Paul Craig Roberts Warns “Only A Counter-Coup Can Save American Democracy” with Comments from NavyJack
The CIA has long engineered coups in other countries. Now we are approaching at breakneck speed a CIA coup in the USA.
When the presstitute media first published unverifired, unsourced leaks attributed to unnamed CIA officials, both the FBI and the Director of Homeland Security said that they did not embrace the accusation that Trump’s election was a result of Russian interference in the US presidential election.
Now suddenly we have a report from the Washington Post, a rag whose integrity is in doubt and a mainstay of anti-Trump propaganda suspected of being a CIA asset, that the FBI and Homeland Security are in agreement with the anonymous leaks to the presstitutes:
“FBI Director James B. Comey and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. are in agreement with a CIA assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election in part to help Donald Trump win the White House, officials disclosed Friday, as President Obama issued a public warning to Moscow that it could face retaliation.
New revelations about Comey’s position could put to rest suggestions by some lawmakers that the CIA and the FBI weren’t on the same page on Russian President Vladimir Putin’s intentions.”
“The positions of Comey and Clapper were revealed in a message that CIA Director John Brennan sent to the agency’s workforce Friday. ‘Earlier this week, I met separately with FBI [Director] James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,’ Brennan said, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message.”
Note, that this claim comes from the CIA. It has not been verified at this time of writing by the FBI and Homeland Security. Indeed, please note that the Washington Post, which is hyping this story of intelligence agency consensus, reports:
“The CIA and the FBI declined to comment on Brennan’s message or on the classified intelligence assessment that CIA officials shared with members of the Senate Intelligence Committee earlier this month, setting off a political firestorm.” In other words, the CIA might be putting words in the mouths of the other intelligence officials.
Note also that Hillary says that Putin interfered against her because he has a grudge against her for her interference in his reelection by fomenting protests against him with the Western-financed Russian NGOs. If what Hillary claims is correct, then any Russian interference, for which proof remains absent, was directed against Hillary in order to settle a score and has nothing to do with any Russian influence over Trump or 200 Internet sites as falsely and maliciously reported by the Washington Post.
All the CIA officials making claims of Russian interference, according to the Washington Post, continue to speak “on the condition of anonymity.”
So we have a coup against the president-elect based solely on unverified, unsourced, anonymous assertions made by the public knows not who.
Read the full article at ZeroHedge.com
Comments from NavyJack
I have always respected the work of Dr. Roberts. This article set off alarm bells for me because it ties into so many other issues currently being hammered by the Main Stream Media (MSM) and known CIA collaborators, including Senators John McCain, Dianne Feinstein and Lindsey Graham:
- Trump keeping private security with significant push back from the Secret Service.
- Shadow organizations being secretly formed by Obama within the DHS, DoD and Dept. of State.
- Trump refusing to personally attend Daily National Security Briefings.
It is now perfectly clear that John Brennan does not intend to leave his position as Director of the CIA quietly. I have personally investigated both sides of the Russia hacking debate. After a thorough review, I am confident that the DNC breach was a leak from a DNC insider. Based on the content of the files released and the date of the actual breach (May 5, 2016), I believe the DNC insider was trying to get information to the public regarding foul-play against Sen. Bernie Sanders’ presidential run by his own party. The John Podesta leak was a simple email phishing attack. Anyone could have done it. The evidence points to a location in Finland or the Netherlands. There is no clear tie to Russia.
It is possible that I am reading too much into this, but the parallels with the incoming Reagan Administration, including day 69 of his presidency, and the issues that John F. Kennedy encountered when he removed Allen Dulles are striking. I will update this article as more information becomes available.