No products in the cart.

News

Connecticut Declared In State Of ‘Public Health Emergency,’ Prepares For Quarantine

Cart Before Horse

This is huge! Connecticut has no medical emergency. They have not one case of Ebola, yet the Governor has declared a state of public health emergency.  Gee, Governor, why not declare a state of medical emergency because of bubonic plague, as Conn. has no cases of that, either? You are depriving individuals of their rights because of a disease that does not exist in your State. Will you force people to be vaccinated? Do you, or your big money supporters, own shares in the vaccine companies? Is this what it is all about? Or is it something even more nefarious, while you claim to be concerned for the little people? – Shorty Dawkins, Associate Editor

This article comes from PoliceStateUSA.com

HARTFORD, CT — Governor Dannel Malloy has declared Connecticut to be in a state of public health emergency, enabling the indefinite suspension of certain civil rights. State bureaucrats have been granted the broad authority to forcibly detain suspected sick people without due process. The declaration came preemptively, as Connecticut has not yet seen a single case of the virus it purports to stop.

The governor’s October 7th declaration read as follows:

“In response to the epidemic of the Ebola virus currently affecting multiple countries in western Africa, and in order to provide the Commissioner of Public Health and other appropriate officials with all authorities necessary to prevent any potential transmission of the Ebola virus within the State of Connecticut, I hereby declare a public health emergency for the State, pursuant to the Connecticut General Statutes Section 19a-131a, for the duration of the epidemic. Specifically, in accordance with Connecticut General Statutes Section 19a-131b, I authorize the Commissioner of Public Health to Order the isolation or quarantine, under conditions prescribed by the Commissioner of Public Health, of any individual or group of individuals whom the Commissioner reasonably believes to have been exposed to, infected with, or otherwise at risk of passing the Ebola virus.”
Governor Dannel P. Malloy, October 7, 2014

Rationalizing his actions, the governor said in a statement: “We need to have the authorities in place that will allow us to move quickly to protect public health, if and when that becomes necessary. Signing this order will allow us to do that.”

The recipient of most of the newly-imparted power is Jewel Mullen, Connecticut’s Commissioner of the Department of Public Health (DPH). By having this measure in place, Commissioner Mullen explained, “we don’t have to scramble in the event I need to take action.”

The actions that authorities might want to “scramble” to use is the forcible quarantine of citizens — without charges or trial.

Connecticut General Statutes Section 19a-131a spells out the powers that may be used during the state of public health emergency:

“[While] the emergency exists [the state] may do any of the following: (1) Order the commissioner to implement all or a portion of the public health emergency response plan developed pursuant to section 19a-131g; (2) authorize the commissioner to isolate or quarantine persons in accordance with section 19a-131b; (3) order the commissioner to vaccinate persons in accordance with section 19a-131e; or (4) apply for and receive federal assistance.”

As noted above, the Commissioner may issue an order of mass vaccination at his or her own discretion.

Section 19a-131d states that any individual who refuses to comply with any portion of the order may be punished with with fines and imprisonment for up to one (1) year.

Fending off a police state requires constant vigilance against efforts to desecrate civil liberties. As the current scenario has shown us, a climate of fear — fear of disease, terrorism, foreign threats, etc. — makes it all-too easy to suspend constitutional rights with minimal public resistance. Many people actually feel grateful to see the government absorbing greater powers; taken with the promises of keeping them safe.

The state of public health emergency will remain in effect indefinitely until lifted by the governor.

0

ldiffey

Veteran’s Day Membership Drive

19 comments

  1. “State bureaucrats have been granted the broad authority to forcibly detain suspected sick people without due process.” “enabling the indefinite suspension of certain civil rights.”

    That is a great clue, think it has anything to do with disappearing people?

    There is NO SUCH THING as “emergency powers” of any type or “martial law” that can be used here in the USA. They are the exact opposite of the US Constitution.

    The Supreme Court of the United States, 1866: “The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times, and under all circumstances. NO DOCTRINE INVOLVING MORE PERNICIOUS CONSEQUENCES WAS EVER INVENTED BY THE WIT OF MAN THAN THAT ANY OF ITS PROVISIONS CAN BE SUSPENDED DURING ANY OF THE GREAT EXIGENCIES OF GOVERNMENT. Such a doctrine leads directly to anarchy or despotism.”

    James Madison: “Because if . . . [An Unalienable Natural Right of Free Men] . . . be exempt from the authority of the Society at large, still less can it be subject to that of the Legislative Body. The latter are but the creatures and vicegerents of the former. Their jurisdiction is both derivative and limited: It is limited with regard to the coordinate departments, more necessarily is it limited with regard to the constituents. The preservation of a free Government requires, not merely, that the metes and bounds which separate each department of power be invariably maintained: but more especially that neither of them be suffered to overleap the greater Barrier which defends the rights of the people. The Rulers who are guilty of such an encroachment, exceed the commission from which they derive their authority, and are Tyrants. The people who submit to it are governed by laws made neither by themselves nor by an authority derived from them, and are Slaves”

    Madison: “… the equal right of every citizen … is held by the same tenure with all our other rights. If we recur to its origin, it is equally the gift of nature; if we weigh its importance, it cannot be less dear to us; if we consult the “Declaration of those rights which pertain to the good people of Virginia, as the basis and foundation of Government,” it is enumerated with equal solemnity, or rather studied emphasis. Either then, we must say, that the Will of the Legislature is the only measure of their authority; and that in the plenitude of this authority, they may sweep away all our fundamental rights; or, that they are bound to leave this particular right untouched and sacred: Either we must say, that they may controul the freedom of the press, may abolish the Trial by Jury, may swallow up the Executive and Judiciary Powers of the State; nay that they may despoil us of our very right of suffrage, and erect themselves into an independent and hereditary Assembly or, we must say, that they have no authority to enact into the law the Bill under consideration. We the Subscribers say, that the General Assembly of this Commonwealth have no such authority: And that no effort may be omitted on our part against so dangerous an usurpation, we oppose to it, this remonstrance; earnestly praying, as we are in duty bound, that the Supreme Lawgiver of the Universe, by illuminating those to whom it is addressed, may on the one hand, turn their Councils from every act which would affront his holy prerogative, or violate the trust committed to them: and on the other, guide them into every measure which may be worthy of his blessing, may redound to their own praise, and may establish more firmly the liberties, the prosperity and the happiness of the Commonwealth.”

    It is an attack on the people of Connecticut by Governor Dannel Malloy and anyone who follows his orders. It is treason. It is terrorism (28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”).

    Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers #28: “The militia is a voluntary force not associated or under the control of the States except when called out; [when called into actual service] a permanent or long standing force would be entirely different in make-up and call.”

    Dr. Edwin Vieira:
    “This has nothing to do with personalities or subjective ideas. It’s a matter of what the Constitution provides…

    The government of the United States has never violated anyone’s constitutional rights…
    The government of the United States will never violate anyone constitutional rights, because it cannot violate anyone’s constitutional rights. The reason for that is: The government of the United States is that set of actions by public officials that are consistent with the Constitution. Outside of its constitutional powers, the government of the United States has no legitimacy. It has no authority; and, it really even has no existence. It is what lawyers call a legal fiction.

    … the famous case Norton v. Shelby County… The Court said: “An unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties. It is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.”

    And that applies to any (and all) governmental action outside of the Constitution…”
    What are the defining characteristics of a limited government? They are its disabilities; what it does not have legal authority to do. Look at the First Amendment… What does it do? It guarantees freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom of religion. But how does it do that? I quote: “Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech or of the press” etcetera. “Congress shall make no law;” that’s a statement of an absence of power. That’s a statement of a disability.” (end Dr. Vieira quote)

    (Start new Dr. Vieira quote)
    Americans would have had to understand and enforce their Constitution. You notice I say Americans, not the Congress or the Supreme Court, because who is the final arbiter of this document? [holding a copy of the Constitution] It is not Congress, and it is not the Supreme Court. It is “we the people.” Read the thing. How does it start? “We the people do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States”; not “we the politicians,” not “we the judges.” Those people are the agents of the people. We the people are the principals.

    The doctrine is very clear that, being the principals, we are the Constitution’s ultimate interpreters and enforcers. You don’t have to take my word for it. Let’s go back to the Founding Fathers…

    The Founding Fathers were profound students of law and political philosophy, their knowledge unequaled by any today. Their mentor in that era was William Blackstone, who wrote Blackstone’s Commentaries, probably the most widely read legal treatise of its time, certainly here in the United States. What did Blackstone write about this subject? He wrote, “Whenever a question arises between the society at large and any magistrate vested with powers originally delegated by that society, it must be decided by the voice of the society itself; there is not upon earth any other tribunal to resort to.” We the people are the Constitution’s ultimate interpreters. (Dr. Edwin Vieira, http://www.constitution.org/mon/vieira_03225.htm )

    Notice that it was the Supreme courts “gave” “emergency powers”, though it was not, and still is not, a power granted to them to give or use.

  2. Huh….didn’t Conn pass a gun registration law at the beginning of 2014???? And now a “Public Health Emergency”. Just thinking out loud.

  3. These idiots are just looking for any reason to start something, what say you? When push comes to shove…

  4. Just saying I think its time for the people put on some steel toe boots
    And start kicking some state and federal asses real long and real hard
    Think about it people

  5. This is just a ploy to gain more control of the people. As with conns recent gun laws, I would suggest that the people ignore this one too.
    It is unconstitutional and therefore null and void. If the people of conn had any balls, they would march strait to the capitol and arrest this idiot.

  6. This has all been preplanned by the muslim in chief. He couldn’t get the guns by way of congress so they signed the UN Small arms treaty and even though congress voted it down he has his pen and phone. If they weaken us through the Ebola simulant then that is when they will strike. We have to be ready

  7. Sorry but i’ve got to chuckle. They pull this crap but the people will vote them right back into office.You get what you ask for.

  8. I could see it now; Malloy declares “assault weapons” a public health emergency and rounds us all up for quarantine. Those that actually registered will be first.

  9. @ bob, “They pull this crap but the people will vote them right back into office.You get what you ask for.”

    Think “Election Fraud”. It has been going on for a long time, in every state.

    Obama was not a lawful candidate, he was placed in the running to be a presidential candidate. H. Clinton the same.

    The 2008 Democratic Nominating Committee (DNC) document did not include the normal language stating that Obama was qualified to be a candidate. The 2008 Republican Nominating Committee (RNC) document did, as is normal. This shows that the DNC knew that Obama was not qualified, or why change the form?

    South Bend, Indiana jury found that Election Fraud put BOTH Obama and Hillary Clinton on the presidential primary ballot in Indiana in the 2008 election.

    The Constitution gives primary responsibility for conducting elections and safeguarding the voting process to the states, not to the federal government.

    Some other examples:
    119% voted in Democratic Madison WI (2012 vote to recall the governor)
    AR, 1998 – A contractor with ACORN-affiliated Project Vote was arrested for falsifying about 400 voter registration cards.
    CO, 2005 – Two ex-ACORN employees were convicted in Denver of perjury for submitting false voter registrations.
    2004 – An ACORN employee admitted to forging signatures and registering three of her friends to vote 40 times. ()Tons more with just ACORN)

    Plus

    Federal judge released the 2008 testimony of GOP IT guru Michael Connell. The Ohio resident died in a mysterious plane crash that year after anonymous warnings he would be killed if he testified about his work with Karl Rove and others helping the Bush-Cheney ticket win in 2000 and 2004.

    Nationwide GOP Voter Registration Fraud Scandal Widens, Becomes Criminal Matter in Florida
    Potentially fraudulent forms in 11 FL counties; Concerns emerge in other states; RNC scrambles to contain damage.

    At least 11 counties; At least 7 states; At least $3.1 million
    Joseph Tanfani, Matea Gold and Melanie Mason of the Los Angeles Times, who have been doing some excellent reporting on this matter, reported on Saturday that “potentially fraudulent voter registration forms submitted on behalf of the state GOP” have now been uncovered “in at least 11 Florida counties.”

    Machine Voting
    In a major step towards global centralization of election processes, the world’s dominant Internet voting company has purchased the USA’s dominant election results reporting company.

    The American advocacy group Project Vote has concluded that SCYTL’s internet voting system is vulnerable to attack from the outside AND the inside, a situation which could result in ‘…an election that does not accurately reflect the will of the voters…’

    In Broward County FL, the results reported by Scytl-owned SOE Software in 2008 showed an entire candidate, who was winning, disappear into vapor in the middle of the count, and in Hillsborough County FL and Dallas County TX, votes that had been reported began to disappear.

    New York – One day before the NY GOP Presidential primary, Vincent Reda, the First Vice Chairman of the NY Republican Party, made robo calls to voters declaring that all other candidates had dropped out of the race except Mitt Romney.

    There were over 70,000 reports of voting problems on election day, and there are numerous eyewitnesses that claim that they saw voting machines change votes for one candidate to another candidate right in front of their eyes.

    In several of the swing states there were counties where the number of registered voters exceeded the total voting age population by a very wide margin.

    There were 59 voting divisions in the city of Philadelphia where Mitt Romney did not receive a single vote.  In those voting divisions, the combined vote total was 19,605 for Barack Obama and 0 for Mitt Romney.’

    The overall voter turnout rate in Philadelphia was only about 60 percent.  But in the areas of Philadelphia where Republican poll watchers were illegally removed, the voter turnout rate was over 90% and Obama received over 99% of the vote.  Officials in Philadelphia have already ruled out an investigation.

    According to WND, one poll watcher in Pennsylvania actually claims that he witnessed voting machine software repeatedly switch votes from Mitt Romney to Barack Obama…
    It was in Upper Macungie Township, near Allentown, Pa., where an auditor, Robert Ashcroft, was dispatched by Republicans to monitor the vote on Election Day. He said the software he observed would “change the selection back to default – to Obama.”
    He said that happened in about 5 percent to 10 percent of the votes.

    Prior to the election, voters in the states of Nevada, North Carolina, Texas and Ohio all reported that voting machines were switching their votes for Romney over to Obama.

    That is correct, ELECTION FRAUD. If we can take back our voting, it will help a lot, but this is another crime mostly swept under the rug. Do not blame the people for things beyond their control.

    How many videos were posted where the LE’s were there and REFUSED to arrest those who were committing election fraud, yet they beat up Ron Paul supporters who were voting LAWFULLY? Sadly hundreds.

    But there is documentation that election fraud was carried out in EVERY state to place presidential candidates, but Ron Paul still won because we had an open internet. So the Rep Party changed the rules and the UN stood over everyone to make sure that it went according to NWO plan.

    Grrrrrrr. Not angry at you, just that all of this is ALLOWED to go on. Because there is no enforcement, we are GIVING our nation away.

  10. @ bob, “They pull this crap but the people will vote them right back into office.You get what you ask for.”

    Somewhere, maybe on another computer or HD, I have the general’s name that REFUSED TO LET OUR overseas servicemen vote BECAUSE those serving overseas openly wanted Ron Paul. I believe I posted it here when it happened.

  11. Cal Says:
    October 12th, 2014 at 6:20 am
    *****************************
    Cal; So Right, ‘enforcement’ of Law not desire, big difference is it not.
    I remember when I took the mechanics class in HS, all tools had a specific place and so marked. At the end of class all tools must be on the board and clean or you got a “WHACK” from a big wood paddle in front of the rest of the class. Yeah I got it ONCE and to this day have never misplaced a tool
    When in LE I left because of ‘Selective Enforcement’, get the picture. The world may never recover
    because the population has lost that the Bull values most.

  12. It is the beginning!
    A state of emergency suspending certain civil rights means the government has determined to suspend all civil rights. That is called tyranny!
    But, what civil rights of the certain are being suspended?
    It may be this is the beginning of suspending freedom of association.
    Freedom to peaceably assemble, is that one of them?
    Are we looking at the little fish creating the opportunity for the bigger fish to consume both the little fish and the prey the little fishes attentions are focused on?
    I am guessing that elections are going to be suspended, martial law imposed restricting civilian movement, and the all out supression of any opportunity to resist this incursion by warrentless searches.
    America (The people) better wake up!
    We are looking at a repeat of the Armenian genocide being structured before our very eyes.
    I believe Obama is purposely putting our own troops in harms way, so that they may return to American soil and bring this insideous disease back with them.
    We all know his desire is the emasculate the military and cause us to be defenseless, at the same time he is creating an extraordinary civilian police force with nothing short of military power.
    The whole of Congress is corrupt that allows this charade to continue.
    He can be lawfully stopped, though that opportunity is being neglected.
    It looks like the tree of liberty needs refreshing!
    ISIS is advertising to use public records to identify the families of servicemen and women so that indiscriminate attacks may be made on them to instill terror in the hearts and minds of Americans.
    Obama in his feckless administration, aided by others equally in violation of their oaths, is bringing us to ruin.
    A public official that I am aware of has stated that mosques are to be afforded every opportunity to flourish in our communities even though every recent attack and murder of American citizens has been accomplished by Sunni Muslims.
    The coincidences are too many and the distinctions too sharp!
    It is though we are suffering an immune deficiency disease.
    We all know where that leads!

  13. @ Gary, “The whole of Congress is corrupt that allows this charade to continue.
    He can be lawfully stopped, though that opportunity is being neglected.”

    Exactly! He, and they can be lawfully stopped. It takes more then 1 citizen because we are threatened when we try to get the prosecutions going, but the people who are already inside can do it, and if it is an OK then they also will – or can – have some protection by other members who can work to keep them alive while this is going through the courts.

    Remember that judge ONLY are ALLOWED to keep their position as long as they use “Good Behaviour” in the courts.

    US Constitution, Article III. Section. 1:

    The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.

    James Madison, Federalist 39, 250 – 53: “According to the provisions of most of the constitutions, again, as well as according to the most respectable and received opinions on the subject, the members of the judiciary department are to retain their offices by the firm tenure of good behaviour.”

    James Wilson, Pennsylvania Ratifying Convention: “… The tenure by which the Judges are to hold their places, is, as it unquestionably ought to be, that of good behaviour.”

    Tucker’s Blackstone, Volume I, Chapter 1 regarding how the Oath applies to the judiciary:

    “But here a very natural, and very material, question arises: how are these customs or maxims to be known, and by whom is their validity to be determined? The answer is, by the judges in the several courts of justice. They are the depositaries of the laws; the living oracles, who must decide in all cases of doubt, and who are bound by an oath to decide according to the supreme law of the land, the U.S. Constitution.
    Now this is a positive law, fixed and established by custom, which custom is evidenced by judicial decisions; and therefore can never be departed from by any modern judge without a breach of his oath and the law. For herein there is nothing repugnant to natural justice;…”

    The judicial branch of the federal government is not in place to “interpret” the Constitution of the United States of America, but to decide if a law, bill, treaty, case is IN PURSUANCE THEREOF – they are to make sure that they are following the US Constitution.

    So what powers, authority, did the US Constitution assign to those who serve within the judiciary?

    US Constitution, Article III Section. 2:
    The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;
    –to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;
    –to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;
    –to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;
    –to Controversies between two or more States;
    — between a State and Citizens of another State,
    –between Citizens of different States,
    –between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.

    In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.
    The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.

    Does that mean that any law created is to be upheld by the justices? No, The US Constitution says in Article VI that it does NOT apply to any law created. It is only those laws that follow (are in Pursuance thereof) the US Constitution,

    “… This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

    The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”

    Article VI says that only the laws that are made in Pursuance thereof the US Constitution are lawful here in the USA. Anything else disguised as “law” is not legal or binding on US Citizens.

    It also says that anyone serving within the federal or state governments MUST support the US Constitution or no longer meet the qualifications of the position or office they are occupying when it says this about qualifying for office or public trust:

    “The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”

    ALL justices – federal and state – MUST support the US Constitution and follow it or they no longer meet the contract, bound and verified by taking the Oath of Office, and would no longer lawfully be occupying the position they are serving in.

    Under our laws all justices must make their case decisions based on that those cases are “in PURSUANCE THEREOF the US Constitution” or found to NOT be “in PURSUANCE THEREOF the US Constitution” to be lawful decisions. They are using “Good Behaviour” and are keeping the contract agreed to when they do so.

    Thomas Jefferson: “…To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions is a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so. They have with others the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps…and their power is more dangerous as they are in office for life and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruption of time and party, its members would become despots….”
    Thomas Jefferson: “The government created by this compact (the Constitution) was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among powers having no common judge, each party (the people of each state) has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress.”

    James Madison: “But it is objected, that the judicial authority is to be regarded as the sole expositor of the Constitution in the last resort…”

    Alexander Hamilton: “Every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid.”

    John Marshall: Opinion as Chief Justice in Marbury vs. Madison, 1802: “The particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.”

    The courts were not given the power to make the decisions of guilt or innocence – that power is left with the people.

    Many have forgotten that the courts were set up to be directly under the influence of the people, as jurors. “We the People” are directly the decision-makers of the guilt or innocence of our neighbors, and of the laws presented to us as jurors. We are also the final decision makers on if judges are using “Good Behaviour” in the courtrooms or not; not the executive or legislative branches; nor is the judicial to decide it’s guilt or innocence itself. “We the people” are the final arbitrator of the decision if the judges within OUR courtrooms are using “Good Behaviour”.

  14. Cal, you are a national treasure! How can I talk with you? I am a member who is still trying to understand the forum and the chat room or whatever. We need to unite the many organizations together!!!
    Thanks for all that you contribute!
    With warm regards,
    Robert


    [Editor’s Note: Uhm, Robert — we almost always decline to post people’s personal contact on the Internet, so I will make it easy for you by sending your email address to Cal, to see if he wants to add one more admirer to his group of appreciative readers. I agree with you — Cal is an incessant and very resourceful writer with a forceful voice. Cal is not shy about speaking the truth, even hard truths. Thank you for reading and writing here.
    Salute!
    Elias Alias, editor]

Comments are closed.