No products in the cart.

News

California Releases Assault Weapons Ban Language

Posted on May 19, 2017 by Beth Baumann


This morning, the State of California released their language regarding their assault weapons and high-capacity magazine bans.

In the document, the state mandates all firearms they consider to be “assault weapons” must be registered with the Department of Justice:

Any person who from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2016 inclusive, lawfully possessed an assault weapon that does not have a fixed magazine as defined in Penal Code section 30515, including those weapons with an ammunition feeding device that can be readily removed from the firearm with the use of a tool (commonly referred to as a bullet-button weapon) must register the firearm before January 1, 2018.

The Golden State is considering anything without a “fixed magazine” the size of the pistol grip to be an assault weapon. The focus is primarily on those who build their own AR-15 style pistols.

Residents are then required to go through a number of crazy steps to make sure their firearm is in compliance:

  1. In order to be legally registered, the firearm has to have been legally acquired on or before December 31, 2016.
  2. Each gun owner would have to establish an account under the California Firearms Application Reporting System (CFARS). The following information must be provided:
    • Full name
    • Address
    • Telephone number
    • Date of birth
    • Sex
    • Height
    • Weight
    • Eye color
    • Hair color
    • Military identification number (if applicable)
    • CA driver’s license or identification card number
    • United States citizenship status
    • Place of birth
    • Country of citizenship
    • Alien registration number (if applicable)
  3. The following information would have to be provided on each firearm that falls under their definition of an “assault weapon”:
    • Firearm type, make and model
    • Caliber
    • Firearm color
    • Barrel length
    • Serial number
    • All identification marks firearm
    • Country of origin/manufacturer
    • The date the firearm was acquired
    • The name and address of the individual from whom or business from which the firearm was acquired
    • Clear digital photos of firearms listed on the application.
      • One photo shall depict the bullet-button style magazine release installed on the firearm.
      • One photo shall depict the firearm from the end of the barrel to the end of the stock if it is a long gun or the point furthest from the end of the barrel if it is a pistol.
      • The other two photos shall show the left side of the receiver/frame and right side of the receiver/frame.
  4. If you’re like most families, you probably share your firearms amongst yourselves. If that’s the case, each family member who will be shooting the firearm must be registered as well. One person who have to be identified as the “primary registrant,” while others must register as “joint registrants.” To be a “joint registrant” you must live at the same address as the primary registrant. Everyone who is registered must be 19 by December 31, 2017.
    • Only direct family members (parent to child, child to parent, spouses) are allowed to be joint registrants.
    • Joint registrants have to provide proof of address showing they live with the primary registrant.


To read steps 5 thru 7, go to Bearing Arms

 

0

nancy.larned

Oath Keepers Merchandise

5 comments

  1. Color of law. The appearance or semblance, without the substance, of legal right. Misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because wrongdoer is clothed with authority of state, is action taken under “color of law.” Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, page 241.

    Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822): “For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution.”

    Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846): ” `The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.’ The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right.”

    Cockrum v. State, 24 Tex. 394, at 401-402 (1859): “The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the “high powers” delegated directly to the citizen, and `is excepted out of the general powers of government.’ A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power.”

    Joel Barlow, “Advice to the Privileged Orders”: “The danger (where there is any) from armed citizens, is only to the *government*, not to *society*; and as long as they have nothing to revenge in the government (which they cannot have while it is in their own hands) there are many advantages in their being accustomed to the use of arms, and no possible disadvantage.”

    28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.

    Here is another color of law passed. Everyone acts as if it is a “real law”, instead of pretend law that is taken for real by the dumbed down because some scum in government declares it so. Guess what, they do NOT have that authority in either the state or federal governments. The only real problem is the enforcers, usually law enforcement. Why? Because if they enforce this they then become under our Laws (capital “L” says it is constitutional Law, real Law) *terrorists because instead of keeping their Oath to support and defend the US Constitution, they are following orders that destroy our nation from within. They may be dumbed down, but I know that in many states they lowered the IQ tests (research it) and refused to let people of a certain level (high) IQ in, only accepting low level IQ – and this went to the courts and was upheld by the scum there.

    Ask yourself why is there more murders by cop, more injuries, stupid things – too many to mention – being done today? Then, if you have been in LE for a few decades, ask yourself if those are really the people you want “having your back”.

    All, we need the Militia, we need to work on Pres Trump to ask for their use. Because he cannot LAWFULLY do certain things with what he has now, nor can he trust them.

    The Militia has as its constitutionally assigned duties to:
    — Enforce the US Constitution (supreme Law) and each state’s Constitution (highest Law),
    — Enforce and keep the “Laws of the Union” (which are constitutional laws ONLY),
    — Protect the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
    — “to suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”

    This is in writing found in the US Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15, with the duties those that serve within the state and federal governments have to the Militias found in Clause 16. Remember, if it is assigned to a branch, to an office in a branch, to a group then those actions are forbidden to any others.

  2. Take your new language & registration requirements and STICK IT UP YOUR ASS!!! NOT REGISTERING MYSELF OR THE FIREARM!!!
    Registration leads to confiscation.

  3. ‘Bullet button’??? ‘BULLET BUTTON’???? WHAT, in GOD’S name is a ‘bullet button’?? Another made up term by ignorant politicians, used to describe something they don’t understand. Or, and this is incredibly disturbing, they actually DO understand and know what they are talking about but seek to confuse, obfuscate and outright lie about their REAL intentions to destroy our Second Amendment and the Constitution of the United States of America.

    The idea behind the Second Amendment was to arm the populace in order to allow them to control an OUT of control militia in order to assure the security of a free state. It’s purpose being to protect the Constitution itself and the rest of the amendments in the Constitution, starting with the rest of the Bill of Rights.

    1. A “bullet button” is a California obscenity designed to make changing a magazine on an AR15 slow and awkward. Before an AR was sold in CA, the FFL had to remove the standard mag release and install a recessed “bullet button”. To release an AR magazine, you have to push an object into this hole. The tip of a round works, hence “bullet button”. Also, no larger than 10 round magazines can be used in rifles or pistols. Criminals always have whatever they want, but the rights of legal CA gun owners are increasingly infringed.

      My family had enough of California taxes, laws, and regulations. We left almost three years ago. My first act on driving into my new home state was to find a gun store and buy a standard capacity (15 round) mag for my Glock.

  4. I live in The Peoples Republick of Kommifornia. I will not be registering any of my AR’s and will be removing the “Bullet Buttons”. The government in Kommifornia has been hijacked by Facist criminal pieces of garbage.

Comments are closed.