No products in the cart.


Wesley Clark Calls For Interning “Disloyal” Americans


This article was written by Kurt Nimmo and originally published at

Retired US Army General and the former Supreme Allied Commander of Europe for NATO Wesley Clark advocates rounding up “radicalized” and “disloyal” Americans and putting them in internment camps for the “duration” of the war on terror.

[ot-video type=”youtube” url=””]

“In World War II if someone supported Nazi Germany at the expense of the United States, we didn’t say that was freedom of speech, we put him in a camp, they were prisoners of war,” Clark told MSNBC.

The difference is that World War II was a war declared under Article I, Section 8, Clause II of the Constitution whereas the war on terror is undeclared and thus illegal.

Clark is in essence advocating a life sentence for people who have not committed a crime but merely engaged in speech — often reprehensible, yet constitutionally protected — the government considers radical and in opposition to its foreign policy.

The Bush administration declared the war on terror would last a generation or more. Senior officials with the Obama administration meanwhile have said — when formulating “disposition matrix” to determine how terrorism suspects will be disposed of — they had reached a “broad consensus that such operations are likely to be extended at least another decade” or more.

The Edward Snowden “leaks reveal that the war on terror at home continues to grind on, capturing in its dragnet millions of Americans and foreigners, many of them innocent of any crime. The war on terror has become institutionalized, and the domestic costs of this war continue to mount: privacy is being eroded; communications are being monitored; and dissent is being cracked down on. The primary targets of the domestic war on terror continue to be Muslims and Arabs, though it is now clear that the sweep of the domestic war has ensnared millions of other Americans. And there is no end in sight to this domestic juggernaut,” writes Alex Kane.

Clark’s remarks reveal the mindset of the upper echelon of government. Those who disagree with the government are now to be rounded up and shut up indefinitely in political internment camps.

Mass internment of official enemies on par with Nazi Germany and Stalin’s Soviet Union is now “on the table” and openly discussed as suspicious attacks and FBI orchestrated and grandstanded terror plots continue to grab headlines and build a reactionary consensus as the designed result of an incessant, decades-long propaganda campaign.


Brandon Smith



  1. Quotes by Niccolò Machiavelli
    The first method for estimating the intelligence of a ruler is to look at the men he has around him. Men are so simple and yield so readily to the desires of the moment that he who will trick will always find another who will suffer to be tricked.
    It should be noted that when he seizes a state the new ruler ought to determine all the injuries that he will need to inflict. He should inflict them once and for all, and not have to renew them every day.

    We have loyal Americans in High places…Mutiny, time to walk the plank Clark…argh!

  2. Retired US Army General and the former Supreme Allied Commander of Europe of “NATO” Wesley Clark, should be contained in detention camp for the duration, till we get our Constitution recognized and followed again. Have him ‘re-educated’ on our Bill Of Rights played over and over again till he understands, and then give him some more, for the duration of course.
    Our serving members of the Armed Forces are getting a good wake-up call on the Top Brass. Keep it coming Wesley, your doing our recruiting for us…
    Liberty wants you to be Oath Keepers!
    Want to help save the Republic ? Join up now!

    1. The same 1st Amendment rights that are the crux of this entire issue apply to this fool. He is entitled to speak his opinion, regardless of how ridiculous it is… without internment.

  3. Let Us ask You,”OathKeepers” does the Supreme Allied Commander of Europe for nato wesley Clark. sound American to Us, to You? Let Us compromise and Talk about this New World. I Love Europe, but You Will Not and Can Not take Free Thoughts and Expression away and Unless you can Give Us better protections than the ones We have. Let Us Talk, Let Us Believe, Let Us Be.

  4. ““In World War II if someone supported Nazi Germany at the expense of the United States, we didn’t say that was freedom of speech, we put him in a camp, they were prisoners of war,” Clark told MSNBC.”

    I agree with him, here… sort of. Except that those traitors and domestic enemies of the USA and the American people need to be arrested, charged, HELD (they will run, I bet even Clark) and PROSECUTED.

    Those that are supporting the NWO are exactly like those that supported, and using a lot of, the Nazi tactics against our legitimate US government, our Constitutional Republic, against the US Constitution that they took a Lawfully binding OATH to support and defend against all enemies – domestic and foreign.

    He admits his *Treason with his words, and advocates the use of **Terrorism against the American people for practicing and using what is PROTECTED by our legitimate government, in writing within the US Constitution.

    When he speaks of disloyalty to the USA, he seemed serious, but he forgot that there is a long way and a huge difference that IS recognized here in America between speaking against actions committed by those who SERVE within our governments – particularly those that are unAmerican in action committed by them – and the acts of Treason.

    His support of, and actions to, destroy our legitimate government is an act of Treason in favor of the UN, NATO, NWO over America, American values, American lives.

    Think not?

    Did/do you see him actively speaking against giving US troops to the UN – and THAT is TREASON – nor does anyone who SERVES within our government have that authority. Yet, it is a fact that is going on now.

    “The difference is that World War II was a war declared under Article I, Section 8, Clause II of the Constitution whereas the war on terror is undeclared and thus illegal”

    Actually war cannot be on a tactic, action, idea, weight, organic farming, using water – that belongs to the people, etc. War is a action against two states, nations.

    “Clark’s remarks reveal the mindset of the upper echelon of government. Those who disagree with the government are now to be rounded up and shut up indefinitely in political internment camps.”

    His words reveal his Treason.

    US Constitution, Preamble: “WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and SECURE THE BLESSINGS OF LIBERTY TO OURSELVES AND OUR POSTERITY, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

    Bill of Rights, Preamble: “Congress of the United States
    begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.
    THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, IN ORDER TO PREVENT MISCONSTRUCTION OR ABUSE OF ITS POWERS, that FURTHER DECLARATORY AND RESTRICTIVE CLAUSES SHOULD BE ADDED: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution…”

    Dr. Edwin Vieira:
    “This has nothing to do with personalities or subjective ideas. It’s a matter of what the Constitution provides…

    The government of the United States has never violated anyone’s constitutional rights…
    The government of the United States will never violate anyone constitutional rights, because it cannot violate anyone’s constitutional rights.

    The reason for that is: The government of the United States is that set of actions by public officials that are consistent with the Constitution. Outside of its constitutional powers, the government of the United States has no legitimacy. It has no authority; and, it really even has no existence. It is what lawyers call a legal fiction.

    … the famous case Norton v. Shelby County… The Court said: “An unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties. It is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.”

    And that applies to any (and all) governmental action outside of the Constitution…”
    What are the defining characteristics of a limited government?

    They are its disabilities; what it does not have legal authority to do.

    Look at the First Amendment… What does it do? It guarantees freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom of religion.

    But how does it do that? I quote: “Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech or of the press” etcetera.

    “Congress shall make no law;” that’s a statement of an absence of power. That’s a statement of a disability.” (End Dr. Vieira quote)

    Amendment I: “Congress SHALL MAKE NO LAW respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

    Amendment II: “A well regulated Militia, being NECESSARY to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.”

    Amendment IV: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, SHALL NOT BE VIOLATED, AND NO WARRANTS SHALL ISSUE, BUT UPON PROBABLE CAUSE, SUPPORTED BY OATH OR AFFIRMATION, AND PARTICULARLY DESCRIBING THE PLACE TO BE SEARCHED, AND THE PERSONS OR THINGS TO BE SEIZED.”

    Amendment IX: “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights,SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO DENY OR DISPARAGE OTHERS RETAINED by the people.”


    * Treason –

    **Terrorism – 28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.

    Clark really needs to read the US Constitution that he gave multiple Oaths to “… support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic;… bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion;…”. Because that IS his sworn duty to uphold.

    1. Very good job Cal some really do need to learn what they have signed up for as this guy doesn’t know that he’s committing treason out loud and should be removed as to not be able to cause any trouble.

  5. It is sickening to me to know that there are people like this traitor in high places in this republic.

  6. General Wesley Clark was commander at Fort Hood during the WACO slaughter. He was the one that ” lent ” all the military equipment and ” advisors ” to the government attackers. Please note that his next assignment was with the Joint Chiefs of Staff. His career path was vertical after helping out Janet Reno and Bill Clinton wipe out the Branch Davidians.
    From Wikipedia :
    Fort Hood and the Waco Siege[edit]
    See also: Waco siege
    Clark’s divisional command came with the 1st Cavalry Division at Fort Hood, Texas. Clark was in command during three separate deployments of forces from Fort Hood for peacekeeping in Kuwait.

    Clark assumed command of USSOUTHCOM in June 1996.
    Some critics, such as left-wing CounterPunch and right-wing, have made allegations that Clark was, to some degree, involved in the Waco siege, where David Koresh and 74 Branch Davidian followers were killed during the FBI’s final raid on the group’s compound.[42] Some also suggest that, given the sensitive nature of the materials lent for the operation, Clark had some knowledge of and perhaps a hand in planning the Waco siege.[43] Others, such as James Ridgeway, dismiss the allegations as having “little evidence to substantiate them.”[44]
    His Officer Evaluation Report (OER) for his command at Fort Hood called him “one of the Army’s best and brightest”.[citation needed] Clark was awarded the Distinguished Service Medal for his work at Fort Hood and was promoted to lieutenant general at the end of his command in 1994. Clark’s next assignment was an appointment as the Director, Strategic Plans and Policy (J5), on the staff of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS), from April 1994 to June 1996.[30][45]
    Equipment and manpower[edit]
    Government agencies[edit]
    • Raid (February 28): 75 federal agents (ATF and FBI); 3 helicopters manned by 10 Texas National Guard counter-drug personnel as distraction during the raid and filming.[93][102] Ballistic protection equipment, fire retardant clothing, regular flashlights, regular cameras (i.e. flash photography), pump-action shotguns and flashbang grenades,[103] 9mm handguns, 9mm MP5 submachine guns, .223 AR-15 rifles, a .308 bolt-action sniper rifle.[104]
    • Siege (March 1 through April 18): Hundreds of federal agents; 2 Bell UH-1 Iroquois helicopters.[105]
    • Assault (April 19): Hundreds of federal agents; military vehicles (with their normal weapon systems removed): 9–10 M3 Bradley infantry fighting vehicles, 4–5 M728 Combat Engineering Vehicles (CEVs) armed with CS gas, 2 M1A1 Abrams main battle tanks, 1 M88 tank retriever.[102][105]
    • Support:[102] 1 Britten-Norman Defender surveillance aircraft;[106] a number of Texas National Guard personnel for maintenance of military vehicles and training on the use of the vehicles and their support vehicles (Humvees and flatbed trucks); surveillance from Texas National Guard counter-drug UC-26 surveillance aircraft and from Alabama National Guard; 10 active-duty U.S. Army Special Forces (Delta Force) soldiers as observers and trainers (also present during assault); 2 senior U.S. Army officers as advisers, 2 members of the British Army’s 22nd Special Air Service (SAS) Regiment as observers;[107] 50+ men in total.[108]
    Branch Davidians[edit]

  7. While making his big fat pension he should think more about Americanizing people in a wholesome way.

  8. So he wants to round up all the Democrats and put them in concentration camps? Hmm. I might be able to support that.

  9. this General RETIRED should be ashamed of himself he has dishonored his uniform and the oath he has taken. Bring it on idiots we will resist and fight

  10. The title up top says honor your oath. I submit the military is a traitor to their oath. They(and I when I was in the army) took an oath, not to defend and uphold a corrupt and unjust govt, but to uphold and defend the constitution of the united states. This is something the military isnt doin. they should be arresting all politions and put them on trial for treason and setting up a new civilian constutional govt. Honor the oarh

  11. By his own statement, Wesley Clark must be the first one locked up.

    He is advocating violation of the first amendment of the constitution. So, that makes him disloyal.

  12. These are the kind of shitheads that scare me the most. They are the ones teaching the younger troops just coming in, that Americans are the domestic enemy of their oath. Someone needs to rip that Ranger tab off his uniform and feed it to him. Lousy traitorous scumbag.

  13. Those who advocate a grossly constitutionally illegal path are not upholding the Constitution, but in fact are lending support to its enemies, or are its enemies.

    Making war on or lending support to those who are making war on the US is the definition of treason.

    What is the US if its Constitution is annulled? Who would annul it? Would that be, perhaps, those who lead to war without a declaration? …who advocate the internment of those who are simply anti-war? …how about those who call friends of the Constitution, such as Oathkeepers, … those who call us traitors? At some point, the Constitution IS the United States, because the so-called US government surely is renegade.

    Clark has demonstrated that with all the power he wields, either he does not understand his oath or took it with intent to deceive. He is not fit to lead any defense of the US or any projection of US intent or power. This is my conclusion; I think a trial by jury is called for.

    Those arrested and interned in WWII for supporting “NAZI Germany at the expense of the United States” are something I know little about, I suspect because they were few and rare, not the kind of anti-war folks that I suspect Clark is warbling about.

    I agree with Stumpjumper: arrest Wesley Clark and put him on trial for treason, conspiracy to deny rights under color of law, and perhaps a few dozen other charges. If his activities in Waco and the many other places noted in comments above fit criminal code complaints, let’s get going.

    Clark is the perfect sacrificial lamb to put the disconstitutionalists in the military and the renegade government on notice.

    Pipe dream, probably. But it’s the RIGHT dream.

  14. I guess the pull of the Dark Side is powerful to some. We don’t want to go there as a Nation. HEIL NO!

  15. He referenced nazi supporters being put internment camps during ww2z I am In agreement with him.

    Now we have the us government supporting nazi soldiers in Ukraine. So we should start there right away. Go round them up Wesley clark!

  16. This traitor to his country, uniform and especially to his oath reminds me of Joseph Goebbels Hitler’s propaganda minister. Clark has retired from the military and taken a new job, progressives propaganda minister! His retirement needs to be taken away for national security concerns since he obviously doesn’t support the Constitution!

  17. Says the General who violated the Posse Commitatus Act by deploying tanks to Waco and was promoted for it by Bill Clinton. Then based on a fake genocide claim launched a carpet bombing campaign against Serbian cities killing over 2000 civilians and 0 soldiers. I served in the Balkans and Serbia and Russia went out of their way to cooperate with NATO until Saudi Arabia paid President Clinton to create a narco terrorist Muslim state in the Balkans. To this day the US Government has never issued a legal justification for this unprovoked act of aggression and instead relies on an after the fact UN resolution.

  18. General Clark would have fit right in with Lenin and Trotsky. In fact Hermon Gering would have praised Wesley.

  19. Pick up a book and read “The Face of Freedom” by Benjamin Vance. You’ll learn something. You’ll learn a little bit about defense, offense and forming a large gathering with political power.

  20. If they’re going to arrest every one who disagrees with this current administration they’ll need a lot of internment camps. Wesley Clark was a disgrace to his uniform from the day he put it on.

Comments are closed.