No products in the cart.


EFF: Two In One Cyber Activism

Editor’s Note: Can the Fourth Amendment survive in the world of electronic gadgetry?  The good folks over at the Electronic Freedom Foundation do never-ending good work to protect privacy in the frightening world of government-sponsored surveillance. I believe that many of our readers will want to know about the petition at bottom of this page.



June 23, 2016 | By Mark Rumold

Federal Court: The Fourth Amendment Does Not Protect Your Home Computer

In a dangerously flawed decision unsealed today, a federal district court in Virginia ruled that a criminal defendant has no “reasonable expectation of privacy” in his personal computer, located inside his home. According to the court, the federal government does not need a warrant to hack into an individual’s computer.

This decision is the latest in, and perhaps the culmination of, a series of troubling decisions in prosecutions stemming from the FBI’s investigation of Playpen—a Tor hidden services site hosting child pornography. The FBI seized the server hosting the site in 2014, but continued to operate the site and serve malware to thousands of visitors that logged into the site. The malware located certain identifying information (e.g., MAC address, operating system, the computer’s “Host name”; etc) on the attacked computer and sent that information back to the FBI.  There are hundreds of prosecutions, pending across the country, stemming from this investigation.

Courts overseeing these cases have struggled to apply traditional rules of criminal procedure and constitutional law to the technology at issue. Recognizing this, we’ve been participating as amicus to educate judges on the significant legal issues these cases present. In fact, EFF filed an amicus brief in this very case, arguing that the FBI’s investigation ran afoul of the Fourth Amendment. The brief, unfortunately, did not have the intended effect.

The implications for the decision, if upheld, are staggering: law enforcement would be free to remotely search and seize information from your computer, without a warrant, without probable cause, or without any suspicion at all. To say the least, the decision is bad news for privacy. But it’s also incorrect as a matter of law, and we expect there is little chance it would hold up on appeal. (It also was not the central component of the judge’s decision, which also diminishes the likelihood that it will become reliable precedent.)

But the decision underscores a broader trend in these cases: courts across the country, faced with unfamiliar technology and unsympathetic defendants, are issuing decisions that threaten everyone’s rights. As hundreds of these cases work their way through the federal court system, we’ll be keeping a careful eye on these decisions, developing resources to help educate the defense bar, and doing all we can to ensure that the Fourth Amendment’s protections for our electronic devices aren’t eroded further. We’ll be writing more about these cases in the upcoming days, too, so be sure to check back in for an in-depth look at the of the legal issues in these cases, and the problems with the way the FBI handled its investigation.


Click the link and sign the petition if you want to be helpful. It’s fast, and its free, and you do not have to divulge personal info aside from your zip code and email address. (There is an option on the petition screen for keeping your name private, or, signing anonymously.)

The petition:

Note: Image atop this page courtesy


Elias Alias

Editor in Chief for Oath Keepers; Unemployed poet; Lover of Nature and Nature's beauty. Slave to all cats. Reading interests include study of hidden history, classical literature. Concerned Constitutional American. Honorably discharged USMC Viet Nam Veteran. Founder, TheMentalMilitia.Net



  1. Seriously? Bill Clinton just met privately for 30 minutes with the woman who holds his wife’s fate in her hands. We’re not just a banana republic…we’re a rotten banana-pickled papaya-mangled mango mess. Time to reboot and reset…all else is delusional.

    1. How true Chip… It gets worse.. The goal then is to build probable cause from someone perhaps surfing porn from say,,, a server based in a potential terrorist known origin. So, based on this data alone, could it then turn into your relinquishing your Second Amendment rights as a potential suspect extremist? Its gotten way too extreme!!

      1. Exactly Brentwood…so what we are both saying is that we know who they are and what they are up to and we’re allowing them to put the noose around our necks anyway. I pray our Lexington-Concord moment comes before they actually pull the chair out…

      2. NEWS FLASH!!! Lynch has not grand children and apparently neither does her husband Steven!!

        [Editor’s Note: Tuaca, I had to delete the link you had posted because it contains malware. Sorry!]

Comments are closed.