No products in the cart.


REVELATION: Dawn Of Global Governance

Wow! Y’all ready for this?

I’ve received a request from Chuck Untersee to make sure all Oath Keepers and friends know about the new movie which will premiere on Friday, April 15 2016 at two theaters in Texas.

Here is the letter I received:

Hi Elias

We need veteran support!…Any help you can offer is greatly appreciated. Recent press release, radio spots, TV commercials, post theatrical screening  audience interviews and Charlie’s original theme for the film.


Stewart is in a big segment toward the middle of the film.

Thanks for the support.

Chuck Untersee
MAJ, AR, USAR ( ret )

Revelation 1 SheetFILM CONCEPT

Looming world government. A global “elite”! The United Nations…loss of American sovereignty! The light of our “shining city on the hill dims”. Dissecting America under judgment. Lieutenant General William Boykin and Alex Jones join Charlie Daniels in a primer for the uninitiated on The New World Order, with Biblical perspective. The global feudal police state unfolds. We were born for such a time as this!


TIME: 1.46 minutes






1. Film has taken over five years. Filmed in fifteen states with 42 rock stars of the patriot movement. Drove over 25 thousand miles Maine to California, Montana to South Texas.


Alex Jones, Charlie Daniels, Lieutenant General William Boykin, Joseph Farrah, Sheriff Richard Mack, Dr Jerome Corsi, Mark Collins as George Washington, Randy Weaver, Gerald Celente, Joel Skousen, Stewart Rhodes, Larry Pratt, Kathryn Albrecht, Edwin Vieria, Jim Marrs, Cliven Bundy, Kamal Saleem, Chuck Baldwin.

Revelation_charlie-daniels3. CU filmed, directed, edited…theatrical 5.1 mix in LA, edited ( 8
months ) Austin.

4. REVELATION will be the first theatrically released documentary on issues of the New World Order and loss of American sovereignty.

5. Same distributor who did 2016, Obama’s America…Rocky Mountain Pictures

6. Opening 15 April in Houston. Santikos theaters: Richmond Palladium, Tomball Silverado. Will break into the Houston Market from there. Opening weekend critical to get big box office.



8. Perfect storm mid election. Not about election but much easier to get people to focus on our issues. Could reach a huge audience.



Agenda 21, our fall toward Marxism/Communism, secret societies, global elite, one world government, spiritual battle, Black Robe Regiment, gun control, Common Core, looming police state, patriot’s line in the sand, geo political situation, Islamic threat, open borders, Constitutional Sheriff, Bundy Ranch, The Constitution, RFID






HOUSTON, we have a problem! 


Finally, a movie that connects the dots that the “elites” don’t want you to see! Launching in Houston on April 15, 16, 17 at the Santikos Palladium Richmond and Santikos Silverado Tomball. This is your opportunity to be a Paul Revere by educating all your friends, family and church with this movie.

REVELATION, Dawn of Global Government, starring country music legend Charlie Daniels, Alex Jones and Lieutenant General William Boykin, reflects a Biblical world view as illustrated in Revelation by the four horsemen of the apocalypse. The American Republic, Christian faith and liberty are rapidly being destroyed by the Trojan Horse of globalism. As we have slept, “change has come to America”…awakened late, we will find ourselves suffocated in a global prison planet. Come and find out how we can restore Liberty to the country we all love!

Buy Tickets Now http://www.revelationthemovie. info/ticketing/

For Group Tickets call Derwin Jordan at  281-750-6955

[ot-video type=”youtube” url=””]


Go Here For More!


Santikos Palladium 7301 West Grand Parkway South, Richmond, Tx

Santikos Silverado 24720 Tomball Parkway Tomball, Tx


Elias Alias

Editor in Chief for Oath Keepers; Unemployed poet; Lover of Nature and Nature's beauty. Slave to all cats. Reading interests include study of hidden history, classical literature. Concerned Constitutional American. Honorably discharged USMC Viet Nam Veteran. Founder, TheMentalMilitia.Net



    1. This movement is a mix of Fascism, Communism, and Feudalism. It may morph into full on Communism, but my guess is it will be Fascist in nature. Just replace Nationalism with Internationalism, and it has all the same attributes. Read the several Das Kapital journals and they point toward Capitalism going through a form of Fascism to Communism, blah, blah, blah.

      What I know for sure; We need to stop it poste haste!

      1. Grek K:
        Good points. Please note that fascism is a form of authoritarian socialism. I’m sure you’ve heard some of those arguments. Nazi means national socialists etc. Hitler praised Marx in Mein Kampf, and often said publicly that his politics were close to communism. The Mises Institute reviews this in detail, on youtube and their website.

        But I’m nit-picking. Your core idea is that they are all similar, and I agree. Globalists want big government, authoritarian control, and a rich oligarchy. Globalists intend to be the rich oligarchs. The main proponents of globalism already are rich oligarchs. E.g., Soros, Buffet, Bill Gates. The biggest customer for Microsoft is the the federal government, so of course Gates is a lefty. MSNBC is his mouthpiece, and they spout the party line so the leftist bureaucracy will like Microsoft and buy it’s products. They’re all like that.

        The way to stop the globalists is to stop the authoritarian socialists.

    2. “. . . of the United States of America and to the DEMOCRACY for which it stands?” So, what is it you’re saying again?

  1. I really hope that this movie can get up here to Washington state I would for sure go see it.

    1. Good luck getting this film or any other patriotic American activity in Washington state… has a become a cesspool of Communist Common Core Progressive Liberal hacks that work harder on implementing Sharia Law than preserving our American Constitution and traditions. Hopefully they will eventually offer it on DVD so we can all see it.

  2. Hope to be able to see this movie soon…it is so very “timely” to come out. Am curious to see how Cliven Bundy performs, and hope this movie includes the video of when the Bundy supporters, many on horseback, went to the site where the cattle were held and the BLM “employees” were there all dressed up in battle gear..and the BLM had a speaker telling them to disperse, or they would SHOOT.them! Chuck Baldwin has an excellent article today that aligns with this movie.

    It is at direct site:
    Title: Washington DC neocons are the greatest threat to world freedom. He references an article that Paul Craig Roberts wrote that is terrific…

    There are so many names in Chuck Baldwins’ article..that are familiar…from research done and published by Kevin Ryan….a 911 researcher and author of.. “Another Nineteen” his website is: You need to look at it…unbelievable research….

  3. I live in Wisconsin. I understand this film is beginning in Texas first, but where are the locations of cinemas carrying this film? Wanna go.

  4. Films are great, provided the correctly identified problems are addressed. I saw no mention of the money, the private federal reserve note, a private debt instrument and the Lynch pin to all that vexes us. Dance around it all we wish, but it’s the money stupid! We abandoned any common law/Constitutional system when silver coin left general circulation. Why is this do difficult to comprehend? It’s maritime law we have not common law, or any Constitution. Don’t take my word for it, go see what the Federal court had to say regarding the Terre Haute litigation. The courts said the constitution is frivolous, without merit and OF NO AUTHORITY! No one mention the 1947 Buck ACT, which was a massive movement toward a 100% voluntary 100% commercial system. I think you’ll find the silver left about the same time the codification of the UCC came about. What does this tell us? There’s no constitution anything. The compact called Constitution is an all or nothing document, if any portion is missing, the whole is missing. Do we have gold and silver coins in general circulation? No! Why wasn’t McVeigh tried in the the state the alleged crime occurred in as per their constitution? That’s right, because we do not have any Constitution. We have a bank pretending to offer government services. Come on people, I know you’re bright, intelligent, capable. Federal means Federal, as in by Agreement at the individual level. Federal doesn’t mean national, and certainly doesn’t mean Constitutional! If OKs haven’t seen Harmon L Taylor’s vids and interviews I suggest doing so. He’s the only fellow I’ve found since 1990′ that knows how this system works
    Respectfully in truth and liberty,

    1. Defender: The object is to wake up more people to the dangers of globalism, not turn them off. Too much too quickly induces slumber; it’s hopeless; why try and do anything about it, etc. At present, too few even realize that the nation faces it’s end in a self-inflicted collectivist eutopia.
      What you should do is thank Elias for his article informing us of this effort.
      Thank you, Elias. Would that more East Texans get on board of the Liberty Train as has Chuck Untersee.

    2. “… go see what the Federal court had to say regarding the Terre Haute litigation. The courts said the constitution is frivolous, without merit and OF NO AUTHORITY!”

      Since the courts, and every other position in our governments, get the authority they use to “govern” us from the US Constitution obviously the court ruling was incorrect. Not saying that Domestic Enemy(ies) or Traitor(s) to the American people, the US Constitution were not involved, they are – and that includes those that serve within the judicial branch.

      The ONLY authority that those that serve within our government has comes directly and in writing from the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution. The people who serve within our governments have NO lawful authority/powers over the American people beyond that/those documents.

      The people who SERVE WITHIN our governments are NOT “THE” government, but are ALLOWED to use the authority DELEGATED to the different branches and specific named offices within those branches. The people who SERVE WITHIN have no real or lawful authority beyond that. That is why every presidents executive order starts with “By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution…”.

      Though the last 10 or so people who served as presidents used powers NOT delegated to the executive branch or even to the general government anywhere. If it is NOT delegated and in writing within the US Constitution it is NOT a lawful authority, but a usurpation a crime, some even are treasonous in nature.

      America is a Constitutional Republic, the people who serve within our governments used the DELEGATED authority of the branch or specific named office that IS in writing within the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution. The people who serve are not our government, those documents are.

      President Andrew Jackson, farewell address: “It is well known that there have always been those among us who wish to enlarge the powers of the general government, and experience would seem to indicate that there is a tendency on the part of this government to overstep the boundaries marked out for it by the Constitution. Its legitimate authority is abundantly sufficient for all the purposes for which it was created, and its powers being expressly enumerated, there can be no justification for claiming anything beyond them. Every attempt to exercise power beyond these limits should be promptly and firmly opposed, for one evil example will lead to other measures still more mischievous; and if the principle of constructive powers or supposed advantages or temporary circumstances shall ever be permitted to justify the assumption of a power not given by the Constitution, the general government will before long absorb all the powers of legislation, and you will have in effect but one consolidated government. From the extent of our country, its diversified interests, different pursuits and different habits, it is too obvious for argument that a single consolidated government would be wholly inadequate to watch over and protect its interests; and every friend of our free institutions should be always prepared to maintain unimpaired and in full vigor the rights and sovereignty of the states and to confine the action of the general government strictly to the sphere of its appropriate duties.”

      Thomas Jefferson: “The several States composing, the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government; but that, by a compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a general government for special purposes – delegated to that government certain definite powers, reserving, each State to itself, the residuary mass of right to their own self-government; and that whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force: that to this compact each State acceded as a State, and is an integral part, its co-States forming, as to itself, the other party: that the government created by this compact was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among powers having no common judge, each party (the people) has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress.”

      Alexander Hamilton: “Until the people have, by some solemn and authoritative act, annulled or changed the established form, it is binding upon themselves collectively, as well as individually; and no presumption, or even knowledge, of their sentiments, can warrant their representatives in a departure from it, prior to such an act.”

      Alexander Hamilton: “There is no position which depends on clearer principles that that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid.”

      Alexander Hamilton, concerning the supremacy clause, Federalist 33: “It will not, I presume, have escaped observation that it expressly confines the supremacy to laws made pursuant to the Constitution.” (Not the people who serve within that government.)

      This includes treaties, laws, regulations, codes, ALL LEGISLATION; and that was delegated to named offices – Senate and the House of Representatives, no one else, no other position has that lawful authority to bind the American people. Nor can those that serve give away, trade, sell, assign, etc those powers that belong to the branch and/or office as it IS NOT theirs to do so with. That means that anything that goes against the US Constitution in any way such as the Patriot ACT, NDAA, Free Trade, Fast Track, NSA, IRS, BLM, DHS, FBI, CIA, etc are all treasonous in their nature and have caused harm, death, the threat of harm, death, etc which also makes them *terrorist actions by those who implement and enforce them.

      *28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.

      So what does this mean? No one can do away with our legitimate government except through the people deciding to change it, or force.

      Thomas Jefferson to Wilson Nicholas: “Our peculiar security is in the possession of a written Constitution. Let us not make it a blank paper by construction.”

      James Madison: “Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government.”

      James Madison, Federalist 14: “In the first place, it is to be remembered, that the general government is not to be charged with the whole power of making and administering laws. Its jurisdiction is limited to certain enumerated objects, which concern all the members of the republic, but which are not to be attained by the separate provisions of any”.

      James Madison, Federalist 39: “Each State, in ratifying the Constitution, is considered as a sovereign body, independent of all others, and only to be bound by its own voluntary act. In this relation, then, the new Constitution will, if established, be a FEDERAL, and not a NATIONAL constitution.” (It was established.)

Comments are closed.