No products in the cart.

News

Hastert’s Perverted Actions Consistent with Character to be Expected of Oath-Breakers

Hastert
Say, you’re cute. How would you like a little hush money?

“Nothing is more disturbing than having ‘serial child molester’ and ‘Speaker of the House’ in the same sentence,” Federal Judge Thomas Durkin declared as he sentenced former House speaker Dennis Hastert, 74, to 15 months in federal prison, USA Today reported.  Hastert pleaded guilty last October to bank fraud linked to hushing up the “molesting” of teenage boys more than 30 years ago, when he was a high school wrestling coach.

“The court also fined Hastert $250,000 and sentenced him to two years of supervised release after leaving prison. Hastert must register as a sex offender,” the story elaborates, noting he’d have received a stronger sentence on sex abuse charges had the statute of limitations not expired on those.

Disregarding the contortions needed to find original intent-based Constitutional powers for federal, as opposed to state jurisdiction in the case (and recall the pretext for initiating the assault on the Branch Davidians at Waco was to save children from abuse, and we saw how well that worked out), Hastert’s fall is a “hoist on his own petard” ending to a career of power and arrogance that included eight years being next in the succession line for the presidency after the Vice President.  He was instrumental in advancing the federal usurpation of powers, betraying his oath, his constituents, and the Republic.

And that included endorsing infringements on the right of the people to keep and bear arms.

Gun owners with long memories will shed no tears over Hastert’s exposure and downfall. Many of us still remember May, 1999, when, per CNN, “House Speaker Dennis Hastert entered the fierce debate on gun control … saying he favored raising the minimum age for owning a handgun to 21 and requiring background checks for all sales at gun shows.” It was especially “puzzling” at the time, as “[a]n aide from [then-Senate Majority Leader Trent] Lott’s office told CNN that … the gun control issue is not slated to come up in the House of Representatives anytime soon.”

“Where the hell is it within the Constitutional powers of the federal government to enact any kind of gun control legislation at all?” I asked in an angry open letter response to Hastert (see end of article). “Where the hell do you get off endorsing a handgun ban for a segment of our population that is old enough to vote, to marry, to parent and to go to war and die protecting your sorry politically opportunistic ass?”

Adding insult to injury, the following month, Hastert refused to use his position of influence “to ‘whip’ members into a unified party line” on guns, The Los Angeles Times noted. “Hastert has spoken favorably of new gun safety measures since the Littleton, Colo., high school massacre.”

Curiously, even after those betrayals, NRA still gave Hastert an “A” rating. Evidently giving them some of what they wanted, including access to his office, was enough to induce Fairfax to overlook the infringements he favored imposing. It’s not like we haven’t seen that time and again.

In any case, with the triumphant attacks on Republicans and with the predictable “progressive” braying, principled “no compromise” gun owners can at least prove a substantial level of separation from the inevitable guilt-by-association conflation. That the charges came when Hillary Clinton’s star was rising amidst allegations of her criminality, was perhaps to be expected as a politically smart way to take such focus off the presumptive Democrat front-runner.

Regardless, it illustrates that the greatest danger to Republicans comes not from principled conservatives criticizing betrayals by party elites, but from those elites’ own actions. It also makes it fair to wonder if anyone else in the leadership is similarly vulnerable and compromised – a theory some have suggested as a potential explanation for a succession of seeming surrenders (key word “seeming”) following the 2014 political party polarity shift.

—–

Here’s the open letter to Hastert I referred to above. It’s worth noting that someone who favored denying guns to others is now a “prohibited person”:

In No Uncertain Terms

 

by David Codrea

 

19 May, 1999
Rep. Dennis Hastert
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515-1101

 

Dear Employee,

 

While I normally maintain a polite tone in letters to legislators, these are not normal times. Or, I should say, your recent statements are not normal for someone who represents himself as the leader of the Republican party in the House of Representatives.

 

As a Republican, I expect you to understand the principles of Constitutional conservatism. I expect you to understand the meaning of enumerated federal powers, and the off-limits proscriptions articulated in the Bill of Rights. I expect you to abide by your oath of office. In short, I expect you to be different from the slimebag socialists.

 

Because you are not, and because you have either stupidly, spinelessly or evilly advocated the imposition of additional coercive infringements against my right to keep and bear arms, you have forfeited any claim to civility from me. I will speak to you clearly so that you understand my utter contempt for you as a legislator who supports the destruction of my rights, for you as an American who has betrayed the birthright of your countrymen, and for you as a man who places position above principle. I will speak to you in no uncertain terms, so that you understand my resolve to oppose the tyranny that you enable, represent and feed off of.

 

I must admit that your motivation for enraging and alienating millions of traditionally Republican voters confounds me- what do you hope to gain? Do you think that liberals will now support you? Do you think that the media will suddenly start editorializing in your favor? Do you think that the gun banners will now go home sated?

 

Are you really that dumb? Or are you just corrupt? Or both?

 

Where the hell is it within the Constitutional powers of the federal government to enact any kind of gun control legislation at all? Where the hell do you get off endorsing a handgun ban for a segment of our population that is old enough to vote, to marry, to parent and to go to war and die protecting your sorry politically opportunistic ass?

 

As a lifelong Republican, campaign volunteer and financial contributor, here’s my oath to you and your fellow subversive trough-feeding poltroons in the GOP — and I guarantee you, I take mine a lot more seriously than you take yours. I am through rewarding unprincipled political parasites who sell out my rights as an appeasement gesture to the socialists. You are undeserving of anything but loathing. The only Republicans who will ever receive my support again will be those principled few who understand and honor their oaths to abide by and defend the Constitution.

 

I intend to do everything I can to encourage enough fellow gun owners to deny turncoats like yourself the narrow margin of victory that most campaigns are won by. If this means the Republicans become minority players, so be it. That’s what you get for taking citizens like me for granted. That’s what you get for arrogantly deeming citizens like me so desperate that we will continually allow you to sell us out. That’s what you get for arrogantly presuming that citizens like me have no choice but to settle for “the lesser of two evils.” That’s what you get for your treacherous and uncalled for surprise attack against our rights.

 

As a party, the Libertarians are the only ones who consistently and steadfastly support the Second Amendment, and they have earned the support I would have given you.* I have heard some decry this position, calling it a “wasted” vote, pointing out the draconian gun control measures the Democrats will impose should they gain ascendancy. I prefer voting my conscience. And I prefer facing this eventuality sooner, rather than later, before bloated hacks like you capitulate away all of our freedoms, including our unalienable and Constitutionally guaranteed right to defend them.

 

In all sincerity,

 

David Codrea

* Hopefully, we all grow as we learn and gain life experience. While I embrace a mix of conservative and certain libertarian principles, the Libertarian Party’s culturally suicidal stance on “immigration” (invasion) disqualifies it from my support.

0

DavidC

David Codrea blogs at The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance (WarOnGuns.com), and is a field editor/columnist for GUNS Magazine. Named “Journalist of the Year” in 2011 by the Second Amendment Foundation for his groundbreaking work on the “Fast and Furious” ATF “gunwalking” scandal, he is a frequent event speaker and guest on national radio and television programs.

Oath Keepers Merchandise

17 comments

  1. Sadly, Oath Keepers tend to attract a hell of a lot more criticism that do oath breakers. Try reminding elected officials of their Constitutional limitations during a city council meeting, a school board meeting , or a county commissioners court meeting. See how that move affects your popularity.
    [W3]

  2. “… hushing up the “molesting” of teenage boys more than 30 years ago…”

    And while serving and as ‘Speaker of the House’ – do NOT let that judge fool you, knew it was a bail out of those who serves azzes (misspelled on purpose) that crime never stopped and kids died because of him and others.

    Hastert was given leniency because he ran/was heavily involved with the “ped” ring that those who serve within our governments, many in the Pentagon, judges, the mass corporate media, etc used.

    Many of those who are serving could not go against him or their other crimes would have been brought to the light of day. Ever read any of Sibel Edmonds books? The one Speaker of the House with the young kids who died was Hastert – names changed as the corrupt who serve would have been exposed to the light of day, and no matter how dumbed down Americans are today, they still will not stand for that.

    Learn a bit more of what those sick SoB’s who serve do with our tax money http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2015/10/19/the-peoples-campaign-the-real-hastert-case-all-in-one-place/

    He made a deal, and they lied about what he could be charged with as almost all of them would have fallen fast, and also been in jail.

    There she collected a lot of the info – not all as she is still being unlawfully blocked from spilling all the corruption they did, not just kids, but selling and trading information that was rated the highest security, weapons, etc.

    As an American it will make you sick to hear/read what they have been doing. Or it should. (Yeah, THAT IS my opinion)

    God Bless!

    Cal
    If there were never intended to be action to defend the Constitution from those who are domestically attempting to destroy its power and authority, why would each Oath require it of those who take the Oaths?

    Chief Tecumseh: “When it comes your time to die, be not like those whose hearts are filled with the fear of death, so that when their time comes they weep and pray for a little more time to live their lives over again in a different way. Sing your death song and die like a hero going home.”

    1. “…. Hastert pleaded guilty last October to bank fraud …”

      Can anybody tell me what ” bank fraud ” is, in this context ?? As far as I know, he just took his own money out of the bank to pay off someone to keep quiet about a previous crime.
      Where is the fraud?? And what is the fraud ??
      ( please note – I am not condoning in the least whatever he did that resulted in the hush money )

      1. The Bank Fraud is the obama/Holder new banking law that require banks to report any withdrawals of $10,000 or more. The plan is to “catch” drug dealers and criminals……looks to me that Hastert isn’t the only criminal in this scenario. The kid who was blackmailing him was breaking the law, the president who came up with this law, it happens to be the legislative body charged with making Law. Criminals circling each other like Vultures. In their own little world.

    2. The GOP, Grand Old Pedophile Party. We know plenty about it here locally where the Franklin Scandal broke years ago. Both parties must be dismantled completely. This has been quite a year in revealing the fraud and treachery of the 2 party system and we can thank Trump for forcing their hand and they are both still in full attack mode even though everything they try backfires on them big time.

  3. Serial child molesters do not voluntarily stop their criminal behavior. So, Hastert is likely to have continued while in congress, right up to the time of his arrest.

    The question then becomes who enabled him and who provided the cover for his actions. I suspect Lindsey Graham and Barney Frank know the answers.

  4. We do not now have, nor have we ever had any Constitution guys. Sounds like blasphemy I know, but it’s a fact. The constitution is of no authority! It has never ever been evidence of law. As s compact it’s an all or nothing document, that if any portion is missing the whole is missing. Please see the introduction to this info by viewing Harmon L Taylor’s YouTube video entitled The con of the constitution. My comments are contrary to the OKs mission and money making ability, but rest assured our system is not a Constitutional one, rather its 100% voluntary, 100% commercial. I suggest all of the OKs examine the material mentioned above. Then contact Harmon at his email which I have leave to offer here at legal_reality @earthlink.net
    Aut pax aut bellum,
    Defender

    1. Let me explain why you are incorrect.

      The armed part of the US Constitution is required to be “We the people…”. The three branches of the AMERICAN government are;
      First Branch –
      “We the people of the united States
      — as the source of all authority;

      — as the enforcement arm (Militia) required to trained as congress requires the military to be trained and also to be educated in the US Constitution and the state Constitution under which we (mainly) domestically live, per Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15 to
      —- Enforce the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution,
      —- Enforce and keep the “Laws of the Union” (which are constitutional laws ONLY),
      —- Protect the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
      —- “to suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”;

      Those that serve within our governments – state and general (federal) – have duties TO the people as the Militia found in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 16

      — As the Grand Jury, those that require, use, and make up the Grand jury Investigations
      —- As jurors deciding if the law/code/regulation/etc being used is a “good” law/code/regulation/etc and if not to throw it OUT of our system. Then, if the law is a good one according to the people as jurors, deciding the guilt or innocence of the person/etc charged.
      Etc

      Second Branch are the states

      Third and most limited branch is the general (federal) government whose duties and responsibilities are in writing and found within the US Constitution. Those that serve there seem to have been trying to add to their authority almost since the beginning. It did not happen because there were Americans who KEPT up their duties for the most part.

      The US Constitution and each state Constitution is REQUIRED to be enforced by us, “We the people…”.

      Basically the problem is like a family with teens. Leave them alone with little supervision and being held accountable and they usually become “monsters”. Is that not the real problem we have today?

      The problem was never the US Constitution, it was getting the people who wanted freedom to bother to educate themselves in it, and to take up the responsibilities that come along with it. There are always responsibilities that comes with living. The decision is that do you want to take responsibility for your life and actions, PLUS what those that serve within our governments being held to the contract they are under; or do you want to carry out the responsibilities assigned to you by a ruler, IF they let you and yours live?

      That is what the US Constitution is about, responsibility of the PEOPLE, not those that serve. We have been p-ss poor in our actions so far. Are we American enough to change that now?

      The framers knew that the country would grow, and they wanted the people to take up their responsibilities and rule themselves by keeping a close eye and hand on those that serve- holding them accountable for their actions. They knew that it was more difficult as people were more spread out, but raised as TRUE Americans, versed in the US Constitution, their state Constitution, and trained as the Militia with the duties divided between ALL of us we could be more free and at the same time more responsible. THAT is the American experiment. WE, our parents and grandparents allowed those in government to dumb them down into penned farm animals.

      We not only let them do what they have no lawful authority to do, we still allow this to go on. The Federal Reserve, the Pentagon, and a two party system are excellent examples. All are forbidden, yet have a huge say so in what happens within our country today. But if we ever start thinking again, those are also the first to go IF we want freedom.

      President Andrew Jackson, farewell address: “It is well known that there have always been those among us who wish to enlarge the powers of the general government, and experience would seem to indicate that there is a tendency on the part of this government to overstep the boundaries marked out for it by the Constitution. Its legitimate authority is abundantly sufficient for all the purposes for which it was created, and its powers being expressly enumerated, there can be no justification for claiming anything beyond them. Every attempt to exercise power beyond these limits should be promptly and firmly opposed, for one evil example will lead to other measures still more mischievous; and if the principle of constructive powers or supposed advantages or temporary circumstances shall ever be permitted to justify the assumption of a power not given by the Constitution, the general government will before long absorb all the powers of legislation, and you will have in effect but one consolidated government. From the extent of our country, its diversified interests, different pursuits and different habits, it is too obvious for argument that a single consolidated government would be wholly inadequate to watch over and protect its interests; and every friend of our free institutions should be always prepared to maintain unimpaired and in full vigor the rights and sovereignty of the states and to confine the action of the general government strictly to the sphere of its appropriate duties.”

      Thomas Jefferson: “The several States composing, the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government; but that, by a compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a general government for special purposes — delegated to that government certain definite powers, reserving, each State to itself, the residuary mass of right to their own self-government; and that whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force: that to this compact each State acceded as a State, and is an integral part, its co-States forming, as to itself, the other party: that the government created by this compact was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among powers having no common judge, each party (the people) has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress.”

      George Washington, “Sentiments on a Peace Establishment”, letter to Alexander Hamilton; “The Writings of George Washington”: “It may be laid down, as a primary position, and the basis of our system, that every citizen who enjoys the protection of a free government…, but even of his personal services to the defence of it, and consequently that the Citizens of America (with a few legal and official exceptions) from 18 to 50 Years of Age should be borne on the Militia Rolls, provided with uniform Arms, and so far accustomed to the use of them, that the Total strength of the Country might be called forth at Short Notice on any very interesting Emergency.”

      St John Tucker: “The congress of the United States possesses no power to regulate, or interfere with the domestic concerns, or police of any state: it belongs not to them to establish any rules respecting the rights of property; nor will the constitution permit any prohibition of arms to the people;…”

      Thomas Jefferson: “We established however some, although not all its important principles. The constitutions of most of our States assert, that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves, in all cases to which they think themselves competent, (as in electing their functionaries executive and legislative, and deciding by a jury of themselves, in all judiciary cases in which any fact is involved,) or they may act by representatives, freely and equally chosen; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed; that they are entitled to freedom of person, freedom of religion, freedom of property, and freedom of the press.”

      St. George Tucker: “The Federal Government is the creature of the States. It is not a party to the Constitution, but the result of it – the creation of that agreement which was made by the States as parties. It is a mere agent, entrusted with limited powers for certain objects; which powers and objects are enumerated in the Constitution. Shall the agent be permitted to judge of the extent of his own powers, without reference to his constituent?”

      George Washington, Farewell Address: “It is important, likewise, that the habits of thinking in a free Country should inspire caution in those entrusted with its administration, to confine themselves within their respective Constitutional spheres; avoiding in the exercise of the Powers of one department to encroach upon another. The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all the departments in one, and thus to create whatever the form of government, a real despotism. The necessity of reciprocal checks in the exercise of political power; by dividing and distributing it into different depositories, and constituting each the Guardian of the Public Weal against invasions by the others, has been evinced by experiments ancient and modern; some of them in our country and under our own eyes. To preserve them must be as necessary as to institute them.”

      Patrick Henry: “It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions, but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason peoples of other faiths have been afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here.”

      Thomas Jefferson: “The most effectual means of preventing [the perversion of power into tyranny are] to illuminate, as far as practicable, the minds of the people at large, and more especially to give them knowledge of those facts which history exhibits, that possessed thereby of the experience of other ages and countries, they may be enabled to know ambition under all its shapes, and prompt to exert their natural powers to defeat its purposes.”

      Thomas Jefferson:“I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, And if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education. This is the true corrective of abuses of constitutional power.”

      George Washington: “The preservation of the sacred fire of liberty, and the destiny of the Republican model of government, are justly considered as deeply, perhaps as finally staked, on the experiment entrusted to the hands of the American people.”

      John Adams: “You have rights antecedent to all earthly governments; rights that cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws; rights derived from the Great Legislator of the Universe.”

      Thomas Jefferson: “I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground: That “all powers not delegated to the United States, by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States or to the people. To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawn around the powers of Congress, is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible of any definition.”

      James Madison, Federalist 14: “In the first place, it is to be remembered, that the general government is not to be charged with the whole power of making and administering laws. Its jurisdiction is limited to certain enumerated objects, which concern all the members of the republic, but which are not to be attained by the separate provisions of any”.

      James Madison, Federalist 45: “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several states will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement and prosperity of the State.”

      James Madison, Federalist 46: “The Foederal and State Governments are in fact but different agents and trustees of the people, instituted with different powers, and designated for different purposes… They must be told that the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone;….”

      Thomas Jefferson to Wilson Nicholas: “Our peculiar security is in the possession of a written Constitution. Let us not make it a blank paper by construction.”

      James Madison: “Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government.”

      Thomas Jefferson: “The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite.”

      Abraham Lincoln: “We, the people, are the rightful masters of both congress and the courts – not to overthrow the constitution, but to overthrow men who pervert the Constitution.”

      James Madison: “The ultimate authority resides in the people, and that if the federal government got too powerful and overstepped its authority, then the people would develop plans of resistance and resort to arms.”

      James Madison, Federalist 57, wrote that Congress “can make no law which will not have its full operation on themselves and their friends, as well as on the great mass of the society.”

      Benjamin Franklin: “In free governments the rulers are the servants, and the people their superiors and sovereigns. For the former, therefore, to return among the latter was not to degrade but to promote them.”

      Thomas Jefferson: “The policy of the American government is to leave their citizens free, neither restraining nor aiding them in their pursuits.”

      “The grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right. In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people”.
      “Thus, citizens have the unbridled right to empanel their own grand juries and present “True Bills” of indictment to a court, which is then required to commence a criminal proceeding. Our Founding Fathers presciently thereby created a “buffer” the people may rely upon for justice, when public officials, including judges, criminally violate the law.” (Misbehavior, “Good Behaviour” requirement)
      “The grand jury is an institution separate from the courts, over whose functioning the courts do not preside, we think it clear that, as a general matter at least, no such “supervisory” judicial authority exists. The “common law” of the Fifth Amendment demands a traditional functioning grand jury.”
      “Although the grand jury normally operates, of course, in the courthouse and under judicial auspices, its institutional relationship with the judicial branch has traditionally been, so to speak, at arm’s length. Judges’ direct involvement in the functioning of the grand jury has generally been confined to the constitutive one of calling the grand jurors together and administering their oaths of office. The grand jury’s functional independence from the judicial branch is evident both in the scope of its power to investigate criminal wrongdoing, and in the manner in which that power is exercised.”
      “The grand jury ‘can investigate merely on suspicion that the law is being violated, or even because it wants assurance that it is not.’ It need not identify the offender it suspects, or even “the precise nature of the offense” it is investigating. The grand jury requires no authorization from its constituting court to initiate an investigation, nor does the prosecutor require leave of court to seek a grand jury indictment. And in its day-to-day functioning, the grand jury generally operates without the interference of a presiding judge. It swears in its own witnesses and deliberates in total secrecy.”
      “Recognizing this tradition of independence, we have said the 5th Amendment’s constitutional guarantee presupposes an investigative body ‘acting independently of either prosecuting attorney or judge”
      “Given the grand jury’s operational separateness from its constituting court, it should come as no surprise that we have been reluctant to invoke the judicial supervisory power as a basis for prescribing modes of grand jury procedure. Over the years, we have received many requests to exercise supervision over the grand jury’s evidence-taking process, but we have refused them all. “it would run counter to the whole history of the grand jury institution” to permit an indictment to be challenged “on the ground that there was incompetent or inadequate evidence before the grand jury.” (Nor would it be lawful of them to do so.) Justice Antonin Scalia writing for the majority said In the Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, 112 S.Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L.Ed.2d 352 (1992)

      I, and many others more educated then I, have written on the militia, etc many times here. But I hope this assists you in understanding that the problem is us, “We the people…” and OUR not doing the duties constitutionally assigned to us. We still are not the Militia as we are required to be.

      Have you read the US Constitution, studied it? If so, then you are in a group of few, YET that is exactly our problem, letting others tell us what to think instead of reading it and learning for ourselves. Because if we are not ready to be knowledgeable and responsible for the actions of those who SERVE WITHIN our governments then we are slaves and deserve the mass murders that have happened before here, and will happen here again on a much larger scale.

  5. Reminds me of the sexual perversion of a world leader from the past whose first move was to end private ownership of firearms as soon as he took power. Adolph was his name and most of his cohorts were perverts. Lot of politicians seem to have much in common with him. They seek to disarm the public and more heavily arm their own groups while seizing control of police forces and arming the enemy with our tax dollars. We have a puppet that rebuilt the old Soviet built Maddi factory in Egypt that reopened with the stated mission,”to arm every jihadist in the world.” He used our tax dollars to do it with the muslim brotherhood and our own media does not consider it newsworthy. Our media works only to disarm the US law abiding public to make them easier victims while saying it is to protect us. An unarmed victim populace is the desire on both sides of the aisle. The jihadists get select fire AK-47 machine guns free that WE have paid for. I need an armed F-16 to put that factory back into the ruin state our money rebuilt it from with the help of an Indonesian citizen named Barry Soetero posing as what he is ineligible to be.

  6. This guy molested teen boys and only got 15 months in jail…??? Did I read that right..??? He was involved in bank fraud too…??? This guy needs to go to prison for at least 50 years. I’ll bet he gets out in ten months. I’ll bet he will change his mind about boys when the prison population gets a hold of his child molesting @##.

  7. Pedophilia ; I’ve done a lot of research about Congress and these pedophilia rumor’s consistently keep coming up . I have read as many as two thirds of Congress have pedophilia criminal record’s and some how they are covered up or expunged . These are sick predators and I think that their should be no Statue of limitations concerning child molester’s and their should be stiff sentencing 20 years for each charge and in some cases the death penalty . Both parties are part of the two thirds I just mentioned above . Both parties are corrupt or this kind of perverted behavior wouldn’t be tolerated ; This two party system that we live under , needs too be extinguished and it needs too be torn down at the local , state and Federal level’s . These are criminals that are taking our right’s away especially our Second Amendment Right’s . Their’s no justification why” We The People ” have to put up with this any longer ; I’m sick of the Socialism and all the regulation’s the pity nature of everything that come’s out of Washington DC , the pay offs and the social engineered wars and the rigging of elections and trying to figure out why I should even vote , it make’s me want too puke . And I don’t see Donald Trump straightening out this nest of despot’s either or neutering all the infringements on our Second amendment right’s ; He’s one of them !!!

  8. Most people have no idea how deep the D.C. cesspool actually is until they’ve spent a significant number of years lobbying for some truly good cause on Capital Hill backed only by grass roots strength, not by money from the special interests as I have as a lobbyist for the natural products industry battling Big Pharma to defend access to everything you can buy in a health food store. I learned that scumbags like Hastert are more the RULE than the exception, and that you can count the number of honest Senators on the fingers of one hand, and the number of honest Congressmen on the fingers of only two hands. Most of them roughly parallel Mafia Dons in their extreme level of corruption, and far too many of them are pedophiles who are being blackmailed by the N.W.O. to pass legislation intended to dismantle America and to usher us in to the elite’s long planned North American Union collectivist dictatorship.
    I have a vast body of hard evidence to back my assertions that I gleaned via the Freedom of Information Act when I squeezed documents out of the FDA pertaining to their Trilateral Cooperation Charter with Canada and Mexico via which they’ve already created the framework for one harmonized set of food and drug regs that harmonize Canada to the EU, and the US and Mexico to Canada.

    Most Americans and even MORE Canadians are blissfully unaware of these threats to our sovereingty, and this explains their naive opposition to our enforcing our borders, especially our southern border with Mexico.

    All of us must be vigilant or we will wind up as microchipped non reproducing cyborgs with all of our natural biology hijacked by synthetic biology conrolled by S-Rock”

  9. “….far too many of them are pedophiles who are being blackmailed by the N.W.O. to pass legislation intended to dismantle America and to usher us in to the elite’s long planned North American Union collectivist dictatorship…..”

    I think that this explanation goes a long way in explaining some of the things that we have seen. Such as , Roberts voting in favor of ObamaCare — as a possible example. How about all the RRRR’s in congress and the senate not doing their jobs, as well as military personnel carrying out O’s orders with nary a whimper.
    Personally, I believe that the real intent of NSA’s spying capabilities is exactly to get dirt on our congress and supreme court to enable blackmailing them.
    Nothing new under the sun , Hoover, Nixon, etc. all used these tactics. It has now been perfected. Notice how many scandals just happen to involve the release of personal e-mails ????
    Petraeus for example.

  10. It was under him that Congress overthrew the govt into the control of an international cabal by defunding civil and criminal oversight of govt contractors as the whole govt began to be contrqcted out. That means no one can find out what they do with our money and if they uphold our rights. and if they break the laws, n can be arrested. let along prosecuted. Sec Rumsfeld got a line item budget for these for the DOD but nor enough. And Sen Sanders did with the new VA bill. But many in Congress did not even know what was slipped in passed them and most new members of Congress are not told and do not know. And agency heads act as if they do know what is going on and isn’t . SEC defunded also to go after shell companies and interlocked that break all kinds of SEC regs and anti-trust laws. And this goes down to local levels also from traffic cams .same cabal, and state contract. There is no govt run health care since 2002, its taxpayer funded and intl cabal run as they please and what laws they wish to obey. And DENNIS HASTERT HELD THE PURSE STRINGS OF THE NATION IN HIS CONTROL AND OPENED THE BAG FOR MASSIVE THEFTS AND NONE CAN SHUT IT WITHOUT A LITTLE MONEY .Cannot even put gas in the car to go arrest anyone. This man ‘ kept’ distracted by his ‘peversions’ did this nation a lot of pain and harm.we are still living with and only a few wish to change things and not able to without more. and he gets 15 months but not for what I call treason. OVERTHROW OF THE NATION. and last week not enough voted in the US Senate to want to know where a missing 23 trillion dollars is at the Federal Reserve. This is monies that the govt and ‘partners’ said to send to a person or entity and the money never got sent out by the Fed.and the partial audit confirmed was missing. THAT MEANS THEY CAN GIVE IT BACK AND WE HAVE A 4 TRILLION DOLLAR SURPLUS AND can make “Amerca great again” Lots of good jobs rebuilding our nation and loan interest loans for housing so no one is homeless etc and wonder if Detroit and Puerto Rico would have gone broke if they had got the monies our govt asked the Fed to send to them for things? The real ‘wealth inequality ; is we have let powerful steal from the public treasury inseqd of the money being sent to whom our lawmakers said it was. and Dennis Hastert was the one who did not see to it that the money got where it was to go and used for what Congress said it was to be used for. . Character does matter when it distracts from doing the business for the people. We know Medicare has been robbed by insiders since 1994 when enforcement laws were suspended as ‘ the insurance industry can police itself” WE HAVE NO POLICE ALLOWED TO UPHOLD THE LAWS AND THEN THINK IT SMART TO TAKE AWAY THE 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHTS AS REAL THIEVES ROAM FREE??. Sorry for being so long…. but this man has done harm to me and mine as well as the rest of us. as the current head of this cabal in charge of the USA Lynn Blodgett is one few even know who he is and is in defiance of 38 federal agency judges on my cases alone and I name him as high level officials do and can do nothing as HE IS IN CHARGE OF THE USA. When media says govt, ask who is the contractor? which have been allowed to say they are the govt now and are not and difference is real govt officials are still bound to uphold the laws., etc. and once in awhile one does get arrested for job related crimes. Linda Joy Adams

Comments are closed.