No products in the cart.

News

New York National Guard Conducts Training At Simulated Detainee Facility

Detention Camp 1

This article comes from Intellihub.com

by Alex Thomas

(INTELLIHUB) — After two months of seemingly nonstop reports about urban military training throughout the United States, many readers of alternative media are rightfully worried about portions of the military being used against the American people.

In fact, officials WITHIN the Pentagon have publicly voiced their concerns that President Obama may, “use force within the United States against its citizens.”

With that being said, each and every announcement by the military of their different training activities is being scrutinized like never before with the latest news raising eyebrows due to its connection to possible internment camps for American citizens.

At least sixty soldiers from the 102nd Military Police Battalion’s Headquarters Detachment recently conducted their annual training at Fort Drum in a simulated detention center.

Detention Camp 2

A press release detailed what the soldiers spent their time doing during the training which included practicing pat downs, biometric checks, and running detainees through hygiene stations. The troops also practiced conducting psychological evaluations.

“What we are conducting here are full-scale operations in order to bring everyone into the fold for what is necessary to run a detention facility properly,” said Capt. Nicholas Monuteaux in the release.

“It is very necessary to ensure all our military policemen and small engineer contingent develop, build or refine their duties and responsibilities.”

While the training in New York may very well be for use overseas (members of the same battalion have served at Guantanamo Bay) the fact remains that any announcement about training in detention centers instantly sparks fears due to the documented fact that plans for internment camps in America exist and could become a reality after some sort of massive unrest within the country.

An extremely important and detailed essay written by Timothy Pope and published on Intellihub News includes a list that highlights official federal government and military documentation that confirms that an extensive framework and infrastructure for internment camps in the United States does indeed exist.

In 2009 the National Emergency Centers Act (H.R. 645), was introduced in Congress, mandating the establishment of “national emergency centers” to be located on military installations for the purpose of providing “temporary housing, medical, and humanitarian assistance to individuals and families dislocated due to an emergency or major disaster,” according to the bill. In addition to emergencies, this legislation is designed to “meet other appropriate needs, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security,” an open-ended mandate which could mean just about anything they want it to mean, including the forced detention of American citizens in the event of widespread rioting after a national emergency or total economic collapse.

In February of 2010 the Internment and Resettlement Operations (FM 3-39.40) was leaked, a U.S. Army manual outlining policies for processing detainees into internment camps both globally and inside the United States. That is against the Law of Nations.

Read more here.

0

Shorty Dawkins

Oath Keepers Merchandise

2 comments

  1. Hestilow writes:

    Dear friends, the following is a copy of my correspondence with Senator Cornyn concerning the arming of the DHS for war against the citizens of our nation. You are each encouraged to copy and properly amend this letter to send to your own senators and members of the U.S. House.

    Further, I am somewhat overwhelmed at the response to my posts leading up to this letter on this issue. At this point almost 3,000 of you have shared my original post, I have 994 new friends requests, 61 messages, and 70 new comments to process.

    Please be patient with me and pray that this window of communication remains open to all of us as we respond to this threat against our Constitution and our people. I am awed by you, by your positive response, and your wonderful support. We each have a role to play in standing against this present tyranny.

    Part of that proper response is sending them a letter like this from YOU, and following it up to make sure it remains a “hot button” issue that must be resolved. God bless you as you honor your oaths and your obligations as citizens of this free nation. May we once again know honorable leadership and peace at home. With all sincerity and respect—Resolved, Captain Terry M. Hestilow, United States Army, Retired. END

    Hestilow’s letter:

    The Honorable Senator John Cornyn, State of Texas
    United States Senate
    517 Hart Senate Office Building
    Washington, D.C. 20510

    Re: Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and that agencies preparation for war against citizens of the United States of America.

    Dear Senator Cornyn,

    It is with gravest concern that I write to you today concerning the recent appropriation of weapons by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that can only be understood as a bold threat of war by that agency, and the Obama administration, against the citizens of the United States of America. To date, DHS has been unwilling to provide to you, the elected representatives of the People, justification for recent purchases of almost 3,000 mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) armored personnel carriers, 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition (with associated weapons), and other weapons systems, when, in fact, the DHS has no war mission or war making authority within the limits of the United States of America.

    Significant is the fact that at the same time the Obama administration is arming his DHS for war within the limits of the United States against the People of the United States in accordance with his 2008 campaign speech claiming,

    “We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve gotta (sic) have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded [as the United States military]” — Candidate Barack Obama, 2008.

    The Obama administration is deliberately de-funding, overextending, and hollowing the Department of Defense; the only legitimate agency of the U.S. government with a war mission.

    This act of the Obama administration stands as a glaring threat of war against our nation’s citizens! This act of the Obama administration can only be understood as a tyrannical threat against the Constitution of the United States of America! If left unresolved, the peace loving citizens who have sworn to defend the United States Constitution “against all enemies, both foreign and domestic” are left no option except to prepare to defend themselves, and the U.S. Constitution, against this Administration’s “coup” against the People and the foundations of liberty fought for and defended for the past 238 years. We have no choice if we honor our oaths.

    The only proper response to this threat against the American people is for the representatives of the People, the members of the U.S. House and Senate, to demand in clear terms that the Administration cannot ignore, that the Department of Homeland Security immediately surrender their newly appropriated weapons of war to the Department of Defense (DoD). Further, since the DHS has assumed a position in the Administration to enforce the tyrannical acts of this president against the People of the United States against the limits of the United States Constitution, it remains for the United States Congress to exercise its limiting power in the balancing of powers established by our founding fathers, to disestablish and dissolve the DHS as soon as possible. One needs only to look to the rise of Adolf Hitler, and his associated DHS organizations, the SA and the SS, of 1932-1934, to see the outcome of allowing an agency of government this kind of control over the free citizens of a nation. The people of Germany could not have imagined, until it was too late, the danger of allowing a tyrant this kind of power. We must not be so naïve as to think it will not happen to us as well if we remain passive toward this power grab by the Marxist Obama administration!

    Finally, for more than two centuries the nation has lived in peace at home because of the protections of our legitimate military and the many appropriate state and federal law enforcement agencies, supported by Constitutional courts. We stand today at a cross-road. Will we allow this present Administration to overthrow our United States Constitution and its legal processes to amend injustices, or, will we honor our obligations to defend the Constitution against a “domestic” enemy? Our Constitution lays out the proper methods of resolving our differences; and it does not include its overthrow by a rogue agency of a Marxist leadership at home. You, sir, are our constitutionally elected agent to defend our Constitution at home. We are counting upon you. We remain aware, however, of this present threat and will not expose ourselves as an easy prey to the authors of the destruction of our nation.

    I know that this letter demands much of you. We elected you because we, the citizens of the State of Texas, believe that you are up to the task at hand and will, against all threats, honor your oath and office. We are also writing to your fellow members of the House and Senate to stand in integrity with the Constitution and against this present threat by the Obama administration and his DHS.

    We refuse to surrender our Constitution or our nation!

    Resolved,
    Captain Terry M. Hestilow
    United States Army, Retired
    Fort Worth, Texas
    March 23, 2013

  2. Good letter, but may I mention and point out that some inaccuracies should be corrected.

    “when, in fact, the DHS has no war mission or war making authority within the limits of the United States of America.”

    It goes beyond that.

    Those that serve within the federal and state governments were, and are under the US Constitution, forbidden to create governmental professsional law enforcement agencies such as the DHS, and a “standing” (permanent) military. Those that serve within our governments are required to use the Militias of the several states. It IS the Militia that has the constitutionally assigned duties to:

    — Enforce the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution,
    — Enforce and keep the “Laws of the Union” (which are constitutional laws ONLY),
    — Protect the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
    — “to suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”.

    As Dr. Vieira says, “Read the thing (US Constitution)”, because no where within the US Constitution is the authorization for governmental professional law enforcement agencies to be created.

    US Militaries can be “raised” when America is under attack, and the Congress declares war – only then – to defend our nation. Until that happens, the Militias of the several states are the ONLY body that is authorized to be trained and armed to defend our states and our nations from attack, and they are REQUIRED to be trained as the US Military is trained.

    “… the DHS has no war mission or war making authority within the limits of the United States of America.”

    The only body that has “war making authority” is the Congress. NO ONE ELSE has been given that authority; nor can those that serve within the US Congress give that authority to another person, branch of government, agency, foreign nation, foreign entity, etc without committing Treason against the American people.

    These people whose quotes I present to you would know.

    James Madison, Father of the Constitution of the United States of America: “The power to declare war, including the power of judging the causes of war, is fully and exclusively vested in the legislature … the executive has no right, in any case, to decide the question, whether there is or is not cause for declaring war.”

    George Washington, General and then the First US President: “The constitution vests the power of declaring war in Congress; therefore no offensive expedition of importance can be undertaken until after they shall have deliberated upon the subject and authorized such a measure.”

    “Significant is the fact…”

    Actually that in itself is a declaration of war against the American people (my opinion, but based on my readings of the US Constitution, framers, etc).

    “… the only legitimate agency of the U.S. government with a war mission.”

    Actually that is incorrect. Those that serve wtihin our governments are FORBIDDEN to create and keep a standing military without a declaration of war by the Congress. The military “brass” are well aware of this and would lose much power if they enforced the US Constitution.

    James Madison: “… large and permanent military establishments … are forbidden by the principles of free government, and against the necessity of which the militia were meant to be a constitutional bulwark.”

    Justice Story, Associate Justice, Supreme Court wrote: “The next amendment is: “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
    The importance of this article will scarcely be doubted by any persons, who have duly reflected upon the subject. The militia is the natural defence of a free country against sudden foreign invasions, domestic insurrections, and domestic usurpations of power by rulers. It is against sound policy for a free people to keep up large military establishments and standing armies in time of peace, both from the enormous expenses, with which they are attended, and the facile means, which they afford to ambitious and unprincipled rulers, to subvert the government, or trample upon the rights of the people.”

    The Militia of the several states, though not under either the federal or state governments, is the ONLY Constitutionally assigned force to “counter Invasions” and “Domestic Violence” within our nation, and that would include those within our nation committing Treason and . Those that serve within the federal and state governments are authorized to use ONLY the Militia to defend our nation unless war is declared by the congress. It is the Militia itself that is constitutionally authorized to defend our nation while from its already trained ranks people are pulled to create an actual military, not a forbidden permanent military, which because of no constitutional backing, once they are used on US soil it also could be considered an attack on the American people, Treason (Can someone ask Dr. Vieira about this in particular?).

    John Adams, A Defense of the Constitutions of the United States 475: “The fundamental law of the militia is, that it be created, directed and commanded by the laws, and ever for the support of the laws.”

    Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers 28: The militia is a voluntary force not associated or under the control of the States except when called out; [when called into actual service] a permanent or long standing force would be entirely different in make-up and call.”

    “… the peace loving citizens who have sworn to defend the United States Constitution “against all enemies, both foreign and domestic” are left no option except to prepare to defend themselves, and the U.S. Constitution, against this Administration’s “coup” against the People and the foundations of liberty fought for and defended for the past 238 years.”

    In a way true.

    The problem is that it IS the people as the organized (trained in military tactics) Militia that has the constitutionally lawful authorization – but when domestic enemies of our nation refused to do their authorized and REQUIRED – in writing – duties, the people have the right of self defense, defense of their neighborhoods, states, etc at all times. That is why those that are currently serving within our nations are disarming the people, and because the vets and ex LE’s are trained and are the organized Militia, after them (my opinion, but based on facts).

    “The Obama administration is deliberately de-funding, overextending, and hollowing the Department of Defense; the only legitimate agency of the U.S. government with a war mission… This act of the Obama administration stands as a glaring threat of war against our nation’s citizens! ”

    Actually, though it is NOT the duty of anyone who serves within the general government except for the congress – that defunding is a constitutional requirement.

    Daniel Webster: “Where is it written in the Constitution, in what article or section is it contained, that you may take children from their parents and parents from their children, and compel them to fight the battles of any war in which the folly and wickedness of the government may engage itself?”

    Referring to “This act of the Obama administration stands as a glaring threat of war against our nation’s citizens! ”

    No, it is the creation of the DHS,
    – and trying to add the *state LEA’s to be under the authority of the general government, executive branch when the STATES, sovereign themselves, whose representatives of the people of the state created the general (federal) government when they created the US Constitution so that they would ahve a central “agency” with the authority to deal with foreign affairs for all the states as opposed to each state dealing with foreign affairs individually;
    – The unconstitutional EO’s against the people (they can only be used as regulations for those who serve within the executive branch and in Washington DC/miltary bases/that type of stuff;
    – The signing over of authority of America’s (forbidden, but existing) US military to the UN to use;
    – And the use for any reason of the US military on US streets except if the US Congress declared war and we are being attacked from foreign nations or foreign entities on US soil – such as when the UN brought armed military to see that the US elections went as they had planned (that was an armed invasion and I am always surprised that it was not viewed as such by most);
    – Assassination Powers which is First Degree Murder here as every LE should be able to know;
    -Etc, etc, etc, etc

    So much Treason committed against the American people.

    *The opinion in Mack and Printz v. United States stated, “The Framers rejected the concept of a central government that would act upon and through the States, and instead designed a system in which the State and Federal Governments would exercise concurrent authority over the people. The Federal Government’s power would be augmented immeasurably and impermissibly if it were able to impress into its service–and at no cost to itself–the police officers of the 50 States… Federal control of state officers would also have an effect upon the separation and equilibration of powers between the three branches of the Federal Government itself.”

    “The only proper response to this threat against the American people is for the representatives of the People, the members of the U.S. House and Senate, to demand in clear terms that the Administration cannot ignore, that the Department of Homeland Security immediately surrender their newly appropriated weapons of war to the Department of Defense (DoD).”

    No, the only lawful and proper response is to deliver those “newly appropriated weapons of war” to the Militias of the several states which should be starting again to operate in each state as CONSTITUTIONALLY required.

    “… since the DHS has assumed a position in the Administration to enforce the tyrannical acts of this president against the People of the United States against the limits of the United States Constitution, it remains for the United States Congress to exercise its limiting power in the balancing of powers established by our founding fathers, to disestablish and dissolve the DHS as soon as possible. ”

    That is correct, but they would have already done so if it did not have the backing of those you are applying to. They were required to by the Oath that binds them. They could defund them at any time, and they have not, which says that they are also Traitors to the American people, and the US Constitution. Since they all have broken the contract that they are under none of them have any legitimacy or lawfullness anymore here in the USA. Our choice is to replace them immediately, EVERY branch within the general government as is our Constitutional duty and right.

    “Finally, for more than two centuries the nation has lived in peace at home because of the protections of our legitimate military and the many appropriate state and federal law enforcement agencies, supported by Constitutional courts…”

    You need to READ the US Constitution. You are incorrect. The erosions of our legitimate government has been ongoing for substantially longer then you are purporting.

    “We are counting upon you.”

    No one who thinks anymore counts on those put into place, NOT elected by the people except in VERY rare conditions, but placed within our governments through election fraud. (I believe this is much more then just my opinion.)

    It is very important that the people remember these words, and read the US Constitution and the state Constitution that applies to where they live. It is also important for the people thesmselves to understand that, as Mark Twain said;

    Mark Twain: “The government is merely a servant, merely a temporary servant; it cannot be its prerogative to determine what is right and what is wrong, and decide who is a patriot and who isn’t. Its function is to obey orders, not originate them.”

    Thomas Jefferson to Wilson Nicholas: “Our peculiar security is in the possession of a written Constitution.”

    James Madison: “Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government.”

    President Andrew Johnson: “Outside of the Constitution we have no legal authority more than private citizens, and within it we have only so much as that instrument gives us. This broad principle limits all our functions and applies to all subjects.”

    John Adams (“On Government,” 1778) Limits Fixed by the US Constitution: “The use of checks and balances in the forms of government, is to create delays and multiply diversities of interests, by which the tendency on a sudden to violate them may be counteracted.”

    Justice Joseph Story: “This provision speaks for itself. Its plain object is to secure the perfect enjoyment of that great right of the common law, that a man’s house shall be his own castle, PRIVILEGED AGAINST ALL CIVIL AND MILITARY INTRUSION.”

    U.S. Supreme Court Justice James Wilson (Lectures, 1790-1791): “Liberty and security in government depend not on the limits, which the rulers may please to assign to the exercise of their own powers, but on the boundaries, within which their powers are circumscribed by the constitution. With us, the powers of magistrates, call them by whatever name you please, are the grants of the people . . . The supreme power is in them; and in them, even when a constitution is formed, and government is in operation, the supreme power still remains. A portion of their authority they, indeed, delegate; but they delegate that portion in whatever manner, in whatever measure, for whatever time, to whatever persons, and on whatever conditions they choose to fix.”

    I leave you with this to consider;

    Alexander Hamilton: “If it be asked, What is the most sacred duty and the greatest source of our security in a Republic? The answer would be, An inviolable respect for the Constitution and Laws — the first growing out of the last…. A sacred respect for the constitutional law is the vital principle, the sustaining energy of a free government.”

    So if one is going to write, call, etc; it is more important that we regain constitutional lawfulness instead of going over to a military dictatorship. Think not? Then maybe peruse the countries that are under one today and see if that is the way you want to live, because history shows that a standing Military and LEA’s are ALWAYS used against the people sooner or later.

Comments are closed.