No products in the cart.

News

Exclusive: Benghazi Hero’s Warning To Democrats To Stop – Kris “Tanto” Paronto

US veteran and private security contractor breaks down left’s attempts to foment a civil war.


Infowars.com
March 25, 2017


[ot-video type=”youtube” url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loaUTjIT7lE”]


Benghazi hero Kris “Tanto” Paronto gives the Democrats a warning that they do not want the violence to continue.


More at INFOWARS


If you believe in the mission of Oath Keepers, to defend the Constitution
against all enemies,  foreign and domestic, please consider making a donation to support our work.   You can donate HERE.

 

0

nancy.larned


6 comments

    1. What about following and ENFORCING the US Constitution? It is the SUPREME contract for all who serves within our governments that we have not changed (or followed completely – which is exactly what we should do next). Or is it because that would require a bit of reading and studying that it is not done.

      Daniel Webster: “We may be tossed upon an ocean where we can see no land – nor, perhaps, the sun or stars. But there is a chart and a compass for us to study, to consult, and to obey. That chart is the Constitution.”

      Patrick Henry: “They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power.”

      WHO does the US Constitution assign the duties to
      — Enforce the US Constitution and all that is in Pursuance thereof it (supreme LAW) and each state’s Constitution (highest Law of the state except in the very rare instances of overlap with the US Constitution which is supreme),
      — Enforce and keep the “Laws of the Union” (which are constitutional laws ONLY),
      — Protect the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
      — “to suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”.

      It assigns those duties to the Militias of the several states because then the arms are in the hands of the people, not in the untrustworthy hands of those who serve within our governments.

      Tench Coxe, Delegate to the Constitutional Convention of 1787: “Who are the militia? are they not ourselves. Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American… The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.”

      Tench Coxe, ‘Remarks on the First Part of the Amendments to the Federal Constitution’, in the Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789, on the Second Amendment where he asserts that it’s the people with arms, who serve as the ultimate check on government: “As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people duly before them, may attempt to tyrannize, AND AS THE MILITARY FORCES WHICH MUST BE OCCASIONALLY RAISED TO DEFEND OUR COUNTRY, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow-citizens, the people are confirmed by the next article in their right to keep and bear their private arms”. (caps are mine. Remember that ALL able-bodied Americans are to be trained as the military is trained, and armed with all military armament.)

      It is that document, the US Constitution, that is supreme, NOT the people who serve within our governments though even most Oath takers who serve do not seem to understand that. That non understanding by many is reinforced by those that serve and want to change our government unlawfully. We have people who serve in agencies that are NOT allowed to exist in our governments, create legislation that is held against the people, and then enforce it, decide guilt or innocence while ignoring that they are the problem.

      Example, the IRS, they act as if they withhold monies from every paycheck LAWFULLY from the people that work – they cannot. they act as if when we decide to withhold OUR money from those that serve within government yet work AGAINST our interests is a crime – it is NOT, etc…

      Samuel Adams, using sarcasm to make a point on May 15, 1764 (Understand that all that he lists is PROTECTED from those who serve within our governments – state and federal – by the US Constitution in writing): “But if our Trade may be taxed why not our Lands? Why not the Produce of our Lands and every thing we possess or make use of? This we apprehend annihilates our Charter Right to govern and tax ourselves… are we not reduced from the Character of free Subjects to the miserable State of tributary slaves?”

      George Washington: ““I think the Parliament of Great Britain hath no more Right to put their hands into my Pocket, without my consent, than I have to put my hands into yours, for money…”

      Thomas Jefferson to Lord North 1775: “That THIS PRIVILEGE OF GIVING OR OF WITHHOLDING OUR MONIES, IS AN IMPORTANT BARRIER AGAINST THE UNDUE EXERTION OF PREROGATIVE, WHICH IF LEFT ALTOGETHER WITHOUT CONTROL, MAY BE EXERCISED TO OUR GREAT OPPRESSION; and all history shews how efficacious is its intercession from redress of grievances, and re-establishment of rights, and how improvident it would be to part with so powerful a mediator.” (caps are mine)

      Those that serve within our governments in all the branches and levels lie and hide things from us, even have “secret courts”, “secret meetings”, etc. This too is not Lawful here within our nation under our LEGITIMATE government.

      Patrick Henry, American colonial revolutionary: “The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them.”

      John Adams, “A Dissertation on the Canon and Feudal Law (1765)”: “Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people, who have a right… and a desire to know; but besides this, they have a right, and indisputable, unalienable, indefeasible, divine right to that most dreaded and envied kind of knowledge, I mean of the characters and conduct of their rulers.”

      WE have duties, not just Oaths; duties that are backed up by those Oaths. WE have obligations to our nation, to the US Constitution, and it is not to go off to foreign lands in wars of aggression for the benefit of corporations, banks, and the higher ranking military of all branches (who would NOT have those positions if we were under our LAWFUL government, but would be serving as the Militia).

      Daniel Webster warned: “Good motives may always be assumed, as bad motives may always be imputed. Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of power; but they cannot justify it, even if we were sure that they existed. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intention, real or pretended. When bad intentions are boldly avowed, the People will promptly take care of themselves. On the other hand, they will always be asked why they should resist or question that exercise of power which is so fair in its object, so plausible and patriotic in appearance, and which has the public good alone confessedly in view? Human beings, we may be assured, will generally exercise power when they can get it; and they will exercise it most undoubtedly in popular Governments, under pretences of public safety or high public interest. It may be very possible that good intentions do really sometimes exist, when Constitutional restraints are disregarded. There are men in all ages who mean to exercise power usefully; but who mean to exercise it. They mean to govern well; but they mean to govern. They promise to be kind masters; but they mean to be masters. They think there need be but little restraint upon themselves. Their notion of the public interest is apt to be quite closely connected with their own exercise of authority. They may not, indeed, always understand their own motives. The love of power may sink too deep in their hearts even for their own scrutiny, and may pass with themselves for mere patriotism and benevolence.” (Daniel Webster, Speech at Niblo’s Saloon in New York (1837)

      Our governments were created to PROTECT the properties of the people, not steal them, not let others steal them, nor to let foreign nations steal them, or agencies, etc.

      They gave us the tools to keep us free and independent. We are where we are today because we do not only not use them, most do not even know they exist, and some even enforce color of law against the people, etc.

      How about that everyone who bothers to read this, start learning what is really expected of them, what their duties are under our LEGITIMATE government.

      Thomas Jefferson: “The true foundation of republican government is the equal right of every citizen in his person and property and in their management.”

      Thomas Jefferson: “A right to property is founded in our natural wants, in the means with which we are endowed to satisfy these wants, and the right to what we acquire by those means without violating the similar rights of other sensible beings.”

      Thomas Jefferson; Batture Case, 1812: “By nature’s law, every man has a right to seize and retake by force his own property taken from him by another, by force of fraud. Nor is this natural right among the first which is taken into the hands of regular government after it is instituted. It was long retained by our ancestors. It was a part of their common law, laid down in their books, recognized by all the authorities, and regulated as to circumstances of practice.”

      Thomas Jefferson: “To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical.”

Comments are closed.