Why You Need To Know About The Cloward-Piven Strategy For Destroying America
by J. D. Heyes
(NaturalNews) His supporters will never admit it, but the fact is, Barack Obama is the most ideologically-driven president the country has likely ever had, and there are reasons for that, most of which have to do with the way he was raised, and the “heroes” who influenced his thinking.
One of those figures was Bill Ayers, a hard-Left radical nut job who actually published a book with the term “radical” in it – Rules For Radicals – in 1972, a time when college protests and activism made today’s campuses look tame in comparison. The paperback version of the book’s back-cover even contains an acknowledgement of Ayers’ influence on Obama, via a quote from the Chicago Sun-Times:
“Alinsky’s techniques and teachings influenced generations of community and labor organizers, including the church-based group hiring a young [Barack] Obama to work on Chicago’s South Side in the 1980s…
“Alinsky has also had a great deal of influence on the woman who would love to succeed Obama, Hillary Clinton. From the same paperback back-cover, per the Chicago Sun-Times:
“Alinsky impressed a young [Hillary] Clinton, who was growing up in Park Ridge at the time Alinsky was the director of the Industrial Areas Foundation in Chicago.”
The pattern matches the strategy
Alinsky’s claim to fame, then, is radicalizing a current president and a would-be president with some of the most vitriolic, radical, anti-capitalist and anti-constitutional ideology Americans have ever seen – and by all measures, judging by the societal unrest in the U.S., he has succeeded in “radicalizing” the country.
But there have been other factors that are heavily influencing their ideology, and they are embodied in the Cloward-Piven strategy, which was developed by a pair of academic radicals in the mid-1960s at Columbia University.
Created by Profs. Richard A. Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, it is essentially a plan that envisions overwhelming the U.S. public welfare system and replacing it with a nationalized system run completely by the federal government, that would ensure “a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty.” 
The strategy, then, was to essentially create enough chaos that the social welfare system would collapse under its own weight, thereby creating an opportunity for the central government to impose a “solution” that essentially transformed Uncle Sam into national paymaster.
Talk about complete control of citizens’ lives, from cradle to grave. Such a radical, Left-wing system is akin to the feudal lords of the Middle Ages, where landowners were “masters,” and serfs either worked (and fought) for them, or were forced off the land to fend for themselves.