No products in the cart.


Malheur Jury Rejects the Thought Police

by Shari Dovale

Thursday’s verdict in the Malheur Protest Trial sent a resounding message to everyone that the citizen’s reject the over reaching tyranny of Federal government.

The trial judge, Anna Brown, and the prosecutors repeatedly told jurors that crimes did not have to take place. All they were to determine is if the defendants had held a conversation about committing a crime.

Straight out of George Orwell’s 1984.

You no longer have to actually commit a crime, you just have to think about it, and maybe discuss it with someone, to be charged.

The trial had been stacked against the defendants from the beginning. The judge repeatedly ruled against them, beginning during jury selection. Allowing people into the jury pool that had obvious ties to the prosecution and rejecting anyone that might be sympathetic to the defense.

One juror was seated that had been a former employee of the very organization that was central to the charges in this case. Judge Anna Brown denied the requests of defense to remove the former BLM employee for bias stating that she felt he could be impartial. That decision came back to haunt her this week when the jury questioned this man’s bias in a inquiry to the court.

Can a juror, a former employee of the Bureau of Land Management, who opens their remarks in deliberations by stating ‘I am very biased …’ be considered an impartial judge in this case?

Brown made every attempt to keep this man on the jury before Marcus Mumford filed a motion addressing that very point. Brown was forced to replace him with an alternate juror.

When the deliberations began again on Thursday, it only took about 5 hours for the unanimous verdicts of Not Guilty to be announced. The jury rejected the government’s plan to hold people accountable for their perceived thoughts without ever actually committing a crime.

The jury must have seen the dangerous precedent this would have set for our country. No one wants to be charged for crimes they did not commit, but it is even worse to be charged for crimes that the government admits did not happen.

The repeated statements throughout the trial that this case was not about committing crimes but only about talking about it, was as scary to the jury as it was to the rest of the Nation.

Truth and Justice prevailed this week in Portland! The US Constitution triumphed!

The Federal government was sent a very clear message from ‘We The People.’

Not Guilty





  1. I hope that message also tells Gov’t that ‘We don’t believe you, we don’t trust you, you no longer have any credibility with us, the people’.

  2. All militias and patriot groups must be very disciplined in their contact with the press and conversations taking place in official meetings. This trial is a warning as to the tactic the feds will use in the future. The Fed will keep going to the well until they are successful. Once the precedence is established they will attack any and all patriot groups who are undisciplined in their rhetoric.

  3. They were found not guilty, but the federal marshals didn’t hesitate to take down Mr. Mumford and taze him after being told by the Judge to step back. Mr. Mumford was still defending his client, who judge sent back to jail. Shameful and frightening. The feds will continue to push the envelope. We still have patriots awaiting trial. They are in our prayers.

  4. The verdict is not a victory, its justice. This is how things should be. Now. Moving on. What about the traffic stop that resulted in Mr. Finicum dying? Ballistics? Contents of truck? Damage to the truck? All audio and video evidence? Where is all that in the legal process?

    Any word on the legal results of all the other Malheur protestors?

    The whole darn thing started over the Hammond’s excessively harsh treatment and federal land grabs. How are the Hammond’s doing? How’s the BLM?

    The sharp family has been picked apart.

    Even before the Snowden leak, it would have been realistic to deduce that all persons involved will be on a watch list. Is there anyone looking into possible 4th amendment violations?

    The Bundys still have a long road ahead of them. Now they have to exhaust countless more money and time in another legal battle.

    Oh, and what about the NATIVE Americans who were/are protesting a pipeline? No word on the protection of their rights……

    I don’t write this as a “what are OKs doing??!!!?” rant post, and am by no means saying they have not done a lot. I just write this as a reflection of questions I have, that in my opinion should be kept at the forefront of any patriotic mind.

    Lavoy deserves justice, as do the Hammonds, and millions of Americans who lose rights to their land daily. The liberal minions may be as dumb as dildos, but their top leadership is not. They are a Machiavellian group, highly educated, well funded, and are not playing checkers.

    1. “What about the traffic stop that resulted in Mr. Finicum dying?”

      What “traffic stop”? They had two roadblocks in place before the trip was started by Finicum and all, even to having a drone there, and police, feds, mercs – snipers, etc already in place. Please do not let those that serve within our government control the narrative, and put descriptive words in your mouth and mind like “traffic stop” when this was an out and out pre planned roadblock of American citizens traveling to a pre arranged meeting with a Sheriff that kept his Oath.

      Pre planned and arranged murder is always First Degree Murder, and at times other crimes, and it matters not if it is a presidential impersonator and judges that commit it or governmental agents/”cops”/etc. But because this was done to change our legitimate government and to put fear into the minds of Americans it is TREASON and *TERRORISM first and foremost.

      *28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.

      Open note to all currently serving LE’s, military – do NOT allow yourself to be used by those traitors and domestic enemies that serve within our governments. That makes YOU a criminal at the least, and quite likely a traitor and *terrorist. Think about it, what is their objectives? That no one will be allowed to own anything. Is that what YOU want, to not be able to own anything? Not just property, anything. Think about it, research it.

      Thomas Jefferson: “For a people who are free, and who mean to remain so, a well organized and armed militia is their best security.” That is because a militarized (armed) force, be they called law enforcement or military are ALWAYS throughout history USED. LE’s how many weapons of war does your department have? Military, has the congress declared war? Then there is NO LAWFUL way for those corrupt, treasonous scum has any lawful authority to send you anywhere, to order you to fight anywhere. Read the Bill of Rights, if only the congress can declare war – and that is true – then those that are ordering you to war are working against our legitimate government.

      James Madison: “The power to declare war, including the power of judging the causes of war, is fully and exclusively vested in the legislature … the executive has no right, in any case, to decide the question, whether there is or is not cause for declaring war.”

      George Washington: “The constitution vests the power of declaring war in Congress; therefore no offensive expedition of importance can be undertaken until after they shall have deliberated upon the subject and authorized such a measure.”

      James Madison: “In time of actual war, great discretionary powers are constantly given to the Executive Magistrate. Constant apprehension of War, has the same tendency to render the head too large for the body. A standing military force, with an overgrown Executive will not long be safe companions to liberty. The means of defence against foreign danger, have been always the instruments of tyranny at home. Among the Romans it was a standing maxim to excite a war, whenever a revolt was apprehended. Throughout all Europe, the armies kept up under the pretext of defending, have enslaved the people.”

      James Madison: “Of all the enemies to public liberty war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded, because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes; and armies, and debts, and taxes are the known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few. In war, too, the discretionary power of the Executive is extended; its influence in dealing out offices, honors, and emoluments is multiplied: and all the means of seducing the minds, are added to those of subduing the force, of the people. The same malignant aspect in republicanism may be traced in the inequality of fortunes, and the opportunities of fraud, growing out of a state of war, and in the degeneracy of manners and of morals, engendered by both. No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare.”

      God Bless All, and Stay Safe

      If there were never intended to be action to defend the Constitution from those who are domestically attempting to destroy its power and authority, why would each Oath require it of those who take the Oaths?

      Chief Tecumseh: “When it comes your time to die, be not like those whose hearts are filled with the fear of death, so that when their time comes they weep and pray for a little more time to live their lives over again in a different way. Sing your death song and die like a hero going home.”

      1. I’m a believer in innocent until proven guilty. They call it a road block. OK, fine. A roadblock can be called into question, in front of a judge and jury. If evidence is put forth that shows there was murder, then the shooter(s) should be sentenced. If evidence is put forth that any person upward in the command chain was in collusion, they should be sentenced.

        Crime is not pretty, wether it’s meth getting sold to kids, arson, child porn, murder, rape, treason, etc.. Depriving Americans of their rights is a crime.

        We the people definitely deserve to hear the truth, and that did not come from horrible drone footage, or garbled phone audio. Seriously, how much did the taxpayers pay for that drone? I’ve seen better drone footage from high school football games…with audio.

        It’s obvious that drone was not specifically designed for surveillance. It wasn’t armed was it?

        Take it to trial!

Comments are closed.