No products in the cart.

News

UPDATES on Bunkerville Trial – Shutting Down The Defense

by Shari Dovale

With the reports coming out if the courtroom in Las Vegas, Nevada, it is obvious that the defendants will not be allowed a fair trial.

Some of the key testimony the defense was planning has been denied them. They intended to bring in Margaret Houston, Cliven Bundy’s sister, who was thrown to the ground by the BLM agent. The defendants were told that her testimony is not relevant to this case and Houston will not be allowed to testify.


[ot-video type=”youtube” url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sPWeqeFzcU”]


The government prosecutors have said that there has been no evidence presented that the BLM showed or used force, and Judge Gloria Navarro agreed. She has ruled that the defense cannot present testimony that the BLM overstepped their bounds or used unnecessary force, such as the testimony of Margaret Houston.

Judge Navarro has also ruled that evidence of Dave Bundy’s arrest will not be allowed. Neither will the evidence of the BLM tazing Ammon Bundy repeatedly, or the evidence of the BLM killing the Bundy cattle.

Navarro also reiterated that Special Agent Dan Love will not be called to testify, and his current investigation into his illegal activities while in charge of the operations in Nevada were not to be brought into court.

Judge Navarro has ruled that all of this evidence is not relevant to the current case and can only confuse the jury. She and the prosecutors discussed, repeatedly today, that they are concerned that ‘Jury Nullification” could become an issue in this trial. Navarro is not going to allow any evidence in front of the jury that could sway the jury to nullify.

Navarro has also ruled that you do not need to point a weapon at an officer for it to be an assault on that officer. Merely having a weapon that the officer can see is enough to be considered assault on that officer.

WITNESS INTIMIDATION

It was made clear today that any witnesses that are allowed to testify for the defense will be required to first talk to the judge and then talk to a court-appointed attorney, as their testimony could likely get them prosecuted.

Attorney Jackson got up and said that if the government is threatening the witnesses with charges if they testify then that is grounds for a dismissal. Navarro did not agree and dismissed that motion.

The government repeatedly made note that this case was a part of an “ongoing investigation” and the government will not discuss who else is under investigation. They seem to be waving the “UN-indicted co-conspirator” flag at anyone that supports the defense. But, there are still people that are willing to testify, if Judge Navarro would allow them to do so.

All of the prosecutions dozens of witnesses were labeled as “experts, regardless of whether or not they were physically at the wash on that eventful day. Even the agents that were only looking at Facebook, memes and posts.

However, the defense is not allowed the same. If a defense witness was at the wash, saw with their own eyes the events as they happened, they are being labeled by the court as “3rd party” or “LAY” witnesses, therefore their testimony is seemingly unreliable. Additionally, lay witnesses are being denied the right to testify because of this, as well as being told they might be prosecuted.

When it was discussed about Metro police, Highway Patrol, etc, the judge amended her stance to include those law enforcement officials, as well. I wonder if any of the defense witnesses are active or retired law enforcement? Would that qualify them?

Another issue the judge has stressed is that the “lay” witnesses are not allowed to discuss their fear. Only the BLM is allowed to discuss whether they feared for their life, the witnesses are not afforded the right to tell the whole truth.

It is painfully obvious that Judge Navarro, between everything we heard this morning, and the limited time she has allowed the defense to present it’s case, she is trying to manipulate the defense into forcing the defendants to testify against themselves.

The defendants are Constitutionally guaranteed a fair trial, with rights to face their accusers, etc. They are being denied these rights. Remember what Navarro told Todd Engel:

“You, as a defendant, have only THREE rights.”

She said that he had the right to:

  1. Plead Guilty
  2. Testify on his own behalf
  3. Appeal his conviction

John Lamb and Andrea Parker update on this morning’s proceedings:

0

nancy.larned

Oath Keepers Merchandise

17 comments

  1. I sat in on the trial last week and was appalled at the treatment of the Defendants, especially that Todd Engel was forced to use a public defender that made the public defender on “My Cousin Vinny” look like a pro… Todd begged the judge to allow him to plead his own case to no avail.

    1. It is a gross violation of Todd’s rights to force him to use counsel he does not want rather than representing himself. We need to find a way to pressure the Trump Admin to put an end to these show trials. As I have said before, if Obama can pardon Weather Underground terrorists, convicted cop killers, and drug dealers, then Trump and Sessions can put an end to these persecutions. But how do we create sufficient pressure? That is the question. And it is something we need to answer, soon.

      1. Judge Gloria Navarro is NOT a judge for life, only for as long as she uses “good Behaviour”. She IS bound to the US Constitution by Oath, breaking it is at least one felony and the crime of Perjury. She can LAWFULLY be removed, and I do know it is hard to go against the propaganda training and “schooling” we all have gone through.

        At this time President Trump seems to have gone off the “reservation” in his actions – military controlling themselves and deciding who they can attack, CIA making it’s own decisions, some of the “old guard” put back into office whose actions have gone AGAINST the US Constitution (their contract and his), etc – which seems to me that he is under threat of some type, or he mislead the American people. Giving him the benefit of the doubt, I am guessing that the unlawful CIA and the unlawful military industrial congressional complex have a threat over him and’/r those he loves because neither “agency” wants to lose the power, money, etc they have. As such, I would not count on him. IF he had bothered to listen to the many who told him to replace every single person in the WH and elsewhere that stands over his life and others things might be different. But we can try, but not let this be our only option.

        This is one of the reasons for the type of government the framers created for us found in Matthew 20:25: “…the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and those who are great exercise authority over them. Yet it shall NOT be so among you; but whoever desires to become great among you, let him be your servant.” (caps are mine)

        This is one of the reasons that in America the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution basically are the governments, while it is the people who SERVE within those governments that carry out the duties put into writing within the Constitutions. They SERVE under us. (caps are mine)

        Our answer to our problems with those that serve within our governments is as Daniel Webster said: “We may be tossed upon an ocean where we can see no land – nor, perhaps, the sun or stars. But there is a chart and a compass for us to study, to consult, and to obey. That chart is the Constitution.”

        James Madison, Memorial and Remonstrance against Religious Assessments (1785): “The preservation of a free Government requires not merely, that the metes and bounds which separate each department of power be invariably maintained; but more especially that neither of them be suffered to overleap the great Barrier which defends the rights of the people. The Rulers who are guilty of such an encroachment, exceed the commission from which they derive their authority, and are Tyrants. The People who submit to it are governed by laws made neither by themselves nor by an authority derived from them, and are slaves.
        We hold this prudent jealousy TO BE THE FIRST DUTY OF CITIZENS, and one of the noblest characteristics of the late Revolution. The free men of America did not wait till usurped power had strengthened itself by exercise, and entangled the question in precedents. They saw all the consequences in the principle, and they avoided the consequences by denying the principle. We revere this lesson too much soon to forget it.”

        This judge has gone way beyond and away from any lawful duty she has, and is instead, working from within to destroy our LEGITIMATE government. She is committing TREASON in very public way. She is breaking her Oath, a crime in and of itself.

        Alexander Hamilton: “Until the people have, by some solemn and authoritative act, annulled or changed the established form, it is binding upon themselves collectively, as well as individually; and no presumption, or even knowledge, of their sentiments, can warrant their representatives in a departure from it, prior to such an act.”

        The requirement for all Federal and State Civil officers to give their solemn and binding Oath is established in Article VI, Section 1, Clause 4.

        Treason, found in Article III, Section 3 of the Constitution of the United States is: “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.”

        The above lists three key elements that are necessary for an offense to constitute treason: an obligation of allegiance to the legal order, the intent to destroy it from within, and action to violate that obligation. Since what the duties and powers are for judges are listed within both the US Constitution, and then again for lower judges within each state’s Constitution. Add to that the PROTECTIONS listed in writing of the people in regard to courts, facing their accused, etc – again, all in writing within the compact between the states and the CONTRACT that those that serve within our government is under.

        Must we not plan a LAWFUL, constitutional way of action against this if we have another compromised US President? Compromised legislature? Compromised judicial branch?

        18 USC § 241 – Conspiracy against rights: “If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or
        If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured
        They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.”

        Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 946: “There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of Constitutional rights.”

        U.S. Supreme Court in Miranda v. Arizona, 380 U.S. 436 (1966): “Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them.”

        Gross v. State of Illinois, 312 F 2d 257; (1963): “State Judges, as well as federal, have the responsibility to respect and protect persons from violations of federal constitutional rights.”

        Olmstead v U.S., 277 US 348, 485; 48 S. Ct. 564, 575; 72 LEd 944 U.S. versus Verdrigo-Urquidez, 110 S. Ct. 1056, 1060-61 (1990); South v.Maryland/Bowers v. DeVito: “Decency, security, and liberty alike demand that government officials be subjected to the same rules of conduct that are commands to the citizen. In a Government of laws, existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Crime is contagious. If government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for the law it invites every man to become a law unto himself and against that pernicious doctrine, this court should resolutely set its face.”

        42 USC §1983 Civil action for deprivation of rights: “Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.”

        Alexander Hamilton, Federalist 33: “…If the federal government should overpass the just bounds of its authority and make a tyrannical use of its powers, the people, whose creature it is, must appeal to the standard [The Constitution] they have formed, and take such measures to redress the injury done to the Constitution as the exigency may suggest and prudence justify….”

      2. Have to roll with Cal on this one Stewart. The remedy is in the Constitution. Have we reached out to Sessions or Trump?

        Aside from Government intervention, we may simply need some martyrs to get folk on board. I have been Socially Experimenting (asking semi-loaded questions) with people from the supposed “Right and Left.” The majority of them are sick of this crap from both sides. One other possible remedy is the “Quit paying them to oppress us” remedy. After that it’s the ultimate remedy, but they need to start that, because the “Focusing Moment” would not be on our side.

      3. Answer soon? We know the answer now which is the elites are totally compromised and USA is being run by the same Bolsheviks that murdered 60K Christians in Russia under Stalin.

        There will be no justice from this system unless we rise up and enforce it ourselves. The day is soon upon us when we choose how to die – in the gulag aka fema camp, or defending our children and freedom.

        They will not stop. The time of debate is past.

      4. Please call House Judituary Committee. 1.202.225.3951
        I just got off the phone with them. They are aware of what Judge Navarro is up to and I was told they are receiving calls from other constituents. 3 minutes of your day well spent folks!

  2. How in the world can a Sessions Dept of “Justice” allow such flagrant injustice to continue??? To your question Stewart, why not mobilize a “Call to Phones (& email)” mission directly into the DOJ as a top priority for all State OK Leaders and their Chapters?

  3. The State will protect the State at all costs. The servants of the People is the aggressor and utilizes a bastardized legal system to jail and deprive innocent men of their liberty. It gives itself and it’s enforcers qualified immunity to maim and kill under color of law. This side show circus called” law” leads the jury to conviction rather than fair and equal justice.
    Understand this. The victory at Bundy Ranch I was a frightening event for the State. The State with all it’s fabled and implied powers of overwhelming force it stood down on that day as the People had enough and were willing to risk it all against tyranny and corruption. The State only retains power as long as innocent men continue to keep their heads down, go to work, pay their bills and ignore the obvious. When that hornet’s nest is stirred the People are truly an army that the State cannot easily overcome. The State realizes that it too will run out of gun seizers and those who want a check and will gladly attempt to disarm others.
    So Judge Navarro is guaranteed to deny any due process or fair trial to the Defendents as they are a threat to her future power and control within the court. To her it is now her ego and the State’s ego that they MUST win and at all costs. After all you cannot continue to project power from a system that lost to the People.
    To the LE agents/trolls surfing this site- you swore an Oath to protect and defend the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Your paycheck and enjoyment of power may have marred your allegiance and true duty. Return to protecting the Citizens first and not your masters.
    What will change this is to educate ALL people of their right to Jury Nullification.

  4. “What will change this is to educate ALL people of their right to Jury Nullification.”
    And this is the key to redress of grievances. The jury is Scalia’s fourth branch of government. It is the peoples advocate standing between them and an oppressive government. The jury is our last stand for redress before invoking the 2ndA, it seems.
    WE all went to DC and stood on the soap box against obamacare and got it anyhow. We send “conservative” congressmen to the swamp and they are immediately compromised by graft greed and corruption. The ballot box is of little use to us anymore. The jury box is our next to the last “box” before we reopen the horror of that last box. Reclaiming our juries will prevent that.
    FIJA seems to be next to non-functional but has the needed agenda. Why can we not support the FIJA effort and put the jury nullification show on the road?

  5. What went on in Oregon and is now going on in Vegas is nothing more than a repeat of the “Madisonville Hoax” trials in Tennessee in 2010 and on.
    The initial federal trial was about charges of intent to incite a disturbance. That person was convicted after a hung jury was instructed, by the judge, to go back and bring in a conviction. The public defender defense in that trial actually refused to seat witnesses for his client. The defendant went thru the trial without any testimony on his behalf. Charges were “enhanced” after the conviction such that the defendant got four years in federal penitentiary. The trial was nothing more than a formality. The FBI bragged up afterwards that now the political activists have been taught a lesson.
    The only “cure” for this tyranny is jury nullification.

  6. I guess the beating that Harry Reid got did not convince him to back-off. This case has all the signs of Harry Reid influence…..

  7. I am not the sharpest knife in the drawer by any means, but at this late stage in this kangaroo court, it seems that phone calls/e-mails to Jeff Sessions and flyers handed out on jury nullification to any one entering the court house may be with the time left, the way to go.This judge sounds like a clown and it seems to me if any one on the jury knew how JN worked that would take care of that.Just my two cents. Oh and by the way Cal and the Constitution are so correct, this judge is not working with any good behavior and needs to be tossed to the curb for the trash man.

  8. Emergency redress of grievances rally in Washington DC. Speakers known to the administration procured for this. If enough people show, they’ll get the message.

  9. He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution,
    and unacknowledged by our laws;
    giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

Comments are closed.