No products in the cart.

News

Patriot Nurse – The Beginning of Open War: Trump’s Tweet and CNN Townhall

Patriot Nurse - The Beginning of Open War: Trump's Tweet and CNN Townhall

We haven’t heard from Patriot Nurse in quite a while. Here she unloads about the latest attempts to control our guns.

[ot-video type=”youtube” url=”https://youtu.be/smwn9n6EiMg”]

0

Shorty Dawkins

Oath Keepers Merchandise

5 comments

  1. Like her a lot, and her words are true.

    Another truth is that those things she speaks of cannot happen without those who serve within the enforcement areas of government “just following orders” and “just doing their jobs”. It already happened where a man was murdered because he did not have a governmental permit (for the ignorant of you, we are NOT required LAWFULLY to have a permit to travel in our cars, etc. Their CoP (chief) told them to stop him by any means necessary except to NOT dent the cars. To shoot him instead. They did shoot an unarmed man who was still driving his vehicle at the speed limit and not recognizing their UNLAWFUL authority. That IS Murder here in THIS nation, though it is not so in China, etc. Those that serve within our government were DELEGATED authority over parts of commerce between the states, mostly seeing that it is fair. Any driver license, car registration, etc are all COLOR OF LAW.)

    Basically, if you who are still serving do NOT say “NO, I will not follow that unLawful order, then do not be surprised when Americans refuse to recognize any type of LAWFUL authority. If you are currently serving with the US (NOT LAWFULLY UN) military, then say NO when ordered to go ATTACK foreign nations as there is NO LAWFUL DECLARATION of War by the Congress who is the ONLY LAWFUL body (that is those who actually serve within the Senate and the House of Reps) that has the delegated authority to send Americans to fight. NO one else has that power, and those that serve within the Congress cannot give that authority to anyone else, sell it, trade it, etc because it is the power that goes with the Office and branch, NOT THE PERSON who serves within that position and is ALLOWED to use that authority as long as they meet the constitutional requirements, do the duties as assigned, take and KEEP the Oath.

    Those of you that serve within LEA’s – state and federal, you are also required to “Support and Defend” the US Constitution first and before anything else including following orders of superiors and duties of the position. That is the REQUIREMENT of the position you occupy. If your state, then you have two things that are before orders of superiors and duties of the position occupied (at least here in the USA) which are to “Support and Defend first the US Constitution, then your own state Constitution – they come FIRST.)

    Do NOT blame the people for you allowing yourself to be USED against the American people, against our legitimate government.

    “To say that one may not defend his own property is usurpation of power by legislature.” O’Connell v. Judnich (1925), 71 C.A.386, 235 P. 664.

    Dr. Vieira: Therefore, no decision of the Supreme Court can be taken at face value as an infallible authority as to what the Constitution means. Rather, the Constitution determines whether a decision of the Supreme Court is correct or incorrect. And in the final analysis only WE THE PEOPLE can render the Constitution’s meaning certain, because WE THE PEOPLE “ordain[ed] and establish[ed] th[e] Constitution” in the first place; and (as the Supreme Court itself has admitted) “[t]he power to enact carries with it final authority to declare the meaning of the legislation”. Compare the Preamble to the Constitution with Propper v. Clark, 337 U.S. 472, 484 (1949). “

    Color of law. The appearance or semblance, without the substance, of legal right. Misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because wrongdoer is clothed with authority of state, is action taken under “color of law.” Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, page 241.

    Preamble to the US Constitution: We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

    Preamble to the Bill of Rights: Congress OF THE United States begun and held at the City of New York, on Wednesday the Fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.
    THE Conventions of a number of the States having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best insure the beneficent ends of its institution.”

    28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.

    James Madison: “Government is instituted to protect property of every sort; as well that which lies in the various rights of individuals, as that which the term particularly expresses. This being the end of government, that alone is a just government, which impartially secures to every man, whatever is his own.”

    “Right of transit through each state, with every species of property known to constitution of United States, and recognized by that paramount law, is secured by that instrument to each citizen, and does not depend upon uncertain and changeable ground of mere comity.” In Re Archy (1858), 9 C. 47.

    “Traveling is passing from place to place — act of performing journey; and traveler is person who travels.” In Re Archy (1858), 9 C. 47.

    “Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts.” Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356

    “As general rule men have natural right to do anything which their inclinations may suggest, if it be not evil in itself, and in no way impairs the rights of others.” In Re Newman (1858), 9 C.
    502.

    “A constitution is designated as a supreme enactment, a fundamental act of legislation by the people of the state. A constitution is legislation direct from the people acting in their sovereign capacity, while a statute is legislation from their representatives, subject to limitations prescribed by the superior authority.” Ellingham v. Dye, 231 U. S. 250.

    “The basic purpose of a written constitution has a two-fold aspect, first securing [not granting] to the people of certain unchangeable rights and remedies, and second, the curtailment of unrestricted governmental activity within certain defined spheres.” Du Pont v. Du Pont, 85 A 724.

    “The constitution of a state is stable and permanent, not to be worked upon the temper of the times, not to rise and fall with the tide of events. Notwithstanding the competition of opposing interests, and the violence of contending parties, it remains firm and immoveable, as a mountain amidst the strife and storms, or a rock in the ocean amidst the raging of the waves.” Vanhorne v. Dorrance, supra.

    A.L.A. Schecter Poultry Corp. v. U.S.: “Speaking for a unanimous Court, Chief Justice Hughes also dealt a death blow to the emergency powers doctrine. Counsel for the government’s opponents relied on [Ex Parte] Milligan, arguing that an “emergency does not increase constitutional power nor diminish constitutional restrictions.”

    [Home Building & Loan Association v.] Blaisdell. “Extraordinary conditions do not create or enlarge constitutional power,” he declared. The Court conceded that such conditions might well require extraordinary remedies, but that did not “justify action which lies outside the sphere of constitutional authority.” Those who acted under authorization of the Constitution, the Court said, were not free to transcend the limitations upon the power that it granted merely because they believed that more or different power was necessary.

    Both the state and the federal governments get their powers from the people. From those who would know:

    Thomas Jefferson: “The government created by this compact (the Constitution) was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among powers having no common judge, each party (the people of each state) has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress.”

    Alexander Hamilton: “Every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid.”

    James Madison, Federalist 46, 315-23: “The Foederal and State Governments are in fact but different agents and trustees of the people, instituted with different powers, and designated for different purposes… They must be told that the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone; and that it will not depend merely on the comparative ambition or address of the different governments, whether either, or which of them, will be able to enlarge its sphere of jurisdiction at the expence of the other. Truth no less than decency requires, that the event in every case, should be supposed to depend on the sentiments and sanction of their common constituents.”

    James Madison: “The ultimate authority resides in the people, and that if the federal government got too powerful and overstepped its authority, then the people would develop plans of resistance and resort to arms.” In Fed 57, He also wrote that Congress “can make no law which will not have its full operation on themselves and their friends, as well as on the great mass of the society.”

  2. Well nice lady, a lot of us agree. I lose friends when I say there is no age limitation regarding gun ownership. I lose friends when I say if the government owns it, I own it. I lose friends when I say 180 million unarmed were slaughtered in the 20th century. I lose friends when I point out we live as felons under out of control tyranny. That’s okay… I’m standing my ground…at the top if my lungs!!!

    Like she says, snooze you lose. Do unto them before they do unto you.

  3. Breitbart is now censoring comments without explanation.
    It first appears as a flag that your comment is “subject to review by a Breitbart moderator.”
    This means it may not be presented on the forum at all.
    The following has remarks of historical significance yet deemed not suitable to be published.
    I have altered though not diminished the form of the content that possibly this might make it through.
    (This too went for review and subsequently approved)

    “Dear Mr President Trump,

    The responses of several service providers and now Dick’s Sporting Goods as result of the recent Parkland shooting, demands consideration when measured against the thoughts and actions of the Founders of our nation.

    We are headed toward an absurdity!

    The spirit and intention of the Founders in providing us with the Second Amendment was that we never be subjected to abuses such as described and anticipated by Benjamin Franklin:

    “In these Sentiments, Sir, I agree to this Constitution, with all its Faults, if they are such; because I think a General Government necessary for us, and there is no Form of Government but what may be a Blessing to the People if well administered; and I believe farther that this is likely to be well administered for a Course of Years, and only end in despotism as other forms before it, when people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic government, being incapable of any other.”

    An important read is Mr. Franklin’s remarks to the Constitutional Convention regarding prayer and an appeal to the Almighty which I heartily recommend to you to develope your understanding of the spirit of the times. His years and wisdom must not go unheeded.

    It is not relevant to the discussion that Franklin’s request went unheeded. Should persons here read all of Franklin’s Convention remarks, the wisdom of his great age and the moderation of his years require more considered attention.

    We are on the cusp of a condition of despotism and tyranny yet are to be rendered utterly defenseless..”

  4. Dear Mr. President Trump,

    When Jesus was approached by Judas in the Garden of Gethsemanee, there were more than a number of swords present other than those of men come to take Him.
    At first glance, His attentions were focused on His betrayer and those accompanying Judas:

    “In that same hour said Jesus to the multitudes, Are ye come out as against a thief with swords and staves for to take me? I sat daily with you teaching in the temple, and ye laid no hold on me.” Matthew 26:55

    Pay close attention also to verse 51 of the same passage:

    “And, behold, one of them which were with Jesus stretched out his hand, and drew his sword, and struck a servant of the high priest’s, and smote off his ear.”

    Elsewhere in Luke 22:49 we read:

    ” When THEY which were about Him saw what would follow, THEY said unto Him, Lord, shall WE smite with the sword?”

    It is notable that not only were the “sinners” that Jesus was to be delivered into the hands of possessing “swords and staves as against a thief,” but the defenders of Christ also possessed swords!

    Not at any time did Jesus either prohibit His disciples or reprove His disciples, or not trust them in the possession of swords while they were with Him.

    Living by a sword and possessing a sword are two different concepts as evidenced by circumstances throughout the world. You only need to look at Israel, it’s enemies and it’s detractors.

    We are facing the runaway train of the greatest dictatorship ever to make it’s appearance in the world and the scenario is being set to disarm the people much by incidents as we are experiencing.

    The Founders would resist such disarmament even in the face of the horror of Parkland because of the larger danger confronting us.

    Do not err.

    Respectfully,

Leave a Reply