Do that today and you will find out how fast the SWAT Team will show up and get a quick trip to jail if the trigger happy fools don’t kill you first. Things have only gotten worse since I left that cesspool of liberalism.
    Back in the 80’s, a couple had some friends over for a party. The husband collected firearms and did reloading in a room upstairs setup for that. One of the guests needed to use the upstairs bathroom and saw the reloading equipment. That ignorant fool thought it was bomb making equipment and called the police. Several weeks later this couple went out for dinner, leaving their kids with a babysitter at the house. When they got home there was police and fire outside the house and the babysitter was running around the front yard in a frantic. The husband, thinking something happened to one of the kids ran up to the house and was stopped by one of the cops. When the guy gave the cop his name he was thrown to the ground, handcuffed and sent to jail along with his wife. The kids were put in foster care. The police confiscated all his weapons, reloading equipment and his camping equipment.
    As I remember, the wife spent several weeks or months in jail. The husband was in jail a year or two going back and forth to court. I can’t remember how long it took for the wife to get back the kids, but it took a long time.
    This turned out to be one of the cases the NRA lawyers took on. The appeal process wound up in the higher courts before the judge said the charges were ridiculous and they were to give him back all his weapons and equipment. Of course the police tried to say all that stuff was destroyed and it took some more years and a law suit to get some of his stuff back.
    The NRA featured several stories about how bad NJ was back in the 80’s.
    NJ has not recovered from the housing crash in 2008, from what I’m being told from family that still lives there. The Casinos that once paid a lot of taxes that the state politicians have been skimming off of are closing because other states, seeing how good it was for NJ, have legalized gambling in there states and now it’s why go to NJ when you have Casinos in your back yard. Now they are raising taxes on the back of home owners, my sister’s property taxes just went up $1,000.00 last year and they are talking about raising them more. The state politicians don’t want to lose the money they have been stealing and don’t want to defund the special programs that generate votes for them. One realtor has told me that they are dealing with 250 foreclosures a month in NJ. The people that can afford it or have family in other states are moving out of NJ in droves. Some of these families have lived in NJ for generations, since the revolution and have made the sad and often hard decision to leave the state. The laws are far to restrictive, most are based on lies, the unions are out of control and it is just to expensive to live there.
    And they all wounder why I moved to AZ and will not go back to live there. Winter alone is reason enough for me, but the weapons and ammo I’ve collected over the years is enough to have me put in prison back in NJ for life. This article is no surprise to me, NJ has always been that way, it was a Tory state back during the revolution and the stupid ignorant people back there keep electing politicians that lie to them, keep screwing them over and they just lay back and take it. I have no sympathy for the people of NJ. You guys have made your bed, now you can lay in it. Or you guys can grow a pair of balls and a back bone and do something about it. Until then NJ is just a lost cause.
    Or you can do like I did and move to another state, but don’t bring your attitudes, laws and your stupid liberal political thinking. We former NJ’ers will make life miserable for you if you don’t leave that crap back in NJ. We have enough problems here without your crap.

  20. It is beginning to sound as if we all went into some kind of time warp and ended up in 1938 Nazi Germany. This is EXACTLY what they did in Germany in the 1930’s with Hitlers “weapons decree” which vaunted a safe and crime free state. Remember how that all worked out? But I have a question:: When they come for our guns will they be wearing brown shirts and displaying the Nazi Swastika’s??

  21. These traitors should not be shot, it would be a waste of time. A bullet will get justice once. One rope will get justice a thousand times. I can not remember where I heard or read this. I am not certian if it is a quote, statement, or an assembly of many comments I have read over many years. Although, I think good old fashioned public hanging is one of many suitable tools in a government repair kit.

  22. I believe with certainty, that many of these mass shootings are, in fact, orchestrated by those seeking to disarm the American People as part of the greater globalist U.N. Agenda 21. There is a ton of evidence for those with an open mind.I firmly believe we will look back on American history one hundred years from now, and realize with certainty, this was the case.

    The question staring us righy in the face is, what are WE going to do about it right now? At the rate we are presently going, we will be fully subjugated and disarmed unless we begin lawfully disobeying unlawful codes in mass, and openly defying AND bringing to justice those treasonous tyrants who are rubbing disarmament in our faces.

    I know there are a number of police who will stand down when ordered to confiscate civilian furearms. I also know there are a growing number that will have no problem whatsoever in following unjust orders for disarmament. Again, what are we who swore an oath to defend and uphold the Constitution against both foreign and DOMESTIC enemies going to do about it?

    Are we truly an oath keeper if we continue to allow these tyrants to fulfill their agenda? There has to be a point when we step in and say, “NO MORE!”. Am I calling for violence??? NO. I am calling for JUSTICE.

    Some are waiting for a SHTF scenario to proceed with due process against these traitors. I believe there are things we can do right now to hold their feet to the fire and make them feel pain. I believe this is our duty as men who are loyal to our founding ideals, which I wholeheartedly love and uphold.

    Ask gun owners in Vermont if merely making phone calls and rallying in mass was sufficient in and of itself to prevent unjust code from being shoved down their throats! Deep in our guts, we know that we are obligated to do more. Think of the kind of America our children and grandchildren will inherit. This thought disturbs me greatly. What’s even more disturbing, is that we are allowing this tyranny to metesticize into something that most assuredly will destroy what is left of our Republic. I truly believe that previous generations would not have tolerated this level of in our face treason.

    1. “The question staring us right in the face is, what are WE going to do about it right now? At the rate we are presently going, we will be fully subjugated and disarmed unless we begin lawfully disobeying unlawful codes in mass, and openly defying AND bringing to justice those treasonous tyrants who are rubbing disarmament in our faces.”

      This should be applied across all things Unconstitutional, such as, “Bills of Attainder” (ex. civil forfeiture), “Titles of Nobility” (creating Agencies with regulatory making ability), Ex Post Facto, Bill of Rights violations, etc. It’s time to step up, group up and stand in the way of Unconstitutional Government. Much like our founders, it’s time to quit allowing Coercive Control!

  23. No one is saying they want the guns of law enforcement until the civilians have been disarmed. That will come later. They only need to look at the other countries who have taken this path. Anti-gunners are dividing and conquering and they are playing right into it.

Comments are closed.