No products in the cart.

News

State Of Emergency Declared In Ferguson, MO

Jay Nixon

This article and video comes from InfoWars.com

Reported by Jakari Jackson

National Guard redeployed as government prepares for worst case scenario.

httpv://youtu.be/NuvpOaIDfPM

According to Executive Order 14-14, National Guard troops will be redeployed throughout the Ferguson area in order to assist law enforcement personnel.

“As part of our ongoing efforts to plan and be prepared for any contingency, it is necessary to have these resources in place in advance of any announcement of the grand jury’s decision,” Gov. Nixon said. “These additional resources will support law enforcement’s efforts to maintain peace and protect those exercising their right to free speech. The National Guard is well-suited to provide security at command posts, fire stations and other locations as well as perform other functions that will free up law enforcement officers to remain focused on community policing and protecting constitutional rights.”

The announcement has fueled speculation that the federal government is anticipating no charges for Officer Darren Wilson.

National Guard units and police departments across the country have begun stockpiling equipment as well in an attempt to control potential unrest.

Here is the text of Gov. Nixon’s State of Emergency Executive Order:

Executive Order 14-14

WHEREAS, the City of Ferguson and the St. Louis region have experienced periods of unrest over the past three months; and

WHEREAS, the United States Department of Justice and St. Louis County authorities are conducting separate criminal investigations into the facts surrounding the death of Michael Brown; and

WHEREAS, the United States Department of Justice and St. Louis County authorities could soon announce the findings of their independent criminal investigations; and

WHEREAS, regardless of the outcomes of the federal and state criminal investigations, there is the possibility of expanded unrest; and

WHEREAS, the State of Missouri will be prepared to appropriately respond to any reaction to these announcements; and

WHEREAS, our citizens have the right to peacefully assemble and protest and the State of Missouri is committed to protecting those rights; and

WHEREAS, our citizens and businesses must be protected from violence and damage; and

WHEREAS, an invocation of the provisions of Sections 44.010 through 44.130, RSMo, is appropriate to ensure the safety and welfare of our citizens.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and Laws of the State of Missouri, including Sections 44.010 through 44.130, RSMo, do hereby declare a State of Emergency exists in the State of Missouri.

I further direct the Missouri State Highway Patrol together with the St. Louis County Police Department and the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department to operate as a Unified Command to protect civil rights and ensure public safety in the City of Ferguson and the St. Louis region.

I further order that the St. Louis County Police Department shall have command and operational control over security in the City of Ferguson relating to areas of protests, acts of civil disobedience and conduct otherwise arising from such activities.

I further order that the Unified Command may exercise operational authority in such other jurisdictions it deems necessary to protect civil rights and ensure public safety and that other law enforcement agencies shall assist the Unified Command when so requested and shall cooperate with operational directives of the Unified Command.

I further order, pursuant to Section 41.480, RSMo, the Adjutant General of the State of Missouri, or his designee, to forthwith call and order into active service such portions of the organized militia as he deems necessary to protect life and property and assist civilian authorities and it is further directed that the Adjutant General or his designee, and through him, the commanding officer of any unit or other organization of such organized militia so called into active service take such action and employ such equipment as may be necessary to carry out requests processed through the Missouri State Highway Patrol and ordered by the Governor of the state to protect life and property and support civilian authorities.

This Order shall expire in thirty days unless extended in whole or in part by subsequent Executive Order.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused to be affixed the Great Seal of the State of Missouri, in the City of Jefferson, on this 17th day of November, 2014.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon

Governor

ATTEST:

Jason Kander

Secretary of State

0

ldiffey

Oath Keepers Merchandise

6 comments

  1. There is NO SUCH THING AS “EMERGENCY POWERS” OR “MARTIAL LAW” here in the USA as they are the direct opposite of the US Constitution. It is treason, and when enforced it is *terrorism against the American people by traitors to the USA.

    *28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.

    The Supreme Court of the United States, 1866 (when courts were constitutional): “The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and peace, and COVERS WITH THE SHIELD OF ITS PROTECTION ALL CLASSES OF MEN, AT ALL TIMES, AND UNDER ALL CIRCUMSTANCES. No doctrine involving more pernicious consequences was ever invented by the wit of man than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the great exigencies of government. Such a doctrine leads directly to anarchy or despotism.”

    James Madison: “Because if . . . [An Unalienable Natural Right of Free Men] . . . be exempt from the authority of the Society at large, still less can it be subject to that of the Legislative Body. The latter are but the creatures and vicegerents of the former. Their jurisdiction is both derivative and limited: It is limited with regard to the coordinate departments, more necessarily is it limited with regard to the constituents. The preservation of a free Government requires, not merely, that the metes and bounds which separate each department of power be invariably maintained: but more especially that neither of them be suffered to overleap the greater Barrier which defends the rights of the people. The Rulers who are guilty of such an encroachment, exceed the commission from which they derive their authority, and are Tyrants. The people who submit to it are governed by laws made neither by themselves nor by an authority derived from them, and are Slaves”

    There’s NO such thing as “emergency powers” that anyone serving or working within either of the state or federal governments in the USA that they can “evoke”, not lawfully. Those within the federal or state governments can claim “emergency powers” for anything they want and the ONLY thing they do is make criminals of those who are too ignorant or are domestic enemies of the USA and actually try to enforce these “pretend” “laws” when they should have immediately arrested those who wrote and gave those orders. They fooled the people who never bothered to learn what part they themselves play within our nation, what powers they actually were granted to use, and now the people are paying for it.

    There’s no “emergency powers” or “martial law” given within the US Constitution to any or all of the branches of the federal government; or any powers that are not defined and remedies allowed put forth, Anything done in the name of “emergency powers” is criminal in action. Worse, those unlawful enforcement actions makes them criminals though they might have done this misdeed with no knowledge that they were committing criminal acts. Yet, they still must be held accountable for those actions because they were REQUIRED as part of the contract agreed to when they took the office or position they occupy to take this Oath and keep it, or one similar to it:

    “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

    “I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.”

    Notice that the most words describe exactly what they are to do for the US Constitution before anything else, including following orders of US presidents and/or orders of those above them or the duties of the position or office they will be occupying. Also notice that “obey the orders of the President of the United States” is joined in the same sentence with “and the orders of the officers appointed over me”, that is how low on the priority scale those presidential orders are compared to the US Constitution and all that is in Pursuance thereof it. Plus that the “Uniform Code of Military Justice” is mentioned because it requires ONLY lawful orders to be followed.

    Dr. Edwin Vieira: “This has nothing to do with personalities or subjective ideas. It’s a matter of what the Constitution provides…

    The government of the United States has never violated anyone’s constitutional rights…
    The government of the United States will never violate anyone constitutional rights, because it cannot violate anyone’s constitutional rights. The reason for that is: The government of the United States is that set of actions by public officials that are consistent with the Constitution. Outside of its constitutional powers, the government of the United States has no legitimacy. It has no authority; and, it really even has no existence. It is what lawyers call a legal fiction.

    … the famous case Norton v. Shelby County… The Court said: “An unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties. It is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.”

    And that applies to any (and all) governmental action outside of the Constitution…”
    What are the defining characteristics of a limited government? They are its disabilities; what it does not have legal authority to do. Look at the First Amendment… What does it do? It guarantees freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom of religion. But how does it do that? I quote: “Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech or of the press” etcetera. “Congress shall make no law;” that’s a statement of an absence of power. That’s a statement of a disability.

    If we go to the doctrine of “Emergency Powers,”… what was the foundational case that put that doctrine on the constitutional map? It was Knox vs. Lee, the legal tender cases brought after the Civil War.

    … read a dissenting opinion by Justice Stephen Field, the only Justice on the Supreme Court who had the integrity to dissent in every legal tender case that he heard. He wrote a dissenting opinion in Dooley vs. Smith, in 1872. He wrote, “The arguments in favor of the constitutionality of legal tender paper currency tend directly to break down the barriers which separate a government of limited powers from a government resting in the unrestrained will of Congress. Those limitations must be preserved, or our government will inevitably drift from the system established by our Fathers into a vast, centralized, and consolidated government.”

    You notice he was not talking specifically about the monetary powers. He wasn’t saying that these arguments would lead to the monetary powers being unrestrained. It was destroying the concept of limited government. “The arguments in favor of the constitutionality of legal tender paper currency tend directly to break down the barriers which separate a government of limited powers from a government resting in the unrestrained will of Congress.” How do you define, or how would you characterize, a government resting in the unrestrained will of Congress, or any other political body? It is by definition a totalitarian government…

    The Federal Reserve System was there when the greatest banking collapse in American history occurred, in 1932-1933, and in what was called the Great Depression of the 1930s. In that period what happened? The Roosevelt New Deal. What were the powers they were screaming for? Emergency powers. You’ll find that written into many statutes, e.g., The Emergency Banking Act of 1933. You should pay attention to the title, The Emergency Banking Act of 1933, and the “Aggregate Powers” doctrine. It’s been all downhill since then.
    … 
    How should that have been done? Well, Americans would have had to understand and enforce their Constitution. You notice I say Americans, not the Congress or the Supreme Court, because who is the final arbiter of this document? [holding a copy of the Constitution] It is not Congress, and it is not the Supreme Court. It is “we the people.” Read the thing. How does it start? “We the people do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States”; not “we the politicians,” not “we the judges.” Those people are the agents of the people. We the people are the principals.
    The doctrine is very clear that, being the principals, we are the Constitution’s ultimate interpreters and enforcers. You don’t have to take my word for it. Let’s go back to the Founding Fathers…
    The Founding Fathers were profound students of law and political philosophy, their knowledge unequaled by any today. Their mentor in that era was William Blackstone, who wrote Blackstone’s Commentaries, probably the most widely read legal treatise of its time, certainly here in the United States. What did Blackstone write about this subject? He wrote, “Whenever a question arises between the society at large and any magistrate vested with powers originally delegated by that society, it must be decided by the voice of the society itself; there is not upon earth any other tribunal to resort to.”

    We the people are the Constitution’s ultimate interpreters. Dr. Edwin Vieira, http://www.constitution.org/mon/vieira_03225.htm

    Notice that it was the Supreme courts “gave” “emergency powers”, though it was not, and still is not, a power granted to them to give or use.

    A.L.A. Schecter Poultry Corp. v. U.S.(Roosevelt’s New Deal legislation). In Schecter, “the NRA attorneys, led by General Counsel Donald Richberg, strongly advocated the use of the ’emergency powers doctrine.'”

    The Justices did not accept the government’s arguments. . . Speaking for a unanimous Court, Chief Justice Hughes also dealt a death blow to the emergency powers doctrine. Counsel for the government’s opponents relied on [Ex Parte] Milligan, arguing that an “emergency does not increase constitutional power nor diminish constitutional restrictions.”

    Yielding to their appeal, the Chief Justice retreated from the near-endorsement he had given the emergency powers doctrine in [Home Building & Loan Association v.] Blaisdell. “Extraordinary conditions do not create or enlarge constitutional power,” he declared. The Court conceded that such conditions might well require extraordinary remedies, but that did not “justify action which lies outside the sphere of constitutional authority.” Those who acted under authorization of the Constitution, the Court said, were not free to transcend the limitations upon the power that it granted merely because they believed that more or different power was necessary.

    Emergency Powers (http://www.cqpress.com/incontext/constitution/docs/constitutional_powers.html )
    In times of crisis presidents often lay claim to extraordinary powers to preserve the nation. Such emergency powers are neither granted expressly to the president nor delegated to Congress by the Constitution. Instead, they are judged to reside purely in the need for leaders to protect national sovereignty and domestic order. The mandate in Article II that the president “preserve, protect and defend” the US Constitution and uphold its provisions is considered (by those who want those powers) to contain implicitly the notion of emergency powers.

    Yet that cannot be true since they are required to “PRESERVE”, not only “protect and defend” the US Constitution. In actuality all US Presidents are held to a higher standard then everyone else as they are the ones charges with implementing the “laws of the land” – all that are IN Pursuance thereof the US Constitution. The wording of the Presidential Oath was established in the Constitution in Article II, Section 1, Clause 8.

    ‘Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”’

    Notice that the Framers placed the presidential Oath of Office after the beginning clauses which set forth the organization of the executive department, and before the ending clauses that specify the contours of the President’s assigned power. The President is required to take the oath after he assumes the office but before he can lawfully execute it. The location and phrasing of the Oath of Office Clause strongly suggest that it is not empowering, but that it is limiting – the clause limits how the President’s “executive power” is to be exercised.

    Both the state and the federal governments get their powers from the people.

  2. “UNIFIED COMMAND” some cop shot a black kid twice in the front and four times in the back-for stealing a cigar-ok so the kid was a bad actor… but shooting anyone in the back can hardly be called self-defense-and now we have Darth Vader and
    “THE UNIFIED COMMAND” a bit much, no?

    [RESPONSE FROM STEWART:

    I’m not at all sure the facts in the Brown shooting are as you state. They may be, but they also may be radically different. He may have reached for the officer’s gun while also beating the crap out of him, breaking facial bones, while the officer was still seated in the squad car, and then when he ran away, he may well have turned and charged when the officer pursued. Don’t know for sure, just yet, till I see all evidence. The other examples I cited above were far, far clearer, with some of them on video. The Brown shooting is still undetermined on that score. We must be hard nosed and call it like it is when we know the cops have screwed the pooch, but we also must be sure of the facts, as much as we can, before we pass judgment. Some things are no-brainers, like the stupid use of SWAT teams to serve mere search warrants, like in the Guerena case (rather than just doing the search while the man is at work), while other things are not so clear at outset. Even an unarmed man, when the force disparity is great, can kill you and you may well be justified in using deadly force to stop that attempt, and that goes double for if he has already gone for your gun once, beat the snot out of you, and then charges at you again. IF that is what is happening, then you would have good reason to believe he intends to go for the gun again, and to also beat the rest of the living snot out of you. And in such a situation, where you are worried about being murdered with your own sidearm, you can fire to stop that threat. That goes for you, the armed citizen, as much as for a cop. Being unarmed does not automatically mean the person cannot be shot. Depends on the threat, the demonstrated intent, the proximity and ability, etc. And the reasonable man standard always rules, as subjective and shifting as it can be. I will call out bad cop behavior, but I will also do it as credibly as I can, without always assuming they were wrong. Stewart]

  3. From the N.L.A. Grand Jury Handbook:
    THE REAL LAW
    The common law is the real law, the Supreme
    Law of the land; the code, rules, regulations,
    policy and statutes are not the law.
    Legislated statutes enforced upon the people
    in the name of law is a fraud. It has no authority
    and is without mercy. Justice without mercy is
    Godless, and therefore repugnant to our United
    States Constitution. Lawmakers were given
    authority by the people to legislate codes, rules,
    regulations, and statutes which are policies,
    procedures, and “law” to control the behavior
    of bureaucrats, elected and appointed officials,
    municipalities and agencies, but were never
    given authority to control the behavior of the
    people—as we read in a US Supreme court
    decision: “All laws, rules and practices which
    are repugnant to the Constitution are null and
    void.” (Marbury -v-Madison, 5th US (2 Cranch)
    137, 174, 176, 1803)
    Legislators simply do not have the authority
    to rule make. “Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule
    making or legislation which would abrogate
    them.” (Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491)

  4. I agree, Sir, we cannot know all the facts. But I admit I no longer trust departments to “police” themselves, or the federal “justice” department to do so honestly either. They both have an agenda.

    We are going to have to go back to the citizens as the Militia finding out the facts. It is the only way to get at the truth anymore.

    I have seen videos with that officer’s face messed up, and videos with his face clear directly after the encounter. If the honest constitutional LE’s would not allow these lies and corruption to go on, if lying was not a matter of POLICY for both the feds and state LE’s, then it would be different.

    There has been too many “false flags” and not enough honesty in those who should as a matter of policy and their position be honest at least MOST of the time.

    None of that has anything to do with “emergency powers” (or “martial law”) which is not a legitimate power or authority of those who serve within our states or our federal government. Governor Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon and Jason Kander, Secretary of State committed their treason with that declaration. As will have any who serve withing that state government and do not immediately work against it by calling for their resignation, pressing charges, etc. Think of all the LE’s, etc that will implement this unlawful order and be made into traitors, commit perjury, possibly murder or mass murder, and other civil and criminal crimes. This can be laid at the feet of Governor Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon and Jason Kander, Secretary of State; but it does not absolve the officers who took the Oath – any who didn’t are not lawful anyway – having their lives and their families lives destroyed by decision they may make to enforce this because they did not understand the seriousness of the Oath.

  5. The unfortunate death of this young man is being USED by the Politicians, Feds, and Outsider black community leaders.
    The grand leader Amerika president has been ineffectual at dealing with situation. Just as he has with fouling up most everything he has been involved with. This president WANTS riots. The Feds WANT this situation to unfold.
    New “changed Amerika” president, Feds, and outsiders provoking “protests” WANT this to become and escalated crises.

    Situation could be defused in a hundred different ways.
    Instead of defusing, the pretend president adds fuel and escalates situation.

    “Never let a crises go to waste.” That is what pretend president, politicians, and outsiders provoking protests, are doing.
    Escalation.

    Outsiders are coming in to the community and PROVOKING lawless acts and violence.
    Outsiders from both sides are fueling this bad situation into a potential extreme crises.
    More loss of life. More property destruction. These are likely results if both sides are not
    exercising restraint.

    Cool heads must prevail on both sides. One idiot could cause and unstoppable chain of events.
    What a mess.

    Condolences to the family and friends of the slain young man.
    Condolences also to the family and friends of the officer involved.
    Both sides should come together as a Unified front against this current situation.
    A real President would bring both sides together. Reassure those concerned that a true investigation is conducted. Reassure that changes will be mandated.
    Nothing will bring back the young man who lost his life. But other lives can be saved by those involved being cool headed and putting aside personal pain for the good of the community. Both sides with President could change chain of events.

    Politicians. Police. Protesters, Outsiders. Media. are ALL adding fuel and escalating.

    This Amerika president Wants a crises and Martial Law and possible Civil war in USA.
    What other explanation is there? He is not a stupid man. This is planned.
    This president is also Fueling a crises with Russia, with the potential of a Nuclear exchange.
    If this president is not IMPEACHED and his provocations STOPPED. Then we are ALL in for a disaster.

    We need a cool headed ADULT statesman/leader, as leader of our country. Not the current Amerika president INTENTIONALLY destabilising America and threatening World Peace.

    This Amerika president has re-ignited the cold war with Russia. Do you good people understand this?
    Ferguson is the least of our worries. A diversion. Staged Theater. Using a young man’s unfortunate death for political purposes.
    We are living a sad time in American history. Those behind the scenes are out of control. Self serving Psychopaths?

  6. The regime occupying the Whitehouse is using the death of a human being for political purposes.
    Ferguson is being used as a Distraction for the Amnesty Invasion. Planned side show diversion.
    I’m not the only one that thinks this.
    Here is a link:
    http://www.prisonplanet.com/is-obama-trying-to-cause-civil-unrest-in-america.html

    All networks besides the spanish stations are blacking out the presidents Amnesty speech.
    Media are covering up presidents proposed Amnesty INVASION plans.
    Regime seeks to water down the voting pool to accommodate a LEFTIST anti American agenda.
    They don’t want your vote to count.
    Notice where the TRAITORS are relocating these immigrants.

    But the presidents INVASION plan may well backfire.
    No where have I seen more pro American patriots than people who have escaped leftist/communist hell holes.
    Cubans that actually lived under Castro and came to USA are some of the most pro American patriots I have encountered.
    I enjoy their company, banter, humor, strong peals paint off coffee. They would be among first to defend American way of life from the TRAITORS in Washington.

    Save the Republic.
    Save America.
    Impeach.

Comments are closed.