No products in the cart.



homogenizeObama, while in Greece, made a statement warning against the rise of “a crude sort of Nationalism” arising in the U.S. It is not surprising that he said this. He is a Globalist, and therefore rejects Nationalism, as it is the antithesis of Globalism. Globalism seeks to wipe out all borders, all cultural and religious differences, in an effort to create a homogenized World Citizen. It is the battle of the Collective versus the Individual, the tribe, or clan, and the culture of uniqueness that has always been at the center of human existence. The Globalists speak of “inclusiveness”, but to them, “inclusiveness” is homogenization. There is no room for individualism. One size fits all, in their world: One World, One Government, One Army, One Currency, One Religion.

Globalists want to eliminate borders, rather than to respect borders, and the uniqueness of the culture within those borders. Homogenization. How dull.

Gary Franchi, of the Next News Network, has the following video.

[ot-video type=”youtube” url=”″]


Shorty Dawkins



  1. As I have stated before this guy is going to much more damage to freedom after he leaves office.Keep watch…

  2. Barry is against the freedoms that got him into the rainbow house. He is actually out campaigning to be Secretary General of the United Nation; King Obama and his surfs.

  3. Ill take my sense of nationalism over your crude sense of treason any day. Just dry up and blow away like the lump of dog duty that you are. You are irrelevant. Your day as dictator is done. Don’t go away mad…just go away… and don’t come back….ever..!

  4. Quite well said. Would it not be more profitable in defense of the Elite to temporarily and intentionally build a wall in order to contain it, less it spread?? Remember. Technology has outdated rock, stone, concrete, including lead and steel. As, Globalism is Internationalism, Isolationism without Cronyism will kill Nationalism with emphasis on Patriotism towards Individualism. . Depends on a One World Order of good relationships with China, Russia, UK, Europe etc etc.. Sovereign Independence will have to go in one way or another in delight of the Elite. The Elite’s Housework is never complete till all the Individuals who desire (within their hearts) actual “Independence, in which made possible our Constitutional Republic” are either swept up in a dust pan, under the rug, or vacuumed up (after the dusting is done) then disposed of. Perhaps, some desire to acquire the “Good Housekeeping Seal” of approval from the supposed Few (Elite)…It was Obama’s previous and current occupation, executive orders and vocalizations (with Hillary and Soros help) that brought about current election results.

  5. When you “accept” that a person, regardless of color/race/sex/etc is/can be the US President without meeting all three (3) requirements, plus with fraud at both the candidacy level and election level of the process, then your actions and words are going against the US Constitution.

    Obama was never the US President, nor can he ever be one. PERIOD! There are three (3) requirements and he totally missed meeting one (1). Fraud was proven in the courts for BOTH Obama and Hilary Clinton. Then both “Obama” elections were filled in every single US state with Election Fraud.

    /shakes head. Think people. How can you be keeping your Oath if you do not at the very least insist on all THREE requirements being met? How can Election Fraud, etc give someone a position that REPRESENTS the very people, the very nation that the fraud was against? Just because, like much of the treason and terrorism that has been ongoing in our nation, it is being ignored does NOT make him all of a sudden actually lawfully represent the USA, the American people in the position where he is IMPERSONATING a US President. He has NO lawfulness to any agreements he made.


    1. Never mentioned Obama and the word “President” in the same sentence ever.. Made that mistake back during the Daddy Bush, Billy Boy Clinton, then Baby Bush administrations and previously. Johnson, Nixon and Carter..As, Commander – in -chief over my own thoughts of loyalty is unto the Declaration of Independence which paved the way to the original Ten Amendments.

    2. I totally agree Cal. At some point we are going to have to get real with our “domestic enemies”. I only pray we will bring them to true justice in my lifetime. But our children’s will do.

  6. Remember. “Nationalism” can and at times, has been and is currently, the enemy of “Patriotism”. It’s when “Nationalism” merges with “Patriotism” in order to quell Individualism. When many cannot distinguish the variations in definitions of either lest they be merged under false premises of false promises.. Though, it is quite easy to tell as what some will continually die for. I will die for what I believe in eventually, as I continue to bide my time. Should one wonder why a bilge keel is needed in the sea of the living?? On land, most haven’t a clue as to what pumps are in operation.

  7. First it was colonialism verses nationalism. Globalism became a force after WWII with the creation of the United Nations. Now we have globalism verses nationalism. In both cases, it was/is all about who owns and controls the wealth of the land. Do the citizens own the wealth of their nation or do the corporate elite own it? This is most definitely the battle that has and is being fought in the western states of the United States. It is the question of sovereignty and this is exactly the “crude form of nationalism” that Obama is talking about. Crude, he says. But according to the founders of this nation, it is one of our God given rights. One world religion, government and this and that is nothing more than an attempt to manipulate the masses. Here is the bottom line concerning their goal. They intend to own everything and the masses will exist only to serve their needs. It is refreshing to see one of the elites openly describing just what they intend to eliminate from the world; A crude form of nationalism.

  8. In my opinion, the “crude sort of nationalism” that Obama complains about is the people (the governed) pushing against the overreach of government. Ironically, the background of all three Presidential debates was the opening lines of the Declaration of Independence, which neatly summarizes the inherent individual rights of people and the proper role of government. When governments violate these basic political principles, and no longer enjoys “consent of the governed” it is not surprising that a “crude sort of nationalism” arises among the governed.

    The founders’ words are worth reading (and re-reading) in today’s world …

    “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security”

Comments are closed.