No products in the cart.


New Obama Policy Would Make “Merely Posting Firearm Information On The Internet” A Crime

gun rights1

This article was written by Mac Slavo and originally published at

The blogosphere is sounding off about a pending new Obama policy that would impact not only the 2nd Amendment, but the 1st Amendment as well.

As incredible as it seems, individuals would be in violation by “merely posting information on the Internet about common firearms” which “could be interpreted as illegally sharing sensitive information with foreign nationals”

Applying issues related to “exporting” and “foreign nations” under an international treaty to individual on-line speech (under the guise of improperly sharing technical data about firearms) may seem like a stretch, but it is apparently what is happening, unless public opposition is voiced before this oh-so quiet regulation sets in towards the end of summer.

While it remains to be seen if such a policy would be enforceable, the mere redefinition of Internet activities – now under FCC regulation – is startling, suggesting that the “bark” about guns may be just as threatening to this anti-gun administration as the “bite” of ‘military-style weapons’ like the AR-15 that so frequently drives media coverage. According to the Washington Times:

[ot-video type=”youtube” url=””]

Gun control and control of free speech would be combined in a new Obama administration plan that could send Second Amendment advocates to prison.

The National Rifle Association (NRA) is furious about new regulations announced last week. The plan uses national security as an excuse to threaten gun advocates with prison time for sharing information about “military-style weapons. The problem is that almost every firearm is considered “military-style” by President Obama and the gun-control crowd.

These new restrictions involve commonly and legally available personal firearms.

Under the new proposal from the State Department, merely posting information on the Internet about common firearms could be interpreted as illegally sharing sensitive information with foreign nationals. So Mr. Obama’s plan is two-for-one in restricting constitutional rights: He would combine gun control with control over free speech.

And the penalty for violating this policy could be drastic if upheld:

The penalty? 20 years in prison plus a $1 million fine for each violation. Each time that any foreign national accesses the data is considered a separate violation.

Wow… I guess that’s pretty severe – enough to discourage even chance encounters with loose talk about one of the most sacred items that many Americans own.

The NRA is charging that the interpretation of language in the proposal would have the State Department treating online speech about firearms in the same way it treats actual firearms when it comes to the regulation of their “export.”

It’s happening again— President Obama is using his imperial pen and telephone to curb your rights and bypass Congress through executive action.

[…] the Obama State Department has been quietly moving ahead with a proposal that could censor online speech related to firearms. This latest regulatory assault, published in the June 3 issue of the Federal Register, is as much an affront to the First Amendment as it is to the Second. Your action is urgently needed to ensure that online blogs, videos, and web forums devoted to the technical aspects of firearms and ammunition do not become subject to prior review by State Department bureaucrats before they can be published.

The rationale is technical, but maybe that’s the point. The potential to enforce gun speech all about catching people on the technicalities, and is tied to the history of participation of in the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). None of that will stop it from creating consequences for those it would go after:

With the new proposal published on June 3, the State Department claims to be “clarifying” the rules concerning “technical data” posted online or otherwise “released” into the “public domain.” To the contrary, however, the proposal would institute a massive new prior restraint on free speech. This is because all such releases would require the “authorization” of the government before they occurred. The cumbersome and time-consuming process of obtaining such authorizations, moreover, would make online communication about certain technical aspects of firearms and ammunition essentially impossible.


Gunsmiths, manufacturers, reloaders, and do-it-yourselfers could all find themselves muzzled under the rule and unable to distribute or obtain the information they rely on to conduct these activities. Prior restraints of the sort contemplated by this regulation are among the most disfavored regulations of speech under First Amendment case law.

The end run around the 2nd Amendment is nearly complete, giving Obama until the end of his administration to set in place legal hurdles that even a gun-toting, pro-2nd Amendment, NRA- and Tea Party-backed politician would be hard pressed to undo completely.



Brandon Smith



  1. I’ve always said that the government didn’t care as much about you owning a firearm as your ability to use it. Videos on tactics and maintenance on youtube are invaluable. Something must be ramping up soon if they are worried enough to shut this down. On a positive note if the web is shut down internet lurkers will be forced to make human contact which will weld the patriot movement and make it even stronger.

  2. “President Obama is using his imperial pen and telephone”

    America is a Constitutional Republic, there is LAWFULLY NO ” imperial pen and telephone”.

    In our Constitutional Republic those that serve get their duties and responsibilities from the US Constitution which splits them into three branches and each branch is NOT allowed to share them, trade them, sell them, give them away, or assign them to another person/etc.

    Here in the USA there is NO monarchy so there is no “imperial pen and telephone”. Anyone who tries to use that, or has used that without any lawful authority is committing multiple crimes.

    So let’s see what duties the President has assigned to him under the contract he agreed to when running for, and accepting the position, plus taking the Oath which makes him PERSONALLY responsible for his actions while in office as it does every other Oathtaker.

    US Constitution, Article II, Section 1: “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.”

    The “executive Power” means that the person who is within that position temporarily is responsible for making sure laws are carried out and followed.

    “Government. That power in the government which causes the laws to be executed and obeyed: it is usually. confided to the hands of the chief magistrate; the president of the United States is invested with this authority under the national government; and the governor of each state has the executive power in his hands”

    Continued with Articler 2, Section 1: “The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation, which shall neither be increased nor diminished during the Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.
    Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:

    “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.””

    Section 2: “The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, WHEN CALLED INTO THE ACTUAL SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

    He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

    The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.”

    Section 3: “He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.”

    Section 4: “The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

    So we see that the only legislative action any US President is allowed to take is “He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur;”

    And that power is shared with the Senate.

    So we now understand that Executive Orders can ONLY lawfully be for those that work within the executive branch, and that they cannot be used LAWFULLY against the people. As the head of his branch he can create “legislation” as regulations that his underlings must follow.

    We can also see that he has committed Treason when he gave the US Military (though in all honestly so did Bush 1, Bush 2, and the Clinton’s) to the UN and NATO; and when he signed giving authority to the UN over the people of the USA – and it matters not what the authority is over, here it is NOT lawful or binding, but it IS Treason against the American people and the US Constitution. Also, since the US Constitution REQUIRES that ALL treaties be in PURSUANCE THEREOF IT (follow it) no treaty that does otherwise is binding on the USA, the American people, etc.

    He also commttted Treason and Terrorism against the American people when he gave himself First Degree Murder powers (assassination powers) which we should ALL know is not lawful in any way or shape here within America.

    Article VI: “… This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, …”

    Article VI also says that anyone serving within the federal or state governments MUST support the US Constitution or no longer meet the qualifications of the position or office they are occupying when it says this about qualifying for office or public trust: “The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution;”

    That/those is/are all the authority and power that ANY US President has, that which is authorized by the contract, and bound personally by the Oath.

    Alexander Hamilton: “The only constitutional exception to the power of making treaties is, that it shall not change the Constitution… On natural principles, a treaty, which should manifestly betray or sacrifice primary interests of the state, would be null.”

    Alexander Hamilton: “… a treaty cannot be made which alters the Constitution or which infringes any express exceptions to the power of the Constitution of the United States.”

    Alexander Hamilton, concerning the supremacy clause The Federalist Papers, 33: “It will not, I presume, have escaped observation that it expressly confines the supremacy to laws made pursuant to the Constitution.”

    Theodore Roosevelt: “Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does NOT mean to stand by the President or any other public official save exactly to the degree in which he himself stands by the country. It is patriotic to support him insofar as he efficiently serves the country. It is unpatriotic not to oppose him to the exact extent that by inefficiency or otherwise he fails in his duty to stand by the country.”

    Mark Twain: “The government is merely a servant, merely a temporary servant; it cannot be its prerogative to determine what is right and what is wrong, and decide who is a patriot and who isn’t. Its function is to obey orders, not originate them.”

    James Madison: “Because, it is proper to take alarm at the first experiment on our liberties. We hold this prudent jealousy to be the first duty of citizens, and one of [the] noblest characteristics of the late Revolution.”

    Thomas Jefferson: “It would be a dangerous delusion were a confidence in the men of our choice to silence our fears for the safety of our rights; that confidence is everywhere the parent of despotism; free government is founded in jealousy, and not in confidence; it is jealousy, and not confidence, which prescribes limited constitutions to bind down those whom we are obliged to trust with power; that our Constitution has accordingly fixed the limits to which, and no farther, our confidence may go…. In questions of power, let no more be said of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.”

    Abraham Lincoln: “We, the people, are the rightful masters of both congress and the courts – not to overthrow the constitution, but to overthrow men who pervert the Constitution”

    Patrick Henry: “The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government – lest it come to dominate our lives and interests.”

    This is just an FYI – Wilson v. State, 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34 Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878): “To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm … is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms.”

    16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256: “The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it’s enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law, and no courts are bound to enforce it.”

    Alexander Hamilton: “Every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid.”

    James Madison, Federalist 14: “In the first place, it is to be remembered, that the general government (federal) is not to be charged with the whole power of making and administering laws. Its jurisdiction is limited to certain enumerated objects, which concern all the members of the republic, but which are not to be attained by the separate provisions of any”.

    (BTW, This is why North is a Traitor to the American people and the USA, as are a lot of other people who serve within our government, or contract out.) -> J. Reuben Clark spoke about the REQUIRED solid support of the Constitution:
    “God provided that in this land of liberty, our political allegiance shall run NOT to individuals, that is, to government officials, no matter how great or how small they may be. Under His plan our allegiance and THE ONLY ALLEGIANCE WE OWE AS CITIZENS OR DENIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES, RUNS TO OUR INSPIRED CONSTITUTION which God himself set up. SO RUNS THE OATH OF OFFICE OF THOSE WHO PARTICIPATE IN GOVERNMENT. A certain loyalty we do owe to the office which a man holds, but even here we owe just by reason of our citizenship, no loyalty to the man himself. In other countries it is to the individual that allegiance runs. This principle of allegiance to the Constitution is basic to our freedom. It is one of the great principles that distinguishes this “land of liberty” from other countries”. (Yes, the military and law enforcement are both “government”. Sorry, but had that asked of me in a comment and it made me realize jsut how much I assume others know – so trying to no longer assume as we all know what that makes me ass u me /big grin).

    Daniel Webster: “Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters.”

    Food for Thought
    St. George Tucker: “The congress of the United States possesses no power to regulate, or interfere with the domestic concerns, or police of any state: it belongs not to them to establish any rules respecting the rights of property; nor will the constitution permit any prohibition of arms to the people;…”

    Thomas Paine: “’Tis the business of little minds to shrink; but he whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves his conduct, will pursue his principles unto death.
    My own line of reasoning is to myself as straight and clear as a ray of light. Not all the treasures of the world, so far as I believe, could have induced me to support an offensive war, for I think it murder; but if a thief breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property, and kills or threatens to kill me, or those that are in it, and to “bind me in all cases whatsoever” to his absolute will, am I to suffer it? What signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my countryman; whether it be done by an individual villain, or an army of them?

    If we reason to the root of things we shall find no difference; neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other. Let them call me rebel and welcome, I feel no concern from it; but I should suffer the misery of devils, were I to make a whore of my soul by swearing allegiance to one whose character is that of a sottish, stupid, stubborn, worthless, brutish man. I conceive likewise a horrid idea in receiving mercy from a being, who at the last day shall be shrieking to the rocks and mountains to cover him, and fleeing with terror from the orphan, the widow, and the slain of America.

    There are cases which cannot be overdone by language, and this is one. There are persons, too, who see not the full extent of the evil which threatens them; they solace themselves with hopes that the enemy, if he succeed, will be merciful. It is the madness of folly, to expect mercy from those who have refused to do justice; and even mercy, where conquest is the object, is only a trick of war; the cunning of the fox is as murderous as the violence of the wolf, and we ought to guard equally against both.” …

    We dishonor ourselves by attacking such trifling characters while greater ones are suffered to escape; ’tis our duty to find them out, and their proper punishment would be to exile them from the continent for ever. The circle of them is not so great as some imagine; the influence of a few have tainted many who are not naturally corrupt. A continual circulation of lies among those who are not much in the way of hearing them contradicted, will in time pass for truth; and the crime lies not in the believer but the inventor…
    …” End quote)

    Cicero 58 B.C.: “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.”

    This is pretty important to read as it, the lessons, are true.
    What I Have Learned From the Twentieth Century

    With thanks to Schoolmasters Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, Mao Tse-Tung and Pol Pot

    From the Liberty Pole June, 1999 by Mike Vanderboegh

    As an amateur historian of this sad century whose time is almost up, I would like to reflect upon six lessons I have learned in my studies. Folks who wish to live free and prosperous in the next century would do well to understand the failures of the past.

    LESSON NO. 1: If a bureaucrat, or a soldier sent by a bureaucrat, comes to knock down your door and take you someplace you do not want to go because of who you are or what you think — kill him. If you can, kill the politician who sent him. You will likely die anyway, and you will be saving someone else the same fate. For it is a universal truth that the intended victims always far outnumber the tyrant’s executioners. Any nation which practices this lesson will quickly run out of executioners and tyrants, or they will run out of it.

    LESSON NO. 2: If a bureaucrat, or a soldier sent by a bureaucrat, comes to knock down your door and confiscate your firearms — kill him. The disarmament of law-abiding citizens is the required precursor to genocide.

    LESSON NO. 3: If a bureaucrat tells you that he must know if you have a firearm so he can put your name on a list for the common good, or wants to issue you an identity card so that you be more easily identified — tell him to go to hell. Registration of people and firearms is the required precursor to the tyranny which permits genocide. Bureaucrats cannot send soldiers to doors that are not on their list.

    LESSON NO. 4: Believe actions, not words. Tyrants are consummate liars. Just because a tyrant is “democratically elected” does not mean he believes in democracy. Reference Adolf Hitler, 1932.

    And just because a would-be tyrant mouths words of reverence to law and justice, or takes a solemn oath to uphold a constitution, does not mean be believes such concepts apply to him. Reference Bill Clinton, among others.

    The language of the lie is just another tool of killers. A sign saying “Arbeit Macht Frei” (Work Makes You Free) posted above an execution camp gate does not mean that anybody gets out of there alive, and a room labeled “Showers” does not necessarily make you clean. Bill Clinton notwithstanding, the meaning of “is” is plain when such perverted language gets you killed. While all tyrants are liars, it is true that not all political liars are would-be tyrants — but they bear close watching. And keep your rifle handy.

    LESSON NO. 5: Our constitutional republic as crafted by the Founders is the worst form of government in the world, except when compared to all the others. Capitalism, as well, is a terrible way to run an economy, except when compared to all other economic systems. Unrestrained democracy is best expressed as three wolves and a sheep sitting down to vote on what to have for dinner. The horrors of collectivism in all its forms — socialism, communism, national socialism, fascism — have been demonstrated beyond dispute by considerable wasteful trial and bloody error. Leaders such as Bill Clinton who view the Constitution as inconvenient and ignorable are harbingers of tyranny.

    LESSON NO. 6: While nations do not always get the leaders they deserve, they always get the leaders they tolerate. And anyone who tells you that “It Can’t Happen Here” is whistling past the graveyard of history. There is no “house rule” that bars tyranny coming to America. History is replete with republics whose people grew complacent and descended into imperial butchery and chaos. Dictators count on the assistance of people who are complacent, fearful, envious, lazy and corrupt. While there is no “Collective guilt” to the crimes of a regime (all such crimes being committed by specific criminal individuals), there is certainly “collective responsibility” — especially for those who watch the criminals at work without objecting or interfering.

    A French journalist of the last century wrote: “I must speak out, for I will not be an accomplice.” Evil tyrants require, indeed they depend upon, willing and unwilling accomplices — good people who would never think of harming a soul themselves. Lenin called such people “useful idiots.”

    De Tocqueville observed that “America is great because America is good. When America ceases to be good, she will cease to be great.” As related in the Old Testament, God judged nations based upon the immorality and criminality of their leaders. Entire peoples were scourged because of their failure to remove corrupt leaders.

    As we move from the Twentieth Century into the Twenty-First, we should take care to remember the ancient story of Sodom and Gommorrah. If we wish to avoid the butchery of the Twentieth Century and the righteous judgment of the God of our antiquity, we would do well to keep our Bibles, our Constitution and our firearms close at hand.

    1. Exactly. 130,000,000 humans, people with lives, were criminally exterminated in the 20th century, by governments and their agencies of murderers; not by any other hand, but by tyrannical evil men. Coming soon to our neighborhoods.


  3. From an article in Canada Free Press, written by Doug Hagman:

    The U.S. dollar, the backbone of world currencies and the proverbial firewall preventing the erosion of our national sovereignty, is the ultimate target of a takedown by the global banking interests controlled by a handful of banks and families of the “royal elite.”

    The plan for a global currency or a one world economic order is a matter that transcends political parties. Those who continue to argue in the Republican-Democrat meme are doing nothing more than providing entertainment to distract people from the real issue, that of the global elite versus the rest of us. The top of the pyramid in this Ponzi scheme is filled with members of both U.S. political parties who are systematically pillaging us and our future generations into financial debt, bondage and slavery. It is a plan that has been in the works for centuries. The problem, however, is that we have been conditioned not to think that big. Yet, the lie is that big.

    The parties
    Our current financial situation was not bred out of incompetence, but by design. The occupancy of Barack Hussein Obama as the putative President of the United States was a plan in the making long ago, to usher in this oppressive system where we will be left at the mercy of the global ruling class. It is not by accident that we have been prevented from knowing exactly who this man is, from the controversy of his birth records to his college transcripts and even his social security number. Contrary to what the state-controlled media wants you to believe, these questions have never been answered with any measure of authenticity.

    For example, does anyone honestly believe that it is merely a coincidence that Obama’s alleged mother, Stanley Ann Dunham-Soetoro, just happened to work with Timothy Geithner’s father, Peter Geithner, at the Ford Foundation in Indonesia? Is it reasonable to believe that the Republican party had no knowledge of the background of Barack Hussein Obama? Yet not one word from the Republican establishment as they not only watched, but facilitated the takeover of the United States from within. As I’ve written before, our nation is a captured operation.

    The plan was set into motion long ago, stemming back to the founding of the United States and the temporary resistance to the central banking system. In 1913, the creation of the Federal Reserve set the countdown clock in motion for the complete subjugation of the United States to the interests of the global bankers and the global elite. The secret supra-governmental cabals such as the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission worked behind the scenes, under the cover provided by the complicit media, to bring us to this point in history. Perpetual wars were induced to occupy the masses while the chess pieces were placed into their current positions. We are now about to pay the price for our inability or unwillingness to confront the establishment and incremental advancements leading to our own demise.

    DHS source: Everything is not “coming up roses”
    According to the most recent information provided to me from my source within the Department of Homeland Security known as “Rosebud,” the final preparations are being made to deploy heavily armed federalized forces onto the streets of America. They will be deployed under the pretext of “restoring and maintaining order from the chaos brought about by the economic collapse,” adding that “many will demand and embrace their deployment on the streets of America. They will get what they ask for, and more.”

    Much like the security theater we have seen following the attacks of 9/11, we will be subjected to the jack-booted control of a federal army whose allegiance is not to the American people, but to the very architects of the chaos.

    “This is the reason that drones are flying over U.S. cities and farmland, and gun control legislation is on the fast track for complete implementation,” stated this source. “How can people look at the situation in Cyprus and not think it won’t happen here? It will, and the blowback will be unlike this country has ever seen. Surveillance, disarming the public, and conditioning the people to believe it’s for their own safety is and has been part of the plan all along. Anyone owing a gun will be demonized and described as contributing to the problem.”

    “What happens when the middle class loses much of their wealth, or it is confiscated, by the stroke of a pen or a keyboard? What will the stores look like when people, unprepared due to the damn lies of the corporate media and the shills for the ruling elite, run to empty out everything they can get their hands on as the world, as they know it, collapses around them?”

    It was during my most recent contact with my source yesterday that he admitted that the situation will be blamed not on the bankers and the elected leaders who are raping us of our wealth and buying power, but on “right-wing, gun-toting Conservative ‘militia’ groups who believe that the situation is orchestrated.” And, of course, it is orchestrated.

    “There is no Republican-Democrat argument to be made anymore. It’s all political theater to keep the majority of the masses occupied while the true enemy has already captured both parties,” he added. “They are all in on it, either knowingly or unwittingly, the takeover, that is. And it’s getting harder to believe that there are any who are unwitting accomplices at this point.”

    “When the curtain is pulled back to reveal the true agenda of a single digital world currency, the people who have been yelling the loudest about such ‘conspiracy theories’ will be specifically singled out and demonized. They will be blamed for causing the panic we will see, and of course, dealt with by the army we asked for, accepted and even tolerated.”

    Anyone who still believes that the information provided by this insider is “doom porn” or some self-created fantasy need to look at the events taking place in Cyprus. It’s coming to America. It has already begun.

    The election process will not fix this. Maybe some ropes will encourage “hope and change.”

  4. Cal;

    Great, Good, Nice to Hear, BUT, I and many others are still waiting to hear WHO you have or think is in the wings that will step forward and Prosecute these individuals. Easy to say they are far out of bounds, yet so what? Not a one can be trusted let alone the damn Republicans just voted in to clear this up. They all sleep in the same bed. So Who is going to enforce this?? Where is the Judge or Prosecutor that will step up and help us???

    1. WE will. That has always been one of our constitutionally assigned duties. This will be long (as usual), but please bear with me.

      The US Constitution assigns the duties to the different governments and also divides the general government into three branches. It defines our government and our laws. Basically the US Constitution IS our government and the requirement of ALL Oathtakers is to “Support and Defend” it FIRST above all things; orders of superiors – if any, duties of the position being occupied, etc.

      The general (federal) government has VERY specific duties that are put into writing and those that serve within it are REQUIRED to take and KEEP an Oath to the US Constitution. It also defines the type of state governments in that they are REQUIRED to be a republican form of government. Otherwise the states are pretty much left alone to run their own governments except in areas that conflict with the US Constitution and all that is in Pursuance thereof it.

      The US Constitution splits up the three branches and assigns the duties that go to each branch. Etc. “Assuming” that most of you know all this already … /big grin

      You know what duties are assigned to the different branches of our general government; or if unsure, can always refer to the US Constitution and discover them. But what duties does the US Constitution assign to the First Branch of the American government and the source of ALL governmental authority – state and general (federal)?

      Within the Bill of Rights is found those items listed (and not listed) that are above and beyond the authority of those that serve within our governments, protections put into writing from those that serve. But beyond being “protections put into writing, they are also duties of the people. Also found within the Bill of Rights are the tools of the American people; the Militia, the Grand Jury, Elections, the US Constitution and each state Constitution. Those tools are under NO branch of the general or state governments, but are the people’s tools completely.

      First realize that the LAWFUL ENFORCEMENT ARM of both the state and general governments are the Militia. Those that serve within the state and general governments are forbidden to create a permanent military and governmental professional law enforcement. They are lawfully and contractually under the US Constitution REQUIRED to use the Militia for:

      — Enforcing the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution,
      — Enforcing and keeping the “Laws of the Union” (constitutional laws ONLY),
      — Protecting the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
      — “suppressing Insurrections and repel Invasions”.

      Those that serve within our governments are by those requirements FORBIDDEN the creation of a standing military and governmental professional law enforcement. But since they created both, the ONLY LAWFUL STANDING that both of those governmental agencies have is the Oath – taking and KEEPING it. Not doing so makes them uniformed-and-supplied-by-those-who-serve within our governments “gangs” (because even though Oath sworn they do NOT keep it).

      Yes, gangs. Using the peoples money they are not only supplying uniformed and trained to “just follow orders” and “just do their jobs” “gangs” much as they do in other countries (arming the “rebels”, etc) to be used against the people of that country.

      Don’t be angry, anyone please think. Read the US Constitution, where does it give those that serve within our governments the authority to create LE’s and permanent military? (Okay, lately, last 50 years, though mostly the last 15 years the STATE Constitution’s have been changed to reflect that – some in an unlawful manner.)

      Also understand that those of you that serve now/served as LE/military would most likely also be the paid LAWFUL Militia, who trains, enforces, investigates, etc. But it would be a lawful position, and it would be in order to KEEP and PROTECT the US Constitution and the peoples liberties and natural rights – not to take them away. See the difference?

      The rest of the people would be the “fillers” (for lack of a better word), barely trained enough to make a difference until they had more experience, but to not be a total lost cause for those who would be “regularl”. Make sense?

      The Militia is the people’s tool, and we make all decisions regarding it as long as we are constitutional and following all LAWS that are “in Pursuance thereof” the US Constitution except for the items specified within the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution (regarding each state’s Militia.

      John Adams, A Defense of the Constitutions of the United States 475: “The fundamental law of the militia is, that it be created, directed and commanded by the laws, and ever for the support of the laws.”

      No person, no governmental body, just the US Constituion and all that is Pursuance thereof it and the state Constitution’s. But it makes it easier as everything forbidden is into writing, and what is protected is also (or easily surmized – 9th Amendment).

      Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers 28: “The militia is a voluntary force not associated or under the control of the States except when called out; [when called into actual service] a permanent or long standing force would be entirely different in make-up and call.”

      The Oath that all who serve within our governments are REQUIRED to take and KEEP requires of those people TO BE CONSTITUTIONALISTS FIRST, above and beyond, before anything else; and that applies to the elected, hired, contracted, volunteer, and to every position within the governmental body.

      The Militia is the people of the USA. The organized Militia are those that have been trained within the US military and law enforcement once they have stepped out of the government. That is the biggest reason that those that serve within our government has been going after vets, constitutional law enforcement. They actually have the US Constitution, our LEGITIMATE government on their side as they are the ones trained “according to the discipline prescribed by Congress” (the same as the US Military).

      Fifth Amendment: “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

      Remember, we are NOT in a legal or lawful war, and have not been so in decades so “except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger;…” does not apply in any way, shape, or form. Congress has NOT declared war, and the ones who want war cannot say since the congress did not defund it they declared it, Nope. Nor can any foreign entity or nation declare and send our military into wars – even though at this time and for the last few decades that is exactly what is going on.

      Those that KEPT their Oath and refused to wear and follow orders of foreign entities or nations are HEROES here in the USA, and those that participated in their arrest, prosecution, encarceration are TRAITORS – literally. Though if they did it from being dumbed down (which is really no excuse), and bother to learn and change to actually DEFENDING the US Constitution, the American people, and our nation I personally believe that period of time in ones lives will be overlooked as we have all had our “stupid” moments.

      Back to the subject of the Grand Jury, realize that US citizens themselves “have the unbridled right to empanel their own grand juries and present “True Bills” of indictment to a court, which is then required to commence a criminal proceeding.” Knowing that “Our Founding Fathers presciently thereby created a “buffer” the people may rely upon for justice, when public officials, including judges, criminally violate the law” is important, more important is that we start using it.

      We are NOT required to ask anyone in government for anything regarding the Grand Jury or any Grand Jury investigation of anyone hence the word “unbridled” which means basically “no strings attached, no “authority” to ask. We assemble them, require the Oath be taken and followed, and we send that group to investigate descreetly and bring the information discovered back to those that required the investigation.

      Since “The “common law” of the Fifth Amendment demands a traditional functioning grand jury”, I suspect that we should have a constitutional sheriff deputize those acting on the peoples behalf more as a formality then necesary. We are still learning to be free and to intiate without some type of governmental oversight from our being “Ruled” days. Perhaps not though.

      “The grand jury’s functional independence from the judicial branch is evident both in the scope of its power to investigate criminal wrongdoing, and in the manner in which that power is exercised.”

      “The grand jury ‘can investigate merely on suspicion that the law is being violated, or even because it wants assurance that it is not.’ It need not identify the offender it suspects, or even “the precise nature of the offense” it is investigating. The grand jury requires no authorization from its constituting court to initiate an investigation … the grand jury generally operates without the interference of a presiding judge. It swears in its own witnesses and deliberates in total secrecy.”

      By the way and a side note, that is the ONLY secrecy that is lawful (though in a declared war one would keep certain things secret, but open after the war is won or lost. Yes, wars do have a beginning and an ending when done properly and not for profit of a few.

      We can investigate any person who serves within the government if we want to, we can do so because a crime is suspected or because we want to make sure that a person we want to send to a higher office is “clean”. Grand Juries are also ours, though we have always had a judge presiding historically.

      John Adams: “It would be an absurdity for jurors to be required to accept the judge’s view of the law, against their own opinion, judgment, and conscience.”

      U.S. vs. Dougherty, 1972: “The pages of history shine on instances of the jury’s exercise of its prerogative to disregard instructions of the judge.”

      16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256: “The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it’s enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law, and no courts are bound to enforce it.”

      Actually (6 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256) the courts are BOUND to NOT enforce it a per their Oaths.

      So you see how we are to handle the investigations and the courts.

      What about the way we “put” people into our governments to serve? Elections.

      For the past decades, since at least when Kennedy was murdered, our elections have NOT been honest. Election Fruad guaranteed that the people who would do as told by those seeking to destroy America – except for a few tokens – were put into office, and they were also to assign certain people to key positions.

      Since elections are the backbone, the beginning of our type of government, and critical as the people’s voice, I BELIEVE that every action done by “our” representatives since Kennedy’s murder has to be “null and void”, cannot be trusted as it was NOT the peoples representatives that were put into office, but those commanded by a destructive force. Yes, EVERY single action.

      Some actions that were unlawfully put into place before then such as the Federal Reserve, everyone involved in that, or involved in not fighting to remove that unalwful act of treason – if still living – must be arrested, prosecuted – if found guilty – and hung by the neck at noon and left until dusk as a warning to all traitors working within our nation.

      Then they must all be hunted down and prosecuted, though not all hung /big grin. (Personal side note – but please, if found guilty, can we hang everyone that was on the red wall and a few that were suggested but not put up – including the Bush’s, Clinton’s, Feinstein, etc). Why do I recommend this action? Because it will make an impact to all traitors to the USA, and also to the American people. Helping them to clear their minds, getting them together as Americans first, and start getting honor and pride back into place where it belongs – which is HERE within America mostly.

      The Preamble to the US Constitution says, “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

      That is literal in that “We the People of the United States” are responsible directly for establishing justice, insuring domestic Tranquility, the common defence, promoting the general welfare, and for securing libertyfor ourselves and those that come after.

      Thomas Jefferson asked: “Sometimes it is said that man cannot be trusted with the government of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others?”

      Thomas Jefferson to Wilson Nicholas, but also applies to all of us: “Our peculiar security is in the possession of a written Constitution. Let us not make it a blank paper by construction.”

      It must be enforced, and it must be understood as Madison also counsels; James Madison: “Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government.”

      So we enforce those actions needed by the constitutional remedies given to the People; the Militia of the several states, Grand Jury investigations and Grand Jury’s; Keeping our elections free and honest – though that also falls under the auspices of the Militia in that it is the defense against those who would corrupt our Elections because it IS the voice of the people.

      Then we must reorganize our schools so that they teach and reflect AMERICAN values. Maybe a paid summer off for educators to teach them the US Constitution, with refreshers once a year?

      Some other suggestions are to kick the UN and NATO out of our nation, investigate every person who works within the Pentagon, and dump the NSA. Close our borders with the Militia as is constitutionally REQUIRED, removing all of Obama’s illegals as found. They want into OUR nation, they need to do it properly and lawfully. Put into the Media his hanging after he, and his complete administration including his “attorneys”, are found guilty of TREASON and TERRORISM against the American people.

      We need to show the world that America is NOT dead, and Americans can be pushed to far and will make appropriate remedies where needed, even if distasteful.

      Hope this helps.


  5. How do our tyrannical rulers and masters (including those in the U.N. who spawned their Bill of Rights and U.S. Constitution nullifying ITAR treaty) figure that the right to free speech only applies to U.S. citizens communicating with other U.S. citizens? That doesn’t sound much like freedom of speech at all (limiting to whom one may speak). It’s certainly not what the founders of the U.S.A. had in mind! Yeah–I know the Internet wasn’t around in their day but how does that argument for speech restrictions reason out? It doesn’t! The Internet promotes free speech, which the founders valued as necessary to preserve liberty and keep government reigned-in. They would love a communications tool as wonderful and powerful as the Internet!

  6. Peace is preferable but if tyranny starts to overwhelm the USA I will gladly offer up my life to defend the freedoms that tyranny is wrenching away from We, the People.

    I will not go quietly into that long “good night.”

Comments are closed.