No products in the cart.

News

NavyJack – The Marxist Takeover of the United States

In my earlier article titled “Understanding the Campaign to Destabilize the United States”, I detailed how the United Nations is sincerely looking forward to becoming the central committee of the “New World Order”.  Yesterday, the United Nations issued the following statements after this week’s deaths of Philando Castile in Minnesota and Alton Sterling in Louisiana “at the hands” of the police:

“The Working Group is outraged and strongly condemns the new police killings of two African- American men. These killings which were captured on video cannot be ignored. We call for prompt independent investigations to ensure the perpetrators are prosecuted and punished.”

And;

“Excessive use of force by the police against African Americans in the United States is a regular occurrence. African Americans are reportedly shot at more than twice the rate of white people. The Working Group is monitoring the situation and has repeatedly expressed its concern to the United States Government about police killings of African Americans and called for justice. The Working Group is convinced that the root of the problem lies in the lack of accountability for perpetrators of such killings despite the evidence.  The killings also demonstrate a high level of structural and institutional racism. The United States is far from recognizing the same rights for all its citizens. Existing measures to address racist crimes motivated by prejudice are insufficient and have failed to stop the killings. It is time, now, for the US Government to strongly assert that Black lives matter and prevent any further killings as a matter of national priority.”

These statements from the United Nations are intended to encourage and sanction more protests/riots by Black Lives Matter members.  This interference completely oversteps the mission of the UN organization. At this point there can be no doubt as to the goal of the UN with regard to the destabilization of our country through the use of racist allegations and divisive rhetoric.  Please take a moment to listen to the following Infowars report detailing the UN involvement in the Black Lives Matter movement and their plan to overthrow the United States of America:

Alex Jones breaks down the plan to destabilize America and bring in UN control

As I stated in my earlier article, members of the Black Lives Matter movement believe they will be the recipients of some long overdue reward for the past mistreatment of their race and be able to live in a new balkanized urban society that is not governed by white devils and thuggish white police officers.  While this goal will never be achieved, the Globalist puppet-masters orchestrating their efforts could really care less. The Globalists are using identity politics and racism to generate unrest, protests and riots. Many people believe that the goal is to enable the President to declare a state of national emergency.  Although the declaration would have no constitutional foundation, the pleas from the public to stem the violence may be enough to quell any wide-spread dissent. Once emergency powers are implemented on a national scale, there is no turning back. Again, many people believe that allowing the President and the Executive Branch to have unlimited power and suspend the Constitution has been the goal all along. There really is no other way to achieve the “New World Order” vision of a totalitarian central committee. Should these events come to pass, there is ample reason to believe that in the end, the United Nations will also be swept aside by the Globalists, leaving only a small body of fascist dictators behind to govern the survivors of the “fundamental transformation” of our nation.

As of today, there have been 612 people killed by police officers in 2016. Of these, 145 were black.  There has been no dedicated 24/7 national media attention on any of these “Black Lives Matter” cases. In fact, the last time CNN, FoxNews and MSNBC all dedicated 24/7 coverage to an individual killed by the police or while in police custody was following the deaths of Freddie Gray in April 2015 and Sandra Bland in July 2015.   It is difficult to believe that it is a coincidence that this most recent unrest has been generated less than two weeks before the Republican and Democratic National Conventions.  Please review my previous articles on the protests planned for the Republican and Democratic National Conventions for additional information:

https://oathkeepers.org/navyjack-hacked-messages-discuss-the-plan-for-a-black-lives-matter-summer-of-chaos-leading-to-martial-law/

https://oathkeepers.org/navyjack-cleveland-a-city-in-the-crosshairs/

https://oathkeepers.org/protests-and-preparations/

0

Navy Jack

During my service I deployed on various platforms, including submarines, amphibious assault units and special boats. I participated in expeditionary and humanitarian missions to the North Atlantic, Iran, Beirut, Libya, and the Caribbean. I am a Patron Life Member of the NRA. I am an Oath Keeper Life Member.

Oath Keepers Merchandise

17 comments

  1. Well, why doesn’t the UN implement top down, centralized, authoritarian, command and control over every teeny weeny, last, little aspect of our lives? That should fix it.

    But why does the constitution need to be destroyed? The Constitution of the United States is, by way of fact, void. I don’t want it to be this way, I’m not advocating for this state of affairs we find ourselves in, but tough, here we are. The gov ignores it, the people have never read it, and our “leaders” do whatever they want. The nations constitutional law schools don’t even review it. I swore an oath to uphold the constitution but it is now null and void. We need to face this fact and proceed accordingly. We are obligated to throw off these chains. A contract that nobody has read and nobody follows in no contract at all. The rule of law is dead.

    1. “The gov ignores it, the people have never read it, and our “leaders” do whatever they want. The nations constitutional law schools don’t even review it. I swore an oath to uphold the constitution but it is now null and void. We need to face this fact and proceed accordingly. We are obligated to throw off these chains. “”A contract that nobody has read, and nobody follows, is no contract at all. The rule of law is dead”.

      Well said..VERY WELL SAID……
      So when does purposefully coordinated UNITY for a plan of logistically sound and supported action begin to to take shape? When does the vision manifest itself at least on the horizon?

      “Silence in the face of tyranny, is your consent to that tyranny”

      1. I am with you. Every year the United States funds the United Nations with 80 billion plus of our tax payers monies! That has got to stop. We should move the UN to Mexico or Cuba and get their corrupt values out of site.

    2. I’ve read the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence
      …But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object envinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government and to provide new guards for their future security. Such has been the patient suffering of We the People; and such is now the necessity which constrains us to alter our former systems of Government. The history of this present government is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over We the People. To prove this, let the facts be submitted to a candid world.

      They have refused to secure the borders of our nation, and enforce existing immigration law. Opening us up to invasion by stealth of peoples hostile to our nation’s security, and bringing in infectious diseases once eradicated from these lands.

      They have created legislation, forcing us to purchase a product from an insurance corporation, under duress. Of which failure to do so begets forfeiture of monies and or wages. A clear example of the merger of state and corporate powers.

      They have removed us from the Gold Standard and onto a fiat monetary system. A clear violation of Article 1 section 10.

      They have created “gun laws”, the restriction of firearms to protect our nation, sovereignty, and posterity. A clear violation of Ex Post Facto, as outlined in Article 1 Section 9 & 10, and the Second Amendment

      They have allowed warrantless surveillance of all of The People’s electronic information. A clear violation of the Fourth Amendment.

      They have imposed taxes upon us without our consent. E.g. The income tax. Which ties in with the following.

      They have sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance. In the form of asset forfeiture and wage garnishment.

      They have excited domestic insurrections amongst us, through racial division and the Black Lived Matter movement. Shedding the blood of the innocent.

      In every stage of these oppressions, we have petitioned for a redress of grievances. Utilizing platforms like whitehouse.gov
      Of which said petitions of either fallen upon deaf ears, or have outright been mocked and rejected

      My fellow Americans, feel free to ad to this list as it is by no means all inclusive of what we have suffered. The tragedy that came upon the noble patriot Lavoy Finnicum is hard for me to categorize to the Tee

      Thank you and God bless

      1. It does cause you to consider that we may no longer part of a nation guided by our Constitution but instead, segments of a vast CORPORATION ruled by a board of directors.

  2. The media is on the agenda to be controlled as well. The internet will be censored, the national broadcast networks are already infiltrated with anti-Americans setting the message, all conservative media will be shut down and the only news will be state regulated media – as in the globalist UN ran media.

    Now comes the push for a national police force to fall in line with the current mercenaries within the federal agencies that are militarized.

    The push for civil unrest is escalating. As it happens, the federal sanctioned “emergency” tools will be deployed. No amount of talk will reverse the impending plan. The Clintonesque approach to destroy enemies as we saw with LeVoy is just the tip of the iceberg of coming events. The simple fact that there was very little outrage in the media and public should be an all eyes opened moment.

  3. @ Fred; “I swore an oath to uphold the constitution but it is now null and void. We need to face this fact and proceed accordingly. We are obligated to throw off these chains.”

    The US Constitution is not “null and void’. What you are saying is that YOU, yourself, is willing to be a Oath breaker. That is a personal decision all makes at one time or another. You see, if you were keeping and following your Oath you would be figuring out what must be done while saving most of the American people as can be saved. Honor is something one must do when there is no one watching to see if it is kept. That is the American way. That is why integrity has to be destroyed to be able to destroy our nation.

    I applaud you for openly declare to all that you are forswearing your Oath publicly, but wonder why you would so so at a site where so many are willing to put all on the line for that document? Here is a bit of education on the Government of the USA just in case it is ignorance that is causing you to declare so.

    What are the three branches of the American government? If you answered legislative, executive, and judicial branches you are part of the problem. Those are the divisions placed within the both the general (federal) and state governments.

    The three branches of the USA are;

    First Branch – “We the people…” and that excludes all who serve within our governments for the time of service. That branch delegated the authority that both the state and federal governments are allowed to use. It did NOT delegate all of its authority, retaining much such as being the lawful and constitutional *enforcement arm for both state and federal governments. That is why all the people are constitutionally required to arm and train as the congress requires the military to be trained.

    They are the Militia that both those that serve within the state governments and those that serve within the federal governments are constitutionally REQUIRED to use. this is in writing,, and it is found within the US Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15. Clause 16 delineates the duties those that serve within the state governments and those that serve within the federal governments are constitutionally REQUIRED to do FOR the Militias. The Militia has as its constitutionally assigned duties to:
    — Enforce the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution,
    — Enforce and keep the “Laws of the Union” (which are constitutional laws ONLY),
    — Protect the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
    — “to suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”.

    *George Washington: “It may be laid down, as a primary position, and the basis of our system, that every citizen who enjoys the protection of a free government…, but even of his personal services to the defence of it, and consequently that the Citizens of America (with a few legal and official exceptions) from 18 to 50 Years of Age should be borne on the Militia Rolls, provided with uniform Arms, and so far accustomed to the use of them, that the Total strength of the Country might be called forth at Short Notice on any very interesting Emergency.” ( “Sentiments on a Peace Establishment”, letter to Alexander Hamilton; “The Writings of George Washington”)

    *Tench Coxe: “Who are the militia? are they not ourselves. Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American…The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.”

    *Clause 15: “To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel invasions.“

    *Clause 16: “To provide for organizing, arming and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress”.

    Retained within the First branch are both the **Grand Jury Investigations and **Grand Juries which are NOT supposed to be under any branch of government. They can both be called up by the people themselves for many reasons with no judge involved, or as a courtesy, with the assistance of a judge.

    **Grand Jury – “The grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right. In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people”
    .
    “Thus, citizens have the unbridled right to empanel their own grand juries and present “True Bills” of indictment to a court, which is then required to commence a criminal proceeding. Our Founding Fathers presciently thereby created a “buffer” the people may rely upon for justice, when public officials, including judges, criminally violate the law.” (Misbehavior, “Good Behaviour” requirement)

    “The grand jury is an institution separate from the courts, over whose functioning the courts do not preside, we think it clear that, as a general matter at least, no such “supervisory” judicial authority exists. The “common law” of the Fifth Amendment demands a traditional functioning grand jury.”

    “Although the grand jury normally operates, of course, in the courthouse and under judicial auspices, its institutional relationship with the judicial branch has traditionally been, so to speak, at arm’s length. Judges’ direct involvement in the functioning of the grand jury has generally been confined to the constitutive one of calling the grand jurors together and administering their oaths of office. The grand jury’s functional independence from the judicial branch is evident both in the scope of its power to investigate criminal wrongdoing, and in the manner in which that power is exercised.”

    “The grand jury ‘can investigate merely on suspicion that the law is being violated, or even because it wants assurance that it is not.’ It need not identify the offender it suspects, or even “the precise nature of the offense” it is investigating. The grand jury requires no authorization from its constituting court to initiate an investigation, nor does the prosecutor require leave of court to seek a grand jury indictment. And in its day-to-day functioning, the grand jury generally operates without the interference of a presiding judge. It swears in its own witnesses and deliberates in total secrecy.

    “Recognizing this tradition of independence, we have said the 5th Amendment’s constitutional guarantee presupposes an investigative body ‘acting independently of either prosecuting attorney or judge.”

    “Given the grand jury’s operational separateness from its constituting court, it should come as no surprise that we have been reluctant to invoke the judicial supervisory power as a basis for prescribing modes of grand jury procedure. Over the years, we have received many requests to exercise supervision over the grand jury’s evidence-taking process, but we have refused them all. “it would run counter to the whole history of the grand jury institution” to permit an indictment to be challenged “on the ground that there was incompetent or inadequate evidence before the grand jury.” (Nor would it be lawful of them to do so.) Justice Antonin Scalia writing for the majority said In the Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, 112 S.Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L.Ed.2d 352 (1992) (end Grand Jury informational quote)

    Another power kept by the people was the selection of most of those who serve within our governments – elections. But the people’s voice haws been denied by fraud. Because it is so very important that the people’s will be done (our governments were created for specific put-into-writing purposes) that deaths, injury can result from those fraudulent actions making this treason against the American people.

    Your proclamation that the US Constitution is dead is wrong, only one branch of it is, the controlling branch, “We the people…”. The dumbing down was deliberately done. When you, or anyone else, let them further destroy our nation, our legitimate government, by continuing your ignorance of the US Constitution, your own state Constitution. Basically our nation, the duties delegated that all who serve are required to follow the contract; when you yourself refuse to bother to reverse those things that only take a bit of reading and studying, then maybe you need a country where you can be ruled – please feel free to move to one on this planet (“you ” and “your” generic).

    Here there are Americans who stand for their nation, that know that freedom and independence must always be watched by them because politicians corrupt easily. Here there are Americans who may not be talking to the world like some of us do, but that does not make their determination any less to defend their nation, their state, and their family.

    Think not? Maybe you are not aware that Obama is considered the best arms salesman in our nation. You see, actions do speak louder then words. With those actions the American people have spoken loudly, but few are listening.

    You see, the problem is that the people have been dumbed down as to what they must do, but are learning more every day. That is why the traitors to our nation went to work on school children to teach them to be passive and accept all that comes.

    The Second Branch is the states. They were created first by the people long before the general (federal) government. The state’s needed a central point to deal with foreign affairs so that all states would have the same treaties, etc. So the general government was created for those purposes. AS you can see, they have gone way out of line for decades.

    Thomas Jefferson: “The several States composing, the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government; but that, by a compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a general government for special purposes — delegated to that government certain definite powers, reserving, each State to itself, the residuary mass of right to their own self-government; and that whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force: that to this compact each State acceded as a State, and is an integral part, its co-States forming, as to itself, the other party: that the government created by this compact was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among powers having no common judge, each party (the people) has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress.”

    Thomas Paine: “THOSE who expect to reap the blessings of freedom, must, like men, undergo the fatigues of supporting it. The event of yesterday was one of those kind of alarms which is just sufficient to rouse us to duty, without being of consequence enough to depress our fortitude. It is not a field of a few acres of ground, but a cause, that we are defending, and whether we defeat the enemy in one battle, or by degrees, the consequences will be the same.”

    The most limited branch of government is the Third Branch, which many call “federal”. It has the most limits placed upon it, those limits are in writing, and are required to be enforced by the First Branch.

    Gage’s proclamation stressing that it is an armed and knowledgeable populace that must keep government in check: “The opposing an arbitrary measure, or resisting an illegal force, is no more rebellion than to refuse obedience to a highway-man who demands your purse, or to fight a wild beast, that came to devour you. It is morally lawful, in all limited governments, to resist that force that wants political power, from the petty constable to the king…. They are rebels who arm against the constitution, not they who defend it by arms.” “A Freeman,” PA. EVENING POST, June 27, 1775, at 2. [Vol. 7:2]

    Justice Sandra Day O’Connor: “The Constitution does not protect the sovereignty of States for the benefit of the States or state governments as abstract political entities, or even for the benefit of the public officials governing the States. To the contrary, the Constitution divides authority between federal and state governments for the protection of individuals. State sovereignty is not just an end in itself: “Rather, federalism secures to citizens the liberties that derive from the diffusion of sovereign power.”

    Mack and Printz v. United States: “The Framers rejected the concept of a central government that would act upon and through the States, and instead designed a system in which the State and Federal Governments would exercise concurrent authority over the people. The Federal Government’s power would be augmented immeasurably and impermissibly if it were able to impress into its service – and at no cost to itself – the police officers of the 50 States… Federal control of state officers would also have an effect upon the separation and equilibration of powers between the three branches of the Federal Government itself.”

    St John Tucker: “The congress of the United States possesses no power to regulate, or interfere with the domestic concerns, or police of any state: it belongs not to them to establish any rules respecting the rights of property; nor will the constitution permit any prohibition of arms to the people;…”

    James Madison, the “Father of the Constitution”: “The States then being the parties to the constitutional compact, and in their sovereign capacity, it follows of necessity, that there can be no tribunal above their authority, to decide in the last resort, whether the compact made by them be violated; and consequently that as the parties to it, they must themselves decide in the last resort, such questions as may be of sufficient magnitude to require their interposition.”

    Hopefully now you actually do understand the problem.

    Cal

    1. No, I’m not saying that I’m an oath breaker, nor have I ever said that. It is exceedingly difficult to uphold a contract to which nobody else claims as law. My oath to Christ and the constitution are secure. The rule of law is dead.

      1. Then I misunderstood your comment here concerning the US Constitution to which you swore an Oath is dead (paraphrased). I am glad it is my error, as our country needs all that will to support and defend her and the US Constitution.

        “The gov ignores it, the people have never read it, and our “leaders” do whatever they want.”

        Language matters, and the people who SERVE WITHIN our governments are NOT our government as our governments are documents, in writing. Understand that it is we who let the corruption spread so badly. It is we who hesitate about pressing charges, serving within our Militias (as is constitutionally required of us) so that we can be the enforcing arm of our Constitutions and all laws that are in Pursuance thereof the US Constitution. That we can then hold accountable through lawful arrests and prosecutions those who serve within our governments with corrupt and treasonous ways.

        It is critical for you to understand that those who serve are bound by Oaths to the contracts that assign the delegated authorities. That when they break the contract they no longer represent us, or our nation. That nothing they do is lawful.

        It is also critical to realize that our elections are fraudulent. But, again, it takes the Militia to be there to see that they are lawful – not a foreign entity like the UN, which has been armed at all of our major elections lately to make sure that they go as planned.

        To me that is a foreign invasion, and WHO is constitutionally required to deal with invasions? It is the Militia has as its constitutionally assigned duties to:
        — Enforce the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution,
        — Enforce and keep the “Laws of the Union” (which are constitutional laws ONLY),
        — Protect the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
        — “to suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”

        Per Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15: “To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel invasions.“

        Until the First Branch starts doing its duty, this will continue. It is now, as it has always been, up to us.

        Some things to consider;

        The federal government may not lawfully circumvent the U.S. Constitution by international treaties. It may NOT do by Treaty what it is not permitted to do by the U.S. Constitution. The 1783 Treaty of Paris, which ended our war with Great Britain, held that each state was a sovereign nation and those states did not give up their sovereignty.

        Each US state is still a nation in its own right. If you are a state LE, you are higher in our nation then any who are federal of whatever rank. Why? Because the states have dominion over the domestic USA, while the general (federal) government was created a creature of the states to represent them in dealing with foreign nations. That is correct, the federal government is a tool of the states – see how far the usurpation goes? It took a lot of dumbing down to get us to where we are. A lot of lies, of re-educating the populace so that when they took positions within government all their concepts would be incorrect so that the destruction of the USA from within would be aided by useful dupes.

        What you do not seem to understand is at this time we have no general (federal) government. Those that serve within it only have authority when they do the duties as constitutionally assigned, take and KEEP the Oath. Don’t take my word for it, ask Dr. Vieira – then research it for yourself.

        If you are still an LE – remember when they come in and get your for a duty, but they tell you it is on a “need to know” basis? Your Oath makes it your duty to know, always.

        If you are retired, etc then now you must start becoming your state’s constitutionally required Militia. Why? Because they are the ONLY body that those who serve within our governments MUST use for certain things. The only excuse they have at this time for using other groups, organizations, etc for those constitutionally assigned duties is that there is no real Militia of the several states.

        We are constitutionally required to NOT have a permanent (standing) military, but that is because every single able-bodied person within the USA is required to be trained as the congress requires the US Military to be trained so that if needed the American people can defend their nation while from their ranks a Military is taken. If every single person serving in the military today quit and learned the US Constitution and their state Constitution we would have the required militia for those who serve within our state and federal government to use. While being used by the state and federal they get paid the same as the military but their highest authority over them is the US Constitution itself, and if being used by the feds the only person who can order them is the person lawfully serving as a US President. At this time we do not have anyone who is in that position to be able to so order the Militia.

        Thomas Jefferson: “The several States composing, the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government; but that, by a compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a general government for special purposes — delegated to that government certain definite powers, reserving, each State to itself, the residuary mass of right to their own self-government; and that whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force: that to this compact each State acceded as a State, and is an integral part, its co-States forming, as to itself, the other party: that the government created by this compact was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among powers having no common judge, each party (the people) has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress.”

        Justice William O. Douglas, Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949): “The vitality of civil and political institutions in our society depends on free discussion… It is only through free debate and free exchange of ideas that government remains responsive to the will of the people and peaceful change is effected. The right to speak freely and to promote diversity of ideas and programs is therefore one of the chief distinctions that sets us apart from totalitarian regimes.”

        Justice William Brennan, Texas v. Johnson (1989): “If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea offensive or disagreeable.”

        God Bless and Stay Safe All

        Cal
        If there were never intended to be action to defend the Constitution from those who are domestically attempting to destroy its power and authority, why would each Oath require it of those who take the Oaths?

        Chief Tecumseh: “When it comes your time to die, be not like those whose hearts are filled with the fear of death, so that when their time comes they weep and pray for a little more time to live their lives over again in a different way. Sing your death song and die like a hero going home.”

        1. No worries, I’m with you brother. I’m just trying to make sense of the times, same as anybody.

  4. KEY POINT: “As of today, there have been 612 people killed by police officers in 2016. Of these, 145 were black. There has been no dedicated 24/7 national media attention on any of these “Black Lives Matter” cases. In fact, the last time CNN, FoxNews and MSNBC all dedicated 24/7 coverage to an individual killed by the police or while in police custody was following the deaths of Freddie Gray in April 2015 and Sandra Bland in July 2015. It is difficult to believe that it is a coincidence that this most recent unrest has been generated less than two weeks before the Republican and Democratic National Conventions.”

    Pay attention to the timing.

  5. We have written enough letters to King DC. The tree of liberty is headed for the saw mill. It is time to follow Jefferson.

  6. I do not routinely listed to Alex Jones and when I do I try to be critical but most often feel that he is correct.
    ” 612 people killed by police officers in 2016. Of these, 145 were black” A few days ago I read similar statistics, again stating that with police killings: 25% were Black, 50% were white and 12.5% were Hispanic.
    DO NOT believe the BS that your government, MSN and in particular the UN tells you. Anything coming out of their mouths should be a warning that what they say is far from being the whole truth.
    Would our Founding Fathers TRUST the government? Obviously not since they granted only limited powers and the means for the PEOPLE to control it.

Comments are closed.