No products in the cart.

News

Paul Craig Roberts Warns “Only A Counter-Coup Can Save American Democracy” with Comments from NavyJack

Source: ZeroHedge.com

The CIA has long engineered coups in other countries. Now we are approaching at breakneck speed a CIA coup in the USA.

When the presstitute media first published unverifired, unsourced leaks attributed to unnamed CIA officials, both the FBI and the Director of Homeland Security said that they did not embrace the accusation that Trump’s election was a result of Russian interference in the US presidential election.

Now suddenly we have a report from the Washington Post, a rag whose integrity is in doubt and a mainstay of anti-Trump propaganda suspected of being a CIA asset, that the FBI and Homeland Security are in agreement with the anonymous leaks to the presstitutes:

“FBI Director James B. Comey and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. are in agreement with a CIA assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election in part to help Donald Trump win the White House, officials disclosed Friday, as President Obama issued a public warning to Moscow that it could face retaliation.
New revelations about Comey’s position could put to rest suggestions by some lawmakers that the CIA and the FBI weren’t on the same page on Russian President Vladi­mir Putin’s intentions.”

“The positions of Comey and Clapper were revealed in a message that CIA Director John Brennan sent to the agency’s workforce Friday. ‘Earlier this week, I met separately with FBI [Director] James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,’ Brennan said, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message.”

Note, that this claim comes from the CIA. It has not been verified at this time of writing by the FBI and Homeland Security. Indeed, please note that the Washington Post, which is hyping this story of intelligence agency consensus, reports:

“The CIA and the FBI declined to comment on Brennan’s message or on the classified intelligence assessment that CIA officials shared with members of the Senate Intelligence Committee earlier this month, setting off a political firestorm.” In other words, the CIA might be putting words in the mouths of the other intelligence officials.

Note also that Hillary says that Putin interfered against her because he has a grudge against her for her interference in his reelection by fomenting protests against him with the Western-financed Russian NGOs. If what Hillary claims is correct, then any Russian interference, for which proof remains absent, was directed against Hillary in order to settle a score and has nothing to do with any Russian influence over Trump or 200 Internet sites as falsely and maliciously reported by the Washington Post.

All the CIA officials making claims of Russian interference, according to the Washington Post, continue to speak “on the condition of anonymity.”

So we have a coup against the president-elect based solely on unverified, unsourced, anonymous assertions made by the public knows not who.

Read the full article at ZeroHedge.com

Comments from NavyJack

I have always respected the work of Dr. Roberts. This article set off alarm bells for me because it ties into so many other issues currently being hammered by the Main Stream Media (MSM) and known CIA collaborators, including Senators John McCain, Dianne Feinstein and Lindsey Graham:

It is now perfectly clear that John Brennan does not intend to leave his position as Director of the CIA quietly. I have personally investigated both sides of the Russia hacking debate. After a thorough review, I am confident that the DNC breach was a leak from a DNC insider.  Based on the content of the files released and the date of the actual breach (May 5, 2016), I believe the DNC insider was trying to get information to the public regarding foul-play against Sen. Bernie Sanders’ presidential run by his own party.  The John Podesta leak was a simple email phishing attack. Anyone could have done it. The evidence points to a location in Finland or the Netherlands. There is no clear tie to Russia.

It is possible that I am reading too much into this, but the parallels with the incoming Reagan Administration, including day 69 of his presidency, and the issues that John F. Kennedy encountered when he removed Allen Dulles are striking.  I will update this article as more information becomes available.

navyjack

0

Navy Jack

During my service I deployed on various platforms, including submarines, amphibious assault units and special boats. I participated in expeditionary and humanitarian missions to the North Atlantic, Iran, Beirut, Libya, and the Caribbean. I am a Patron Life Member of the NRA. I am an Oath Keeper Life Member.

Oath Keepers Merchandise

12 comments

  1. The article laments the lack of proof [ “…the proof remains absent” ], and that “…we have a coup against the president-elect based solely on unverified, unsourced, anonymous assertions made by the public knows not who”.

    I totally agree with the article.

    But then you come along with your comments, claiming that “The evidence points to a location in Finland”, but….you give us no such evidence.
    I would like to ask you…What evidence?

    1. The phishing email contained a link to a website where Podesta was encouraged to change his password. The link directed him to a computer in Finland or the Netherlands with a web address associated with Tokelau, a territory of New Zealand located in the South Pacific. The hackers carefully disguised the link using a service that shortens lengthy online addresses. I have added a link in the body of the article. See http://www.businessinsider.com/new-evidence-shows-hillary-clinton-campaign-chairs-email-was-hacked-in-a-phishing-scheme-2016-10 and http://truepundit.com/cia-washington-post-report-linking-russian-government-to-trump-election-hacking-is-outright-lie/ for more information.

      1. Navy Jack –
        Articles written by authors who write without attributing the details to any source [Business Insider], or who attribute some details to un-named ‘CIA sources’ [True Pundit], are hearsay. Not evidence. Multiple un-named sources may make a story more believable, but doesn’t make it factual.
        Anyway, I’m nitpicking.

  2. Your suspicions are correct. The flood of disinformation, islamic attacks designed to provoke reaction, etc etc etc … We’ll see soon if the “agency” government crosses that line. They have no boundaries at this point.

    Time to have a public ammunition fire sale to disarm the “agency” mercenaries. It is time to reduce by 80% the “agency” employment numbers. That will give pause to how they will suppress a civil up rising should something obviously suspicious happen to Trump. Am sure “they” already thought about that and will attempt to remove Trump prior to or shortly after inauguration.

    We know who are enemy is.

  3. Reading too much into that? No. You’ve been entered on the list of required reading, for this household. Keep on polishing that journalistic chrome Thank You.

  4. Good catch on the article, Navy Jack, and thanks for adding the “evidence” in a comment below the article. I am always glad when (if I do not quote or link evidence) someone asks, that means they are thinking for themselves.

    PC Roberts knows better then to call our legitimate government a “democracy”, that it is a constitutional republic.

    I have said before, and will again, if trump is going to do as he says when he was running, he will need to completely change the personnel guarding him (Secret Service, etc) as they have proven themselves to willingly, and in the open, be a part of the murder of a US President. Research JFK, his brother, his son’s murder though I have posted it many times here and elsewhere.

    Anyone that is going to remove the corruption that is within our nation today has to replace them – and it is his right. I would do it down to those that cook and housekeep, etc. All of th4em are REQUIRED to take Oaths to support and defend the US Constitution, none of them did so (okay, very few).

    Kennedy called upon the people, but they were too naive to understand. He also called for the Militias to be brought back as is constitutionally required, thus in one sweep of preserving the US Constitution as is written, and removing a huge armed group of domestic enemies and traitors who owes their Oath to that document and instead “just followed orders” and “just did their jobs”.

    Everyone says that it would be difficult to restore the US Constitution.but that is not true. Read the presidential Oath, it REQUIRES that all US Presidents PRESERVE, Protect and Defend the US Constitution. By the requirement of that office Trump can, as Ron Paul would have done, PRESERVE the US Constitution and by that requirement wipe out a ton of unlawful, unconstitutional agencies and positions. Since it is in writing, and is our legitimate government nothing that he does that is constitutional, though it would create enemies of the NWO and their minions, it would also be a lawful restoration.

    Yes, that will, if done, cause a ripple throughout the USA, particularly concerning money. But he also has the duty in that restoration to see to it that the legislative branch and judicial branch KEEP their Oaths.

    I made some recommendations to him as to Secret Service, etc replacements. Hopefully all of you who stand for the US Constitution will do the same if he puts his life in danger for us by restoring the US Constitution, we owe him the same. So train on all, hopefully we will be needed, or all else will remain the same.

    God Bless You All, and Stay Safe Everyone!

    Cal
    If there were never intended to be action to defend the Constitution from those who are domestically attempting to destroy its power and authority, why would each Oath require it of those who take the Oaths?

    Chief Tecumseh: “When it comes your time to die, be not like those whose hearts are filled with the fear of death, so that when their time comes they weep and pray for a little more time to live their lives over again in a different way. Sing your death song and die like a hero going home.”

  5. I can’t help but feel that Cal’s Chief Tecumseh challenge is closer than we think. Great work NJ…loved and echo Sarge’s apt description. Keep your enemies close…and God much closer.

  6. And who really gives a crap for democracy…??? This is a REPUBLIC…not a democracy. If we were a democracy, Clinton would have won the presidency. The election rules our founding fathers gave us support the republic and the republic rejected the wicked witch of Washington DC.
    I am getting quite tired of our elected officials throwing that word out with every breath. Seems they don’t even know what form of government we have under the constitution. I do remember the honorable Dr. Ron Paul using the word REPUBLIC quite a bit though. I wish he had been president. It would have saved us from a lot of BS.

    1. Exactly.

      But RP would have faced the same problems of being assassinated by those whose duty it is to protect him, and the replacement of every person who serves within the WH for his, and those he loves, safety.

    2. The word republic means a non-monarchy form of gov’t. Look it up in any dictionary or take a 100 level political science class.

      As the Founding Fathers did not see the wisdom of a direct democracy (think referendums and populism), they did establish a a representative form of democracy where the people choose the society’s decision makers (think electoral college, congress, the PotUS).

      The inent behind a representative form of democracy is to ensure the people have some kind of voice while realizing that the rule of mob is too emotional and impractical for implementation of a direct democracy in the current age.

      Look up the Greek demokratia form of gov’t and compare it to what you read in the constitution… it’s rather enlightening.

  7. Sep 11, 2011 General Wesley Clark: Wars Were Planned – Seven Countries In Five Years

    “This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.” I said, “Is it classified?” He said, “Yes, sir.” I said, “Well, don’t show it to me.” And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, “You remember that?” He said, “Sir, I didn’t show you that memo! I didn’t show it to you!”

    https://youtu.be/9RC1Mepk_Sw

Comments are closed.