Obama’s Kalamazoo Blood Dance Reveals End Game Disarmament Goal
“Obama calls Kalamazoo officials over shootings, pleads for more gun laws,” The Washington Times reported Monday. “Clearly we’re going to need to do more if we’re going to keep innocent Americans safe,” Obama proclaimed at a White House meeting with governors. “[We need] to partner and think about what we can do in a common-sense way, in a bipartisan way, without some of the ideological rhetoric that so often surrounds that issue.”
Like what? Notice he doesn’t get all that specific?
What he’s doing is playing off long-time fellow traveler Rahm Emanuel’s advice to “never let a serious crisis go to waste.” That and he’s blood dancing.
Because the fact is, at this writing, and certainly at the time Obama made his opportunistic comments, we know very little about the killer and his twisted motives. And because relevant social media pages have been disabled, we’re now dependent on what the police tell us and how the media parrots statements back to us for further information to be revealed.
That’s not necessarily the most reliable way for the truth to come out, as some of us have found out the hard way. But seeing as how that’s all we’ve got right now, here are two extremely relevant pieces of information about the suspect:
He has no criminal record.
He passed an employment background check.
That means he would have passed a “universal background check” to buy a gun. That’s one of the big ticket items Obama is pushing right now, and it would have been useless here (as well as without registration, per the National Institute of Justice). It’s what Michael Bloomberg has made the centerpiece of his state-by-state march to the sea.
But, as happens every time the monopoly of violence sharks smell blood in the water, the cry goes out that “Something must be done!”
In this case, since the killer was not committed to an institution and segregated from society, and since he reportedly used a semiautomatic handgun, two things that have not been implemented – yet – would be to ban handguns and to require all prospective firearm purchasers pass a comprehensive battery of mental health tests to prove they are qualified before being allowed to take possession.
Who doubts Obama wouldn’t love to be able to impose those requirements? And does either of those preconditions sound like “unalienable” or “shall not be infringed” to you?
All this talk about “common sense gun safety laws” is just that. None of it is common sense and none of it makes anyone but criminals—both freelance and those working for the government – any safer. The end game is citizen disarmament and those imposing it will take it in pieces when they can get it, and then move on to the next target of opportunity.
Anyone who tells you otherwise is either an idiot or a liar, noting there’s nothing stopping them from being both.