No products in the cart.


Ark Midnight: J B Wells: AmeriGEDDON With Gary Heavin

Jason Van Tatenhove and Stewart Rhodes have harpooned each torpedo the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has fired at Oath Keepers in previous articles. (Click those links for their articles.) Consequently, SPLC is stymied, left with no legs on which to stand.

So why shouldn’t I cut SPLC a bit of slack and give them some more ammo to fire at Oath Keepers, just to show we’re good sports, yes?

A quick way to increase their pulse and blood pressure is simply to publish an article on the mother of all conspiracy-theory movies, AmeriGEDDON. As soon as they see this article, especially on this particular site, SPLC will feel reinvigorated, recommitted to exposing Oath Keepers as a “conspiratorial” “anti-government” “extremist” organization. The way SPLC uses such terms is meant to imply that Oath Keepers bases our “Ten Orders We Shall Not Obey” on far-fetched anti-government fantasies, such as “theories” of a major kidnapping of our American government by conspiratorial globalists. SPLC taunts when we speak of martial law, or a police state, or a surveillance state, or a Technocracy jab backed by the TriLateral Commission, or a military-industrial complex which nurses Wall Street and is backed by the Federal Reserve.  And most recently, SPLC has even published the accusation that Oath Keepers as an organization is guilty of sedition.

As Jason and Stewart have thoroughly debunked all the SPLC’s previous claims (which are packed with defamation, ridicule, libelous lies), I now fear the SPLC may give up with their attacks on Oath Keepers and quit the game and go manufacture their next new victim organization, painting their target with trumped-up charges of “extremism”.  While that would lighten my workload to some degree, it also would take a lot of fun out of my job as editor here. It of course works against our fun in revealing their lies to readers everywhere, so in that odd way I propose to let Mark Potok discover on Oath Keepers’ national website the trailer for the Mike Norris / Gary Heavin film,  AmeriGEDDON.

[ot-video type=”youtube” url=””]


And for even more fun, here is John B. Wells of Ark-Midnight (sister show with Caravan To Midnight) hosting Gary Heavin, the producer of this Mike Norris film. Mr. Wells is right in there with Mr. Heavin, who lays out *why* he wanted to do this film — and that is going to rub SPLC’s fur against the grain, for sure.  Martial law in the wake of an EMP, with allusions to an authoritarianism of the United Nations which is backed by the military force of government. Mr. Heavin lays a lot of cards on the table for Mr. Wells, so kick back and dig on this peak episode by John B. Wells. Under this video I’ll paste in the info which I found under the YouTube host of this film — it will link to where you can buy your copy of the film as well as where one may sign up with John B. Wells’ radio operation. My opinion of John B. Wells? Easy to answer — he’s the finest late night show host operating in America today. Er, make that read, “tonight”.

[ot-video type=”youtube” url=””]

Published on Aug 28, 2016

Our guests today:

Gary Heavin

He joins us to discuss the incredible feedback of their movie –

Buy Amerrigedon the full movie here:…

Subscribe to the John B Wells show on Caravan to Midnight today for the truth behind the headlines – Only $5 per month.

We are sensitive to the expectations of our audience and remain faithful to our mandate to provide educational, cultural and informational programs independent of commercial obligations or influence.…

Former Host of Coast To Coast AM John B Wells is now in control on Caravan To Midnight & Ark Midnight

Copyright – Caravan To Midnight Inc, Any re-uploading of this video without expressed written permission will be subject to copyright claim.


Elias Alias, editor


Elias Alias

Editor in Chief for Oath Keepers; Unemployed poet; Lover of Nature and Nature's beauty. Slave to all cats. Reading interests include study of hidden history, classical literature. Concerned Constitutional American. Honorably discharged USMC Viet Nam Veteran. Founder, TheMentalMilitia.Net



  1. The fact the obummer has given the keys to the internet to the UN is going to come home real quick.Communication like the one here on Oathkeepers site will be restricted and the beginning of Amerigeddon will no doubt begin.I have a radio that can talk the length of this country at times.I can still communicate ,but most speech will become none existent as the UN will shut down sites that communicate things like what Thomas Jefferson said.You can expect the beginning to of the worst of times now that World wide Communication is in the hands of thugs from the UN .Dictators.will have the web.

    1. “The fact the obummer has given the keys to the internet to the UN …”

      Part of the problem is that everyone seems to act as if the presidential IMPERSONATOR actually had/has any lawful authority; but the bulk of the problem is that there IS NO ONE WHO SERVES WITHIN OUR GOVERNMENTS THAT HAS/HAD ANY AUTHORITY TO GIVE THE INTERNET, or anything else to any foreign nation foreign entity, foreign person, foreign group, etc. That act is just another TREASON that will be ignored.

      The first thing that people have to start being vocal about is that since Obama did NOT meet all three requirements to be a US president. The second thing is that there was Election Fraud that was used to PLACE HIM INTO THAT POSITION both “elections”. Nothing he and this administration have done is lawful or binding on the American people, the USA.

      Understand that since they have been doing misappropriation of funds for decades means that all who still are alive can have LAWFULLY everything they have taken from them when they are found guilty.

  2. Now that the democratic National Convention headquarters has been hacked ,they are saying the voting machines in a couple of states.I think the democrats will use this to post UN troops or watchers at every voting place and steal the election that they know they can not win with only 27% voters and that number includes the illegal voters that will be voting like the dead that votes every election.I am sick and tired of the Communist running our US elections.I suggest that during Nov that Oath Keepers post their own at each voting place to counter the possibility of thievery at the polls.I live in a strong democratic county.The thing is there is only about 5000 Dem voters in a 65,000 people County.The numbers alone suggest thievery in every election.The clerks of Court are always Democrat.The votes are counted by the Clerk of Court in each county.There is no real way to count votes from voting day by 11:00 the nite of voting.The Associated Press calling the election every election is wrong and of course impossible for them to do it without cheating or just simply electing a person by the decision rather than the vote.Our system sucks in every way possible when it comes to how the two parties control the vote that is in no way Democratic.

      1. We could organize a method to have UN troops arrested as foreign spies. Shot by firing squad. I’ll clear my schedule.

  3. No person who serves within our government can make laws/regulations/codes/treaties (w/US President)/etc except for those that serve within the House of Representatives and the Senate (actually named within Article 1, Section 1) that are binding on the American people, the USA.

    As for treaties, they take BOTH Senate, the Us President and they MUST be in Pursuance of the US Constitution or they are NOT binding on our nation, the American people. They are representatives ONLY when they take and KEEP the Oath, and do their duties as constitutionally assigned.

    Those things mentioned can only happen if those serving within military, law enforcement agencies follow unlawful, unconstitutional orders making themselves Traitors and *Terrorists to/against the American people, the US Constitution, our nation.

    *28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.

    Thomas Jefferson: “In giving to the President and Senate a power to make treaties, the Constitution meant only to authorize them to carry into effect, by way of treaty, any powers they might constitutionally exercise.”

    Thomas Jefferson: “Surely the President and Senate cannot do by treaty what the whole government is interdicted from doing in any way.”

    Thomas Jefferson: “According to the rule established by usage and common sense, of construing one part of the instrument by another, the objects on which the President and Senate may exclusively act by treaty are much reduced, but the field on which they may act with the sanction of the Legislature is large enough; and I see no harm in rendering their sanction necessary, and not much harm in annihilating the whole treaty-making power, except as to making peace.”

    John Jay, in Federalist 64, says that treaties relate to “war, peace, and to commerce” and to the promotion of “trade and navigation”.

    Madison, in Federalist 42, says treaties also relate to sending and receiving ambassadors and consuls and to commerce.”

    Alexander Hamilton: “… a treaty cannot be made which alters the Constitution or which infringes any express exceptions to the power of the Constitution of the United States.”

    Alexander Hamilton, concerning the supremacy clause, in Federalist 33 said that: “It will not, I presume, have escaped observation that it expressly confines the supremacy to laws made pursuant to the Constitution.”

    Alexander Hamilton: “There is no position which depends on clearer principles that that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid.”

    1. CAL, I mean no disrespect, but you write these(they have no right under the Constitution) pieces and yet still still keep doing it. I have been waiting brother for a long time for you to give me some meat on what I can do, who I can connect with that will take these illegal congress critters out. HELP!!! And really is there any thing we can do to keep the internet with a free flo of info to the masses? Need some solid answers
      for the Republic CB

      1. No offense taken.

        The US Constitution tells us how to enforce it and each state’s Constitution, the laws of the land, hold those that serve within our governments accountable, etc. It is important to all to know that there is NO position within our governments – state or federal – that was given any authority to call for “emergency powers” or to declare “martial law”. Those are just open declarations of treason and the intent to use *terrorism against the American people.

        28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.

        Second Amendment is not under the authority of any who serve within our governments. WE retained that authority and it just clarifies this for those that serve.

        Each state’s Militia is made up of “We the People” protecting our own interests, homes, states, nation, and enforcing our governments. The Militia has as its constitutionally assigned duties to:
        — Enforce the US Constitution (Supreme law of this nation) and each state’s Constitution (Highest law of the state),
        — Enforce and keep the “Laws of the Union” (which are constitutional laws ONLY),
        — Protect the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
        — “to suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”.

        Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15: “To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel invasions.“

        But the US Constitution requires that each militia person (EVERY able -bodied person over age 16) be trained as the congress requires the military to be trained and they must be educated in the US Constitution and their own state’s Constitution because that is who they are bound to even when working under a governor or presidents orders. This way if there is a corrupt official one knows and refuses to follow those orders. Stewart and Elias can tell you more about how this is organized. As long as the Militias is trained as required and they keep that Oath they have the full backing of our legitimate government – the US Constitution and their state Constitution. I believe that because veterans of all ages are already half way there as the Militia that those that serve within our governments are REQUIRED to use for those items listed is why vets are under attack.

        Think about it, when there is enough Militia for them to use they are FORBIDDEN in writing to use any other agency other them the Militia for those purposes. That really screws things up for those domestic enemies and traitors to the US Constitution. Plus then they can also be lawfully charged (actually already can) and then prosecuted for their crimes.

        George Washington, “Sentiments on a Peace Establishment”, letter to Alexander Hamilton; “The Writings of George Washington”: “It may be laid down, as a primary position, and the basis of our system, that every citizen who enjoys the protection of a free government…, but even of his personal services to the defence of it, and consequently that the Citizens of America (with a few legal and official exceptions) from 18 to 50 Years of Age should be borne on the Militia Rolls, provided with uniform Arms, and so far accustomed to the use of them, that the Total strength of the Country might be called forth at Short Notice on any very interesting Emergency.”

        When working for the state or federal government it is a paid position, and I believe a long time ago that Stewart, Elias had come up with a way for the training to also be paid (??) for those that never served in the military. So that no one person is tied up with Militia duties (except when paid) disrupting their lives, all rotate. Etc.

        Clause 16 tells what duties those that serve within the federal and state governments have to the Militia.

        Clause 16: “To provide for organizing, arming and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress”.

        Understand that those veterans in your state (if you need training) have already been trained, and that if you have a traitor or domestic enemy or a “dumbed down” governor, etc they can train you as is lawfully required in the way that congress requires the military to be trained. The US Constitution and your state Constitution you can do yourself or with others.

        Probably if you wish there are many sites, free classes, books, lectures (Dr. Vieira) is one who has all of those things available; and there are others. Use more then one viewpoint then figure out how you believe it is. I am always up for an “argument” to prove my view because that challenges me to think, learn, to provide evidence to myself and others that I am basing what I believe on facts, etc.

        A decent start is with the US Constitution itself, Vieira’s stuff (meaning writings, videos, lectures – somewhere I have the links if you cannot find them here or at TMM . Every one has different learning styles so am going to provide links to different things for you to peruse if you wish.


        Understand that the US Constitution did not/does not just assign or remove duties to federal and state governments but also assigned the people their duties, PROTECTED the people’s natural rights in writing FROM those that serve within our governments and made it clear that we retained much of our own authority and power, natural rights, in the Ninth and Tenth Amendments.

        Amendment 9: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

        Amendment 10: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

        Examples of this is that the Militia is not under either the federal or state governments, even though they are REQUIRED to use them. The Grand Jury, Grand Jury Investigations, Juries are all ours, and NOT under governmental authority. WE can call forth a grand jury, or an investigation. They are OUR tools and NOT under the jurisdiction of any branch of government. See why our country is in a mess? WE have not done OUR duties.

        Grand Jury – “The grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right. In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people”.
        “Thus, citizens have the unbridled right to empanel their own grand juries and present “True Bills” of indictment to a court, which is then required to commence a criminal proceeding. Our Founding Fathers presciently thereby created a “buffer” the people may rely upon for justice, when public officials, including judges, criminally violate the law.” (Misbehavior, “Good Behaviour” requirement)
        “The grand jury is an institution separate from the courts, over whose functioning the courts do not preside, we think it clear that, as a general matter at least, no such “supervisory” judicial authority exists. The “common law” of the Fifth Amendment demands a traditional functioning grand jury.”
        “Although the grand jury normally operates, of course, in the courthouse and under judicial auspices, its institutional relationship with the judicial branch has traditionally been, so to speak, at arm’s length. Judges’ direct involvement in the functioning of the grand jury has generally been confined to the constitutive one of calling the grand jurors together and administering their oaths of office. The grand jury’s functional independence from the judicial branch is evident both in the scope of its power to investigate criminal wrongdoing, and in the manner in which that power is exercised.”
        “The grand jury ‘can investigate merely on suspicion that the law is being violated, or even because it wants assurance that it is not.’ It need not identify the offender it suspects, or even “the precise nature of the offense” it is investigating. The grand jury requires no authorization from its constituting court to initiate an investigation, nor does the prosecutor require leave of court to seek a grand jury indictment. And in its day-to-day functioning, the grand jury generally operates without the interference of a presiding judge. It swears in its own witnesses and deliberates in total secrecy.”
        “Recognizing this tradition of independence, we have said the 5th Amendment’s constitutional guarantee presupposes an investigative body ‘acting independently of either prosecuting attorney or judge”
        “Given the grand jury’s operational separateness from its constituting court, it should come as no surprise that we have been reluctant to invoke the judicial supervisory power as a basis for prescribing modes of grand jury procedure. Over the years, we have received many requests to exercise supervision over the grand jury’s evidence-taking process, but we have refused them all. “it would run counter to the whole history of the grand jury institution” to permit an indictment to be challenged “on the ground that there was incompetent or inadequate evidence before the grand jury.” (Nor would it be lawful of them to do so.) Justice Antonin Scalia writing for the majority said In the Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, 112 S.Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L.Ed.2d 352 (1992) (end quote)

        There is a LAWFUL and constitutional way to bring our nation back inline with where it is supposed to be. But we must do our duties. When those who are charged with crimes are to be arrested, that is where I figure that there might be problems. BUT, because they will have been charged or are being charged with a crime(or crimes) the American people will be behind it. They recognize the corruption, the fraudulent elections, but they now need to be shown the LAWFUL way of enforcement.

        I believe that the Militia duties will at first fall mostly on those who are willing. But once fines are lawfully charged for those who do not wish to serve and train.

        Hope this answers your question.

        Richard Henry Lee, 1788, Initiator of the Declaration of Independence, and member of the first Senate, which passed the Bill of Rights: “Whereas, to preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them; nor does it follow from this, that all promiscuously must go into actual service on every occasion. The mind that aims at a select militia, must be influenced by a truly anti-republican principle; and when we see many men disposed to practice upon it, whenever they can prevail, no wonder true republicans are for carefully guarding against it.”

        Thomas Jefferson: “A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun, therefore, be the constant companion of your walks.”

        President Andrew Johnson: “Outside of the Constitution we have no legal authority more than private citizens, and within it we have only so much as that instrument gives us. This broad principle limits all our functions and applies to all subjects.”

        Everyone in this nation is required to have a chance to defend themselves by a jury trial, that does include traitors, those we do not like, etc EVERYONE. That is why secret prisons, secret arrests, secret murders, and secrets from ANTONE who serves within our governments are not allowed to be withheld from the people.

        God Bless All, and Stay Safe!

        If there were never intended to be action to defend the Constitution from those who are domestically attempting to destroy its power and authority, why would each Oath require it of those who take the Oaths?

        Chief Tecumseh: “When it comes your time to die, be not like those whose hearts are filled with the fear of death, so that when their time comes they weep and pray for a little more time to live their lives over again in a different way. Sing your death song and die like a hero going home.”

Comments are closed.