No products in the cart.

News

The Shadows Of Power: The Council On Foreign Relations And The American Decline | James Perloff

CFR2

James Perloff does a great job of showing the power of the Council on Foreign Relations, and the history of those within, and surrounding, the CFR. Why should an organization of a few thousand people have this enormous power? Most people have no idea what it is, let alone how powerful it is. It is this ignorance of it, that allows them to hide in the background and manipulate public opinion to their goal, which is,  and always has been, a One World Government.

[ot-video type=”youtube” url=”https://youtu.be/j_gj1uZ6194″]

0

Shorty Dawkins

Oath Keepers Merchandise

5 comments

  1. Okay, but lets boil this all down to its most common denominator, all of it is still TREASON against the American people, the US Constitution and all that is in Pursuance thereof it, and the USA. Yes, it has been committed over decades – lots of them, and yes, some of those Traitors will not see arrest and prosecution because they have died, but we can STILL charge, arrest, and PROSECUTE the rest of the TRAITORS to our nation.

    And we SHOULD.

    Those that are serving, and have been serving, MUST all be removed from the positions they occupy – all positions large and smallest.

    We have not had a legitimate government in place for a long time – NOw it is time to RESTORE THE US CONSTITUTION AS OUR LEGITIMATE GOVERNMENT AND PROSECUTE, and hopefully HANG the worst Traitors as the original Title 18 U.S. Code section 2381 required:

    “When in the presence of two witnesses to the same overt act or in an open court of law if you fail to timely move to protect and defend the constitution of the United States and honor your oath of office you are subject to the charge of capital felony treason, and upon conviction you will be taken by the posse to the nearest busy intersection and at high noon hung by the neck until dead…The body to remain in state till dusk as an example to anyone who takes his oath of office lightly. ”

    Instead of keeping the replacement put into place when they started these treasonous actions.

    Replace Title 18 U.S. Code section 2381: Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

    With the original version.

    It is still “just” Treason, done over a long period of time, in many different ways, with willing Traitors.

    1. We can, the organized Militia can.

      It is important to not only know as much as one can about the US Constitution, but to understand that placement, and every single word within it has meaning and is LAW, the DEFINER of our governments, the one thing that ALL laws/regulations/codes/Treaties/etc MUST follow (means no other recourse if to be lawful) is the US Constitution.

      Do you understand that
      1) Judges only are allowed here in America to hold their position for as long as they use “Good Behaviour” while in office? That even though the jduges are NOT under either the legislative or executive branch, nor beholden to them one can understand what “Good Behaviour” is by reading what the US Constitution REQUIRES of all judges – state and general?

      US Constitution, Article III, Section 1: “The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.”

      James Madison, Federalist 39, 250-53: “According to the provisions of most of the constitutions, again, as well as according to the most respectable and received opinions on the subject, the members of the judiciary department are to retain their offices by the firm tenure of good behaviour.”

      The US Constitution assigns what all judges, state and federal, must do to be allowed to stay in a judicial position, they are:
      — Required to take, and keep an Oath(s), or a combined Oath.
      — Required to “support and defend” the US Constitution and all that is in Pursuance thereof it before the duties of the office they occupy.
      — Required to carry out the enumerated duties assigned to the judicial branch by the US Constitution in a constitutional manner.

      That is “Good Behaviour” for judges according to the US Constitution.

      Judge Wythe (John Marshall’s law teacher) in his opinion in “Caton” where he indicated that it is a judge’s responsibility to check overreaching by the political branches: “If the whole legislature, an event to be deprecated, should attempt to overleap the bounds, prescribed to them by the people, I, in administering the public justice of the country, will meet the united powers, at my seat in this tribunal; and, pointing to the constitution, will say, to them, here is the limit of your authority; and, hither, shall you go, but no further.”

      It is important to understand that ALL justices – federal and state – MUST support the US Constitution and follow it or they no longer meet the contract, bound and verified by taking the Oath of Office, and would no longer lawfully be occupying the position they are serving in.

      That there was a time that all Judges were generally well versed in political theory, and VERY STRONGLY IN THE CONCEPT OF SEPARATION OF POWERS since it is their constitutionally assigned duty to see that it is upheld, which is as it should still be today as their constitutional requirements have not changed in any LAWFUL way, though they have by usurpation?

      That Jurors are independent of the judge and prosecutor no matter what they (unlawfully) tell the jurors?

      John Adams: “It would be an absurdity for jurors to be required to accept the judge’s view of the law, against their own opinion, judgment, and conscience.”

      U.S. vs. Dougherty, 1972: “The pages of history shine on instances of the jury’s exercise of its prerogative to disregard instructions of the judge.”

      That “Judicial independence” meant/means independence of/from the other two branches within the US Constitution; clearly nothing to do with judges behavior in the courts, but to do with the independence of the judicial branch itself from the other two branches. Though they are still beholden in every way to the US Constitution and to the People.

      That the Grand Jury is a tool of the people, not under any branch of the US Constitution or under state governments just as the Militia is also not?

      That the people themselves can call for a Grand Jury Investigation of anyone without giving a reason, and if enough evidence is found those people/that person/corporation/etc MUST be prosecuted by a Grand Jury?

      Grand Jury Quote:
      “The grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right. In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people”.

      “Thus, CITIZENS have the unbridled right to empanel their own grand juries and present “True Bills” of indictment to a court, which is then required to commence a criminal proceeding. Our Founding Fathers presciently thereby created a “buffer” the people may rely upon for justice, when public officials, including judges, criminally violate the law.” (Misbehavior, “Good Behaviour” requirement)

      “The grand jury is an institution separate from the courts, over whose functioning the courts do not preside, we think it clear that, as a general matter at least, no such “supervisory” judicial authority exists. The “common law” of the Fifth Amendment demands a traditional functioning grand jury.”

      “Although the grand jury normally operates, of course, in the courthouse and under judicial auspices, its institutional relationship with the judicial branch has traditionally been, so to speak, at arm’s length. Judges’ direct involvement in the functioning of the grand jury has generally been confined to the constitutive one of calling the grand jurors together and administering their oaths of office. The grand jury’s functional independence from the judicial branch is evident both in the scope of its power to investigate criminal wrongdoing, and in the manner in which that power is exercised.”

      “The grand jury ‘can investigate merely on suspicion that the law is being violated, or even because it wants assurance that it is not.’ It need not identify the offender it suspects, or even “the precise nature of the offense” it is investigating. The grand jury requires no authorization from its constituting court to initiate an investigation, nor does the prosecutor require leave of court to seek a grand jury indictment. And in its day-to-day functioning, the grand jury generally operates without the interference of a presiding judge. It swears in its own witnesses and deliberates in total secrecy.”

      “Recognizing this tradition of independence, we have said the 5th Amendment’s constitutional guarantee presupposes an investigative body ‘acting independently of either prosecuting attorney or judge”

      “Given the grand jury’s operational separateness from its constituting court, it should come as no surprise that we have been reluctant to invoke the judicial supervisory power as a basis for prescribing modes of grand jury procedure. Over the years, we have received many requests to exercise supervision over the grand jury’s evidence-taking process, but we have refused them all. “it would run counter to the whole history of the grand jury institution” to permit an indictment to be challenged “on the ground that there was incompetent or inadequate evidence before the grand jury.” (Nor would it be lawful) Justice Antonin Scalia writing for the majority said In the Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, 112 S.Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L.Ed.2d 352 (1992) (End Quote)

      So we now have both the Grand Jury and the Militia as tools of the people to enforce both the US Constitution and state Constitutions. We actually also have elections as one of our tools for removal but not today due to rampant Election Fraud. But again, the Militia is the KEY to our Elections being honest as they are the enforcers the constitution assigns the duties to:

      — Enforce the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution,
      — Enforce and keep the “Laws of the Union” (which are constitutional laws ONLY),
      — Protect the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
      — “to suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”.

      So the next question is since the Militia is NOT a governmental agency, who is the Militia? We are, though the Militia that can enforce those in the list above is the organized Militia – trained as the congress requires the US Military to be trained.

      Now you see why veterans are such a threat. They have the LAW OF OUR LAND behind them every step of the way as long as what they do is CONSTITUTIONAL – stae and general.

      Hope that answers your question about WHO and HOW they can be enforced. The Grand Jury can file charges, as can the Militia. Any court of law that follows the US Constitution, any other type of court is NULL AND VOID, and the people serving within it including judges MUST be charged with the types of crimes they committed including breaking the Oath they are required to keep which may be Treason, a felony or two, and the crime of Perjury. As you now know the Grand Jury and the Militia is us. Remember the organized Militia is veterans, LE’s trained to the way congress requires vets to be trained, all trained in the US Constitution, and to be lawful, they MUST follow and KEEP their Oath while doing those duties.

      Make sense?

      Also, vets can train others to feel the ranks of the Militias.

  2. TYVM 4 post of James Perloff…. I’m particularly po’d @ 1- the council on foreign relations & 2- msm ignoring same. These creeps are @ the center of world problems, w/higher ups in this bottom feeding food chain including American banksters & America’s king david rockefeller…. their European connection includes the European banksters.

    Perloff looks into these ‘men behind the curtain’, usually very accurate commentary on his part!!! TY again.

    PS- if you wish to see another ‘stunning; you tube, see: ‘From Major Jordan’s Diaries’…. under an hour, lays out in great detail info from Major George Racey Jordan’s book of the same name. Details 1- uranium shipments to iron joe (hundreds of pounds); & 2- war materials to iron joe denied to our troops! YOU WILL CRINGE & BE TOTALLY PO”D TOO!!!! Not in that order….

Comments are closed.