No products in the cart.

News

CFR Globalists Outline Strategy For “North American Community”

North America

Knowing the people of the US, Canada and Mexico oppose the North American Union, the globalist, One World Government Elite, are trying new, softer tactics. Betrayal is still betrayal. Time to arrest those in the CFR who are promoting the North American Union, as a betrayal of our sovereignty. – Shorty Dawkins, Associate Editor

This article comes from thenewamerican.com

Written by  Alex Newman

The global government-promoting Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) published a new report this month demanding further integration of North America, calling for deeper “cooperation” on everything from energy, law enforcement, and healthcare to labor regulations, trade, and education. With the globalist architects well aware of how unpopular their sought-after “North American Union” scheme remains among the public, the CFR appears to have toned down some of its extreme anti-sovereignty rhetoric. Instead, the new report emphasizes what the outfit called a “new focus” on North America dealing primarily with energy, “community,” and “security.” The scheme, however, remains just as radical.

“In sum, we recommend a new partnership for North America, a new model for the world of integration and cooperation among sovereign states,” the report claims, paying phony lip service to national sovereignty even while openly advocating its surreptitious surrender to unaccountable transnational institutions. “The foundation for U.S. foreign policy in years to come should be ‘Made in North America.’” It adds: “Now is the moment for the United States to break free from old foreign policy biases to recognize that a stronger, more dynamic, resilient continental base will increase U.S. power globally.”

The controversial 137-page CFR report, dubbed North America: Time for a New Focus, was produced by a self-styled “Independent Task Force” chaired by retired U.S. Gen. David Petraeus and former World Bank boss Robert Zoellick, now a bigwig at Goldman Sachs. The two globalists are longtime veterans of the CFR and the even more shadowy Bilderberg summits, which every year bring together some of the leading extremists from around the world in the push for what they call “global governance.”

This summer, Petraeus, who resigned in disgrace from the CIA “killing machine” amid the exposure of an extramarital affair, came under fire for declaring publicly that, “after America, comes North America.” The CFR task force was directed by Shannon K. O’Neil, who serves as a senior fellow in the CFR’s “Latin American Studies” division, which is run by a brazen Castro apologist described by a senior U.S. intelligence officer dealing with Cuba as an “agent of influence” in the United States for the barbaric regime in Havana.

The late Professor Robert Pastor, a CFR operative often described as the “Father of the North American Union,” also served as a member of the task force promoting a continental regime to usurp the sovereignty of Americans, Canadians, and Mexicans. Before he died, Pastor credited The John Birch Society, an affiliate of this magazine, for having killed his radical dream of a European Union-style Leviathan to rule over North America. However, as evidenced by the latest CFR demands on “integration,” the plot to impose a regional super-state on the North American continent is far from dead.

The dubious CFR task force, which appears to have been tasked with formulating politically palatable schemes to assault national sovereignty on the continent, placed special emphasis on energy. Claiming that “North America” could eventually prove to be self-sufficient when it comes to production, the report argued that “continental energy and environmental policies are not keeping up.” Of course, the overwhelming majority of Americans have no idea that there are even “continental energy and environmental policies” — much less whom or what formulates them. But those schemes are expanding nevertheless, though apparently not quickly enough for CFR globalists.

Read more here.

0

ldiffey

Oath Keepers Merchandise

5 comments

  1. Shorty Dawkins, Associate Editor, “Time to arrest those in the CFR who are promoting the North American Union, as a betrayal of our sovereignty.”

    God Bless you!

    I feel that it is past time. That many lives already lost, and that will be lost is on our head – all of ours, not just the Oathkeepers, but the general population. Why?

    Because WE allowed this to happen instead of tending to the business of seeing that the schools were not distorting the minds of our children, ourselves with propaganda, lies, and training.

    Because we did not remove those who were performing corrupt deeds while under contract to perform OUR will, not others no matter what they were promised, or riches they would receive, or threats tendered against them.

    Because allowing those who served/serve within our government to use secrecy to hide their crimes, to arrest, prosecute, and jail or kill those who let us know of those crimes – whistleblowers – governmental, military, or corporate.

    Because we allowed those who take law for whatever reason to be taught UN constitutional law, so they no longer know what is really lawful here in the USA.

    Because we allowed them to take family members and put them into wars that are NOT lawful under our US Constitution.

    Because we allowed them to replace the Militia of the several states with LE’s who did the bidding of those who serve in government instead of what they are REQUIRED to do first and foremost by Oath and by being OUR (Militia) replacements. The Militia has as its constitutionally assigned duties to:

    – Enforce the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution,
    – Enforce and keep the “Laws of the Union” (which is constitutional laws ONLY),
    – Protect the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
    – to suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”.

    We also let those who serve within our government get away with terrorism against the American people almost daily now, and at places like Waco, Ruby Ridge, Kent State, etc. Plus more currently Fast and Furious and Benghazi, ETC

    28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.

    The one change that must be made once the domestic enemies and traitors to/of our nation are charged, arrested, and prosecuted is to make sure that this can never happen in the way it has again here in the USA.

    Then we must go after the “core” of this and arrest and prosecute them and it matters not what country on this planet they are on. They must be held accountable.

    James Madison said of Property: This term in its particular application means “that dominion which one man claims and exercises over the external things of the world, in exclusion of every other individual.”

    In its larger and juster meaning, it embraces every thing to which a man may attach a value and have a right; and which leaves to every one else the like advantage. In the former sense, a man’s land, or merchandize, or money is called his property. In the latter sense, a man has a property in his opinions and the free communication of them. He has a property of peculiar value in his religious opinions, and in the profession and practice dictated by them.

    He has a property very dear to him IN THE SAFETY AND LIBERTY OF HIS PERSON. HE HAS AN EQUAL PROPERTY IN THE FREE USE OF HIS FACULTIES AND FREE CHOICE OF THE OBJECTS ON WHICH TO EMPLOY THEM. In a word, as a man is said to have a right to his property, he may be equally said to have a property in his rights.

    Where an excess of power prevails, property of no sort is duly respected. No man is safe in his opinions, his person, his faculties, or his possessions. Where there is an excess of liberty, the effect is the same, tho’ from an opposite cause.

    GOVERNMENT IS INSTITUTED TO PROTECT PROPERTY OF EVERY SORT; as well that which lies in the various rights of individuals, as that which the term particularly expresses. This being the end of government, that alone is a just government, which impartially secures to every man, whatever is his own.

    According to this standard of merit, the praise of affording a just securing to property, should be sparingly bestowed on a government which, however scrupulously guarding the possessions of individuals, does not protect them in the enjoyment and communication of their opinions, in which they have an equal, and in the estimation of some, a more valuable property. (Me again – those who serve within our governments do no limit how we communicate!)

    Conscience is the most sacred of all property; other property depending in part on positive law, the exercise of that, BEING A NATURAL AND UNALIENABLE RIGHT. To guard a man’s house as his castle, to pay public and enforce private debts with the most exact faith, can give no title to invade a man’s conscience which is more sacred than his castle, or to withhold from it that debt of protection, for which the public faith is pledged, by the very nature and original conditions of the social pact.

    That is not a just government, nor is property secure under it, where the property which a man has in his personal safety and personal liberty, is violated by arbitrary seizures of one class of citizens for the service of the rest. A magistrate issuing his warrants to a press gang, would be in his proper functions in Turkey or Indostan, under appellations proverbial of the most compleat despotism.

    That is not a just government, nor is property secure under it, where arbitrary restrictions, exemptions, and monopolies deny to part of its citizens that free use of their faculties, and free choice of their occupations, which not only constitute their property in the general sense of the word; but are the means of acquiring property strictly so called. What must be the spirit of legislation where a manufacturer of linen cloth is forbidden to bury his own child in a linen shroud, in order to favour his neighbour who manufactures woolen cloth; where the manufacturer and wearer of woolen cloth are again forbidden the oeconomical use of buttons of that material, in favor of the manufacturer of buttons of other materials!
    (Me – Think Monsanto, big pharma, military contractors, and other corporations)

    A just security to property is not afforded by that government, under which unequal taxes oppress one species of property and reward another species: where arbitrary taxes invade the domestic sanctuaries of the rich, and excessive taxes grind the faces of the poor; where the keenness and competitions of want are deemed an insufficient spur to labor, and taxes are again applied, by an unfeeling policy, as another spur; in violation of that sacred property, which Heaven, in decreeing man to earn his bread by the sweat of his brow, kindly reserved to him, in the small repose that could be spared from the supply of his necessities.

    If there be a government then which prides itself in maintaining the inviolability of property; which provides that none shall be taken directly even for public use without indemnification to the owner, and yet directly violates the property which individuals have in their opinions, their religion, their persons, and their faculties; nay more, which indirectly violates their property, in their actual possessions, in the labor that acquires their daily subsistence, and in the hallowed remnant of time which ought to relieve their fatigues and soothe their cares, the influence [inference?] will have been anticipated, that such a government is not a pattern for the United States.

    If the United States mean to obtain or deserve the full praise due to wise and just governments, they will equally respect the rights of property, and the property in rights: they will rival the government that most sacredly guards the former; and by repelling its example in violating the latter, will make themselves a pattern to that and all other governments.”
    (End Madison Quote – pretty eye opening isn’t it? And I left a lot out.)

  2. with the in/nwo, imf, cfr, and many many others, the only way for America to be turned around is for a 2d revolution now… the American people, not the Feds, can only bring this about, to secure for themselves, and their future loved one, their liberties that have been ever so slowly taken away from them by others. the paid for, elitist hacks, have got to go to prison , if for nothing else, treason is the charge. Treason against the American people, Treason for their own actions against mankind.


    [Editor’s Note: Well, Chuck, Oath Keepers is not calling for any revolution other than the revolution of the mind. We believe that “consciousness works”. I am allowing your post simply as an indicator of your and other peoples’ consciousness – what people are saying “out there in the big old world”, but your suggested solution is not what Oath Keepers is advising our readers. We advise people to join the “Mental Revolution” by taking control of their own minds individually. Ownership, and control over, one’s mind is the first step in changing errors in perception, and as God’s own Angels who work for the CIA know, “perception is everything“.
    Salute!
    Elias Alias, editor]

  3. @ Chuck, “… the only way for America to be turned around is for a 2d revolution now..”

    I disagree. DEFENDING our nation and our legitimate government, the Constitution of the United States of America, and not following the orders of those who are “just following orders” and “just doing their jobs”. Instead start working to have them removed. They broke the contract, committed a felony when they broke their lawfully required Oath (and none of it is lawful if they did not take that Oath), and quite possibly committed terrorism against the American people or the people of the state (28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”).

    Start a Militia within your state, talk to cspoa.org to see if there is a constitutional sheriff who is willing to train you , and the Militia IF your governor won’t do his lawful duty. Join Oathkeepers Community Preparedness Teams to make a difference.

    What most seem to not understand – and I would not put it beyond those in our governments that are domestic enemies, to have started the “revolution” talk – is that THOSE working to destroy our nation from within are the one revolting against our legitimate government. It is not us that are using lies, propaganda, illegal spying, etc to destroy our government, it is them.

  4. Yes bob peters, Petreaus said as reported in the New American magazine… “After America, it is North America.”
    He couldn’t be more connected to the N.W.O.

Comments are closed.