No products in the cart.


The Weirdest Possible Outcomes For The Strangest Election In U.S. History

Clinton Trump Mask

This article was written by Brandon Smith and originally published at

If you are a longtime activist in the Liberty Movement then you are well aware that elections do not matter in terms of the future direction our nation takes. Presidents are puppets of international financiers, and so are most legislators. Whenever a president does attempt to go against the system, he either ends up shot by a “lone gunman,” or his office is disgraced by a conveniently-leaked scandal.

Today, elections represent the illusion of choice; that is all. The leadership of both major parties seem different in terms of their rhetoric, but this is all cosmetic. Underneath the talk, Democrat and Republican leaders are nearly identical in their support for bigger government, more centralization, less constitutional protections, more globalism, more power to international banks and central banks, and less transparency and accountability.

For many decades now, the choice has been between the puppet on the left hand or the puppet on the right hand. This year is proving to be a little different, at least on the face of things, to the point where elections are becoming rather surreal.

For younger generations with limited experience participating in the world of U.S. elections, developments today might seem odd but not outlandish. For older generations of Americans a consensus seems to be forming and the concerns commonly expressed in the mainstream and on the web appear to match – 2016 is turning out to be the strangest presidential election they have ever seen.

In my recent article “Will A Trump Presidency Really Change Anything For The Better?,” I examine Trump’s ambiguity as an individual and his lack of political history, and why this makes him a hard candidate to pin down. The fact is, Trump is enticing to the public for the most part because the public has no idea what he really stands for. We have no evidence that his rhetoric is false because he has no legislative history to contradict his claims.

With candidates like Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, and Ted Cruz, the public is well aware of where they really stand on the issues – Clinton is hardcore globalist establishment, Ted Cruz is the same though he pretends to be opposite, and Bernie, well, Bernie is damn socialist and his only redeeming value is that he is at least honest about it.

The public knows what they will get with the other candidates; they do not know what they will get with Trump. Thus, Trump enjoys an incredible level of popularity because many Americans would rather gamble on the unknown than stick with the status quo.

The very presence of a candidate like Trump alone makes election 2016 extra weird, but this is only the beginning.

Some might argue that any change in the atmosphere of our election process at this point can only be a good thing. I would argue that the fact that the establishment is allowing their long time control mechanism to evolve into an overwhelming reality television-style circus (rather than the stiff and boringly predictable farce we are used to) suggests that Americans are being deliberately distracted from dangerous geopolitical and economic developments.

Look at it this way; we have Trump who is an attack-dog candidate who ends up in the news every other day for something he said and who attacks a Democratic opponent with which he has in the past maintained a longtime friendship. We have a fully exposed international criminal in the form of Clinton, who has been under investigation and should be prosecuted. We have a full-blown socialist named Bernie whose supporters make up a majority of the crazed social justice and cultural Marxist crowd. And we have Cruz, a “pro-constitution” anti-bank candidate with ties to those same banks and ties to an anti-sovereignty think tank (The Council on Foreign Relations).

Some Republicans accuse Trump of being an agent for the Clinton camp. Some Democrats accuse Sanders of being an agent for the Republicans. Hillary barks like a dog at her own campaign events. Sanders supporters start fights at Trump rallies and then get their asses beat because cultural Marxists are abject weaklings. Cruz gets accused of repeated adultery while some idiot thinks that posting naked pictures of Trumps wife will actually hurt his campaign rather than help it.

This whole situation feels like a soap opera gone terribly awry. How could one NOT be distracted?

In the meantime, we have a global economy returning to extreme volatility after years of central bank manipulation which has failed to accomplish anything except make the rich and powerful more rich and powerful. We have potential geopolitical hot spots in Syria, Ukraine and the South China Sea which continue to present possible triggers for global conflict. We have internationally organized terrorist supervillains in the form of ISIS, the same Islamic extremists that Western covert intelligence agencies trained and funded to destabilize the Middle East now attacking multiple countries in the West. And, we have Eastern and Western banks working closely with the International Monetary Fund and the Bank for International Settlements while pretending to be at odds with each other.

Any of the above factors could set catastrophes in motion that could change the world for a hundred years or more, and yet we are fed a steady diet of campaign mega-drama.

As stated earlier, elections in the U.S. do not decide the future of our nation, but they do in many ways reflect the level of insanity that our collective society has reached, and, they also can reflect the direction in which the establishment hopes to send us.

I believe it is very possible, considering the already erratic nature of the elections so far, that we might end up with unexpected developments and outcomes designed to further mesmerize the masses. Here are just a few of those potential events.

A Three Or Four-Way Race

Trump has suggested in the past that he might run as an independent candidate in the event that the Republican Party uses a brokered convention to remove him from the race. I am not convinced that the entire Trump vs. Republican Establishment situation is not a contrived Kabuki theater. That said, the general argument would be that a Trump independent run would “guarantee” a Democratic win.

Again, I believe the winner of the election is already predetermined, but assuming for a moment this is not the case, the Democrats have the same problem as the Republicans. Bernie Sanders has said months ago that he was not interested in running under a third party if Clinton gets the nomination, but his supporters continue to call for him to do so, and, many of those polled have stated that they would refuse to vote for Clinton if Sanders loses the nomination.

This presents a potentially frenetic final election filled with utter chaos; a three- or four-way “competition” in which there is no clear leader; a funny prospect for those of us who are tired of the election con game, but pretty disturbing to everyone else.

Delegates Choose A Candidate That Does Not Represent Public Wishes

Contentions are increasing over the existence of “super delegates” in the Democratic Party which have the power to override party majority sentiment towards a particular candidate. Many of these super delegates are actually top ranking members and officials of the Democratic Party, and can vote for any candidate they wish rather than following a “pledge” to vote at the convention for the candidate that the democratic constituency wants.

While the Republican establishment tends to use convention “rule changes” as a fail-safe to prevent a grassroots candidate from achieving an upset in the nomination (as they did with Ron Paul), the Democrats use the super delegates as a fail-safe for the same purpose. It is very possible that Bernie Sanders could receive the widest popular support among Democrat voters but still lose the nomination to Clinton through the super delegates.

Convention-Inspired Conflict And Riots

Given the already seething angst between supporters of Trump, Cruz, Sanders and Clinton, any railroading of a candidate at the conventions, whether real or fabricated for effect, could very well result in internal violence spilling into open riots. Some candidates, including Trump, have suggested this will be the ultimate outcome. I tend to agree. The divisions between Americans are so pronounced now that I would be shocked if people did not react emotionally to a brokered or stolen convention. This would also be a fantastic method to continue the distraction of the public away from greater problems.

A Surprise Combined Ticket

This scenario had not struck me as realistic until last week; I’m not sure why (perhaps it is too strange), but it is certainly plausible.  The idea that Trump and Cruz or Clinton and Sanders might actually combine forces at a brokered convention might sound ridiculous today, but keep in mind that most elections are nothing more than theater, and this includes fake rivalries.  Beyond this, the argument could be made on either side that the only way to “win” is to unite the divided Democrats or divided Republicans through a truce.  I can hear the sound bites now – “People, in the end we are all (Democrats/Republicans), and we must stop the divisiveness for the good of the party.  It is time to focus on the real enemy; the (Democrats/Republicans)…”

Such a scenario could stave off rioting and inner-party chaos, but the final election results would still be a guaranteed explosion of tensions.

Widespread Election Fraud On Both Sides

Yes, there is already widespread election fraud in the U.S. every two to four years. However, what I am referring to is election fraud which takes a mainstream stage and which makes even the most oblivious Americans question the validity of the process. I am talking about the mainstream media deliberately pushing the meme of election fraud to help the establishment conjure the environment of instability they obviously want. I am talking about the complete unraveling of the American presidential race.

A Postponed Election

In the event of stolen conventions, election fraud or rioting, the election itself could very well be postponed. Congress does have the authority to pass a law postponing federal elections due to emergencies or “extenuating circumstances”, and, they also have the ability to transfer that authority to the executive branch.

Keep in mind, this could also take place in the event of a national crisis outside of the election process. An economic collapse, large scale terrorist attacks, or general social breakdown could result in a postponed election. Though this is an incredibly unlikely scenario, with the way 2016 has been going I would not rule anything out.  Also take note that such a scenario would result in a prolonged Obama White House and of course the inevitable outcome mentioned below…

Civil War

I have said it before and I’ll say it again, if Hillary Clinton is chosen by the establishment to take Obama’s place, the result would probably be outright civil war in the U.S. The level of hatred among conservatives for that woman is so stratospheric I cannot see any other outcome.  It might not happen immediately, but a solid bet would be conflagration within her first term.

With a Trump win, I could also see at the very least nationwide riots similar in tone to those that occurred in Ferguson, Missouri, with the social justice cultists running wild with their goofy slogans and molotov cocktails. These people are a paper tiger however, and are only a threat if they manage to convince a majority of the ethnic American population to follow their lead.

The greater danger is if Trump is actually an agent for the establishment rather than anti-establishment. If Trump responds to rioting using unconstitutional measures or exploits the crisis to overstep the bounds of federal power, at that point we will know exactly who he works for. Again, with Trump, everything is a gamble and we won’t know until we know.

Some of the above theoretical scenarios might sound outlandish, but then again, if you traveled back in time a decade ago and tried to explain what the conditions of elections would be in 2016, I doubt anyone would believe you.

I continue to hold to the premise that the elections have entered the world of the weird because America itself is on the edge of something that will shake its very core. What that event will be is hard to say because there are so many possibilities, but tensions of this caliber usually escalate to crisis before they deescalate, and tensions today are surely escalating.

It is clear that we are in for a roller-coaster ride in the next year, so prepare accordingly, but also keep in mind that elections in themselves do not represent threats or solutions to threats. You and I, the awake and aware, are the solution to the threats facing this country. The elections only serve as a gauge for how close to the bottom of the abyss we actually are.


Brandon Smith


  1. THEY keep telling us that “Voter Fraud can get you 3 1/2 years and a $10,000 Fine” and that “Every Vote Counts,” but this year, the American voter has seen more than they can stomach. Many are saying, “Yes…it’s time to destroy the establishment, time to destroy both parties.”

    We can do it….but (ironically) requires everyone of us to vote in the general election.

    The oligarchy dictatorship voting system has reached maximum exposure. This is NOT the America we grew-up in, but is now a stark reality of being a Third World country with a government that has taken a nose dive as a result of their own arrogance (and corruption).

    I hate to say it, this is the type of government we have heard about with other countries, i.e., Brazil, Venezuela, Greece, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Ukraine, and many others, always resulting in a deadly civil war. Then (we) the United States or the U.N. send-in “Peace Keepers” to guarantee lawful elections.

    But NOT in this country that has proven to us that our time consuming votes recently meant absolutely nothing. The GOP president, Priebus, stated recently that fact and didn’t even bat an eye.

    Hillary Clinton is the pick by both parties and everyone else is just mental fodder to keep the calm in America, because (even now) half this country is still asleep and letting this corrupt government screw the rest of us into chaos.

    Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump win with excellent voter turn-out while Cruz and Clinton get the delegates. It’s a charade that didn’t require us to vote, because it is all decided in a backroom of each party. Plus…we’re learning the GOP doesn’t care if WE destroy them, and I would imagine the reason to be….the end game is here.

    Hillary Clinton used her time as Secretary of State, to set-up the New World Order by making the right contacts her and Bill needed for future negotiations for control and disbursement of wealth. The oligarchy are relying on the Clintons to maintain continuity of world government corruption, keeping politicians and leaders wealthy during a world economic collapse of which will trigger WWIII.

    Look at it this way….

    The bank owners discovered that one of their own has been filtering billions of dollars from individual bank accounts for years and now the board of directors say to themselves….”it was wrong, but it sure was clever, and now I want in on the scam.”

    Therefore…..the board of directors (Democrat / Republican) agree to keep the corrupt banker in office (The Clintons). But….oh no, here comes an outsider that says, “it’s all crap and I’m gonna stop it,” and the board of directors from both parties say, “no way, even if we have to rig the votes.”


  2. At this point, Im having a hard time seeing us get through the next two years with out massive civil unrest or a civil war. Camps on both sides are promising days of rage or this democratic spring ( reference Arab spring, same thing ) if they are not elected. We very much are at a tipping point in this country, and even IF we got someone who could unit us, we are in for a very long road cleaning up this mess.

  3. First, the elections are the peoples voice and election fraud is Treason. Why? Because it shuts up the people actions and wants in what goes on in our government, the one in writing, the US Constitution. Because the way election fraud is going it is done to do away with the US Constitution and America from within.

    George Washington: “However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.”

    John Adams: “There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution.

    Never confuse that the people who serve within it – elected, hired, contracted, etc – as actually being our government, they are NOT. That is something the PTB have been working on for decades, to confuse Americans about the people who SERVE WITHIN our governments – state and general (federal) as actually being “the” government. They are not, they are representatives of the people and they have gone way beyond the authority delegated, thank God it IS in writing.

    Benjamin Franklin: “In free governments the rulers are the servants, and the people their superiors and sovereigns. For the former, therefore, to return among the latter was not to degrade but to promote them.”

    J. Reuben Clark spoke about the need for a solid support of the Constitution: “God provided that in this land of liberty, our political allegiance shall run not to individuals, that is, to government officials, no matter how great or how small they may be. Under His plan our allegiance and the only allegiance we owe as citizens or denizens of the United States, runs to our inspired Constitution which God himself set up. So runs the oath of office of those who participate in government. A certain loyalty we do owe to the office which a man holds, but even here we owe just by reason of our citizenship, no loyalty to the man himself. In other countries it is to the individual that allegiance runs. This principle of allegiance to the Constitution is basic to our freedom. It is one of the great principles that distinguishes this “land of liberty” from other countries”.

    Alexander Hamilton: “Until the people have, by some solemn and authoritative act, annulled or changed the established form, it is binding upon themselves collectively, as well as individually; and no presumption, or even knowledge, of their sentiments, can warrant their representatives in a departure from it, prior to such an act.”

    President Andrew Johnson: “Outside of the Constitution we have no legal authority more than private citizens, and within it we have only so much as that instrument gives us. This broad principle limits all our functions and applies to all subjects.”

    Defending the US Constitution, our legitimate government, our way of life is NOT a “civil war”, nor is it a “revolution”; those are the terms given to make it seem like it is a “change in government by mal/miscontents” (basically politispeak). They are used to confuse and shape peoples opinion, to distort thinking. Words matter.

    So what are we doing?

    We are DEFENDING the US Constitution as is required of us. We are replacing those corrupt and treasonous people SERVING WITHIN by those who will behave more honorably (just by what happens when we replace the others).

    But to justify our actions every step we take MUST be constitutional in action. AS all criminals, they MUST be charged with the crimes committed and given their day in court with a jury trial.

    Thomas Jefferson: “When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.”

    Abraham Lincoln: “We, the people, are the rightful masters of both congress and the courts – not to overthrow the constitution, but to overthrow men who pervert the Constitution”.

    Our US Constitution REQUIRES the Militia made up of people trained as the congress requires the military to be trained and knowledgeable about the US Constitution because one cannot enforce it if one does not know it, plus all must be Oathbound to our document. The Oath requires that knowledge.

    Thomas Jefferson: “For a people who are free, and who mean to remain so, a well organized and armed militia is their best security.”

    George Washington: “A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well-digested plan is requisite; and their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories as tend to render them independent of others for essential, particularly military, supplies.”

    US Constitution, Section 8, Clause 15: “To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel invasions. “

    Basically says that the Militia has as its general constitutionally assigned duties to:
    — Enforce the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution,
    — Enforce and keep the “Laws of the Union” (which are constitutional laws ONLY),
    — Protect the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
    — “to suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”.

    With those words delegating those duties to the people as the Militia, it FORBIDS those who serve within our governments to use any other governmental agency for those duties. It IS in writing for all to see, and the debates, comments, etc of the time back that up.

    George Washington, “Sentiments on a Peace Establishment”, letter to Alexander Hamilton; “The Writings of George Washington”: “It may be laid down, as a primary position, and the basis of our system, that every citizen who enjoys the protection of a free government…, but even of his personal services to the defence of it, and consequently that the Citizens of America (with a few legal and official exceptions) from 18 to 50 Years of Age should be borne on the Militia Rolls, provided with uniform Arms, and so far accustomed to the use of them, that the Total strength of the Country might be called forth at Short Notice on any very interesting Emergency.”

    So please use the correct terms so that people who are still ignorant, and those slavering to destroy our nation cannot use those terms to discredit us and our actions.

    They have been trying everything they can to make their treasonous actions look lawful, from laws that are not binding on the American people, to wars that are not declared by congress as required, to “treaties” that are unlawful in their nature and makeup.

    John Adams, “A Dissertation on the Canon and Feudal Law” (1765): “Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people, who have a right… and a desire to know; but besides this, they have a right, and indisputable, unalienable, indefeasible, divine right to that most dreaded and envied kind of knowledge, I mean of the characters and conduct of their rulers.”

    Alexander Hamilton: “The only constitutional exception to the power of making treaties is, that it shall not change the Constitution… On natural principles, a treaty, which should manifestly betray or sacrifice primary interests of the state, would be null.”

    Alexander Hamilton: “… a treaty cannot be made which alters the Constitution or which infringes any express exceptions to the power of the Constitution of the United States.”

    Some things to consider that ties in with the above that will hopefully clarify.

    Alexander Hamilton, concerning the supremacy clause, Federalist 33: “It will not, I presume, have escaped observation that it expressly confines the supremacy to laws made pursuant to the Constitution.”

    Alexander Hamilton: “There is no position which depends on clearer principles that that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid.”

    Alexander Hamilton, defending the new Constitution, and especially its Treaty Clause: “I aver, that it was understood by all to be the intent of the provision [the Treaty Clause] to give to that power the most ample latitude to render it competent to all the stipulations, which the exigencies of National Affairs might require—competent to the making of Treaties of Alliance, Treaties of Commerce, Treaties of Peace and every other species of Convention usual among nations and competent in the course of its exercise to controul & bind the legislative power of Congress. And it was emphatically for this reason that it was so carefully guarded; the cooperation of two thirds of the Senate with the President being required to make a Treaty. I appeal for this with confidence.”: “It will not be disputed that the words ‘Treaties and alliances’ are of equivalent import and of no greater force than the single word Treaties. An alliance is only a species of Treaty, a particular of a general. And the power of ‘entering into Treaties,’ which terms confer the authority under which the former Government acted, will not be pretended to be stronger than the power ‘to make Treaties,’ which are the terms constituting the authority under which the present Government acts.”

    John Adams, A Defense of the Constitutions of the United States: “To suppose arms in the hands of citizens, to be used at individual discretion, except in private self-defense, or by partial orders of towns, countries or districts of a state, is to demolish every constitution, and lay the laws prostrate, so that liberty can be enjoyed by no man; it is a dissolution of the government. The fundamental law of the militia is, that it be created, directed and commanded by the laws, and ever for the support of the laws.”

    Alexander Hamilton, Federalist Papers: “The militia is a voluntary force not associated or under the control of the States except when called out; [when called into actual service] a permanent or long standing force would be entirely different in make-up and call.“

    St John Tucker: “The congress of the United States possesses no power to regulate, or interfere with the domestic concerns, or police of any state: it belongs not to them to establish any rules respecting the rights of property; nor will the constitution permit any prohibition of arms to the people;…”

    “A constitution is designated as a supreme enactment, a fundamental act of legislation by the people of the state. A constitution is legislation direct from the people acting in their sovereign capacity, while a statute is legislation from their representatives, subject to limitations prescribed by the superior authority.” Ellingham v. Dye, 231 U. S. 250.

    “The basic purpose of a written constitution has a two-fold aspect, first securing [not granting] to the people of certain unchangeable rights and remedies, and second, the curtailment of unrestricted governmental activity within certain defined spheres.” Du Pont v. Du Pont, 85 A 724.

    Hope this helps that laws/rules/codes/regulations made that are not following (in Pursuance thereof) the US Constitution are not binding on the American people. That includes election laws made to further and make easier election fraud.

    If there were never intended to be action to defend the Constitution from those who are domestically attempting to destroy its power and authority, why would each Oath require it of those who take the Oaths?

    Chief Tecumseh: “When it comes your time to die, be not like those whose hearts are filled with the fear of death, so that when their time comes they weep and pray for a little more time to live their lives over again in a different way. Sing your death song and die like a hero going home.”

  4. Quite well said as to the candidates that are known. I find Trump comparable to Obama’s ticket to the Presidency, as very little was/is known. Regardless of labels, the bulk of the Liberals and Conservatives and whatever thrive off the thrill of not knowing. Trump also seems comparable as to an agitator in a washing machine due to his past, since his past of what is known goes both ways in laundering himself previous to public view as to what he says.

  5. Civil War in today’s context could or will involve, not states between states or even states between a corrupt federal government, but would evolve from a race war perpetrated by political turmoil and instigated by the power brokers. Then comes martial law, but would not be nationwide at first, but in most major cities…followed by a total crackdown by the corrupt government (as a convenient excuse) of which would THEN sweep across the nation, state by state, county by county.

    MANY areas will NOT fall in-step……

    Families will be split-up, military personnel will question their allegiance, law enforcement will be divided, Blacks and Hispanics will continue to be motivated by outside influence(s) against Whites, new militias will rise from nearly nothing, and regions of the country will be labeled “no go areas” and will be controlled by various elements.

    It could happen before or after THEY kick-off WWIII to erase enormous debts around the world and to reign-in the New World Order.

    Therefore, a Civil War in today’s context, will look nothing like the first Civil War, but will be a three or four way battle of resistance, self preservation, political power and the restoration of Constitutional values.

    The borders will be officially erased and bingo….the North American Union replaces the United States and Mexico’s former Presidente’ Fox will attempt to rule the NAU, since he was very instrumental with instigating the “Reconquista” movement in America when the SPP was signed.

    Foreign born presidents will be the norm, much like what we are seeing now, with the Canadian running for President and a Kenyan leaving office (maybe).

    The U.S. will look like it did when there were only 13 Colonies with territories controlled by different countries. The population will be dramatically reduced by then…..

    America was an “Experiment” and is quickly heading into the trash, therefore….we will have to start all over again.

  6. A reminder to all fellow Oathkeepers.

    Your Sacred Oath binds you to obey LAWFUL orders and to refuse ALL UNLAWFUL orders. This duty does not merely apply to unlawful orders you do not like, or from men you dislike; it binds you to refuse unlawful orders of ANY sort, given by ANYONE. Nor does the CinC have the authority to disregard or change the Law in this regard. Obeying an illegal order makes you as guilty as he who gave the order. “I was only following orders” is NO EXCUSE, morally or in the eyes of the Law.

    Orders to specifically target non-combatant families of the enemy where the enemy is not present, or orders to engage in torture (I am not referring to waterboarding, but rather full-blown torture techniques), are violations of the UCMJ, Geneva Conventions, and a VIOLATION OF YOUR OATH! Doing these things are just as illegal, and as much of a violation of your Sacred Oaths, as orders to fire upon American Citizens. Any man who would violate their oaths in their dealings with the enemy is no less criminal, and no more honorable, than men who would violate their oaths in their dealings with their fellow citizens.

    America rightly and justly hung many Nazis for the very thing that has been advocated; both for ordering and carrying out orders, to wage war and conduct reprisals against non-combatant family members of their enemies. The crimes of our enemy are irrelevant in this regard; their crimes do not justify nor exonerate ours.

    You cannot support a man who would give such orders, making War Criminals of our servicemen and women, and claim to be an “Oathkeeper”, without being a HYPOCRITE and DISHONORABLE. Those of you who, like I, have been honored to serve in the Armed Forces… I KNOW FOR A FACT that you know what I am saying is true. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU rec’d training in this very subject in your Basic Training.

    STAND TO YOUR DUTY… else be the lowest form of scum there is, a TRAITOR TO YOUR OATH, AND TO YOUR COUNTRY, and a WAR CRIMINAL.

    EVERY ONE of you who has worn the uniform of the Armed Services KNOWS what I said here is the TRUTH.. whether you like it or not. Your character is not determined by whether you abide by your Sacred Oath when it is easy or convenient… the measure of your character is determined by whether you abide by your oath when it is NOT easy or convenient to do so.

    For those who try to tell me that I should disregard Trump’s statements about making my son, and thousands of others, a war criminal, because he later “walked it back”.. I have the following question…

    Imagine one day you met a guy who needed a place to spend the night. You decide you are going to let him stay at your house for the night.

    While you introduce him to your family, he makes the remark when he see’s your 12 yr old daughter “man, I cannot wait until your folks go to sleep, cause I am gonna come visit your bedroom and have fun with you”.

    You reply “WHAT!?! What did you just say? That is my daughter you are talking about?!?!”

    Then the guy “walks it back” saying “Hey, man, I am sorry, I did not really mean that.. I would never touch your daughter!”

    So what are you going to do now? Does it matter to you that he “walked it back” after he learned what he said made him unpopular with you? Will you now let him stay in your house? Or do you kick his ass into the street?

    It is a pretty easy thing to shrug your shoulders and take it lightly when you do not have a son or daughter in the military.

  7. It will only be civil war if those who hate Clinton are really REALLY stupid, violent, assholes. guess you might be on to something.

Comments are closed.