No products in the cart.

News

Study: Global One-child Policy Not Enough For “Sustainability”

One-child

This article comes from thenewamerican.com

Written by  Alex Newman

A team of environmental “scientists” published a new study in a U.S. government-linked journal claiming that even a planetary Communist Chinese-style one-child policy would not be enough to stop alleged “overpopulation” from ravishing the Earth and making humanity “unsustainable.” In fact, according to the Australian researchers, even combined with massive reductions in population via another world war, a global one-child policy would still not be enough to save the planet and the environment from the supposed scourge of mankind. To deal with their reputed “crisis,” the authors propose encouraging — read brainwashing or perhaps even coercing — women to have fewer children while rationing resources for those humans fortunate enough to escape their population-control regime. But even that will not be enough, according to the paper.

Fortunately for the people of the world, the fringe population-control movement lurking behind the study has been making similarly outlandish claims since the Malthusian crackpots of the late 1700s — only to be proven embarrassingly wrong every time. Indeed, the editor of the latest paper on overpopulation, Paul Ehrlich, is perhaps one of the most widely ridiculed contemporary “scientists” on Earth. Thanks to funding from billionaire overpopulation zealots and the U.S. taxpayer, Ehrlich remains on the scene — despite being wrong about virtually everything throughout his career as an advocate of draconian population controls to stave off an imagined overpopulation crisis. He has previously stated that the “optimum number of people” is 1.5 billion to 2 billion. Yet, like every other population-control advocate, he has so far refused to lead by example.

“The planet’s large, growing, and overconsuming [sic] human population, especially the increasing affluent component, is rapidly eroding many of the Earth’s natural ecosystems,” claims the new paper, published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) of the United States of America. “However, society’s only real policy lever to reduce the human population humanely is to encourage lower per capita fertility.” By lower per capita fertility, the authors mean that each woman should have fewer children. While that may be the only “humane” policy lever, the authors reveal clearly that their “humane” option will not be nearly enough to suit their taste for fewer humans allegedly messing up the “ecosystem” and consuming the elite’s resources.

The paper, entitled “Human population reduction is not a quick fix for environmental problems,” also examines various scenarios and potential “interventions” surrounding human population numbers — including mass deaths and drastically decreasing birth rates. Its conclusion, essentially: No matter what population controllers do to slash the population, there will still be too many people to save the planet, so global economic controls are also needed. “Even one-child policies imposed worldwide and catastrophic mortality events would still likely result in 5–10 billion people by 2100,” explains a summary of the paper, with the implicit assumption that 5-10 billion is too many. “Because of this demographic momentum, there are no easy ways to change the broad trends of human population size this century.”

Read more here.

0

ldiffey

Oath Keepers Merchandise

4 comments

  1. They lie!

    The complete worlds population would fit into the state of Texas, leaving the rest of the world to grow food on. Research it.

    California – well, until they deliberately destroyed it – alone could grow 85% of the worlds HEALTHY non GMO toxic food.

    All ex military ought to be aware of Operation Popeye – where they used climate “Geo Engineering” (what many call today as chemtrails) as a weapon of war in Vietnam. Geo engineering our climate has been around since the early 1930’s, do you really think that with computers, etc that they did not “improve” what they can do with it?

    They can use climate to murder a lot of people at one time and NOT get the blame. RESEARCH and stop believing lies or what you do not want to believe.

    How many times has those within our governments used unsuspecting people within the USA as experiments en mass? Lots. Usually poorer or people of different colors like American Indians, blacks, Mexicans. Though they have used the New york subway a few times also. American soldiers have been used a LOT as experimental guinea pigs throughout history, and my understanding is that they are doing the same with LE’s today – though I have not verified it.

    I chose the things I am trying to keep abreast of, but I cannot do them all as we are being hit on all sides, many different ways including zoning (Agenda 21), So many false flags, etc.

    Research, do not believe any one site, or one source – verify, verify, verify until you are sick of it.

    Stay Safe and Detention Free All

  2. Just did the math all 6 billion people on earth could fit in a 47square mile area shoulder to shoulder. So yes Texas would give us all a house an about 5 acres each.

Comments are closed.