No products in the cart.


CFR Globalist: End U.S. States, Build China-style Regional Gov’t

new map of America

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), wants to destroy America, plain and simple. In this article, by a foreigner, writing for the CFR, the elimination of the States is proposed. Of course it is never mentioned that it was the States who joined together to create the United States and the Federal Government. Just where Mr. Khana thinks the Federal Government has the Constitutional power to abolish the States, he chooses not to mention. The CFR is the main pusher of Globalization, whose goal is to create a Centralized one-world government, economy, army and religion. – Shorty Dawkins, Associate Editor

This article comes from

By Alex Newman

It is time for the United States of America to ditch the whole “states” thing, and for the federal government to re-organize the nation politically into massive regions with powerful regional governments fully subservient to national and even international authorities. The goal of the dystopian “economic master plan” is for America to become more like Communist China on the road toward a North American Union.

That might sound ridiculous — perhaps like the ravings of a mad man — to the average American. After all, the United States is, by its nature, a union of 50 states that have delegated a few limited and defined powers to their agent, the federal government, in pursuit of, among other objectives, securing “the Blessings of Liberty.” If globalists get their way, though, that “antiquated” notion would be tossed on to the ash heap of history.

Writing in the New York Times last month, a mid-level globalist operative with the war-mongering, global government-promoting Council on Foreign Relations argued that there needs to be a “new map for America.” “Advanced economies in Western Europe and Asia are reorienting themselves around robust urban clusters of advanced industry,” wrote Parag Khanna, a CFR globalist and self-styled “leading global strategist,” whatever that means. “Unfortunately, American policy making remains wedded to an antiquated political structure of 50 distinct states.”

Instead of the 50 states, Khanna argues that America’s new map should be based on regions, each with its own regional government. “We don’t have to create these regions; they already exist, on two levels,” the CFR operative explained. “First, there are now seven distinct super-regions, defined by common economics and demographics, like the Pacific Coast and the Great Lakes. Within these, in addition to America’s main metro hubs, we find new urban archipelagos.” Federal policy should be used to bring it all about, he said.

Of course, Khanna, who was born in India but lived in Arabia and Europe, is hardly the first to push such a radical reorganization of America. In 1975, The Daily World, a Communist Party propaganda organ, published a piece by Morris Zeitlin headlined “Planning is Socialism’s Trademark.” “In socialist countries, metropolitan regions enjoy metropolitan regional government and comprehensive planning,” the communist operative argued. “The economic and functional efficiencies and the social benefits that comprehensive national, regional and city planning make possible in socialist society explain the Soviet Union’s enormous and rapid economic social progress.” The Soviet Union ostensibly imploded less than two decades after that drivel was published, but only after murdering tens or even hundreds of millions of people in Russia and around the world.

Read more here.


Shorty Dawkins



  1. Well….THEY have already established 10 FEMA REGIONS and 10 Regional Governor positions, first initiated by Richard Nixon, likely after his visit to Communist China ! The only thing holding back the full implementation of wiping clean all 50 states, in-order to place these regions under absolute federal control, is an event. The right crisis awaits as we watch the potential socialist/communist Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders take the helm….or even Ted Cruz (again) as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) puppet if THEY disrupt the Trump wagon.

    1. “” Ted Cruz (again) as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) puppet “”
      As a hard core constitutional conservative that has followed Ted Cruz and his legal accomplishments before the Supreme Court, I find this statement “GROSSLY INACCURATE” and highly offensive to myself and many people and staffers that know that this “wildly ridiculous statement:” “” Ted Cruz (again) as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) puppet “”,…. is a 100% wildly ridiculous crap-sandwich.

      1. Overtaxed? And you want the full implementation of the North American Union under the New World Order…along with a bogus Carbon Tax??

        Yep….Ted Cruz and his wife are just what you need !

        “The CFR is the operational mechanism of the global elites through which they exercise control. They are dedicated to the destruction of American sovereignty, a reduction in the American standard of living and our transformation into global citizens, no longer endowed with the rights and freedoms given to us by our creator.” –Gary Franchi

        Gee….I thought there were intelligent people here??

      2. Ahhh, yes — there *are* intelligent people here, but some lag a bit behind the others. The MainStream media has taken its toll and I must admit that many Americans are unable to see through the haze of entertainment, faux news, fedgov propaganda, and the fear-thought matrix of their own mental laziness. Such would believe a politician’s lies while never looking more deeply into the fact that anyone running for an office is of course a statist at his core — for to run for the office one must believe in the power of that office, and as you and I know, that consensus-held “power” exists to control people. Cruz, Trump, any of them except Ron Paul (who sought to undo the centralized power and became because of that the only true statesman since Kennedy’s conversion shortly before his assassination), any of them seeks to control via government office. Cruz is as good a liar as any of the others, and many were deceived. But while those who are deceived are in part responsible for accepting the deception, I suggest that the deceivers themselves, such as the CFR/Tri-Lateral Commission, RNC/DNC, Wall Street, Military-Industrial Complex, DHS, etc etc — they have a guilt upon their souls which shall not fare well as they depart this crazy world.
        But all that aside, I can report for you that some of our readers here have indeed absorbed this —

        Elias Alias, editor

      3. CFR members, too many to list here but here are some: Brezinski, Kissinger, Collin Powell, Hillary Clinton, Heidi Cruz. American,s who believe in individule liberty, American values, strong US military should be making sure their canidates are not members of the CFR! Their are too many senators, congressmen and a couple of US generals, commanders on this list. Let’s vote them out at election time These regional sections would be terrible for the disappearing states. That means at any time, the globalist could ship you or people in you neighborhood out to Kenya, Cuba, to do work projects. You would not have a dog in this fight to say no. The sad part is that we have been sold out! I can remember not too long ago that some of the major eastern sea ports were to be managed by the Arabs. There was an out roar with the American citizens and hard questions were forwarded to the media, congressmen senators. The idea did not materialze.

      4. Elias, it seems strange that these so-called experts believe that the general government can do any of this stuff as though they are independant of the States and their wishes. If you will recall, the States formed the union giving us an at first, limited central government. None of the signers of the Constitution were representing the central government, but rather, were representing their separate and soverign States. The general or central government did not exist and was not represented in any way. Only representives of the States were present. And it was the States that eventually ratified that Constitution.
        Why the States have failed to Nullify unconstitutional legislation, rules and regulations has to be either ignorance or complicity.
        Regarding Cruz, he would be the lessor evil in comparison to a Clinton, but not by enough margin to assure confidence. He has shown himself to be a globalist at heart already and only backed away from TPP for political reasons alone. As OVERTAXED has done, I too have monitored Cruz’s actions and voting record. Relative to most other Senators, much better, but that distrust and his past actions of “lawyers’ tricks” to get his way or make his points means he always views things from a lawyer’s perspective. We the people don’t want no damn judge (another lawyer) determining who we can and cannot sleep with, much less marry. Nor should the general government have the last say as to what is or is not Constitutional. The States were the authors of the Compact. They are part of that separation of powers that everyone brags about. It wasn’t the three central branches alone. That power block includes the States, the authors, the publishers and the last word as to what is and is not lawful.
        My pride in OathKeepers and the realization that Conspiracy is not based on Theory, but is real gives some slight hope that we can someday begin to turn back to our foundation and become again a more liberty minded people.
        May I end this rant with a final word of regret: Too soon old, too late smart. But maybe at last enough are beginning to wake up to the threats to do something about it all.
        Oh, I almost forgot. The objection to having lawyers look into anything dealing with Nullification is that lawyers will almost always turn to the courts. Again, I don’t want no damn judge telling me what is and is not lawful. I can read and understand the Constitution about as well as anyone. It ain’t no living breathing document. It is direct and to the point. Only lawyers’ tricks can make it appear otherwise.

      5. Dear OVERTAXED, I can’t remember seeing a bigger phony run for office than Cruz. His political record isn’t anything great & his Supreme Court work got us another Bush Jr. term & that didn’t go so well. I hope you realize that you won’t be allowed to own any small business if globalists get their way & you’ll be 90% taxed. Cruz is all talk & no substance. Trump is our last chance to stop globalization & save the USA from being wrecked forever. Stop thinking about yourself because if you don’t help save the USA you will wish for the good old days when you called yourself Mr. OVERTAXED.

      6. OVERTAXED Absolutely CORRECT. It appears some of the oathkeepers may have elected to hang hats on the unconstututional actions of trump.

    2. This is all about pushing the UN Sustainable Development Agenda 21, the plan to make America part of a Communist one world government! excuse for this is global warming/climate change. Ted Cruz is the only one to ever speak against this! His father came from Communist Cuba, tortured & jailed so Cruz is very much against it. Ted Cruz is no puppet, he worked as solicitor general in TX & fought for our sovereignty & our constitution at the Supreme Court & won many cases. He defended 31 states for the right to keep & bear arms & won. Another case was about an illegal who had raped & murdered a woman, sentenced to death. World Court (Bush supported) wanted the man freed but Cruz also won.

      1. Actually, Senior 74, Raphael Cruz (Ted’s dad) was part of those supporting the cause against the Bastista dictatorship. Young and stupid, maybe, but no anti -Castro hero.

      2. He was anti-Batista until he found out who Castro really was. Just like we’re going to find out who Trump really is.

    3. No no and once again no. Ted Cruz is not in favor of the CFR. Neither is Heidi. She participated in a review to oppose it. She wrote one of the desenting opinions.

  2. Since we have had foreign troops and mercenaries “training” on US soil almost since the day Obama, the *US Presidential IMPERSONATOR, they seem to be planning on backing this up with force – foreign, those of our troops and the militirized LE officers that will “just follow orders” and “just do their jobs”, and the mercenaries that have been at almost every US false flag event, and at the Bundy’s and others ranches/property.

    *He never met all three requirements – and YES, it is up to him to prove that he is elegible, the “democratic cadidacy” papers were changed, plus election fraud in all 50 states. Nothing done in the last 8 years is lawful and binding on then American people, and all that are involved or did NOT work to bring this to the light/remove these traitors are all complicit in Treason.

    1. We’ve had foreign troops training on our soil loooong before Obama. I know this for a fact. From what I’ve seen and done. I would not worry about foreign troops occupying us, however, especially since there are much more pressing threats that right in front of our eyes, yet most people fail to see them. It’s just my professional opinion. You see, we aren’t moving towards George Orwell’s ‘1984’ Rather, we are already living in Aldous Huxely’s ‘Brave New World.’ Once you can understand that concept and its implications, then you would see how unnecessary foreign troops are. Think about it, we already have the worlds largest incarcerated population, at just over 20% of the world’s ‘prisoners,’ and about 5% of the world’s population. Of course, this is not including those on some sort of government supervision like bond, parole, probation or house-arrest. When you add those and everyone else being tagged in the criminal “justice” system, those statistics become even more staggering, especially for a population that openly considers itself the beacon of freedom. What’s worse, is that a very large portion of these people are incarcerated for breaking ‘positive law,’ In other words, ‘political crimes,’ or those “crimes” created by the legislature for political reasons and which do not create a victim -as opposed to natural reasons, such as offenses that do produce victims. This situation is only getting worse, as we have lost one of the most important institutions required to maintain liberty and a government ‘of,’ ‘by,’ and ‘for’ the people, namely a free press. Add to that an increasing militarized domestic police force, the reinterpretation or complete ignorance of our Constitution, consolidating centralized authority, corrupted electoral process, matured pyramid scheme monetary system and the abandonment of posse comitatus, -with everything all at the cheers of the people! Our own soldiers, sailors, marines and airmen are training in our urban areas against American subjugated populations or western threats under an almost total media black-out.No, out government won’t force us to get ‘chipped’ because we voluntarily carry around a host of sensors that are constantly communicating with NSA servers in our pockets and when we lose or forget this device, we freak out and take measures to ensure we have our phones with us at all times. Our vehicles can be remotely controlled, including being tracked and remotely turned off, and in fact, we gladly pay a premium for the feature. To my knowledge, you cannot buy a new car from a company headquartered in the States (often mistaken as American made) without this feature in it. Beyond that, we have had whistle blowers, many of them, come forward, one with proof even, that the government is tracking everything we all do and storing it in a database, yet nobody cares enough to put a stop to it. It’s the 9/11 syndrome, a combination of both illusion and delusion where the truth is painfully obvious, yet ignored by the masses because the stone soup is, at least for the moment, hydrating the majority of us and everyone else has no other way of assembling due to the aforementioned lack of a free press or even a functional press. In fact, we are worse off than lacking a free or even functional press, as most people believe the media works as the press and if they have any doubts about it, most people believe that its merely just dysfunctional, rather than maliciously illusory. Out of the small portion of the people who suspect the media, most will simply look at the media as a Venn diagram of sorts, where if you watch both FOX and CNN, MSNBC/FOX, CNN/BBC, or any combination thereof, they will find a kernel of truth somewhere in the middle. At least the people of Iran and North Korea know that their media is complete BS. We don’t have that luxury. Of course, everything I just said is only a fraction of the tip of an iceberg and so there is clearly no need for foreign troops and in fact, foreign troops would be the equivalent of throwing the proverbial frog into the proverbial pot of boiling water. Why do that, when the frog is relaxing in the pot anyway, with the water already almost at the boiling point without Mr. Frog even realizing or caring about. I can guarantee that if you force people to ask the question “Why?” or to start to question the nutrition of their ‘stone soup,’ so to speak, if you force them to recognize the obvious, the United States wouldn’t look much different than Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine or Syria. Those people either had their ‘stone soup’ taken away, or they were forced to confront the fact that it was only stone soup. They don’t have the luxury of lying to themselves any longer and so they fight their enemies with everything they have by sending suicide bombers and media multipliers like chopping heads off.

  3. The nice guys will continue to be led by the not so nice guys….right to the death camps, ovens, gas chambers, and firing squads. The fact that the criminal in the WH still has over a 50% approval rating is a real problem. They will demonize and continue to vilify patriotism. They are organized, we are not They speak with one voice, we are scattered in opinion and steeped in argument.

  4. The CFR needs to be disbanded, and every one of them put on trial along with Jugears and his minions, for treason, found guilty and stood before the firing squad. That’s what Sam and John and Patrick and Ben would have done. That’s my opinion and I’m sticking to it.

  5. ANY politician that is a member of…or a supporter of the CFR is a traitor to OUR America. They are globalists that want to enslave every American under a New World Order. Because it will make them billionaires, while THEY continue to buy property outside the United States for their get-away. THEY are scumbags and for those that don’t understand the consequences of the CFR policies, had better wake-up !

    1. They won’t need property elsewhere; their Agenda 21 calls for almost everyone who survives the massive depopulation to be crowded into megacities, with no appliances and water restricted to 26 gallons a day, while the elite have the rest of the country as their playground.

      I hope that whoever/whatever has been responsible for 1,600+ mysterious, unsolved disappearances in wilderness areas and national parks (described in David Paulides’ Missing 411 books) will be waiting out there for them.

      1. well if we can keep our guns for the begining fight we might have a chance.this has been going on since I was a kid 62 years ago

      2. Guns won’t help in this sort of war. This is MindWar and We The People had best learn to use our individual minds, and pronto. Sheer knowledge and awareness is all we need to stomp out this sort of globalist silliness. We are, after all, Americans, and we’ve always defeated whatever statist power tried to get in our way. The fact that it’s now coming at us from our own government simply calls for an adjustment in style, which we shall implement by seeing it, recognizing it, first in our own minds. Thankfully, I’m encouraged, since Al Gore gave us the Internet, yes? 😉

        Elias Alias, editor

  6. And who controls the CFR? The Jesuits through the human blood parasites, the Rockefellers.

  7. In the near future, the UN has already carved up the US, ala the Palestinian mandate of 1947. Only this time, the protectorates have been given over to those nations with the biggest grudges. Go to to see the role the OathKeepers play in this epic global smackdown.

  8. That “antiquated” notion was tossed on to the ash heap of history in 1861-64. Since then the remains have been eviscerated, cremated, and carried one bucket at a time to the ash heap. Today we suffer under the full effect of THE UNITED STATES, our all powerful nanny, rather than these united States as was intended. Rule by decree, activist judges, ceding of power to the central government (and now to international powers), have seen to it.

  9. Excellent! About time someone (thank you, Shorty!) got this out on the I-way trails. I’ve pretty much read up on this several years ago. I didn’t know the National Governors Association had their hand in this cookie jar. And to think my Delaware Governor Jack Markel is right in the mix. Rabid vDog, shut off the MSM. Cruz’s wife is a member of the CFR. THAT is all one needs to know. “Birds of a feather sleep together”.

    1. HENRY Kissinger just got another award from current Govt. THAT SAYS MORE THAN ENOUGH. I LOVE The New American, and Read Oath Keepers.I am a old Senior, but my EYES, souls Sure Open. IT Amazes me, how many people I know still dont know or want to believe whats been planned for America since the ’40’s… and getting close now to Americss destruction.

  10. HENRY Kissinger just got another award from current Govt. THAT SAYS MORE THAN ENOUGH. I LOVE The New American, and Read Oath Keepers.I am a old Senior, but my EYES, souls Sure Open. IT Amazes me, how many people I know still dont know or want to believe whats been planned for America since the ’40’s… and getting close now to Americss destruction.

  11. This article, or at least what it trys to imply, is generally BS. Yes, there are people involved with CFR (maybe even the majority, but certainly not all) who are pushing for global government, but CFR has no power to do anything about it, other than make suggestions

    The real problem is the people within our government who are actively undermining the Constitution and working to cede authority over innumerable things to the UN, international trade organizations, etc., and enter into treaties and agreements that relinquish control over US policy and law to various international bodies. What some people at the CFR, UN, IMF, World Court, etc. may say has no effect, unless they have the means to force us to comply — what the morons in Washington are doing will be enforced on us. We need to focus on the real enemy, not meaningless distractions.

    Many people belong to CFR to engage in debate and hear the various opinions and policy suggestions, not because they support any particular policy. There are good people involved with CFR, just as there are good people serving in Congress (though there aren’t many left in Congress).

    1. Sorry…but being accepted and a member of the CFR, equates to being a member of Skull and Bones. You must follow the policy / agendas for a New World Order, or you don’t get invited to the cocktail parties, you are ostracized, and you are only a one term politician. These TRAITORS (all of them) make policy and pass laws. They vote on wars and treaties….and play a major role in our economic system, so please don’t tell (us) the CFR has no power, because it’s the parasites within the CFR that collectively vote on what most every American does NOT want. ENSLAVEMENT

    2. I do believe i heard with my own ears Hillery and Mr Cheney say they get their marching orders from the CFR. Just to name two of i bet many from both sides of the so called left and right.Why would you be involved with an organization that you don’t want to see succeed in the views of that organization?Hogwash!

      1. Bisley, the CFR is not a bunch of empty suits that just strut upon the stage. They are the US branch of The Royal Institute for International Affairs [RIIA) of Great Britain and a continental European element (in Germany, I think). It’s the organization that sponsors gradualism rather than revolution. You know, as a communist is an impatient socialist. The CFR takes up where the Fabian Socialist petered out–at least to some extent, but devolving into the progressive movement here. Progressives and Neo-Cons (some call them RINOS, but Republicans) began after the onset of the Civil War (southerners may call it The War of Northern Aggression), developing once the war was over, the Mercantilist system we operate under (government/business partnerships–AKA crony capitalism).
        Carter’s National Security Adviser and mentor, Zbigniew Brzezinski was a one world order CFR member, as once was G.H.W. Bush. Henry Kissinger is also. His Mentor was David (the founder of the Trilateral Commission) Rockefeller. Many have been within our presidential administrations in many positions in adviser or leadership rolls.
        Most have joined by way of preselection rather than petition, much like Rhodes Scholars. Cecil Rhodes was a Fabian Socialist as was Beatrice and Sidney Webb and George Bernard Shaw. Even Reagan’s cabinet was filled with them. Many in Congress also hold membership.
        Any of the CFR members or associates who are ignorant of the goals and machinations of the organization are by such ignorance, useful idiots, much as innocent followers of communists were.
        Study this stuff for yourself, know what you are talking about prior to attempting to enlighten us. It’s all there if you have the will to see.

      2. I totally agree with Ivan Berry’s assessment. There may be some naive members who join the CFR for purpose of contributing to “open-minded assessments” on various topics the CFR champions, but such people are not seeing what’s going on atop the pyramid of authoritarian intent held by the leadership. The CFR claims to be an objective private-sector think tank of sorts, or something to that effect. They are outright liars if they tell you that. Ivan Berry mentioned the Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA). That is indeed a Cecil Rhodes/Lord Milner/Rothschild/W.T. Stead hierarchical lineage which (as one example of their sordid intent) is solidly behind the TPP which is now being stuffed down America’s throat (like NAFTA). They are one-world-government internationalists, attempting since the late 1890s to preserve the British Empire as the dominant world power on earth. The RIIA met with the U.S. delegation at the 1919 Paris Peace Talks and convinced our sons of Wall Street to return home here and start the CFR, which they did in 1921. The CFR is the American extension of the RIIA, which is an extension of the Rhodes Round Table groups.

        Here are some items from my massive volume of notes on the subject:

        In his book With No Apologies (1979), Senator Barry Goldwater writes:
        “The C.F.R. is the American branch of a society which originated in England. Internationalistic in viewpoint, the C.F.R., along with the Atlantic Union Movement, and the Atlantic Council of the U.S., believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established … What the Trilaterals truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political government of the nation-states involved. As managers and creators of the system they will rule the world … In my view, the Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power: political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical.” (With No Apologies, [1979], Senator Barry Goldwater pp. 128, 284).

        Senator Goldwater also noted: “David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski found Jimmy Carter their ideal candidate. They helped him win the nomination and the presidency. To accomplish this purpose, they mobilized the money power of the Wall Street bankers, the intellectual influence of the academic community-which is subservient to the wealth of the great tax-free foundations — and the media controllers represented in the membership of the CFR and the Trilateral.” ( 1; p. 286.) Senator Goldwater continued, “Brzezinski and Rockefeller invited Carter to be a member of the Trilateral Commission in 1973. They immediately began grooming him for the Presidency … We have arrived at our present position of peril in the world and at home because our leaders have refused to tell us the truth … unless we, who profess to believe in freedom, wake up, the world is headed for a period of slavery.” (p. 299)


        Tragedy And Hope: A History Of The World In Our Time
        by Carroll Quigley; copyright 1966 by Carroll Quigley; first published by Macmillan, New York; current publisher: GSG and Associates, Post Office Box 590, San Pedro, California, 90733; phone – 310-548-3455; Library of Congress catalog card member: 65-13589.
        page 324
        “[….] The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching plan, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalistic fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks, which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank, in the hands of men like Montagu Norman of the Bank of England, Benjamin Strong of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, Charles Rist of the Bank of France, and Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichsbank, sought to dominate its government by its ability to control treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence co-operative politicians by subsequent rewards in the business world.” ~ Professor Carroll Quigley

        page 1247 & 1248 –
        “The chief problem of American political life…has been how to make the two Congressional parties more national and international. The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy.”


        From pages 950-956:
        There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies (notably to its belief that England was an Atlantic rather than a European Power and must be allied, or even federated, with the United States and must remain isolated from Europe), but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.
        (snip) … because the American branch of this organization (sometimes called the “Eastern Establishment”) has played a very significant role in the history of the united States in the last generation.
        The Round Table Groups were semi-secret discussion and lobbying groups organized by Lionel Curtis, Philip H. Kerr (Lord Lothian), and (Sir) William S. Marris in 1908-1911. This was done on behalf of Lord Milner, the dominant Trustee of the Rhodes Trust in the two decades1905-1925. The original purpose of these groups was to seek to federate the English-speaking world along lines laid down by Cecil Rhodes (1853-1902) and William T. Stead (1849-1912), and the money for the organizational work came originally from the Rhodes Trust. By 1915 Round Table groups existed in seven countries, including England, South Africa, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, India, and a rather loosely organized group in the United States (George Louis Beer, Walter Lippmann, Frank Aydelotte, Whitney Shepardson, Thomas W. Lamont, Jerome D. Greene, Erwin D. Canham of the Christian Science Monitor, and others). The attitudes of the various groups were coordinated by frequent visits and discussions and by a well-informed and totally anonymous quarterly magazine, The Round Table, whose first issue, largely written by Philip Kerr, appeared in November 1910.
        Money for the widely ramified activities of this organization came originally from the associates and followers of Cecil Rhodes, chiefly from the Rhodes Trust itself, and from wealthy associates such as the Beit brothers, from Sir Abe Bailey, and (after 1915) from the Astor family. Since 1925 there have been substantial contributions from wealthy individuals and from foundations and firms associated with the international banking fraternity, especially the Carnegie United Kingdom Trust, and other organizations associated with J. P. Morgan, the Rockefeller and Whitney families, and the associates of Lazard Brothers and of Morgan, Grenfell, and Company.
        The chief backbone of this organization grew up along the already existing financial cooperation running from the Morgan Bank in New York to a group of international financiers in London led by Lazard Brothers. Milner himself in 1901 had refused a fabulous offer, worth up to $100,000 a year, to become one of the three partners of the Morgan Bank in London, in succession to the younger J. P. Morgan who moved from London to join his father in New York (eventually the vacancy went to E. C. Grenfell, so that the London affiliate of Morgan became known as Morgan, Grenfell, and Company). Instead, Milner became director of a number of public banks, chiefly the London Joint Stock Bank, corporate precursor of the Midland Bank. He became one of the greatest political and financial powers in England, with his disciples strategically placed throughout England in significant places, such as the editorship of The Times, the editorship of The Observer, the managing directorship of Lazard Brothers, various administrative posts, and even Cabinet positions. Ramifications were established in politics, high finance, Oxford and London universities, periodicals, the civil service, and tax-exempt foundations.
        At the end of the war of 1914, it became clear that the organization of this system had to be greatly extended. Once again the task was entrusted to Lionel Curtis who established, in England and each dominion, a front organization to the existing local Round Table Group. This front organization, called the Royal Institute of International Affairs, had as its nucleus in each area the existing submerged Round Table Group. In New York it was known as the Council on Foreign Relations, and was a front for J. P. Morgan and Company in association with the very small American Round Table Group. The American organizers were dominated by the large number of Morgan “experts”, including Lamont and Beer, who had gone to the Paris Peace Conference and there became close friends with the similar group of English “experts” which had been recruited by the Milner group. In fact, the original plans for the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations were drawn up at Paris. The Council of the RIIA (which, by Curtis’s energy came to be housed in Chatham House, across St. James’s Square from the Astors, and was soon known by the name of this headquarters) and the board of the Council on Foreign Relations have carried ever since the marks of their origin. Until 1960 the council at Chatham House was dominated by the dwindling group of Milner’s associates, while the paid staff members were largely the agents of Lionel Curtis. The Round Table for years (until 1961) was edited from the back door of Chatham House grounds in Ormond Yard, and its telephone came through the Chatham House switchboard.
        The New York branch was dominated by the associates of the Morgan Bank. For example, in 1928 the Council on Foreign Relations had John W. Davis as president, Paul Cravath as vice-president, and a council of thirteen others, which included Owen D. Young, Russell C. Leffingwell, Norman Davis, Allen Dulles, George W. Wickersham, Frank L. Polk, Whitney Shepardson, Isaiah Bowman, Stephen P. Duggan, and Otto Kahn. Throughout its history the council has been associated with the American Round Tablers, such as Beer, Lippmann, Shapardson, and Jerome Greene.
        The academic figures have been those linked to Morgan, such as James T. Shotwell, Charles Seymore, Joseph P. Chamberlain, Philip Jessup, Isaiah Bowman and, more recently, Philip Moseley, Grayson L. Kirk, and Henry M. Wriston. The Wall Street contacts with these were created originally from Morgan’s influence in handling large academic endowments. In the case of the largest of these endowments, that at Harvard, the influence was usually exercised indirectly through “State Street”, Boston, which, for much of the twentieth century, came through the Boston banker Thomas Nelson Perkins.
        Closely allied with this Morgan influence were a small group of Wall Street firms, whose chief figures were Elihu Root, John W. Davis, Paul D. Cravath, Russell Leffingwell, the Dulles brothers and, more recently, Arhur H. Dean, Philip D. Reed, and John J. McCloy. Other nonlegal agents of Morgan included men like Owen D. Young and Norman H. Davis.
        On this basis, which was originally financial and goes back to George Peabody, there grew up in the twentieth century a power structure between London and New York which penetrated deeply into university life, the press, and the practice of foreign policy. In England the center was the Round Table Group, while in the United States it was J. P. Morgan and Company or its local branches in Boston, Philadelphia, and Cleveland. Some rather incidental examples of the operations of this structure are very revealing, just because they are incidental. For example, it set up in Princeton a reasonable copy of the Round Table Group’s chief Oxford headquarters, All Souls College. This copy, called the Institute for Advanced Study, and best known, perhaps, as the refuge of Einstein, Oppenheimer, John von Neumann, and George F. Kennan, was organized by Abraham Flexner of the Carnegie Foundation and Rockefeller’s General Education Board after he had experienced the delights of All Souls while serving as Rhodes Memorial Lecturer at Oxford. The plans were largely drawn by Tom Jones, one of the Round Table’s most active intriguers and foundation administrators.
        The American branch of this “Eastern Establishment” exerted much of its influence through five American newspapers (The New York Times, New York Herald Tribune, Christian Science Monitor, the Washington Post, and the lamented Boston Evening Transcript). In fact, the editor of the Christian Science Monitor was the chief American correspondent (anonymously) of The Round Table and later secretary of the Rhodes Trust (1925-1939) and ambassador to Washington, was a frequent writer in the Monitor. It might be mentioned that the existence of this Wall Street Anglo-American axis was quite obvious once it is pointed out. It is reflected in the fact that such Wall Street luminaries as John W. Davis, Lewis Douglas, Jock Whitney, and Douglas Dillon were appointed to be American ambassadors in London.
        This double international network in which the Round Table groups formed the semisecret or secret nuclei of the Institutes of International Affairs was extended into a third network in 1925, organized by the same people for the same motives. Once again the mastermind was Lionel Curtis, and the earlier Round Table Groups and Institutes of International Affairs were used as nuclei for the new network. However, this new organization for Pacific affairs was extended to ten countries, while the Round Table Groups existed only in seven. The new additions, ultimately China, Japan, France, the Netherlands, and Soviet Russia, had Pacific councils set up from scratch. In Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, Pacific councils, interlocked and dominated by the Institutes of International Affairs, were set up. In England, Chatham House served as the English center for both nets, while in the United States the two were parallel creations (not subordinate) of the Wall Street allies of the Morgan Bank. The financing came from the same international banking groups and their subsidiary commercial and industrial firms. In England, Chatham House was financed for both networks by the contributions of Sir Abe Bailey, the Astor family, and additional funds largely acquired by the persuasive powers of Lionel Curtis. The financial difficulties of the IPR Councils in the British Dominions in the depression of 1929-1935 resulted in a very revealing effort to save money, when the local Institute of International Affairs absorbed the local Pacific Council, both of which were, in a way, expensive and needless fronts for the local Round Table groups.
        The chief aims of this elaborate, semisecret organization were largely commendable: to coordinate the international activities and outlooks of all the English-speaking world into one (which would largely, it is true, be that of the London group); to work to maintain the peace; to help backward, colonial, and underdeveloped areas to advance toward stability, law and order, and prosperity along lines somewhat similar to those taught at Oxford and the University of London (especially the School of Economics and the Schools of African and Oriental Studies).
        These organizations and their financial backers were in no sense reactionary or Fascistic persons, as Communist propaganda would like to depict them. Quite the contrary. They were gracious and cultured gentlemen of somewhat limited social experience who were much concerned with the freedom of expression of minorities and the rule of law for all, who constantly thought in terms of Anglo-American solidarity, of political partition and federation, and who were convinced that they could gracefully civilize the Boers of South Africa, the Irish, the Arabs, and the Hindus, and who are largely responsible for the partitions of Ireland, Palestine, and India, as well as the federations of South Africa, Central Africa, and the West Indies. Their desire to win over the opposition by cooperation worked with Smuts but failed with Hertzog, worked with Gandhi but failed with Menon, worked with Stresemann but failed with Hitler, and has shown little chance of working with any Soviet leader. If their failures now loom larger than their successes, this should not be allowed to conceal the high motives with which they attempted both.
        It was this group of people, who provided much of the framework of influence which the Communist sympathizers and fellow travelers took over in the United States in the 1930’s. It must be recognized that the power that these Left-wingers exercised was never their own power or Communist power but was ultimately the power of the international financial coterie, and, once the anger and suspicions of the American people were aroused, as they were by 1950, it was a fairly simple matter to get rid of the Red sympathizers. Before this could be done, however, a congressional committee, following backward to their source the threads which led from admitted Communists like Whittaker Chambers, through Alger Hiss, and the Carnegie Endowment to Thomas Lamont and the Morgan Bank, fell into the whole complicated network of the interlocking tax-exempt foundations. The Eighty-third Congress in July 1953 set up a Special Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations with Representative B. Carroll Reece, of Tennessee, as chairman. It soon became clear that people of immense wealth would be unhappy if the investigation went too far and that the “most respected” newspapers in the country, closely allied with these men of wealth, would not get excited enough about any revelations to make the publicity worth while, in terms of votes or campaign contributions. An interesting report showing the Left-wing associations of the interlocking nexus of tax-exempt foundations was issued in 1954 rather quietly. Four years later, the Reece committee’s general counsel, Rene A. Wormser, wrote a shocked, but not shocking, book on the subject called Foundations: Their Power And Influence.


        From “The Anglo-American Establishment” by Quigley:

        {p. 3} ONE WINTRY AFTERNOON in February 1891, three men were engaged in earnest conversation in London. From that conversation were to flow consequences of the greatest importance to the British Empire and to the world as a whole. For these men were organizing a secret society that was, for more than fifty years, to be one of the most important forces in the formulation and execution of British imperial and foreign policy.
        The three men who were thus engaged were already well known in England. The leader was Cecil Rhodes, fabulously wealthy empirebuilder and the most important person in South Africa. The second was William T. Stead, the most famous, and probably also the most sensational, journalist of the day. The third was Reginald Baliol Brett, later known as Lord Esher, friend and confidant of Queen Victoria, and later to be the most influential adviser of King Edward VII and King George V.
        The details of this important conversation will be examined later. At present we need only point out that the three drew up a plan of organization for their secret society and a list of original members. The plan of organization provided for an inner circle, to be known as “The Society of the Elect,” and an outer circle, to be known as “The Association of Helpers.” Within The Society of the Elect, the real power was to be exercised by the leader, and a “Junta of Three.” The leader was to be Rhodes, and the Junta was to be Stead, Brett, and Alfred Milner. In accordance with this decision, Milner was added to the society by Stead shortly after the meeting we have described.
        The creation of this secret society was not a matter of a moment. As we shall see, Rhodes had been planning for this event for more than seventeen years. Stead had been introduced to the plan on 4 April 1889, and Brett had been told of it on 3 February 1890. Nor was the society thus founded an ephemeral thing, for, in modified form, it exists to this day. From 1891 to 1902, it was known to only a score of per-
        {p. 4} sons. During this period, Rhodes was leader, and Stead was the most influential member. From 1902 to 1925, Milner was leader, while Philip Kerr (Lord Lothian) and Lionel Curtis were probably the most important members. From 1925 to 1940, Kerr was leader, and since his death in 1940 this role has probably been played by Robert Henry Brand (now Lord Brand).
        During this period of almost sixty years, this society has been called by various names. During the first decade or so it was called “the secret society of Cecil Rhodes” or “the dream of Cecil Rhodes.” In the second and third decades of its existence it was known as “Milner’s Kindergarten” (1901-1910) and as “the Round Table Group” (1910-1920). Since 1920 it has been called by various names, depending on which phase of its activities was being examined. It has been called ” The Times crowd,” “the Rhodes crowd, ” the “Chatham House crowd,” the “All Souls group,” and the “Cliveden set.” All of these terms were more or less inadequate, because they focused attention on only part of the society or on only one of its activities. The Milner Kindergarten and the Round Table Group, for example, were two different names for The Association of Helpers and were thus only part of the society, since the real center of the organization, The Society of the Elect, continued to exist and recruited new members from the outer circle as seemed necessary. … we shall generally call the organization the “Rhodes secret society” before 1901 and “the Milner Group” after this date, but it must be understood that both terms refer to the same organization.
        This organization has been able to conceal its existence quite successfully and many of its most influential members, satisfied to possess the reality rather than the appearance of power, are unknown even to
        {p. 5} close students of British history. This is the more surprising when we learn that one of the chief methods by which this Group works has been through propaganda. It plotted the Jameson Raid of 1895: it caused the Boer War of 1899-1902; it set up and controls the Rhodes Trust; it created the Union of South Africa in 1906-1910; it established the South African periodical The State in 1908; it founded the British Empire periodical The Round Table in 1910, and this remains the mouthpiece of the Group; it has been the most powerful single influence in All Souls, Balliol, and New Colleges at Oxford for more than a generation; it has controlled The Times for more than fifty years, with the exception of the three years 1919-1922, it publicized the idea of and the name “British Commonwealth of Nations” in the period 1908-1918; it was the chief influence in Lloyd George’s war administration in 1917-1919 and dominated the British delegation to the Peace Conference of 1919; it had a great deal to do with the formation and management of the League of Nations and of the system of mandates; it founded the Royal Institute of International Affairs in 1919 and still controls it; it was one of the chief influences on British policy toward Ireland, Palestine, and India in the period 1917-1945; it was a very important influence on the policy of appeasement of Germany during the years 1920-1940; and it controlled and still controls, to a very considerable extent, the sources and the writing of the history of British Imperial and foreign policy since the Boer War.
        It would be expected that a Group which could number among its achievements such accomplishments as these would be a familiar subject for discussion among students of history and public affairs. In this case, the expectation is not realized, partly because of the deliberate policy of secrecy which this Group has adopted, partly because the Group itself is not closely integrated but rather appears as a series of overlapping circles or rings partly concealed by being hidden behind formally organized groups of no obvious political significance.

        For more, I recommend Carroll Quigley’s two superb books on the subject: “Tragedy And Hope”, and “The Anglo-American Establishment”. Both are available on Amazon. And some may ask, who was Carroll Quigley? Here is a bit about him, but remember, he was the History Professor at Georgetown University when Bill Clinton was a student there, and was the guy who sent Clinton to Oxford to be indoctrinated into Fabian socialism as a “Rhodes Scholar”. People in America have no idea what it means to be a Rhodes Scholar — in fact, they think of it as an honor of sorts. That is a horrible misunderstanding. A Rhodes Scholarship is a training program for the overthrow of U.S. sovereignty in favor of assimilating America into their one-world order.

        Carroll Quigley was professor of history at the Foreign Service School of Georgetown University. He formerly taught at Princeton and at Harvard. He has done research in the archives of France, Italy, and England, and is the author of the widely praised Evolution of Civilizations. He was a member of the editorial board of the monthly Current History. He was a frequent lecturer and consultant for public and semi-public agencies. He was a member of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the American Anthropological and the American Economic Association, as well as various historical associations. He became a lecturer on Russian history at the Industrial College of the Armed Forces in 1951, and on Africa at the Brookings Institution in 1961. He also lectured at the U.S. Naval Weapons Laboratory, the Foreign Service Institute of the State Department, and the Naval College at Norfolk, Virginia. In 1958 he was a consultant to the Congressional Select Committee which set up the present national space agency. He was collaborator in history to the Smithsonian Institution after 1957, in connection with the establishment of its new Museum of History and Technology.


        Okay. This could go on and on. There are tons of info revealing the truth about the CFR and Trilateral. They dominate the American mass media, for example: Connie Chung, Barbara Walters, Walter Cronkite, Dan Rather — any major network news anchor is in the CFR, and takes instructions from the CFR. They dominate the State Department almost exclusively. There is a conspiracy, and it’s all out in the open now, so I thank anyone who has taken time to look into this like Ivan Berry has. The more Americans who can discover this hidden history, the better our chances of getting out of the Left-Right political paradigm and re-establishing the vision of this nation’s founders.
        Elias Alias, editor

      3. So what do you propose? It seems to me that RTI is really a slow process, and that we are only “hoping” that it will work when the time comes.
        I believe all of this is true, because I’ve been following it pretty closely since I read “None Dare Call It Conspiracy” back in the 60s. If something isn’t done soon, it will be too late for us to even find out if RTI works.
        Right now, I’m thinking that nothing other than Jesus coming back will stop the madness.
        But I’m still curious… what do you propose?

  12. the thing is that a global unificatin is innevitable, the question here is how would it be, either by a centralized goverment control or by the union of free nations and a power regulator.

    I believe the best option its the second one, since its the only one that can keep power in check, and this will be more important as technology advances, since it will allow for centralized goverment to concentrate more power into less people, eliminating all types of checks and balances, this is also true for the people within the central goverment itself, so see no valid justification in the modern era.

  13. How much easier would it be for the US Government to pull this off if it already owned, say, a third of the land in America?

    Oh, wait – it DOES own a third of the land in America!

    1. Actually, the US Government does *not* own a third of the land in America. But it thinks it does, and shall continue to think so until enough Americans stand up for our States. Until enough Americans stand up and “just say NO”, the federal government, in cooperation with the United Nations’ Agenda 21 and a regiment of NGOs, shall rely upon their surveillance/police-state raw militarized power, brute force and a totally corrupted court system pumping new blood through the privatized prison industry, backed by a confiscatory IRS and a bogus War on Drugs, to force the fedgov’s will upon the people. Add social entertainment, dramatic newscasts/media, pro sports events, the political circus, the loss of jobs, inflation, and other commonly experienced stresses, and the people are reduced to, as Steve Earle has written it into a song, “Letters to the editor and cheatin’ on your taxes is the best that you can do.” (He was taunting a sleepy American public for its impotence, challenging them to answer up if that is indeed “all they can do”.)

      We are seeing the destruction of the American way of life at the hands of globalizing socialist bankers whose history is readily available as we trace back one by one the Administrations of the succeeding Presidents, all the way back to 1912 when Wall Street bought the White House and most of Congress, set up the Federal Reserve System and the first-ever Federal “income tax” (1913), drug this nation into a foreign war overseas (WWI), created the Bank for International Settlements in 1930, financed the rise of the Third Reich across the 1930s, suckered us into WWII with FDR’s now-infamous “8-Point Plan” to make Japan attack us, created a United Nations at end of WWII (1945), pumped undeclared war in Korea as a UN police action (we’re still there, eh?), and on and on it runs, this insane 20th Century history of in-your-face tyranny so blatantly paraded as being “Official” before a trusting proletariat who have been sold on their slavery by the convenience of electricity, internal combustion oil-based energy devices on wheels, and the greatest unspoken coup d’ tat — the invention of Television.

      The very families who were involved in all such peak events of 20th Century — the Federal Reserve, the IRS, two World Wars and a forty-year Cold War, gave us also the AMA, the American Historic Society, the National Education Association (NEA), higher taxes, higher national debt, perpetual war for perpetual peace, the surveillance state, the police state, and the assault on middle-America’s family value system, all that and so much more than I can say in one comment here, have placed the concentrated power of governmental force in the hands of those who are working for the United Nations and their Agenda 21. And those same families, as history now shows clearly, were behind the creation of the CFR in 1921, as well as, in 1973, the creation of the Trilateral Commission. Don’t believe me? Do yourself a favor by reading this one —

      And then, to see the privilege the globalizing socialist banking elite grant unto themselves, take a serious read of this older piece by Patrick Wood —

      All of that is CFR and Tri-Lateral based elitist activity and it is what is behind the federal land grab in the Western States. And, Jeanette, as you so aptly stated, how much easier it would be for the US Government to pull this off (the dismantling of the States and our State governments) if the Fedgov owned a third of America’s landmass. The political lobbies for the hidden powers which move domestic and foreign policy behind the scenes figured that out long ago, and have set up the “statute” and “code” and “color of law” and “rules of the court” BS and sold it to the American people wrapped in attractive lies over decades, so that now most Americans do not know or understand that the Federal agencies have no authority over public lands within any State brought from a territory status into Statehood via respective Enabling Acts done in accordance with the Equal Footing rules. The BLM and USFS and EPA, among other departments and agencies, have no lawful claim, only what they consider to be “legal” claims. Legal is their word, but “lawful” is the term we the people must demand of our governmental agencies and departments. To be “lawful”, a “legal statute” must be pursuant to the Constitution. If it is repugnant to the Constitution, is it no law, as the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled. Government employees who will gun down a rancher for exercising his 1st and 2nd Amendment rights to protest unlawful activity by the government’s agencies such as EPA or BLM etc., are committing grievous crimes against the very people they swore to serve. And they don’t seem to be able to grasp that, which is a huge problem. So that is sorta where we’re at as the election cycle circus ramps up with juvenile contests between criminal types who’ll do what they’re paid to do by the very founders of the CFR and Tri-Lateral Commission.

      Sorry to be all over the place with this reply. Just wanted to vent a bit, I reckon. Thanks for your comment as it pinged me to want to add my two cents. 😉
      Elias Alias, editor

      1. Elias, you have really been on a roll, showing an amazing grasp of the overall situation.
        If my memory serves me, you had stated that you had begun waking up about 16 years ago after I in one of my comments mentioned my having been aware and involved for about 40 years.
        You have really advanced in your understanding and studies, and I salute you for your effort and enlightenment, especially in so short a time.
        Two issues come to mind after having read all that has been said: is the leadership of OK in line with your take on things; also, how fully should we in the know dump on the membership, many of whom are in the beginning stages of their learning process? Too many still show signs of government school indoctrination.
        It may be slower and reach fewer people, but visiting businesses, junk stores and used goods venders and thrifts as well as farmers markets, starting conversations leading to revealing some elements of what you have written about works well, with the extra atvantage of being able to immediately answer any questions that may come up. An additional benefit of speaking directly is that the audience response can lead you in the direction that they themselves inspire, feedback being a useful key for determining the value or effect of your statements. That’s been my method for years. However, no measurement exists to determine how affective this has been. Just wondering what your take on this is? Oh, and I am not so well organized so all presentations have been without notes or reference material, except, of course, when covering the Constitution and Declaration of Independance.

  14. Shorty Dawkins…

    Many of our Presidents in recent years have been CFR members. CFR also controls most media whether TV or print media. Bill Kristol and his father Irving are examples…the National Review…
    Mitt Romney is aligned with the CFR as well as many Democrats and Republicans….this is why policy never changes…no matter who we elect.. Behind the CFR are the Bildergers…and some of these men control most of the banks and financial assets of the world….I believe Executive Order 11647 signed by Nixon, covers the 10 regions…Many CIA heads have been members…..and have spawned many radical left wing groups….. Many CFR are communist , some socialist. The want total control of the individual.

  15. Article III
    Section 1.
    Of The U.S. Constitution and Moral Law states

    The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.

    Please explain “GOOD BEHAVIOUR”
    Please explain how one can do The Pledge of allegiance to Satan and Allah?
    Please explain how a traffic courts in New York can display a U.N. Flag higher than a red, white and blue flag with a questionable Gold Fringe on 3 sides of its desecrated flag display in that tyrannical false flag dichotomy fraud court?
    Please explain how a judge in New York can Swear in on the Quran?
    Please explain why any one is subject to walk into a court without a flag or flag pole to explain a traffic ticket to a court that has no pride or loyalty to put up a flag or a flag pole?
    Please tell me why public trust, treason and jury tampering dose not matter anymore?
    Please tell me why none of the above matter?

    Please explain, Please explain, Please explain?

  16. how refreshing to see so many people of like mindedness .we have a fight its the suits that have been linning their pockets for years selling us down the road without reading anything.They always say its for the greater good ,right into their bank accounts.we can win if we can just come together .they are tearing us apart one law at a time

  17. All the states should order all companies within their borders to pay all federal taxes collected directly to the states and nothing to the federal government. let the states decide who will withhold funding.

  18. I think Trump has but little choice to have CFR Newt as his VP, while he is also consulting with Kissinger this week about foreign policy. Trump will lend an ear, and smile…..


    Because, THEY will go forward with Mitt’s 3rd Party plan to cause Hillary to get the crown, if Trump doesn’t half-way play ball with these globalists. It’s an extremely dangerous game, either way on how Trump proceeds.

    If WE force the military’s hand with an overwhelming push to assure the popular vote for Trump’s presidency, the chaos will fall right into the hands of the CFR globalists, on this side of the pond and on the other side as well.

    If we allow Trump to meet them halfway, then we still get a Trump presidency…..

    Like THEY say, you can’t fight city hall unless the people rise in mass, and THEY still win ! THEY win by allowing America to fall, or THEY win by pushing us further into a communist nation with Soviet style B.S. we are already seeing.

    Unfortunately….the only way for outright control of a new America under the constitution is to let them destroy themselves (and most of us) with a full blown nuclear holocaust event, wiping out the government and other elements.

    Those of us left can form a new government, but guess who and what will show-up to “help us form a new government?” The same bastards that showed-up after 1776 that brought us to this point now !

  19. I cannot help but think of the “Antiquated concept” of so damned many European Countries.
    But then I did not vote for the CFR. But I do vote to have them assassinated… Sooo . . . .


    1 AR
    100 Magazines (30 round)
    5000 Rounds of Ammo
    ————— —————
    If three percent of the population were to keep
    and maintain AT LEAST ONE assault rifle, ONE hundred magazines and FIVE thousand rounds of ammo we would have roughly 10 million rifles, 1 billion magazines and 50 billion rounds of ammunition at the ready. Spare parts and cleaning supplies are a must too.

    Being apart of the 3% means being prepared.
    (physically, mentally and geared up)

    Tell your friends.

  21. Pssssht!

    Texas will themselves carved out just the way they were back in 1836. Not without a fight at least…

Comments are closed.