No products in the cart.


Stefan Molyneux on Charlottesville

Stefan Molyneux on Charlottesville

The tragedy that was Charlottesville, in my opinion, needn’t have happened. The fact that the police presence was removed, and two extreme factions who hate each other viciously, were allowed to go at each other, resulted in the death of a young lady, and injuries to many.

Free speech must be defended. The Nazis (who, by the way, are collectivists) must be allowed to have their say, just as the Communists (who, of course are collectivists), must be allowed to have their say. It doesn’t matter if you like what is being said. A Communist calling me a Nazi, for instance, means nothing, if there is no proof. It is a futile attempt by someone incapable of any sound reasoning.

I don’t like what either side in Charlottesville had to say, (both sides are idiots. Their slogans are empty,), but I will let them speak. I don’t have to listen, or be at all concerned with what they say, or I may wish to engage them in debate. It is my choice. The Constitution guarantees free speech. If I deny it for others, they can deny it for me. Violence is the result of people who can’t reason. It is justified only as a response to aggression.

For those who might think I am a pacifist, I beg to differ. I will defend myself, my family and friends, and my neighbors against aggression. Period. But I will use reason first.

Shorty Dawkins

[ot-video type=”youtube” url=””]


Shorty Dawkins



  1. “The fact that the police presence was removed,”

    Let’s start here. I do NOT care if it was the Governor of that state, or any other person in any position within government, Chief of Police, etc, THAT/those person/people is directly responsible for the MURDER of that woman and for the crash and subsequent deaths of those officers. Since it was planned it is First Degree Murder. The officers that did NOT keep their Oaths to the US Constitution and to their state Constitution (they are NOT to any person who serves within our governments nor to any governmental position or office) are also at fault. Add to that/those crimes for all of them a(nother) felony or two and the crime of PERJURY.

    Why do I say that? Because their duty is to/was to the US Constitution FIRST – and that is found in writing and within the words of the Oath. Then their duty is to/was to their own state’s Constitution – and that too is found in writing and within the Oath, NOT to any person, position, or office but to the Constitutions. IF you (generic “you”) cannot keep your Oath quit. YOU are working against our legitimate governments, your actions are *terrorism against the American people, YOUR actions quite likely qualify as treasonous.

    Color of Law is anything that is not in Pursuance thereof the US Constitution.
    Color of law: The appearance or semblance, without the substance, of legal right. Misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because wrongdoer is clothed with authority of state, is action taken under “color of law.” Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, page 241.

    “The constitution of a state is the fundamental law of the State.” Ware v. Hylton, 3 Dall. 199.

    “What is a constitution? It is the form of government, delineated by the mighty hand of the people, in which certain first principles of fundamental laws are established.” Van Horne v. Dorrance, 2 Dall. 304.

    “A constitution is designated as a supreme enactment, a fundamental act of legislation by the people of the state. A constitution is legislation direct from the people acting in their sovereign capacity, while a statute is legislation from their representatives, subject to limitations prescribed by the superior authority.” Ellingham v. Dye, 231 U. S. 250.
    “The basic purpose of a written constitution has a two-fold aspect, first securing [not granting] to the people of certain unchangeable rights and remedies, and second, the curtailment of unrestricted governmental activity within certain defined spheres.” Du Pont v. Du Pont, 85 A 724.

    “The constitution of a state is stable and permanent, not to be worked upon the temper of the times, not to rise and fall with the tide of events. Notwithstanding the competition of opposing interests, and the violence of contending parties, it remains firm and immoveable, as a mountain amidst the strife and storms, or a rock in the ocean amidst the raging of the waves.” Vanhorne v. Dorrance, supra.

    Understand that when Dr. Vieira said: “This has nothing to do with personalities or subjective ideas. It’s a matter of what the Constitution provides… The government of the United States has never violated anyone’s constitutional rights… The government of the United States will never violate anyone constitutional rights, because it cannot violate anyone’s constitutional rights. The reason for that is: The government of the United States is that set of actions by public officials that are consistent with the Constitution. Outside of its constitutional powers, the government of the United States has no legitimacy. It has no authority; and, it really even has no existence. It is what lawyers call a legal fiction.”

    This also applies to each state government which is defines the state government, assigns the “powers”, etc. When those that SERVE WITHIN the state governments do not follow that state’s Constitution they too are a “legal fiction”.

    *28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.

    Treason – Article III, Section 3 of the Constitution of the United States provides:
    Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
    The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

    There are three key elements that are necessary for an offense to constitute treason: an obligation of allegiance to the legal order, intent to go against that legal order, and then actions taken to violate that obligation if I understand our version of treason correctly.

    Daniel Webster: “We may be tossed upon an ocean where we can see no land – nor, perhaps, the sun or stars. But there is a chart and a compass for us to study, to consult, and to obey. That chart is the Constitution.”

    Daniel Webster: “Is the Constitution worth preserving?” He said, “Then guard it as you would the very seat of your life. Guard it not only against the open blows of violence but also against that spirit of change.”

    Justice William O. Douglas, dissenting, Colten v. Kentucky, 407 U.S. 104 (1972): “Since when have we Americans been expected to bow submissively to authority and speak with awe and reverence to those who represent us? The constitutional theory is that we the people are the sovereigns, the state and federal officials only our agents. We who have the final word can speak softly or angrily. We can seek to challenge and annoy, as we need not stay docile and quiet.”

    1. Cal, If you could try and then try again and again to write to the President and give him not your opinion, but what the constitution really has to say, then I don’t think any one would have anything really intelligent to say back to him. Maybe (And I a not kidding) if you needed some back up from members to recommend you I don’t think you would have a problem. The people need to hear the truth and the law as to what’s up. Cal the country is about finished and I am not trying to not give you a big head but we need some one that knows the truth to get the person in charge to really open up and show the public just how much they are being taken to the cleaner.
      FTR CB

  2. Highly correct, if the court appointed attorney for the young man used as a pawn in this sick play between Marxists groups knows anything about defense arguments he will use the facts to have the real criminal culprits prosecuted.

  3. I would urge people to follow Stefan Molyneux on his you tube Channel for he is very intelligent conservative who explains things in a common sense way. We could use a lot more like him.

Comments are closed.