No products in the cart.


NYC ‘Gender Expression’ Enforcement Proof ‘It’ Can Happen Here

Do you consider such as these to be your countrymen? Uh, countrypersons… Uh… Well, unless you refer to them with politically-manufactured terms like “ze” and “hir,” prepare for a world of enforced hurt. (NYC Commission On Human Rights Facebook photo)

With “progressives,” every day is Opposite Day.

The very idea that a government with the power to suppress individual liberty represents “progress” makes that assertion self-evident. Their words and actions evoke nothing so much as Orwell’s 1984 Ministry of Truth slogans:




Such is the case with the oxymoronically-titled New York City Commission on Human Rights. Like all totalitarians, they base every action on the presumption that rights are what government functionaries tells you they are, to be dispensed or withheld to the advantage of the regime. Naturally, there is no place in such a scheme for unalienable rights. And naturally, oath-breaking traitors feeding off such a scheme have no use for the Bill of Rights, except to engage in acts of in-your-face evisceration any time they feel like it.

We know they have particular contempt for the right of the people to keep and bear arms. Also of paramount importance to control: the right of freedom of expression, of freedom of religion, of freedom of association.

Thus we have the commission’s monstrous “Gender Identity/Gender Expression: Legal Enforcement Guidance” directive. It’s the logical progression of an evil “culture” that forces Christian (never Islamic!) bakers to either publicly renounce their faith or be destroyed, and mandates the rest of us can either share a restroom with someone who identifies as – with 51 “gender options” and counting, they don’t even know what the hell they are – or hold it until you get home.

Mr. Heston would like to have a word before we proceed:

[ot-video type=”youtube” url=””]


See, it’s not about “live and let live.” It’s about sticking it in your face and ramming it down your throat. It’s about a form of rape. Ultimately it’s about dominance by those who hate (and who once more demonstrate the Opposite Day truism by painting victims who protest the abuse as “haters.”)

Case in point from the commission’s enforcement edict (although there’s really no need to single out a specific section, as the entire dictat is an abomination):

Failing To Use an Individual’s Preferred Name or Pronoun … Some transgender and gender non-conforming people prefer to use pronouns other than he/him/his or she/her/hers, such as they/them/theirs or ze/hir.

It sounds like something out of an absurdist dystopian satire by Kurt Vonnegut. Except these Gauleiter are serious.

How serious?

“The Commission can impose civil penalties up to $125,000 for violations, and up to $250,000 for violations that are the result of willful, wanton, or malicious conduct,” the decree warns. “These penalties are in addition to the other remedies available to people who successfully resolve or prevail on claims under the NYCHRL…”

That means if anyone defies instead of obeys, they’ll be destroyed.

“The Commission may consider the lack of an adequate anti-discrimination policy as a factor in determining liability, assessing damages, and mandating certain affirmative remedies,” it elaborates.

That means its subjects – that’s what they are — must advocate on behalf of tyranny.

It also means that in order to enforce their orders and compel the surrender of punitive monetary “damages,” the commission will ultimately, and with full backing of the mayor’s office, the council and the courts, authorize its enforcers to use and escalate through a full continuum of armed force up to and including lethal.

One of the prime directives for government, as articulated in the Preamble to “the supreme Law of the Land,” is to “secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.” The domestic enemies of freedom turn that upside down, seeking to enslave not just us, but our children and the generations to come.  It goes without saying that any government “official” or “law enforcement” officer who participates in, and/ or abets the enforcement of such tyranny is an oath-breaker and worse.

But don’t look to the citizens of New York City to do anything about “alter[ing] or abolish[ing]” a “Form of Government … destructive of these ends.” They’re the brainwashed useful idiots who “vote” their rulers in, or the parasites  dependent on ”entitlements” at the expense of the productive, or the apathetic, the lazy, the trivial or the outnumbered and resigned. And it’s from these secured urban political power centers that we see the assault on the rest of the Republic being directed and supplied: For example, Bloomberg is intent on bringing the (birthed in New York political corruption) Sullivan Act disarmament edicts to Everytown.

“Resistance is futile,” the Borg from Star Trek declare. “You will be assimilated.”

If they succeed, expect New York-style “Human Rights” panels to be the norm for determining “loyalty” throughout the land.  Expect severe enforced consequences for those viewed as problematic, or a threat. Hell, they’re already floating prosecution of “climate change deniers,” and I personally have been attacked for saying gun rights advocates would resist being “bundled off to Bagram.”

“Tyranny can never happen here,” idiots and liars maintain. “We have the right to speak our mind. We have the vote.”

Those who will not refer to demanding anomalies as “ze” and “hir” have no such recognized right. And we’ll get plenty more of the same once those who presume to rule us can establish a permanent and pliable tyranny of the majority – which they’re working on via a “pathway to citizenship” for collectivist alien invaders.

The thing is, as poet Robert Burns noted, “the best-laid schemes ‘o mice and men Gang aft agley.”

Some of us don’t think resistance is futile. When it comes to “gun control,” our position is “We will not comply.”  When it comes to orders to submit, our response is “No. Your move.”

Hold fast, because “monopoly of violence” cultists who label us “domestic extremists” and worse are doing their best (worst) to shake that resolve.



David Codrea blogs at The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance (, and is a field editor/columnist for GUNS Magazine. Named “Journalist of the Year” in 2011 by the Second Amendment Foundation for his groundbreaking work on the “Fast and Furious” ATF “gunwalking” scandal, he is a frequent event speaker and guest on national radio and television programs.


  1. “Some transgender and gender non-conforming people prefer to use pronouns other than he/him/his or she/her/hers, such as they/them/theirs or ze/hir.’

    First, controlling the language controls the thoughts. You know, basically it is GIGO (garbage in, garbage out). This is the next step at redefining our language, which redefines us.

    But our US Constitution does NOT allow those that serve within our governments to control our language for just that reason.

    Remember that not one person in government has the combined authorities to create a “law”/”regulation”/”code”/etc; then enforce it and decide the guilt or innocence. Not lawfully. What happens is those that enforce that “color of law” are made into *terrorists against their own state, their own nation. Those that create(d) that edict and require its enforcement do the same. They are REQUIRED to use only the authority delegated to the branch or office of government they are occupying.

    But we do NOT enforce it on those that work for us; are under contract that is in writing defining exactly what authority they are ALLOWED to use – remember all authority is delegated to the branch or office(s) within a branch and the person serving at the time is ALLOWED to use it for as long as they do the duties required of them and take and KEEP the Oath.

    The US Constitution makes it very clear, along with the writings of the framers and forefathers, that it is the Militia – trained as the US Military is trained and knowledgeable of the US Constitution and their state Constitution – that is the enforcement arm of the US Constitution and both the state and general (federal) are REQUIRED to use them, and FORBIDDEN to use any other group, agency, etc. If it is assigned to one group, it is forbidden to any other group. If it is assigned to two branches, or a branch and an office of another branch, or offices of two different branches it is forbidden to any other but those named.

    Examples from the US Constitution: Article 1: “ALL legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.”

    Article 2: … “He shall have Power, by and WITH the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, …” (caps in both are mine)

    Then we come to a section of the US Constitution which lists things that were NOT delegated to those that serve within our governments whatever branch, office; state or general; or that they can have a very limited amount of control – and only if they under certain circumstances and done in specific named way – they are found within the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights comes with its own Preamble.

    Preamble to the Bill of Rights: “Congress OF THE United States begun and held at the City of New York, on Wednesday the Fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.
    THE Conventions of a number of the States having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best insure the beneficent ends of its institution. …”

    The Preamble makes clear that those that serve wtihin our governments at EVERY LEVEL are forbidden to do those things or limited in what they can do and WHEN they can do it.

    Basically, they may think that they can create such a law and fine, but they were NEVER given that authority over what is PROTECTED by the US Constitution.

    “They’re the brainwashed useful idiots who “vote” their rulers in, ”

    Do not let the Election Fraud that has happened there fool you. As in all states within the USA, Election Fraud has taken the peoples voice out of government, and allowed the appearance of “the people speaking through votes”.

    What happens is up to us, “We the people…”, it always has been. So is this another thing we are going to overlook except for a very few people that will speak out and get late night visits and their doors kicked in?

    *28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.

  2. Good article!

    In addition to not consent and not comply, let’s change the narrative too.

    Change the words and refuse to follow their fake words and definitions.

    The label LGBTQ has got to go. So do the associated words the letters represent. Get rid of the false labels and the false definitions.

    Gender identity? Not. It’s not even remotely a real thing. Gender is solely based on body parts. Body parts identify two genders, male and female. That’s all. The only thing the false labels truly identify is who the person using the label wants to have sexual relations with. Who cares?!

    Unless a person physically changes their body parts they remain their original gender. That is the only piece of information needed that corresponds to the Constitution and its Amendments with lawful reference to non-discrimination and this topic. That is what gender/sex are they based on their body parts.

    Male or female are the only two ‘sex'(es).

    Change the words. Change the narrative. Burst their bubble of fake labels and definitions and let’s move on.

    1. If you change the order of the letters from “LGBT” to LBGT,” you get an acronym that can be pronounced “El-Bigot.”

    2. I know Gay, uh, MEN who lean Libertarian and are totally against the political tactics and agenda of the so-called LGBTTTTTQQQQQQQQQQQ bowel movement. They could give a crap about the L’s, the B’s, and the (multiple) T’s (transgender & transsexuals). As to Q (for queer), it is a redundancy and encapsulates those who are “Gay” (which included Lesbians until the LGBTTQ moniker came into vogue). Lastly, the Gay men I know stridently oppose what they call “Professional Minorities” who are observed to have no jobs or careers because they seem to primarily focus on leisure, identity, sex, and drugs.

  3. So glad we moved from the Socialist Republic of New Yorkistan – unfortunately this abhorrent behavior amongst the sheeple – that ‘do whatever you want’ is all hunky-dory – is spreading around the entire country like a plague. Our once great nation is following in the footsteps of the failed states of ancient Greece and Rome. Corruption, career politicians, bribery, state-sponsored freakishness – we are doomed. Buy more ammo.

    1. Buy even more ammo for those who did not,but who you will need to join you in order to survive.

  4. How about just using the moniker,”he/she?” That’s what was once used to designate one who was confused about sexual identity. Outside the relm of the LGBT community, those who wish to change gender on a whim are just nonconformists and do not fit any other designation other than confused. And if they are confused and subject to change positions on the moment, why are we responsible for being unconfused as to what to identify them as at any specified time? My defense will be, disregarding that I consider them sick, that how was anyone to know at any given time how they wished to be addressed? And anyway, Mr./ Ms. Obama himself/herself is sick and attempts to place the inmates in charge of the asylum. What better place to start than New York, where the voters as well as their administration are sick as well? Inmates all. And that goes for D.C. as well.

    1. “She” contains both “he” and “she” so we could just call everyone “she,” but why should nearly 300 million people have to change their language to suit a tiny percentage of noncomformists?

      Soetero/Obama (Original/Alias) is trying to put the jihadis in charge of the disarmed American adults, and American children too young to protect themselves, so that the Muslims can do whatever the Koran allows, without interference from us.

      1. An entirely different “Alias,” I assure you, and one that I’m sure bears no resemblance to you in any matter of honor and decency!

      1. @ Miles, How about S and P Sodomite and Perverts. And buy the way does any one know why the rainbow? Is this another slap in the face of the creator when He made a covenant with Noah?

  5. Are you KIDDING me? With all the patently unconstitution [One word deleted by Elias Alias, editor] the government has done and IS doing — from TSA searches, to NSA spying, to murders-by-drone, to turning the police into a standing army that shoots on sight with impunity — with all THAT going on, THIS is the issue you’re up in arms about?
    Are you complete [One word deleted by editor] idiot?

    Liberty & Justice,


  6. Are you aware that within a few days of Target declaring its bathrooms open to all and sundry, a man was caught taking pictures of a 7 year old girl in one of the stalls?

    Transgender? Right.

    And if I were the mother of that little girl, The Operation would be free.

  7. SJ, I might agree with you that this is a silly tangent, except that David’s talking about officials inflicting fines for a ridiculously minor verbal “infraction”… and not just fines, but utterly crushing fines that will ruin anyone in the bottom 99% income bracket for the remainder of their lifetime… and that is clearly the intent. It’s a push to destroy lives out of pure malice disguised as tolerance, and we tolerate it at our own personal peril.

    Ok that was the simpler point to address. Now let’s see if I can piss off everyone else…

    Linda, it’s not quite so straightforward as you might think. There is at least one well-documented biological condition that is well known to drive both transsexual physiology and behavior, and it’s not a recent discovery:

    People born with XXY chromosomes sometimes pop out into this world with male genitalia, sometimes with female genitalia, sometimes hermaphroditic, and they almost always develop ample breasts. Furthermore, XXYs often identify as other than the gender they came packaged with, and are heavily over-represented among those electing to undergo sex-change surgery.

    Given what we know so far, surely it’s conceivable that there are other biological conditions not so easily identifiable as an entire extra chromosome, but which still induce similar predispositions. Even if you reject the possibility of other as-of-yet unidentified such conditions, there is still a population of XXYs that surely warrant some compassion and forebearance as they work to sort out the hand they’ve been dealt.

    That said, if we encounter a “woman” with 5-o’clock shadow and an Adam’s apple in the grocery checkout line tomorrow, do we know for certain that he/she is not an XXY, as opposed to just playing out some sort of personal sexual melodrama entirely of his/her own construction? I’ll go out on a limb here and say “probably not”.

    So, in our ignorance of that specific person’s circumstances can we afford our scorn? Perhaps that person makes us feel icky but if compassion was always easy it would be a hobby, not a virtue.

    If we want to indulge in criticizing the hateful apparatchiks depicted in the article above, we’d best be prepared to represent a positive and well-thought-out alternative.

    …and just to be clear, I’m not talking about submitting to the adoption of redonkulous pseudo-pronouns under threat of political annihilation. I’m just talking about showing some love for our fellow human beings. Even when it’s difficult or we’re not quite sure whether they’re deserving of it. Especially then.

    Happy trails,


    1. Retrofitting businesses with individual bathrooms, and schools with individual bathrooms, showers and dressing rooms, would be very expensive.

      If the tiny percentage of the population that is transgender wants to fund their own bathrooms, let them go for it.

      Not only should the majority not be forced to fund the tiny minority’s every whim, too much of the majority can’t afford to make major repairs to their own bathrooms in their own homes now.

      And Obama pops the cork on yet another bottle of champagne.

    2. “love for our fellow human beings” A good place to start is by not forcing their BS on 98% of the rest of us. For over 40 years I have had associates, friends and family with homo sexual preferences. Though their choice differs completely from mine, I still like and love them UNTIL they attempt to force their ways on me, my family OR our youth. Quite frankly, it now is becoming much more difficult to remain tolerant.

  8. Talk about the war on women ; These petty Dingle Barrie’s are disrespecting women , taking their dignity at their most private moment’s ; In your face despotism by a President that has made
    privacy in too being a freak show on nightmare on Elm Street !! This is putting Young girl’s in arms way ; Sound’s like there acclimating the people to except pedophilia inside women’s bath rooms as the next step on their menu , a utopia for perverted butt wipe ‘s ; Tower of Babel !!!

    1. It’s not FAIR that transgenders can’t use the ladies’ room.

      What will not be fair next?

      Male cult members who are unfairly without a little girl for sex? Will Obama proclaim that all non-cult girls between one and eight must be “lent” to a cult member for one day a week?

      What if some cult members don’t have anyone to burn alive in a cage? Or drown in a cage? Or vivisect? Or crucify? Or mutilate? Or enslaved? Or locked up with no food until they die of starvation?

      Would our Congress finally, FINALLY move to stop Obama if he ordered that such things be made available for the Cult of the Throat-Slitters?

      Sadly, I doubt it.

  9. In reference to Oregon Hobo’s comments about showing some love, I agree. Everyone deserves love. I understand there are ‘rare’ instances of gender issues such as you describe, the XXY issue. They are rare as you say and I don’t believe they fall into the false label LGBTQ.

    All children should be taught to love themselves they way they are, with whatever body parts they have or don’t have.

    Showing love is not the issue at all in my mind.

    I object wholeheartedly to the false label LGBTQ being used to define ‘gender’. It does not define gender. It defines who a person desires to have sexual relations with, that’s all.

    Trying to use the label LGBTQ is a falsehood.

    Gender is based on ‘sex’ which is based on reproductive organs. I would say a person with true XXY chrom;s has either a male organ or a female organ for reproductive purposes. Breasts are not considered a reproductive organ, nor is a 5-o’clock shadow or an adam’s apple.

    1. I agree, and there is also the matter of the hundreds of millions of people being inconvenienced and made uncomfortable (at best) in order to suit a group that is a tiny minority.

      This would be like disallowing lights in classrooms because there is a tiny group of people in America who are unbearably sensitive to light. Or outlawing gluten and peanuts because some are allergic to it.

      I feel safer if my horse, Samwise the Brave, is with me. I think I should be allowed to have him accompany me to the ladies room, and I DEMAND that my statistically non-existent group of 1 be catered to by the other 300 million people of America!!!!

      And while we’re fixing things, I want every language that every member of my family speaks on every formal document in the country, and on all government signs, too.

  10. “Find out just what the people will submit to and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.”
    — Frederick Douglass, Aug. 4, 1857

  11. I wonder about a future where a fed-up warrior class with superb leadership and ample planning wrests away a portion of the USA and creates a New USA where the idiocy of the failing original USA is left behind.

    The Constitution will work for the New USA but all the governmental crud that has been attached to government in the dying perverted old USA is not allowed.

    That New USA would be a country worth fighting for. The old one? I do not know. Maybe it would be best if it did fall. I do not know.

    1. I understand that the Texas Nationalist Movement has been successful in their effort to have secession brought up for consideration by the state legislature – a historical first, as far as I know.

    2. Maybe it would be best if it did fall. But then the problem becomes ‘how do we keep all the IDIOTS out and properly vet those who are escaping the lunacy’.

Comments are closed.