No products in the cart.


Oath Keepers Pledges to Fight ISIS in U.S.

(Above is an audio recording of my side of an interview with a journalist on my response to the Orlando terror attack, taped Sunday afternoon 6/12/2016)
As the Founder and National President of Oath Keepers, I hereby issue the following statement and  a CALL TO ACTION to our membership, in the wake of the horrific Islamic/ISIS terrorist attack that took place in the early morning hours of Sunday June 12th, 2016 in Orlando, Florida.

First and foremost, our thoughts and prayers go out to the victims and family members of this nation’s most deadly terror attack since 9/11. This senseless attack against our citizens, and the LGBT community specifically, is proof beyond all doubt that ISIS has now brought their murderous, radical Islamic hatred for freedom, and their total war on Western Civilization, to American soil. The terrorist himself proclaimed his devotion to ISIS and ISIS has officially claimed responsibility.

It has always been the mission of our Oath Keepers members to defend the constitutionally guaranteed rights of every citizen of this nation. It is our mission to train and advise them how to defend themselves and their loved ones. We Oath Keepers have declared ourselves to be “Guardians of the Republic” and have adopted “Not On Our Watch” as our official motto.

In response to this act of war by ISIS here at home, we are now honor bound to fulfill those promises and to honor our oaths by standing physically, shoulder-to-shoulder with our local peace officers and with fellow veterans and patriots, in direct defense of our communities against ISIS and their sympathizers and supporters. We must also fulfill our pledge to train our fellow Americans to FIGHT against this evil that aims to wipe liberty from the face of the earth.

I will say what Obama refuses to say: The horrific attack on the Pulse Nightclub in Orlando was an ISIS Islamic terror attack on America, an attack on Western Civilization itself, and an attack on our core principles of individual liberty (the inalienable right of the people to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” as Jefferson wrote in our Declaration of Independence in 1776).

There will be more.  As both Navy SEAL veteran Matt Bracken and I have been predicting for well over a year, we are now in the beginning stages of an Islamist “Tet Offensive” type wave of terror attacks on U.S. soil that will dwarf anything we have seen since 9/11. Both of us have also argued that this wave of Islamist terror attacks will be part of a “perfect storm” of intentionally orchestrated “Cloward-Piven” chaos -inducing economic devastation, social and political disruption and violence, and the use of intentionally undefended borders and mass illegal and “refugee” immigration as weapons of destabilization (and to provide cover for and facilitate more violence and terrorism by multiple proxy agents of the elites, including the cartels, gangs, well funded Marxist and racist agitators – such as La Raza and Black Lives Matter – and radical Islamist cells and individuals).

I encourage you all to read Bracken’s excellent piece “Tet Take Two: Islam’s 2016 European Offensive” on what is now clearly happening in Europe and compare it to what we are now seeing here in the U.S. as well.

I also encourage you to watch my speech from the 2015 New York Oath Keepers Banquet where I predicted this “perfect storm”:

As you watch it, reflect not only on the San Bernardino attack and this horrific ISIS attack in Orlando, but also on the Soros funded street thug and communist agitator violence we saw in Ferguson, Missouri Baltimore, Maryland; San Jose, California;  and their most recently stated goals of shutting down both the Republican and Democratic National Conventions coming this July.

It really sucks to be right about predicting bad things happening to our own country.  But only a fool will fail to see that what is happening is not an accident, but is instead all according to plan.  As for radical Islam itself, Bracken has correctly pointed out the unholy alliance between the Sharia loving, Caliphate worshiping, woman and homosexual hating, 13th Century minded Islamacists and the Western Civilization hating Marxists in both Europe and in the U.S.  Just one example of this alliance is demonstrated through Minnesota Congressman Keith Ellison, who clearly views his transformation into a radical Muslim as a more effective way to advance his Marxist ideals.

Another example of the odd marriage between Marxism and radical Islam is this confused Marxist/Muslim woman screeching about the oppression of the “patriarchy” while wearing her red Islamic headscarf:

I submit that this strange alliance goes all the way up to the White House, and, as expected, the blood dancing domestic Enemy-In-Chief, and his ghoulish comrades such as Chuck “the Schmuck” Schumer, wasted no time in attacking your right to bear arms after this horrific ISIS Islamist terrorist attack on U.S. soil.   While refusing to even call this an act of Islamist terrorism, they insist that the problem is our guns, and their solution is using Orwellian watch lists, that any of you can be listed on by some faceless agency minion with no due process whatsoever, enabling them to arbitrarily disarm any of you at any time.  Terrorists and other violent thugs don’t obey gun laws.   Nor would they let watch list prohibitions on gun ownership stop them from using firearms to commit terrorism.  The fully automatic AK-47 rifles used in the Paris attack were completely illegal and banned in France, but that didn’t stop them being smuggled in by the terrorists along with explosives.

As “Navy Jack” said in his excellent piece, the only real answer is for you, the American people, to step up and defend yourselves and each other. The only people who could have saved the lives of the 49 Americans killed in the Pulse Club in Orlando where those 49 Americans themselves. The lone uniformed officer serving as security for the club was the first one shot as the terrorist came through the door.  Sadly, that shows the vulnerability of uniformed, easily identified security. The same thing occurred in the Charlie Hebdo attack.

What is needed in such an attack is the unseen, concealed carry, armed American who the terrorist does not even know is there until hot lead is sent his way. An armed patriot who is an intended victim can ambush the terrorist and “shoot him to the ground” as firearms trainer Gabe Suarez puts it. It ends with a bullet to the terrorist’s head to make sure he is shut down and cannot fire another shot or detonate an explosive vest.

A layered security protocol, combining overt, official security deterrents and hidden, armed “first-responders” among the intended victims, is the right answer. And that means armed staff and patrons of any club, church, mall, or other “soft targets” of terrorist attacks (as well as armed teachers and school staff, just as is done in Israel).

Above all, it requires a change in mindset, such that the American people fight back and attack the attackers.  They need to know that even when unarmed, they can take down a shooter.

In the wake of the Oregon college shooting, Oath Keepers committed to teaching college students how to counter-attack against an active shooter.  We are now forming College Oath Keepers student groups on campuses across the nation, for that express purpose and to also stand up for free speech on campus against Marxist attempts to shut down opposing views with force and intimidation.

Similarly, we will train any other American or group of Americans who are targeted by Islamist terrorists, be they churches, Synagogues, school staff, or LGBT groups or nightclubs.   We stand for the right of all Americans to defend themselves, and we stand united against all terrorists who would murder them.

Just as we guarded military recruiters (disarmed by idiotic government policies) after the Chattanooga Islamist terror attack, we will offer our protection to any and all Americans now targeted by Islamist terrorists so long as we have the resources to do so.

That is the whole point of our Community Preparedness Team (CPT) Program. Our highly trained and experienced military and police members are here to serve as direct protection for our communities against terrorists and, even more critically, to serve as training cadre to teach the American people to protect themselves.

I call on all Oath Keepers members and chapters to offer their protection, advice, and training to any and all in their community who are targeted by Islamist terrorists. Show them the way toward effective defense against the wave of ISIS attacks that we know are coming, teach them to defend themselves, and lead by example. Step up and Honor your oath by defending all Americans from these evil Islamist enemies of liberty and enemies of Western civilization. We of course support the sincere moderate Muslims like Maajid Nawaz, author of Radical: My Journey out of Extreme Islam, that condemn these acts of terror and are attempting to reform Islam from the inside.  But we also must acknowledge the reality that among Muslims in America are those who have adopted a fundamentalist and radical political version of Islam that compels them to commit Jihad.

Today I call on our national membership to directly assist local police as well as those members of the LGBT community who may continue to live in fear by the threat of future attacks, and any other potential “soft” target in our community such as churches, synagogues, schools, etc.

We are offering our organization’s full resources/personnel which  includes our many former federal, state and local law enforcement and military personnel to deploy to Florida or any other area, nationwide, where citizens feel a threat may exist.

With Community Preparedness Teams (CPTs), chapters and members in every state, we are willing to provide private protection to families of victims, organizers of any high-risk events, club and bar owners as well as any other groups or individuals who feel their lives may be in danger from the threat of future attacks by radical Islamic groups or other domestic terrorists.

We are all Americans and any attack on an American citizen on our soil by Terrorists against any Americans exercising their most basic rights as guaranteed by the Constitution we swore to defend, will be countered by Oath Keepers to the utmost extent of our power.

Once again, our thoughts and prayers are with all affected by this heinous attack.

To request our assistance or join our efforts, please email us using our contact form or email us at and put either “request for help” or “offer of assistance” for “Oath Keepers Operation Guardian” in the subject line.

Media inquiries should be directed to

For the Republic,

Stewart Rhodes
Founder and President of Oath Keepers


Stewart Rhodes

Stewart is the founder and National President of Oath Keepers. He served as a U.S. Army paratrooper until disabled in a rough terrain parachuting accident during a night jump. He is a former firearms instructor, former member of Rep. Ron Paul’s DC staff, and served as a volunteer firefighter in Montana. Stewart previously wrote the monthly Enemy at the Gates column for S.W.A.T. Magazine. Stewart graduated from Yale Law School in 2004, where his paper “Solving the Puzzle of Enemy Combatant Status” won Yale’s Miller prize for best paper on the Bill of Rights. He assisted teaching U.S. military history at Yale, was a Yale Research Scholar, and is writing a book on the dangers of applying the laws of war to the American people.



  1. Amen. Stewart tells it like it is. Anyone not a member of OKs PLEASE join and actively support us!

  2. A leader steps up and declares war instead of saying we need tougher gun laws… Thank you Stewart Rhodes ! Oath Keepers unite in the fight for our Country!
    Sacramento OK Chapter Leader
    Rocky Twitchell

    1. Compared to: Following the Orlando Islamic terror attack on Sunday, Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah called for violating the Constitution with another assault weapons ban and an infringement of the rights of people to purchase a gun who are on the very questionable no fly list.
      Makes you wonder who instigated the attack, especially when hearing that the Terror list was scrubbed.

  3. If you are going to rout ISIS out of their hiding spots you will have to penetrate deep into the mosques in America. This will require quite a sacrifice of time and expense as well as very, very good espionage. The mosques are the command and control for ISIS in America. Not all mosques but every state has at least one command and control headquarters, mosque. I admire your tenacity and patriotism. This is a very daunting task ahead.

    1. Al-kidya, you are absolutely correct. Surveillance of each and every mosque in this country has to be put into effect. Not some mosques, ALL mosques. These places are the the mother-ships that incite, equip, and disperse the attackers. Researcher Dave Gaubatz has found that over 80% of the mosques in America openly present written or oral excitations to jihad. The other 20% are probably just more discreet. It is the primary duty of all Muslims, as directed by Al’lah in the Qur’an through the Prophet Muhammad, that the entire world be brought under the sway of Islam, either voluntarily or by force if necessary. Not On Our Watch!

  4. You’re pledging to fight Isis? Isis wouldn’t even be here were it not for the enemy within. I think you need to revise your battle plan and attend to the source. We’re moving into a civil war/martial law scenario if Killery is not indicted. If we pass November with no indictment, there will effectively be no more rule of law. It will be every man for himself. Isis will be like fly swatting compared to the real enemy. I feel like Oath Keepers is becoming irrelevant. Ask Finicum’s widow. Where was OK when Finicum was being assassinated? Where was anybody? I guess it will take a full blown insurrection to get anybody to come out.

    1. You are absolutely right Bill! It was the So-Called US Government administration and the CIA, Mossad, and Saudi Royal Family that created ISIS, however it started with the Imposer Government in Washington DC. Education and understanding is the key to winning the battle, and so far Americans in general aren’t doing a very good job of becoming educated!

  5. Looks like so far, this all reactionary(i.e. after action) Your ducks are not in a row. You have a call to arms. Well we shall see! Prove it. Then I will join you. In California the liberal communist polititions are going to be running interference for them. God be with you.

    1. There is a difference between a “call to action” and a “call to arms”. Oath Keepers did not issue a “call to arms”. We issued a call to action.
      One must be careful not to misquote, eh? Thanks!
      Elias Alias, editor

    2. At least reactionary is not radical. It’s because of others actions that others react. Had they, the ones acting, those provoking others to act, those presenting proximal cause for the ills this country faces, there would be no cause to react. And those who will not pause before starting a conflict and give thought before taking actions against bad actors often get blamed for “firing the first shot”. And “ducks in a row”? Easier to shoot than ducks at random. Just an observation. Do you understand?

  6. For what I believe to be good reasons I can not trust any Muslim to be a vital thriving trustworthy American. That does not mean I will bring them harm… NO!!! However… well… consider this:

    Islam is far more than a religion. It is also a way of life, a set of customs and if not constrained by outside forces an economic AND governmental system. Islam is not compatible with the Western way of life. It is our right and DUTY to preserve our Western way of life.

    Since I consider Islam to be far more than a mere religion I believe that to preserve the USA and our Western way of life Islam and its adherents MUST be controlled in some way to ensure its brainwashed adherents can cause no harm to the USA.

  7. Personally as a card holding firearm carrier in my state, I WILL be armed regardless of law, regulation, or signage. The only way I will enter UNARMED is if the establishment has metal detectors or searches, and in that case I will not enter the establishment at all. I refuse to be (or be a witness to) killings and assaults by perpetrators of this genre.

  8. Thank you Stewart for this powerful call to action. It is for situations such as this that the Second Amendment exists. The right to keep and bear arms for personal and community defense is what makes a free person free. Openly carrying arms for personal and community defense is a powerful political statement.

  9. I am a Christian above all else. I believe wholly in my God, my Savior, and the Holy Bible which tells me how to live. I am also a veteran who will forever do my best to uphold my eternal oath. I do not believe in, nor support, the lifestyle of the homosexuals and lesbians. That being said, however, I also do not believe I, or anyone else, has the right to interfere with them living the lifestyle they desire. It is none of my business how they live as long as they don’t bother me personally. I have known and worked with gays for most of my adult life. their private lives have never made them any less of a person than anyone else I have known. As for God’s judgement, we will ALL face that judgement when our time comes.
    I just wish the media, and everyone else, would stop using the term “gay” in this whole ghoulish story. They say they were gay victims in a gay nightclub, etc. They were simply American citizens enjoying a night out in a nightclub and were cut down in the prime of their lives by a sadistic, evil MUSLIM TERRORIST who would not allow them the same freedom to seek happiness that he could not find in his own life. Nobody deserves to have such a fate forced on them, and their sexual orientation should never be the main storyline in this horrible story.

    1. Hear Hear! And I would add that all should distinguish and use in their conversation the distinction between judgement, condemnation, and punishment. Our “justice” system has three phases: Trial, Judgement, and then Sentencing. Like you, I have made a judgement that the so-called “Gay” lifestyle/orientation/whatever is not for me. And because of my Biblical beliefs, I have also made a judgement it is an impediment to spiritual growth. However, who am I to condemn it in such a manner that punishes people or calls for their punishment? Yes, I will continue to judge, for judgement should be about looking at the facts and then making a judgement, a choice.

      If condemnation and punishment is in order, let God be God on this social/behavioral matter. For actual crimes and acts of war, while we can be informed by God (thru scriptures and prayer) as to what to do, it is up to the law and politics to pre-determine and determine what must be done. Unfortunately, we now have a large segment of a 1400 year old religio-socio-political movement that is responding to a reiterated written call — made hundreds of years ago — to play God on the entire Earth.

    2. I fully support your view. It is not up to anyone to judge…only our God will judge. No one has the right to force others to live as they live. As long as I am not being coerced I have no problem with what they choose as their lifestyle.

  10. I think that this is the time that Oath Keepers should be calling for the revitalization of the militia, and working to show the need.
    The Emergency Preparedness statutes, federal and state, make no mention of the man on the street. It’s all about government “officials” and how they will survive.
    Certainly, the Orlando incident shows how woefully unprepared we are as a nation for such tragedy, and in the light of this ISIS threat why we all need to be prepared, and know exactly what is our duty should other attacks take place.
    In light of the fact that a number of witnesses have claimed more than one shooter, and we know that ISIS has made threats against us, the whole of the people must be organized into a cohesive body.
    We, you and I, are always the first responder’s. Why do we continually shirk from that duty, and call for someone else to do the job? I am certainly willing to do my part, but that part does not include assisting local law enforcement that neither asks for, and in my experience wants the assistance of the public, especially those who have no training.
    It’s time that all Oath Keepers admit that to take the oath means the acceptance of every word in the Constitution; “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state.”

      1. Really??? I know Dr. Vieira has been calling for it, and written extensively on the topic.
        I know that I’ve written on the topic and sent notification to the governor, and to every legislator in this state on the subject. I’ve spoken on it, and broached the idea with pro-2nd groups.
        I use the name Militia as the only lawful, and peaceful method of restoring a republican for of government.
        However, when I broached the subject with others in Oath Keepers I was told otherwise.

      2. Okay. Everything is relative to context. I do not know who told you that Oath Keepers is not promoting a revitalization of the Constitutional Militia of the several States. The Militia is required by the Constitution but the people of America have been denied that rightful authority especially since the Dick Act of 1903, which is a total piece of rubbish.
        If you chanced to talk to other Oath Keepers in a context which indicated that you wanted Oath Keepers to become a militia, you would be incorrect. Oath Keepers is NOT a militia. But as an educational organization we fully support the educating of all Americans to their duty and right to participate in the Constitutional Militia. It is written into the highest uncontradicted law of the land. It is our primary “homeland security”. Oath Keepers strongly supports the return of the Constitutional Militia of the several States. But Oath Keepers is not a militia.
        Check your email.

        Elias Alias, editor

    1. We have a law that’s been on the books in our State for several decades, a law that mandates an organized and unorganized militia that must be totally separate from the National Guard but still be under the Governor. However, even the most ardent conservative politicians are afraid to broach the subject. Definitely not PC don’t ya know. The rank and file of the USA will need a SEE, a Significant Emotional Event, to “see” what must be done and to effectively cleave together to do it. But when traditional folks seek to cleave together, they are excoriated and sabotaged by the Left. Case in point is the Tea Parties, labeled as “astro turfed” (conceived and financed by rich donors) and hobbled by the IRS as they attempted to obtain their non-profit exemptions (bureaucratic guerilla warfare to more or less nullify the Supreme Court decision on the Citizen’s United free speech case)

  11. Active-shooter training is HUGE. The fact that this scoundrel shot 100 people without being rushed is sad, pathetic and heart-breaking.

  12. How the Declaration of Independence got Hijacked
    Written by Susan

    June 21, 2013 This July 4th Americans celebrate their 237th Independence Day. The Declaration of Independence, signed during the midst of the American Revolution in 1776, was not just a statement of grievances against the British monarchy but also a declaration of freedom from it, citing unalienable rights of self-governance. Please notice that I said un-alienable, not in-alienable rights. Most believe there is no real difference between the two words. But not so fast. When unalienable was replaced with inalienable it diminished the original intention of personal rights, among which are “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”

    Declaration of Independence July 4, 1776The Declaration of Independence begins with the reason for the colonists’ separation from the Monarchy; a separation entitled by “the Laws of Nature and nature’s God.” (Capitalization and lack of capitalization is original.) It continues:

    “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed , that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…”

    Despite the fact that at the time of the Declaration unalienable rights were considered to be for white men only, the word, unalienable, refers to rights inherent to all humans, no matter gender or race. I find it interesting how the word unalienable is rarely used anymore and how modern versions of the Declaration now use the word inalienable. Even President Obama uses the word inalienable. What’s up with that?

    Pay close attention to the difference between the definitions of unalienable and inalienable given below. They are subtle but very important.


    Bouvier’s Law Dictionary (1856) defines unalienable: “Incapable of being transferred. Things which are not in commerce, as, public roads, are in their nature unalienable. Some things are unalienable in consequence of particular provisions of the law forbidding their sale or transfer; as, pensions granted by the government. The natural rights of life and liberty are unalienable.”

    Blacks Law Dictionary, 2nd Edition, (1910) defines unalienable: ”Not subject to alienation; the characteristic of those things which cannot be bought or sold or transferred from one person to another such as rivers and public highways and certain personal rights; e.g., liberty.”

    William Blackstone, 18th century Common Law English jurist and judge defined unalienable in his Commentaries on the Laws of England, 1:93:

    “Those rights, then, which God and nature have established, and therefore called natural rights, such as life and liberty, need not the aid of human laws to be more effectually invested in every man than they are; neither do they receive any additional strength when declared by the municipal laws to be inviolable. On the contrary, no human legislature has power to abridge or destroy them, unless the owner shall himself commit some act that amounts to a forfeiture.”

    (“[T]he Due Process Clause protects the unalienable liberty recognized in the Declaration of Independence rather than the particular rights or privileges conferred by specific laws or regulations.” SANDIN v. CONNER, _ U.S. _(1995)

    Essentially, unalienable rights are inherent to being human and exist forever outside of the world of commerce; they cannot be bought, sold or transferred…ever.

    Now here is, INALIENABLE.

    Bouvier’s Law Dictionary (1856) defines inalienable: “A word denoting the condition of those things the property in which cannot be lawfully transferred from one person to another. Public highways and rivers are inalienable. There are also many rights which are inalienable, as the rights of liberty or of speech.”

    Black‘s Law Dictionary 2nd Edition (1910) defines inalienable: “Not subject to alienation; the characteristic of those things which cannot be bought or sold or transferred from one person to another such as rivers and public highways and certain personal rights; e.g., liberty.” (emphasis mine)

    [Morrison v. State, 252 S.W.2d 97, 101, 1952] In this decision, the Missouri Court of Appeals defined inalienable rights as those rights incapable of being surrendered or transferred; at least without one’s consent. (emphasis mine)

    U.S. 2013 defines inalienable: “Inalienable right refers to rights that cannot be surrendered, sold or transferred to someone else, especially a natural right such as the right to own property. However, these rights can be transferred with the consent of the person possessing those rights.” (emphasis mine)

    According to Bouvier’s Law Dictionary (1856), the meaning of inalienable began much the same as unalienable; but it changed over time starting with the 1910 definition. Inalienable has evolved to mean rights that can be transferred with the consent of the person having them. If someone consents to transfer their rights, those rights can no long be considered un-alienable, impossible to transfer, inherent human rights. They become rights “in commerce.”

    Maybe you are scratching your head and still saying, so what? Here’s the deal. Inalienable rights (as currently defined) are transferable by one’s consent via contract, which includes the concept “social contract.”

    Social contract theory originated with the political philosophy of Plato, was popularized by Thomas Hobbes in the 17th century, and then embedded deep into the concept of the U.S. Constitution and U.S. Government in 1787.

    What is it? A social contract is a political philosophy typically defined as an agreement a nation’s people make with their government for mutual benefit. But actually, it is an agreement the people tacitly consent to (without signature); the belief being the state only exists to serve the will of the people and therefore as part of the deal, the people give up some rights so government can provide safety and order.

    The Constitution has no inherent authority or obligation as a social contract.In conclusion, the social contract Americans unwittingly made at the time of the U.S. Constitution was breached when unalienable rights became inalienable rights. Unalienable rights had originally been considered the same as one’s private property, which included all physical property, one’s labor and even privacy (part of liberty). However, unalienable rights became inalienable rights transferred in commerce to the government via statutory laws, regulation and taxation.

    The Declaration of Independence refers to this potential loss of un-alienable rights when it states: “…whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…”

    The time has come for Declaration 2.0.

    Think outside the box. Live outside the cage.

  13. Those of us who have the sheepdog mindset will defend our flock. Of those who are sheep most will remain sheep, no matter what. For that small percentage that is left, there may be some hope, if they don’t wait too long. I’m not optimistic, and the election will tell the tale.

  14. I tend too agree with Bill Hickey ; Here’s why ; First I want too quote Putin ” I’m not after the dogs that bit I am after the owner’s of the dogs that bit ” ; Steward Isis is no more than payed Mercenarie’s they are financed by four different entities from around the world ; One being us ! We will not defeat our common enemy by chasing their dog’s around the woods you need to acknowledge that we must indentify the owners of these dogs so they can be isolated as the owners of the dogs , only then can we fully defeat this despicable criminal terrorist organization that are false flagging our right’s away through murder and mayhem ; When you prosecute the owner’s of the dogs Isis will disappear !!!

    1. I agree with your statement that the U.S. government and its Intelligence community is complicit in creating and expanding ISIS.

      There is much more, including interviews with Zbigniew Brzezinski and in-depth reports from Global Research etc. When we start looking into U.S. foreign policy after it was kidnapped by the CFR and subsequent Trilateral Commission, say, for the last sixty years or so, we begin to see a picture which Americans themselves do not want to admit exists.

      Elias Alias, editor

  15. This goes along wit Navy Jack’s notion of “Controlling the Narrative.”
    Yesterday, Jeh Johnson decided that “Guns are a Homeland Security Issue.” They are coming after them gang!
    However, what got lost in the shuffle is the “Mental Illness” Bill before Congress. The AMA testified that “Guns are a Health Issue.” Here’s the typical progressive hypocrisy at play. Did you know that “Medical Malpractice is the 3rd leading cause of death in the US?”

  16. Dear Senator Boozman,
    I received this e-mail below from you and at the bottom it says agree i had to click it to agree with you however the Agree button doesn’t work ..So this is what i received:Further down is my response to you, Sir
    June 20, 2016
    Dear Laura,
    Our nation is at war with ISIS and other radical Islamic terror organizations who seek to destroy our way of life. Those who deny this are denying the facts.
    These terrorists have repeatedly called on their supporters to attack Americans here at home and abroad. Our country must have the resolve to defeat them. They’ve carried out barbaric acts of terrorism, from the beheading of Americans hostages to attacks at Ft. Hood, Benghazi, Boston, Chattanooga, San Bernardino, and now Orlando.
    President Obama consistently tries to cover up the fact that he has no real strategy to destroy ISIS by politicizing the acts of radical Islamic terrorists. Political correctness has no place in this fight. Neither does attacking the Republican Party. Diplomacy will not work with this terrorist group.
    When you hear the President refer to this terror organization as the “JV team,” and tell us that ISIS is “contained,” and that their attacks around the world are “setbacks,” it makes you question if his Administration is taking this threat as seriously as they must.
    The number one priority of the federal government must always be to ensure our national security. Unfortunately, poll after poll shows Americans are less confident in their safety here at home. Mr. President, it’s past time that you start listening to those who understand these terrorists – like your own CIA Director – and follow the advice of our military leaders and put in place a decisive strategy to destroy ISIS now.

    John Boozman Signature
    Dear Senator,
    I have the Utmost Respect for you when you were our Congressman and I have the Utmost Respect for you as our Senator.
    I would however invite you to read the book.”.Because They Hate”Author Annette, Unfortunately I must have loaned it or gave it to someone so i don’t know her last name but i’am sure u can find it on it turns up that i do still have it i will mail it to u to read,a true story and so compelling u just can’t put it down and it is a easy read.. She and her Family lived in Lebanon and when Israel and Lebanon were at war This Christian young Women named Annette grew up with Muslims ..They played together as children and the Christians and Muslims ate together they were neighbors the Christians believed they were not only there neighbors but thier friends.
    Nothing could be further from the truth..They murdered their life long neighbors and she lived with her Mother and Father.
    To make her story as short as i can, they blew up her home, shot and killed her Mother..After thier home was destroyed ,they still had to try and live in what was left..Crawling on thier Bellies to a very far away water pipe that was leaking water to stay alive..Then they shot her Father and he told her to Leave with a Friend of the Family which she didn’t want to leave her Father all alone but he made her..Good Daddy!…She eventually made it here to America and wrote her book..I didn’t agree to some of her solutions for America at the end of the book but she wasn’t a American and they lived in terror everyday for years.
    Yugoslavia the exact same thing under Bill Clinton…The Christians thought thier Muslim Neighbors were their Friends and they decapitated as many as they could..over 600 Roman Catholic Priest’s were Decapitated, and Christians of any Denomination were murdered at the hands of people they trusted and loved as friends and neighbors.
    The Sudan as i type this to u have been Crucifying thier life long Neighbors and so called friends lining the roads with Crucified Dead Christians .
    Iraq had over 500 Million Christians that spoke the Language of Our Lord, Aramaic,and there are less then 50 million now.
    As Christians and Moral people we all want to Believe that there is goodness in everyone, However the Koran say’s it is okay to lie to the Infidels ( anyone who is not Muslim) To Further the cause of Islam..If there truly is good Muslims we will never know who they are because Lying to anyone but each other is not sinful to them and they are willing to die to murder as many infidels as they can..So Death is like a Freedom to them.
    New York City a Father shoots both his daughters to death..He was from Egypt and these little girls were born here.
    He shot both of them one was still alive and called police and said i’am dying please stop it..please stop it..her last words ..The Father got on a Plane through T.S.A. Security and went straight back to Egypt and has never been heard from again.
    How did a man a Illegal Immigrant get a gun?
    Not one American Citizen had a Concealed carry in that nightclub in Orlando and it took the Police and first Responders 3 hours to get in? Master key locks on all exit doors except 3? Just that night and right before a election?..We now know he was questioned by the F.B.I. 3 times and Hillary Clinton had met his Father in her office? We now know his Father had ties to the Taliban in Afghanistan. The Islamic Terrorist Who murdered all these Americans and wounded so many was not only questioned by the F.B.I. When that F.B.I. Agent was telling us this the men behind him other agents were smiling..It was very unsettling to say the least.
    Now The Left wants to Disarm Americans Like Australia, France, Germany, Britain basically all of Europe except Switzerland which has 8.2 Million people are armed and have the lowest crime rate in the entire world.
    They will not disarm they don’t care what the United Nations says!.
    Paris is History, The police and firefighters are being murdered and they won’t get thier Military in there to protect thier own citizens and police? Germany will not say Radical Muslims and allows the Barbaric Practices on thier Citizens, Belgium, Brussels same thing..Just what is going on ?
    I was Listening to a Commentator talking to just one Gun Sale Establishment , Since Orlando have sold 30,000 Ar_15 Rifles and climbing because of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama and left wing extremist’s Blatant anti- 2nd Amendment agenda. Now everyone of these Law abiding American Citizens feel it is Necessary To have the very Rifle they want to take away..Actually they want to Disarm all Americans like Europe has forced thier Citizens to disarm.
    Sir, Americans will not obey unconstitutional law, nor do we see this rifle on our streets.
    Obama, Hillary, Shumar, Reid and the other thugs who seem to hate Law Abiding Americans are the greatest gun salesmen America has ever known. Am i afraid that Americans are buying these?, No Sir, I feel a lot more safer knowing that Americans are arming themselves,
    I also know these things always happen in a place called a Gun Free zone and there should be no such place in America…You will never see me go to a Gun free zone..A place where the Left have told everyone is the safest place to be and have all over..Only Law Abiding Americans obey Laws..Criminals never will and gun free zones are a free target to murder Americans Who go into a gun free zone and criminals will always be able to get guns. Prohibition didn’t work .The War on Drugs is pouring across our boarders in the form of Heroine , no war on drugs has worked and disarming Americans will cause millions of dead Americans..Americans won’t Disarm anyway !!

    We know the Consequences..
    God Bless you and your Family and God Bless America..
    Sincerely Lauraleigh

Comments are closed.