No products in the cart.


Judge: US Intelligence Likely Leaked DNC Emails, Not Russians

Disgruntled intel workers were angry that Hillary exposed classified information

Steve Watson | December 14, 2016

While Democrats, sore losers and the butthurt corporate media continue to yell ‘THE RUSSIANS DID IT’ or something… a sane voice noted that it is far more likely that it was in fact people within the US intelligence community who leaked the DNC emails to Wikileaks, which ultimately wound up affecting the election result, so the left would have America believe.

Appearing on Varney and Co., Judge Andrew Napolitano told Stewart Varney that he has a source inside the intelligence community who is adamant that insiders leaked the damning emails to Wikileaks, and the Vladimir Putin and Russia had nothing to do with it.

[ot-video type=”youtube” url=””]

“There is NO EVIDENCE that this was done by the Russians.” Napolitano stated, adding “But there is evidence for this. Who was harmed by Mrs. Clinton’s extremely careless use of state secrets? Whose agents’ lives were jeopardized by her failure to keep these state secrets? The American intelligence community.”

“It is more likely than not that members of the American intelligence community leaked this to Julian Assange than that the Russians did… The suggestion comes from members of the intelligence community.” Napolitano noted.

 Napolitano has made the same claims before, stating that members of the intelligence community simply did not want Hillary Clinton to be President of the United States.

As Infowars reported in November, days before the election, numerous trustworthy sources have claimed that the Podesta hack, which led to Wikileaks releasing tens of thousands of Clinton campaign emails, as well as other hacks targeting the Democratic Party, were the work of U.S. intelligence operatives attempting to save America from a Clinton presidency.

William Binney, NSA whistleblower and former technical head of the NSA, also told Infowars back in August that the email leaks were carried out by individuals within the US intelligence community who were angry at Hillary exposing classified information and sought to take revenge.

“The CIA and FBI examined the exact same data that was produced for them by the NSA.” Napolitano said.


“The CIA analysts said the Russians are behind this. The FBI analysts said there is no evidence that the Russians are behind this. We do know this was leaking. This was not hacking. Leaking is the unauthorized exposure of something to a person to whom it wasn’t intended. Hacking is the altering of an operational system… You can’t affect the outcome of the election if you hack Clinton and the DNC. You can affect the outcome of an election if you affect those who register the voters or count the voters.”

Napolitano’s analysis also dovetails with that of former British ambassador Craig Murray, who was told by security insiders that the email leak “comes from within official circles in Washington DC.”

Read more at: INFOWARS

Image Credits: Brian Klug | Flickr.





  1. Could some one help me out here? Who is Nancy Oakley? Seems she may be on the Trump campaign?
    I must be missing something else also. If Hillary was party to selling nuclear bomb making materials to the Russians, why are they,from what I have heard, that there would be war between the U.S. and Russia if she were to have won? I can understand that Putin would think that if she would sell out her country to possibly annihilate the US that she is most definitely not trust worth in the least, but….. Thanks for you answer in advance.

    1. I am a Founding Associate Member of Oath Keepers since I joined over seven years ago. (Several of us don’t use our real names when we post here. Obviously, Stewart Rhodes knows who we are.) Negative on the Trump campaign and I am not going to attempt to decipher current world politics. I will leave that to others.

      1. Thanks Nancy, I am sorry I had never seen your name come up until Mr. Trump had won the election, and the last few weeks many articles from you.Again thank you for the response.

Comments are closed.