No products in the cart.

News

The Worst Part Is Central Bankers Know Exactly What They Are Doing

human_chess

This article was written by Brandon Smith and originally published at Alt-Market.com

The best position for a tyrant or tyrants to be in, at least while consolidating power, is tyranny by proxy. That is to say, the most dangerous tyrants are those the people do not recognize: the tyrants who hide behind scarecrows and puppets and faceless organizations. The worst position for the common citizen to be in is a false sense of security and understanding, operating on the assumption that tyrants do not exist or that potential tyrants are really just greedy fools acting independently from one another.

Sadly, there are a great many people today who hold naïve notions that our sociopolitical dynamic is driven by random chaos, greed and fear. I’m sorry to say that this is simply not so, and anyone who believes such nonsense is doomed to be victimized by the tides of history over and over again.

There is nothing random or coincidental about our political systems or economic structures. There are no isolated tyrants and high-level criminals functioning solely on greed and ignorance. And while there is certainly chaos, this chaos is invariably engineered, not accidental. These crisis events are created by people who often refer to themselves as “globalists” or “internationalists,” and their goals are rather obvious and sometimes openly admitted: at the top of their list is the complete centralization of government and economic power that is then ACCEPTED by the people as preferable. They hope to attain this goal primarily through the exploitation of puppet politicians around the world as well as the use of pervasive banking institutions as weapons of mass fiscal destruction.

Their strategic history is awash in wars and financial disasters, and not because they are incompetent. They are evil, not stupid.

By extension, perhaps the most dangerous lie circulating today is that central banks are chaotic operations run by intellectual idiots who have no clue what they are doing. This is nonsense. While the ideological cultism of elitism and globalism is ignorant and monstrous at its core, these people function rather successfully through highly organized collusion. Their principles are subhuman, but their strategies are invasive and intelligent.

That’s right; there is a conspiracy afoot, and this conspiracy requires created destruction as cover and concealment. Central banks and the private bankers who run them work together regardless of national affiliations to achieve certain objectives, and they all serve a greater agenda. If you would like to learn more about the details behind what motivates globalists, at least in the financial sense, read my article ‘The Economic Endgame Explained.’

Many people, including insiders, have written extensively about central banks and their true intentions to centralize and rule the masses through manipulation, if not direct political domination. I think Carroll Quigley, Council on Foreign Relations insider and mentor to Bill Clinton, presents the reality of our situation quite clearly in his book “Tragedy And Hope”:

“The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank … sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.”

This “world system of financial control” that Quigley speaks of has not yet been achieved, but the globalists have been working tirelessly towards such a goal.  The plan for a single global currency system and a single global economic authority is outlined rather blatantly in an article published in the Rothschild owned ‘The Economist’ entitled ‘Get Ready For A Global Currency By 2018’.  This article was written in 1988, and much of the process of globalization it describes is already well underway.  It is a plan that is at least decades in the making.  Again, it is foolhardy to assume central banks and international bankers are a bunch of clumsy Mr. Magoos unwittingly driving our economy off a cliff; they know EXACTLY what they are doing.

Being the clever tyrants that they are, the members of the central banking cult hope you are too stupid or too biased to grasp the concept of conspiracy. They prefer that you see them as bumbling idiots, as children who found their father’s shotgun or who like to play with matches because in your assumptions and underestimations they find safety. If you cannot identify the agenda, you can do nothing to interfere with the agenda.

I have found that the false notion of central bank impotence is growing in popularity lately, certainly in light of the recent Fed decision to delay an interest rate hike in September. With that particular event in mind, let’s explore what is really going on and why the central banks are far more dangerous and deliberate than people are giving them credit for.

The argument that the Federal Reserve is now “between a rock and a hard place” keeps popping up in alternative media circles lately, but I find this depiction to be inaccurate. It presumes that the Federal Reserve “wants”  to save the U.S. economy or at least wants to maintain our status quo as the “golden goose.” This is not the case.  America is not the golden goose.  In truth, the Fed is exactly where it wants to be; and it is the American people who are trapped economically rather than the bankers.

Take, for instance, the original Fed push for the taper of quantitative easing; why did the Fed pursue this in the first place? QE and zero interest rate policy (ZIRP) are the two pillars holding up U.S. equities markets and U.S. bonds. No one in the mainstream was demanding that the Fed enact taper measures. And when the Fed more publicly introduced the potential for such measures in the fall of 2013, no one believed it would actually follow through. Why? Because removing a primary support pillar from under the “golden goose” seemed incomprehensible to them.

In September of that year, I argued that the Fed would indeed taper QE. And, in my article “Is The Fed Ready To Cut America’s Fiat Life Support?” I gave my reasons why. In short, I felt the Fed was preparing for the final collapse of our economic system and the taper acted as a kind of control valve, making a path for the next leg down without immediate destabilization. I also argued that all stimulus measures have a shelf life, and the shelf life for all QE and ZIRP is quickly coming to an end. They no longer serve a purpose except to marginally slow the collapse of certain sectors, so the Fed is systematically dismantling them.

I received numerous emails, some civil and some hostile, as to why I was crazy to think the Fed would ever end QE. I knew the taper would be instituted because I was willing to accept the real motivation of central banks, which is to undermine and destroy economies within a particular time frame, not secure economies or kick the can indefinitely. In light of this, the taper made sense. One great pillar is gone, and now only ZIRP remains.

After a couple of meetings and preplanned delays, the Fed did indeed follow through with the taper in December of that year. In response, energy markets essentially imploded and stocks became steadily more volatile over the course of 2014, leading to a near 10% drop in early fall followed by foreign QE efforts and false hints of QE4 by Fed officials as central banks slowed the crisis to an easier to manage pace while easing the investment world into the idea of reduced stimulus policies and reduced living standards; what some call the “new normal”.

I have held that the Fed is likely following the same exact model with ZIRP, delaying through the fall only to remove the final pillar in December.

For now, the Fed is being portrayed as incompetent with markets behaving erratically as investors lose faith in their high priests. This is exactly what the bankers that control the Fed prefer. Better to be seen as incompetent than to be seen as deliberately insidious. And who knows, maybe a convenient disaster event in the meantime such as a terrorist attack or war (Syria) could be used to draw attention away from the bankers completely.

Strangely, Bloomberg seems to agree (at least in part) with my view that the taper model is being copied for use in the rate hike theater and that a hike is coming in December.

Meanwhile, some Federal Reserve officials once again insinuate that a hike will be implemented by the end of the year while others hint at the opposite.

Other mainstream sources are stating the contrary, with Pimco arguing that there will be no Fed rate hike until 2016.  Of course, Pimco made a similar claim back in 2013 against any chance of a QE taper.  They were wrong, or, they were deliberately misleading investors.

Goldman Sachs is also redrafting their predictions and indicating that a Fed rate hike will not come until mid-2016. With evidence indicating that Goldman Sachs holds considerable influence over Fed policy (such as exposed private meetings on policy between Fed officials and banking CEO’s), one might argue that whatever they “predict” for the rate hike will ultimately happen. However, I would point out that if Goldman Sachs is indeed on the inside of Fed policy making, then they are often prone to lying about it or hiding it.

During the taper fiasco in 2013, Goldman Sachs first claimed that the Fed would taper in September. They lost billions of dollars on bad currency bets as the Fed delayed.

Then, Goldman Sachs argued that there would be no taper in December of that year; and they were proven to be wrong (or disingenuous) once again.

Today, with the interest rate fiasco, Goldman Sachs claimed a Fed rate hike would likely take place in September. They were wrong. Now, once again, they are claiming no rate hike until next year.

Are we beginning to see a pattern here?

How could an elitist-run bank with proven inside connections to the Federal Reserve be so wrong so often about Fed policy changes? Well, losing a billion dollars here and there is not a very big deal to Goldman Sachs. I believe they are far more interested in misleading investors and keeping the public off guard, and are willing to sacrifice some nominal profits in the process. Remember, these are the same guys who conned nations like Greece into buying toxic derivatives that Goldman was simultaneously betting against!

The relationship between international banks like Goldman Sachs and central banks like the Federal Reserve is best summed up in yet another Carroll Quigley quote from “Tragedy And Hope”:

“It must not be felt that these heads of the world’s chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not. Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up and were perfectly capable of throwing them down. The substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers (also called “international” or “merchant” bankers) who remained largely behind the scenes in their own unincorporated private banks. These formed a system of international cooperation and national dominance which was more private, more powerful, and more secret than that of their agents in the central banks.”

Goldman Sachs and other major banks act in concert with the Fed (or even dictate Fed actions) in conditioning public psychology as much as they manipulate finance. First and foremost, globalists require confusion. Confusion is power.  What better way to confuse and mislead the investment world than to place bad bets on Fed policy changes?

Heading into the end of 2015, we are only going to be faced with ever mounting mixed messages and confusion from the mainstream media, international banks and central banks. It is important to always remember, though, that this is by design. A common motto of the elite is “order out of chaos,” or “never let a good crisis go to waste.” Think critically about why the Fed has chosen to push forward with earth-shaking policy changes this year that no one asked for. What does it have to gain? And realize that if the real goal of the Fed is instability, then it has much to gain through its recent and seemingly insane actions.

0

Brandon Smith

Oath Keepers Merchandise

20 comments

  1. It is tiring, to say the least, hearing the media mouthpieces parrot how clueless our politicians and bankers are concerning our economy that is in shambles. One can clearly see that the Mutually Assured Economic Destruction is orchestrated by those pulling the global purse strings.
    “Again, it is foolhardy to assume central banks and international bankers are a bunch of clumsy Mr. Magoos unwittingly driving our economy off a cliff; they know EXACTLY what they are doing.”
    You are spot on my friend and sadly there are so many that don’t see this as fact.

    1. Rudolf Steiner agrees with the view everything which happens in the globe, especially politically, is planned, there are no accidents.

    2. Where do they reside, these world bankers, can we not declare war on them and take them out of business for their treason?

  2. Consider how to survive WWIII. A final solution. Some one, some nation, some desperate foolish entity will provide the initiation. “The world is a dangerous place to live, not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don’t do anything about it.” Albert Einstein

    MOLON LABE

  3. good article, Yet most Americans are so deceived / dumbed down they wont understand.
    the federal reserve controls the policies of this nation in various ways using players / pawns / corrupt
    politicians.
    Sadly, no General Officer is willing to lead an operation to stop our downfall.
    i salute Oathkeepers.

  4. Very interesting and helpful!
    1. Regarding Quigley, why does he write in past tense: “was”?
    2. David Icke in a radio interview with Richie Allen celebrating an anniversary of the radio program referred to a Free Mason saying in Latin the preposition of which I believed he wrongly translated: ordo ad chaos. Icke translated it as “order out of chaos”, as you quote a saying of tge elite above without source. I thought ad means “to”, whereas ex is “out of”, perhaps de means from.

    1. True. “Ad” is dative and translates “to” or “for.” “Ex” is ablative and translates as “from.” Perhaps there is a bit of literary license here. Is “de” latin? I’m too old to remember.

  5. What is one to think about the Chinese challenge to Western financial dominance? Both China & Russia have Central Banks. Is this World Bank & IMF competition truly a threat to the filthy rich bankers in Europe & the US, or just a transition from western to eastern based control?

  6. Yes, you are correct. Here is another case in point form another email I received earlier today:

    “What we are witnessing now is the continuation of a cycle of financial downturns that has happened every seven years. The following is a summary of how this cycle has played out over the past 50 years…

    It started in 1966 with a 20 percent stock market crash.
    Seven years later, the market lost another 45 percent (1973-74).
    Seven years later was the beginning of the “hard recession” (1980).
    Seven years later was the Black Monday crash of 1987.
    Seven years later was the bond market crash of 1994.
    Seven years later was 9/11 and the 2001 tech bubble collapse.
    Seven years later was the 2008 global financial collapse.
    2015: What’s next?”

    Most of these people are blaming a 1,000 year old Muslim prophecy for this, but are missing that this really did start 50 years ago. In other words, this is a well orchestrated and executed conspiracy. The question of what is next is simply the next step in the plan. Having a major rate hike in December will threaten the biggest commercial holiday ripoff of the year. Most people in this country are totally consumed by the Christmas shopping scam whether they are Christians or not. I am not a Christian, and even I can tell that this consumer feeding frenzy that goes on is nothing about what that time is supposed to be for that religion. Cause a monetary panic then and the already stretched thin emotions in the country will explode in a frenzy of greed, violence, fear and anger, and I have no doubt that the political and banking controllers of our nation know it, and are looking forward to the greater control they can expect to get from it when it is all over.

    1. We are doing our best to warn our friends and family keeping in mind that most people have no clue what is coming. I am preparing accordingly and to the best of my ability so no one goes hungry or ends up in the streets if I can help it. If you are able to wake up just one person I commend you because my family thinks I am nuts and refuses to put down the cell phones to take a closer look at ANY of the events that have perpetuated the mess we find ourselves in today. Don’t care, they can think I am nuts if they like but I refuse to back down. You don’t back down because you care about them. I will not however hold back on a single “I told you so” when the lights finally come on.

  7. Brandon is spot on.

    People who follow the commodities/precious metals remember the “Brown bottom”, that point where the gold price had crashed and Gordon Brown started selling UK reserves in 1999. A smaller number of those people know that Australia’s RBA sold 2/3 of its gold reserves in 1997. A remnant also know Canada sold about 80% of its reserves starting in 1998. Happenstance? Coincidence? or enemy action.

    Australia’s Banking Act of 1959 has a dormant clause allowing confiscation of gold as necessary.

    And … as far as I know the; *official* gold price in the U.S. is still $42.44/oz. When Tricky Dick “closed the gold window” in August, 1971 and in December, reset the official gold price from $35,00/oz to $38.00. On February 12, 1973 the US$ was again devalued when the official gold price was set at $42.22/oz.

    In 1979, Franklin Mint shipped a horde of Krugerrands on TWA. That consignment went missing and Franklin Mint sued for compensation at thethen market value. The Supreme Court ruled the official price was the only value to be honored.

    The push for a Central Bank in the U.S. actually started in the latter part of the 19th Century, led by the “useful idiots” of the Populist movement. The Indianapolis Monetary Commission of 1897 gave the public the first clue about an “elastic” dollar. They sure got it and have been getting it ever since. I won’t say where.

    There are Clues everywhere. Forget Hollywood’s ruby slippers and read the text of “The Wizard of Oz” where you find silver slippers and a yellow brick road.

  8. SPOT ON. Every Secretary of State and President since Woodrow Wilson has been a member of the CFR, a group that actively pursues the goal of obliterating national boundaries and establishing a single world government – a corporate oligarchy. Rockefeller is the president, Bush wad a past president and Clinton is a member. So is carly fiorina and most of the members of congress running for US President. Every major media (newspapers, radio, TV, communications networks) is owned by members and associates of the CFR. The US has paid The Rockefeller Foundation $10 MILLION dollars to a “New States Constitution” that excludes a Bill of Rights, the right to bear arms and does not protect freedom of religion. EO 11490 includes many EO’s that allows the government to take over our electric power, petroleum, gas, minerals, food resources, farms, ALL modes of transportation, control of highways and seaports, ALL health and welfare functions, airports, aircraft, railroads, inland waterways, all Public Storage facilities, and allows the government to mobilize ALL civilians into work brigades under government supervision and designates the Postmaster General to operate National Registration of ALL citizens, On 9/26/61, congress passed Public Law 87-297 which calls for arms control and DISARMAMENT of the American people at the determination of the President. On 4/2/92, the US Senate voted unanimously for SB 1425, which ratified an International Covenant on our civil and political rights and put the UN Charter superior to our Bill of Rights and SCOTUS ruled, in Middleton v. Holland that a treaty supercedes our Constitution, which places the judgments of American citizens under the UN and World Court where our rights are NOT protected by the Constitution or God. Thus, every treaty the president signs with the UN places interpretation and judgment in the jurisdiction of the World Court, including all US treaties and trade agreements (TPP, TPPI, TPA) that serve to expand jurisdiction over America’s economic, political and environmental crims and includes their control over the very core of our society – the family AND our children through the “UN Covenant of the Rights of the Child” treaty. They plan to criminalize christianity and persecute, ostracize, eliminate and imprison christians to establish Humanism. Their plan to bring the US into the IMF includes economic disruption, collapse of many banks (smaller ones) and National bankruptcy. The large swaths of land that the government has been buying and seizing is being given to the Federal Reserve. Folks, i”m sure most of you can see why obama is getting away with finalizing these plans before he leaves office and why there are so many global communists running for the presidency in both parties. His plans are put our military under the control of the UN Armed Forces, which is why he insists on increasing US funding to the UN and why he is decimating our military. Congress signed a treaty with the UN, a few decades ago, making George Bush Commander and Chief of the Coalition Forces and using SCOTUS rule (not law) that a treaty takes precedence over our Constitution, the president was given the power to declare war WITHOUT congressional approval and allows the US to commit our soldiers to fight and die in UN wars all over the world. This should clear up why obama has been doing all this without any interference from congress and with the approval of the supreme court.

    1. What you wrote is true, they did do those things, BUT they were NEVER given the authority to do them so they are null and void. It was just Treason in action that was never charged and prosecuted, as is still going on today.

      Show me the delegated authority written within the US Constitution – the contract they are all under, the definer of our American government, it and all that is in Pursuance thereof it is the SUPREME LAW of this nation, and all who serve within our governments are lawfully bound by an Oath making them personally responsible for their actions.

      – “pursues the goal of obliterating national boundaries and establishing a single world government – a corporate oligarchy”

      Is this not Treason? Is this not *Terrorism when force, or the threat of force, is used ?

      – “The US has paid The Rockefeller Foundation $10 MILLION dollars to a “New States Constitution” that excludes a Bill of Rights, the right to bear arms and does not protect freedom of religion.”

      Where in the US Constitution was this delegated? What amendment created? When was the “power” given to them by the people to do these actions? Is this NOT Treason?

      – ” Every major media (newspapers, radio, TV, communications networks) is owned by members and associates of the CFR”

      This is Treason on the part of those who serve within the FCC whose duty it is to see that the people have recourse to a wide range of information, not a limited monopoly.

      Supreme Court stated in Red Lion v. FCC in 1969: “It is the purpose of the First Amendment to preserve an uninhibited marketplace of ideas in which truth will ultimately prevail, rather than to countenance monopolization of that market, whether it be by the Government itself or a private licensee. It is the right of the public to receive suitable access to social, political, esthetic, moral, and other ideas and experiences which is crucial here. That right may not constitutionally be abridged either by Congress or by the FCC.”

      “EO 11490 includes many EO’s that allows the government to take over our electric power, petroleum, gas, minerals, food resources, farms, ALL modes of transportation, control of highways and seaports, ALL health and welfare functions, airports, aircraft, railroads, inland waterways, all Public Storage facilities, and allows the government to mobilize ALL civilians into work brigades under government supervision and designates the Postmaster General to operate National Registration of ALL citizens,”

      Where is this authority delegated to the executive branch within the US Constitution? It is not. It is FORBIDDEN by the word “All” in Article 1, Section 1: “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.”

      That means that no one who serves within any other branch can write any type of legislation – laws, executive orders, regulations, codes, etc – that are binding on, or affect the people.

      They are allowed to write them for those that serve within their own branch if they are in a “managerial” position, which the person who serves as president is (the presidential impersonator is NOT the US President and nothing that he creates is lawful and binding on anyone in any position). All laws, etc written to be binding on the America people MUST come directly and intimately from those voted into office. They are allowed to have assistance with those duties, but they MUST be written by those who were elected to be lawfully binding on the people.

      That makes it Treason against the American people, and it makes those that enforce those “color of laws” *Terrorists – knowingly or not on the part of the enforcers who are also BOUND by Oath.

      *28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.

      “congress passed Public Law 87-297 which calls for arms control and DISARMAMENT of the American people at the determination of the President. On 4/2/92, the US Senate voted unanimously for SB 1425, which ratified an International Covenant on our civil and political rights and put the UN Charter superior to our Bill of Rights and SCOTUS ruled, in Middleton v. Holland that a treaty supercedes our Constitution, which places the judgments of American citizens under the UN and World Court where our rights are NOT protected by the Constitution or God.”

      No one who serves within our government were ever delegated those powers. Read the US Constitution, it is JUST Treason against the American people. Nothing can “supercede” lawfully our US Constitution.

      Thomas Jefferson, in the Resolutions says “that a federal “law” that violates the Constitution is no law at all. It is “void and of no effect.”

      Alexander Hamilton: “Until the people have, by some solemn and authoritative act, annulled or changed the established form, it is binding upon themselves collectively, as well as individually; and no presumption, or even knowledge, of their sentiments, can warrant their representatives in a departure from it, prior to such an act.”

      Alexander Hamilton: “Every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid.”

      Thomas Jefferson: “Our peculiar security is in the possession of a written Constitution. Let us not make it a blank paper by construction.”

      James Madison: “Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government.”

      “Decency, security, and liberty alike demand that government officials be subjected to the same rules of conduct that are commands to the citizen. In a Government of laws, existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Crime is contagious. If government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for the law it invites every man to become a law unto himself and against that pernicious doctrine, this court should resolutely set its face.” Olmstead v U.S., 277 US 348, 485; 48 S. Ct. 564, 575; 72 LEd 944 U.S. versus Verdrigo-Urquidez, 110 S. Ct. 1056, 1060-61 (1990)
      South v.Maryland/Bowers v. DeVito

      “Thus, every treaty the president signs with the UN places interpretation and judgment in the jurisdiction of the World Court, including all US treaties and trade agreements (TPP, TPPI, TPA) that serve to expand jurisdiction over America’s economic, political and environmental crims and includes their control over the very core of our society – the family AND our children through the “UN Covenant of the Rights of the Child” treaty.”

      Notice that the Supreme LAW of our nation requires that EVERY Treaty be in Pursuance of the US Constitution or it is NULL and VOID, not binding on the American people or the USA. Again it is just OPENLY admitting to Treason. Call those actions what they are. Do not act as if they have any credence or legitimate power here within the USA, call it PUBLICLY what it is, Treason against the American people and the US Constitution.

      “His plans are put our military under the control of the UN Armed Forces, which is why he insists on increasing US funding to the UN and why he is decimating our military. ”

      You are a bit late on that one; he, Panetta, Dempsey did that in his first term. “Our” US Military has been the UN’s Military for quite a few years now. That is why I called for charges of Treason to be brought not only on them, but on those who were present at that Senate Hearing and did nothing; brought no charges as they are required to do, just asked incredulously If those in charge of the US Military – upon which Trillions of American dollars are spent, bankrupting our nation – were going to inform the congress when we go to wars. They said they would AFTER the UN and NATO had made the decisions on where to USE our family members in their quest for world dominance in the wars of aggression.

      This is why it is Treason to follow those unlawful orders of anyone who serves within our government be they high ranking military or anyone else if one is serving within the US Military; until we can sort out all the Traitors to the USA. So anyone who has died in a military operation has been MURDERED by those who serve within our government fighting for and at a foreign entities orders which is again, Treason. KNOW YOUR OATH AND WHAT IT MEANS.

      OPEN NOTE TO All US (not UN) Military – you are needed here at home to DEFEND our nation from the Treasonous high ranking military “leaders” and those who serve within our government. Do not bother if you do not know your Oath and what it means or are not willing to learn those things. If you love and want to keep America as a Constitutional Republic YOU ARE NEEDED NOW AT HOME.

      ” Congress signed a treaty with the UN, a few decades ago, making George Bush Commander and Chief of the Coalition Forces and using SCOTUS rule (not law) that a treaty takes precedence over our Constitution, the president was given the power to declare war WITHOUT congressional approval and allows the US to commit our soldiers to fight and die in UN wars all over the world. ”

      This is just TREASON ON THE PART OF ALL INVOLVED, even the person who makes the copies or brings the coffee because they are ALL under Oath to the US Constitution, to “SUPPORT AND DEFEND” it before anything else, including orders of superiors or the duties of the position one is occupying within the US Governments.

      Call it what it is, do not give it the “power” of believing that any of that can LAWFULLY be used against the American people. It is TREASON and TERRORISM being used against the American people and the US Constitution. Anyone who “just follows those orders” or “just does their jobs” are still committing Treason because they are REQUIRED TO SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE US CONSTITUTION BEFORE ANYTHING ELSE.

      Learn that word, Treason, and start using it in the very same sentence of those “color of law” items because when you do not, you give them power within the minds of the ignorant of what our government is, and what it requires of us. Remember, words do have power and the more those treasonous actions are associated with the word “Treason”, and the enforcement of them associated with the word and actions of “*Terrorism” it will educate the American people AND the enforcers of those things.

  9. Worst part? For them it is because we KNOW.
    Yes this was planned. I have been warning people for over a decade.
    The flocking Sheeple have not listened. Many attack me because I am a veteran. I am the “bad guy” so I pleasantly share with them that it will be men like me who protect them when the SHTF. So stand with me or get the hell out of the way. [One sentence deleted by Elias Alias, editor]

    1. I 100% agree with CONSTITUTIONAL Militias.

      But each Militia must be the Militia of the state, not a “national” Militia to be lawful. They MUST be strictly under the US Constitution and the Constitution of each state (be careful of those one reads online as many have been unlawfully changed to reflect what those traitors who serve within the governments want the people to believe).

      To be lawful here within the USA those that enforce the laws MUST be trained as congress requires the Military to be trained. That training is supposed to come from each state, but many of those that serve within the state governments are NOT doing their duties so the people may of course do them constitutionally. That means that those trained by the US Military can and should train the Militia. But all must study the US Constitution and the state Constitution that they are under. When a Militia goes to assist in another state someone who knows that state Constitution must be assigned to help guide them to only do Constitutionally LAWFUL things within the state.

      It is important to all to realize that no one owes any person who serves within either the state or general government any loyalty, as they are NOT our government. Everyone’s loyalty, not just those who are actually serving within Militias, MUST be to the US Constitution and all that is in Pursuance thereof it, and to each state Constitution.

      J. Reuben Clark spoke about the need for a solid support of the Constitution: “God provided that in this land of liberty, our political allegiance shall run not to individuals, that is, to government officials, no matter how great or how small they may be. Under His plan our allegiance and the only allegiance we owe as citizens or denizens of the United States, runs to our inspired Constitution which God himself set up. So runs the oath of office of those who participate in government. A certain loyalty we do owe to the office which a man holds, but even here we owe just by reason of our citizenship, no loyalty to the man himself. In other countries it is to the individual that allegiance runs. This principle of allegiance to the Constitution is basic to our freedom. It is one of the great principles that distinguishes this “land of liberty” from other countries”.

      George Washington: The preservation of the sacred fire of liberty, and the destiny of the Republican model of government, are justly considered as deeply, perhaps as finally staked, on the experiment entrusted to the hands of the American people.

      Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers 28: “The militia is a voluntary force not associated or under the control of the States except when called out; [when called into actual service] a permanent or long standing force would be entirely different in make-up and call.”

      John Adams, A Defense of the Constitutions of the United States 475: “To suppose arms in the hands of citizens, to be used at individual discretion, except in private self-defense, or by partial orders of towns, countries or districts of a state, is to demolish every constitution, and lay the laws prostrate, so that liberty can be enjoyed by no man; it is a dissolution of the government. The fundamental law of the militia is, that it be created, directed and commanded by the laws, and ever for the support of the laws.”

      George Washington: “A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well-digested plan is requisite; and their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories as tend to render them independent of others for essential, particularly military, supplies.”

      Ronald Reagan: “I had a copy of the Soviet Constitution and I read it with great interest. And I saw all kinds of terms in there that sound just exactly like our own: ‘Freedom of assembly’ and ‘freedom of speech’ and so forth. Of course, they don’t allow them to have those things, but they’re in there in the constitution.
      But I began to wonder about the other constitutions – everyone has one – and our own, and why so much emphasis on ours. And then I found out, and the answer was very simple – that’s why you don’t notice it at first. But it is so great that it tells the entire difference.
      All those other constitutions are documents that say, ‘We, the government, allow the people the following rights,’ and our Constitution says ‘We the People, allow the government the following privileges and rights.’ We give our permission to government to do the things that it does. And that’s the whole story of the difference – why we’re unique in the world and why no matter what our troubles may be, we’re going to overcome”.

      Constitution of the United States of America, Second Amendment: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

      This is the only place where the framers put the word “necessary” as they considered that the people themselves in charge of their own, their states, and their nations defense was NECESSARY.

      Rep. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts, floor debate over the 2nd Amendment, I Annals of Congress: “What, Sir, is the use of a militia? It is to PREVENT THE ESTABLISMENT OF A STANDING ARMY, the bane of liberty….”

      US Constitution, Article I, Section. 8, Clause 15: “To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel invasions.”

      This clause is very straightforward. These are the duties for which those who serve within the general government are REQUIRED to use the Militia. Yes, “are”; and be the requirement to use the Militia using any other organization to do any of those duties is unlawful and quite possibly treasonous.

      The Militia has as its constitutionally assigned duties to:

      — Enforce the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution,
      — Enforce and keep the “Laws of the Union” (which are constitutional laws ONLY),
      — Protect the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
      — “to suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”.

      Remember, that when a duty is assigned to one thing, it is FORBIDDEN to do or use another other then that strictly and in writing required.

      The militia of each state is entrusted with the defense of the USA and her people, not just with the defense of their state; and they are to be armed with weapons that can repel any invasions bearing modern weapons of war. Congress is required to provide those military grade weapons for the militias in the next Clause. The next Clause also lays out the duties of those who serve within the state and general governments have to the Militias.

      Clause 16: “To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress”.

      Article 2, Section 2: “The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States;”

      Notice that there are commas used here, not semi colons which means that all listed MUST be called into service not KEPT into service (standing military). Also the ONLY time that a US President is LAWFULLY the Commander in Chief is when they are called into service to defend our nation.

      Samuel Adams: “It is always dangerous to the liberties of the people to have an army stationed among them, over which they have no control … The Militia is composed of free Citizens. There is therefore no danger of their making use of their Power to the destruction of their own Rights, or suffering others to invade them.”

      Tench Coxe: “Who are the militia? are they not ourselves. Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American…The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.”

      Tench Coxe, ‘Remarks on the First Part of the Amendments to the Federal Constitution’, on the Second Amendment where he asserts that it’s the people with arms, who serve as the ultimate check on government: “As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people duly before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must BE OCCASIONALLY RAISED TO DEFEND OUR COUNTRY, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow-citizens, the people are confirmed by the next article in their right to keep and bear their private arms.”

      Justice Story, Associate Justice, Supreme Court wrote: “The next amendment is: “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
      The importance of this article will scarcely be doubted by any persons, who have duly reflected upon the subject. The militia is the natural defence of a free country against sudden foreign invasions, domestic insurrections, and domestic usurpations of power by rulers. It is against sound policy for a free people to keep up large military establishments and standing armies in time of peace, both from the enormous expenses, with which they are attended, and the facile means, which they afford to ambitious and unprincipled rulers, to subvert the government, or trample upon the rights of the people. The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them”.

      One can have a website that all the Militias of each state can communicate and discuss; but there is no constitutional allowment for a “national” Militia; though each state’s Militia must be trained the same and can assist when requested another state.

  10. http://www.amtvmedia.com/the-real-reason-putin-is-fighting-isis/

    I keep up with the attached link a year now so I can get the breakdown on what is going on.
    ISIS works for our Corrupt gov’t and banks to destabilize east, like herding cattle to flood borders into Europe. We are a direct enemy to Russia so Russia being in the East now is for him, Russia and more than I don’t know certainly may not just be for Christians as some may think.

Comments are closed.