No products in the cart.


Former Nazi…George Soros Now Connected to Every Major Protest Since November Election

The University of California, Berkeley, the self-proclaimed “home of the free speech movement”, on Wednesday night gave conservatives a Nazi style beat-down on Wednesday night.  

Violent far left rioters and goons shut the talk down.

Former Nazi...George Soros Now Connected to Every Major Protest Since November Election


The progressive thugs started fires, assaulted women, beat Trump supporters unconscious, raided ATMs, shot off fireworks and destroyed private property.

Former Nazi...George Soros Now Connected to Every Major Protest Since November Election


Now there is evidence that former Nazi, Democrat donor and Billionaire George Soros was behind the UC Berkeley riots:

The left-wing group that helped organize the violent shut down of the Milo Yiannopoulos event at the University of California, Berkeley on Wednesday is backed by a progressive charity that is in turn funded by George Soros, the city of Tucson, a major labor union and several large companies.

US Berkeley gave an award to George Soros in 2004. In announcing the award the University of California Berkeley reported on Soros’s past as having a “personal experience with fascist and totalitarian regimes”

Might does not make right, and therefore the United States has committed a tremendous mistake in using its military supremacy to force democracy on Iraq. That was the blunt critique of the Bush Administration that billionaire financier and munificent philanthropist George Soros delivered to a packed audience at UC Berkeley last night.


The Hungarian-born Soros, whose personal experience with fascist and totalitarian regimes has informed his decades-long approach to promoting open societies around the world, has now turned his attention on his own adopted democracy. America’s recent foreign policy justifying preemptive strikes — but only those by America — has undermined the legitimacy of U.S. supremacy, Soros said, while the branding of American protesters as unpatriotic undermines the foundations of our democracy.

UC Berkeley reported that UC Berkeley Chancellor Robert M. Berdahl presented Soros with the Chancellor’s Distinguished Honor Award.

The award recognized Soros’s “tireless efforts as a philanthropist,” in particular through his Open Society Institute and other organizations that support projects in areas such as education, public health, and civil-society development.

Soros was also reportedly behind the airport protests last weekend in the US.  A week before that Soros was reportedly behind 50 Groups involved in the ‘Women’s Protests’ the day after the inauguration.  Before that, Soros was connected to the groups demanding election recounts after the November 8th election and Soros money was funding more protests during these efforts.  And DCLeaks released information showing that Soros funded Black Lives Matter protests across the country.

Former Nazi George Soros is connected to every major protest since the election and many, if not all leading up to the election, including Black Lives Matter.

Read more here at:





  1. Soros supplies funds just like Air America provides planes and pilots. Even Soros cant get Police departments to stand down. These protests are run by the same guys who did the work in the rest of the worlds color revolutions. Look at your own description of the anarchist leaders in Operation Hypo and think about it for a minute. Guys with that skill set dont “come over” to globalism/communism. We only do it if we are getting paid.

  2. Soros is a criminal, one who seeks to destabilize countries, wreak havoc and fill his bank account.. He and the other trouble making globalists who want a NWO need to be held accountable for Crimes against Humanity, not given awards.

  3. “… started fires, assaulted women, beat Trump supporters unconscious, raided ATMs, shot off fireworks and destroyed private property.”

    So what is it called when an ORGANIZED group of people use force – actually attacking and hurting Americans, destroying property, etc?

    What do we call those actions being committed from the inside? What does that make Soros? Why is it never, or extremely rarely, named as what those crimes are Treason and *Terrorism?

    *28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.

    Once again, military currently serving, law enforcement, every single time you go against the US Constitution – such as no warrants, third party info, breaking into a persons home, asset forfeiture, spying, etc – you weaken the US Constitution, our legitimate government to which you are REQUIRED to be Oath bound.

    Why else do you think they stopped the constitutionally requirement of the use of warrants? The constitutional requirement that ONLY the Congress can declare war?

    It was NOT to make your job easier, it was to start the erosion of the US Constitution and see if the people would take it, and if they would accept that, what else would they accept in the destruction of our nation? To see if the American people would accept a person in uniform breaking into their house and injuring/killing them.

    To see if they can get you to take food from the hungry, to destroy the last possessions of those who had lost their homes, to take the weapons of the American people, to stop gardens, their use of water, food, etc. IF you keep “just following orders” and/or “just doing your job”, you are doing the same as the other enforcers in Hitler’s Germany, Lenin’s/Stalins Russia, China, etc. They cannot do those things without your compliance.

    It has been accepted so far because the people believed when told these were “dangerous” people. But it has happened so many times that they now KNOW some of those people, and/or their friends/family, and they know it is a lie. Remember, if you cannot do the job constitutionally, then you cannot do the job; not here in the USA, but are good for it in Russia, China, the Saudis, etc. Because that is where those actions against the American people, the US Constitution comes from, people who want to make our nation like those before mentioned, etc.

    No one should have followed a single order from Obama and his administration. He was NEVER a US President. He never met, and still does NOT meet, the three requirements; and fraud got him as a candidate, and there was election fraud in all the states.

    No one who serves in any position in our government should ever follow any presidential/governor – or any other who serves within our governments – unlawful orders.

    No one who SERVES within the US military – if we have any left that is not in the UN – should ever follow an order to attack another country if the Congress has NOT made a declaration of war. Notice that I did not say to stop defending the USA and the American people, that is different. Read and know the document that you are REQUIRED to be Oath bound to. If you, whatever position you serve within, took an Oath to anything but the US Constitution (unless it was an Oath that was a lawful combination) nothing you do here in the USA is lawful.

    Enforcers must decide if they are going to stand for the nation, or still be USED against it. Remember, this is verifiable as it IS all in writing.

    President Andrew Johnson: “Outside of the Constitution we have no legal authority more than private citizens, and within it we have only so much as that instrument gives us. This broad principle limits all our functions and applies to all subjects.”

    Judge Thomas M. Cooley: “Legislators have their authority measured by the Constitution, they are chosen to do what it permits, and NOTHING MORE, and they take solemn oath to obey and support it…To pass an act when they are in doubt whether it does or does not violate the Constitution is to treat as of no force the most imperative obligations any person can assume.”

    US Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 11: “To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water”.

    That means everyone else, all other branches are FORBIDDEN to do so.

    Some things to consider…

    “I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.”

    Officers Oath: “I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

    In all lawful Oaths, the fealty to the US Constitution, your own state’s Constitution comes first. Why? Because it is very difficult to corrupt what is in writing. So if all Oath takers are bound the the supreme law, and the highest law of the state (except when it conflicts with the US Constitution), why are they NOT enforcing those documents FIRST as is required of them?

    Color of law. The appearance or semblance, without the substance, of legal right. Misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because wrongdoer is clothed with authority of state, is action taken under “color of law.” Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, page 241.

    5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office the three branches of our government, the military, all law enforcement, the heads of the States, all federal employees are required to take before assuming office.

    5 U.S.C. 3333 requires the three branches of our government, the military, all law enforcement, the heads of the States, all federal employees sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office.

    18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath of office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1) removal from office and; (2) confinement or a fine.

    5 U.S.C. 7311 explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense for anyone employed in the United States Government to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”.

    The definition of “advocate” is further specified in Executive Order 10450 for the purposes of enforcement supplements 5 U.S.C. 7311. Executive Order 10450 provision specifies it is a violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311 for any person taking the oath of office to advocate “the alteration … of the form of the government of the United States by unconstitutional means.”

    It is important to realize that our form of government is defined by the Constitution of the United States. That according to Executive Order 10450 and 5 U.S. 7311 any act taken by government officials who have taken the oath of office prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 3331 which alters the form of government other then by amendment, is a criminal violation of the 5 U.S.C. 7311.

    Brookfield Construction Company V. Stewart 284 F Sup. 94: “An officer who acts in violation of the constitution ceases to represent the government.”

    18 U.S. Code § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law: Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

    (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 696; Pub. L. 90–284, title I, § 103(b), Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 75; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, § 7019, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4396; Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60006(b), title XXXII, §§ 320103(b), 320201(b), title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1970, 2109, 2113, 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §§ 604(b)(14)(B), 607(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3507, 3511.)
    Summary: Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.

    For the purpose of Section 242, acts under “color of law” include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official’s lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.

    The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.

    God Bless All, Stay Safe

    If there were never intended to be action to defend the Constitution from those who are domestically attempting to destroy its power and authority, why would each Oath require it of those who take the Oaths?

    Chief Tecumseh: “When it comes your time to die, be not like those whose hearts are filled with the fear of death, so that when their time comes they weep and pray for a little more time to live their lives over again in a different way. Sing your death song and die like a hero going home.”

  4. I also asked all my representatives and senators on Twitter if they accepted any monies from Soros backed organisations.

Comments are closed.