No products in the cart.


HuffPo Hoax Says Much about ‘Progressive’ Media’s Subversive Goals

HuffPo Hoax Says Much about ‘Progressive’ Media's Subversive Goals
Even though the article turned out to be a hoax, don’t think for a minute it doesn’t express the sentiments and goals of those who published it.

“White Men And The Vote: Why We Took The Blog Down,” The Huffington Post admits in a contrived mea culpa written less as an apology  for journalistic malpractice than an exercise in finger-pointing and excuse-making. Huffington Post SA has removed the blog ‘Could It Be Time To Deny White Men The Franchise?’ published on our site on April 13, 2017.”


South Africa. Nothing like adding more fuel to an already volatile situation.

Why did they take it down?

Bottom line: It wasn’t for moral reasons, like it might inspire more violence, terror and misery. The simple truth is, they got punked. The author of the article wasn’t a real leftist spouting the requisite subversive and hateful inanities. It was a setup, an intentionally outrageous submission from a fake contributor who succeeded in appealing to HuffPo’s elitist strain of privileged “progressivism” and getting the piece published in a forum that would reach the world.

They didn’t take it down because they found the premise objectionable.  Any pretenses of self-righteousness and responsibility now being feigned are just that. If the whole thing hadn’t proven an embarrassing fraud, they’d still be defending the author and the proposals, that:

“[A] denial of the franchise to white men, could see a redistribution of global assets to their rightful owners … A period of twenty years without white men in the world’s parliaments and voting booths will allow legislation to be passed which could see the world’s wealth far more equitably shared.”

“Gullible Huffington Post Falls for Hoax Article Calling for White Men to be Stripped of Voting Rights,” HeatStreet reported. “They even crowed about how much traffic it was getting and mocked readers for complaining, before suddenly reversing their decision and deleting the post over the weekend.”

That in itself is telling. As someone who has been blogging and writing internet articles for some time, I have experienced being hoaxed myself. No matter how much due diligence you engage in, it can still happen. But the important thing is, you don’t then try to erase the past, at least if you’re honest. You admit where you erred but don’t try to hide it. After all, the whole point behind all of this is to discern the truth. Unless you have an agenda where truth is an inconvenience to be supplanted by historical revisionism (SOP for collectivists)…

To call for stripping white men of their right to vote and of their property is especially dangerous at this time in South Africa, when attacks, torture and murder against whites are on the rise. The government’s response (which is predictable when you recall President Jacob Zuma, singing songs like “Shoot the Farmer, Kill the Boer” and demanding land be confiscated from whites without compensation) is to ramp up confiscation of licensed and registered guns.

Zimbabwe, here they come!

The government knowing who has what is the prerequisite. That’s why the push here for “universal background checks” and renewed demands for things like “one gun a month.”

Oh, but South Africa is different from the United States, right? We have protections they don’t!

The goals are the same. Give it a few years for the cultural terraforming here to become irreversible, particularly if his enemies on both sides of the aisle succeed in torpedoing Donald Trump. Because look at the type of legal “thought” that already exists on the Supreme Court, sure to be joined by more of the same should Republicans blow it and the Democrats take over.

Per sitting Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg:

“I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a Constitution in the year 2012. I might look at the Constitution of South Africa,” says Ginsburg, whom President Clinton nominated to the court in 1993. “That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, had an independent judiciary. … It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done. Much more recent than the U.S. Constitution.”

Don’t doubt for a minute that the fake HuffPo piece, to “disenfranchise” (that is, enslave) white males by taking away their property  isn’t exactly what the globalists are working toward, and that “progressive journalists” wouldn’t go into eye-rolling ecstasy fantasizing about.

It’s kind of fitting, really, when you think about how founder Ariana Huffington came into the initial bulk of her fortune.

Curious: I see they also removed the article “Trump Supporters Deserve To Die More Than I Do,” now only available via a webcached copy. For being an asylum of foot-stamping effetes, they sure do seem to be a hate-filled and and bloodthirsty lot.


If you believe in the mission of Oath Keepers, to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, please consider making a donation to support our work.  You can donate HERE.



David Codrea blogs at The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance (, and is a field editor/columnist for GUNS Magazine. Named “Journalist of the Year” in 2011 by the Second Amendment Foundation for his groundbreaking work on the “Fast and Furious” ATF “gunwalking” scandal, he is a frequent event speaker and guest on national radio and television programs.



  1. Apparently it is easy to deceive the radical leftists who are sooo sold on the idea of destroying ALL of their opponents that they fall for a hoax. What is funny is that it was NOT the content of the post that got them to pull the garbage. It was the FACT that they had been suckered.
    This is JUST like the scandal that was and is Hillary’s emails. The liberals and media said NOT A WORD about the facts revealed about the corruption and law breaking. Their ONLY[ focus was on accusing anyone and everyone about who had hacked them. LOL
    I guess the attitude of leftists is much like a lawyer. IF the information was not obtained “LEGALLY” it should be rejected and silenced. Like O.J. Simpson’s bogus claim that the glove did not fit.

  2. We should have an award encouraging hoaxes like this. Instead of calling it the Oscar, I say we should call it the Codrea.

    I don’t care much for the term Lefties because it indicates some evidence of rational ideological discipline. I had thought Mobster would be more accurate. But Effete is so much better, darling!

  3. I have found that anything associated with the Huffington Post to be basic socialist bilge. Justice Ginsburg’s comment is not surprising considering she is an absolute lunatic. We are currently living in the most unstable times in American history and the turmoil has only just begun. Our Sovereign Constitutional Republic is under full attack and some very hard times are just ahead.

  4. Now these refugees would be good for the USA as they are hard working farmers and the like. I see smoke over the horizon. I think it is campfires. Better pout extra pickets out tonite. Lock and load.

  5. HuffPost has a (Light Black? Medium Mulatto?) radical writer by the name of Rachel Decoste who routinely insults White Canadians. When Trump was running for President, Decoste published a pic of three white hoods of the KKK. I got to her in Twitter and said that for genocidal motives she was painting self-government as racist. She blocked me after answering two other tweets of mine, but not hits one!

    HuffPost also covertly sanitizes information that does not break their rules, but which they don’t want the public to know about. I triple-checked their rules after a hidden troll over there quietly took a valid, polite, informative comment of mine offline. It had already been published. It contained links to three valid sources proving North American (Soviet) Union is underway, including an article by and a video or two of Gilles Duceppe, “former” Marxist-Leninist-Maoist who headed the unconstitutional federal Bloc Québécois for quite some time. I put the comment and links back up, they took them down, again and again.

  6. any attempt to strip the working class white male of voter rights will mark the second civil war, you Blacks have no idea of your own history, that without help of Blacks in SA the Portuguese and muslim slave traders couldn’t buy them because they couldn’t find them, the Blacks sold by Blacks to others, the current 27 Million Black slaves held by muslims around the world no one speaks of that, and at the peak of Slavery in the US were held by only 1.6% of Americans?, that the first Black slave owner was himself Black? “Anthony Johnson”…and this isntt really a war against Whites as much as it is Christians….it’s odd to me that the blacks in America, support the party of Jim Crow, and the Party of the KKK, and the only party requiring Blacks to join a Democrat Black Caucus? when it was the Very people who fought to end slavery, is the one they hate, and the ,yth the parties switched is laughable, they only switched addresses, not platforms…

Comments are closed.