No products in the cart.

News

Ron Paul: Chemical Weapons Attack in Syria Likely a False Flag

Ron Paul: Chemical Weapons Attack in Syria Likely a False Flag

 

It looks like the neo-cons have gotten to Trump. It is the neo-cons who are desperate for a war in Syria. Why would Assad use chemical weapons? He, with Russia’s support, is winning the war. If Trump turns to the neo-cons, he will definitely be a one-term President. The voters soundly defeated the neo-cons, Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio and Hillary Clinton. He needs to wake up. – Shorty Dawkins

This article comes from InfoWars.com

by Paul Joseph Watson

“Zero chance” Assad behind attack, says former Congressman

According to former Congressman Ron Paul, the chemical weapons attack in Khan Sheikhoun that killed 30 children and has led to calls for the Trump administration to intervene in Syria could have been a false flag attack.

Pointing out that the prospect of peace in Syria was moving closer before the attack, with ISIS and Al-Qaeda on the run, Paul said the attack made no sense.

“It looks like maybe somebody didn’t like that so there had to be an episode,” said Paul, asking, “who benefits?”

“It doesn’t make any sense for Assad under these conditions to all of a sudden use poison gases – I think there’s zero chance he would have done this deliberately,” said Paul.

The former Congressman went on to explain how the incident was clearly being exploited by neo-cons and the deep state to enlist support for war.

“It’s the neo-conservatives who are benefiting tremendously from this because it’s derailed the progress that has already been made moving toward a more peaceful settlement in Syria,” said Paul.

Read more here.

0

Shorty Dawkins


7 comments

    1. Excellent info! Thank you! I am proud to be an OathKeeper alongside people like you!

  1. And because Ron Paul says it, it must be true just like Alex Jones, Gavin Seim, or Putin………..NOT. Also Brian, Global Research is a seriously mixed bag for information, be careful there.

    1. DC, it’s just like anything else, you must verify. The linked article above, is supported through other embedded links. Also, with every event, you must ask; Cui Bono? Who would benefit from a chemical attack? Certainly not Assad. So he is not likely to have committed suicide.

  2. Whether Assad is dumb enough to have done this or not, regime change is not the answer. Assad still is better than the rebels! Turkey wants to take America and Canada for the caliphate, and Turkey supports regime change as well!

  3. Bashar Assad may be a tyrant (which is necessary to rule over such a population as Syria has), and not above using anything at his disposal to retain power, but he’s not a fool. Assad is a reasonable, intelligent and educated man — if he still possesses chemical weapons, he’s not going to use them indiscriminately, or in instances where conventional explosives would work better, stirring up public condemnation and inviting attacks like he just received. They would be retained for instances where they would be the most appropriate, or the only, means available to accomplish something absolutely necessary.

    Since this bombing raid was supposedly directed against a sort of terrorist munitions depot, it’s most likely that any release of sarin was the result of blowing up something the terrorists had. Gas would not be the effective thing to use against such a target anyway.

    I don’t believe Trump has the foggiest idea of what’s going on here, and he’s relying on advice from political appointees who are equally ignorant (and have their own agenda), and a military/intelligence establishment, State Dept., etc. that’s been packed with Obama supporters for the last eight years. The con-man is being conned into doing what they want him to do. Trump’s presidency is going to be a disaster, if he doesn’t replace most of the people he’s surrounded himself with, and purge the military/intelligence/diplomatic bureaucracy. He can get by without knowing everything himself, but he has to have people around him that do know, that have his and the country’s best interests in mind, and will give it to him straight.

  4. Do we know this happened? What Ive seen is what appears to be some type of “movie set”. With that said is there actual proof that we bombed the airstrip? I guess I have to ask myself if there was real proof, would I actually believe it? The “spin” is overwheming anymore.

Comments are closed.