No products in the cart.


White House: President “To Continue To Use His Pen And His Phone To Fix The Immigration System”

White House: President “To Continue To Use His Pen And His Phone To Fix The Immigration System”

This article was written by Melissa Melton and originally published at The Daily Sheeple

So much for a system where the federal government’s powers are separated into three branches which check and balance each other, you know, as stipulated by our nation’s Constitution.

The latest official White House press release, “President Obama Speaks on Immigration Reform,” vows that Obama “is going to continue to use his pen and his phone to fix the immigration system.”

The President, citing that House Republicans have “proven again and again that they’re unwilling to stand up to the Tea Party in order to do what’s best for the country,” announced yesterday, “I’m beginning a new effort to fix as much of our immigration system as I can on my own…without congress.”

The official White House press release went on:

Republicans have indicated that they intend to block a vote at least for the remainder of this year.

“Their argument seems to be that because the system’s broken, we shouldn’t make an effort to fix it. It makes no sense. It’s not on the level. It’s just politics. Plain and simple.” — President Obama, 6/30/2014

Other Republicans are mad at the President because he has used his executive actions too broadly. The President quickly countered that argument:

This also makes no sense. I don’t prefer taking administrative action. I’d rather see permanent fixes to the issue we face. Certainly that’s true on immigration. I’ve made that clear multiple times. I would love nothing more than bipartisan legislation to pass the House, the Senate, land on my desk so I can sign it. That’s true about immigration, that’s true about the minimum wage, it’s true about equal pay. There are a whole bunch of things where I would greatly prefer Congress actually do something.

President Obama reiterated that “the failure of House Republicans to pass a darn bill is bad for our security, it’s bad for our economy, and it’s bad for our future.”

So where Congress fails to act, the President is going to continue to use his pen and his phone to fix the immigration system and keep our borders secure. [emphasis added]

Never mind the simple fact that, just because Congress won’t do what the president wants, doesn’t mean he automatically gets gets to go around them and usurp the process. That’s the whole point of our Constitution in the first place. Shouldn’t that go without saying, especially to a man who supposedly taught courses in constitutional law?

To ignore the authority of Congress and do whatever he wants is what makes Obama a dictator, not a president.

Sadly, for a long time now, the majority of our White House’s official press releases have been less like actual press releases and more like a bratty little kids sports team openly whining about how the other side just won’t ever let them win.

For a bunch of grown adults supposedly running our country, it’s pretty pathetic.

In the meantime, the system of checks and balances this nation’s government was based upon has officially gone out the window.

Watch the entire press conference from the White House Rose Garden (if you can stomach it) below:






  1. If congress and the senate doesn’t step up and stop this tyrannical overreach it is going to get worse so my question is what do we do ?

  2. Joe, if you have to ask ok’s what to
    do about illegal immigration, you are truly [One word deleted by Elias Alias, editor].

  3. It is PAST time to start bringing charges. I know that most of you believe that it would do little to no good. Here is where we differ.

    Charges of crimes committed up to and including treason, First Degree Murder, *Terrorism against the USA and her people, plus a multitude of other criminal and civil charges agaisnt those who are elected, hired, contracted, etc to serve within our government. Charges that are carefully planned to be released so that the MOST people can hear about them and pass them on will bring this to the front of EVERYONE instead of them putting out their “press releases” on how bad we are for defending our legitimate government.

    *28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.

    This will do a few things right away;
    Raise consciousness of crimes committed against the American people themselves plus our legitimate government by those who serve within it.
    Put doubt in the minds of those who do want freedom but believed the lies being told so think we must accept this temporarily.
    Show that there is room for LEGITIMATE lawsuits to be brought against those who serve within our governments.
    Educates on what they can and cannot do, what those who serve within our governments are forbidden to do by the supreme law of this land and by each state’s Constitution.

    Visibility and legitimacy is important to show that those of us willing to defend our nation are doing so based on fact and the LAWS of OUR nation, not foreign nations or entities that have no legal base here (read the US Constitution, it says EXACTLY what laws apply here in our nation, and it is NOT the UN’s or any foreign nations laws.

  4. Cal;

    Your comment in ‘Boarder Wide Open’ and your thinking on OTM’s, seem inconsistent with you post here??
    So you feel that awareness will come fast enough and a resolution by the people fast enough to prevent the OTM from (if to be used against us) doing damage that can not be repaired for generations. It has taken generations for the powers to get us to this point, how can it be turned around in a few short months (about all we have left)?

  5. No, I do not “feel that awareness will come fast enough and a resolution by the people fast enough to prevent the OTM from (if to be used against us) doing damage that can not be repaired for generations”.

    I feel that when we ignore our laws (Constitution) we do so at our own peril. How many here are aware that the ONLY authority granted to those who serve within the federal government concerning immigration is what it will take for those LEGAL immigrants the STATES decide to let in our country must do to become US citizens. PERIOD! That is their only lawful authority.

    Constitution of the United States of America, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4: “To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;”

    Article 1, Section 9: “The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress…”

    Let’s say that those serving within the federal government actually had authority to “mess with” gun ownership” because there was no Bill of Rights. It still would not authorize grabbing weapons, etc because of Art 1, § 9 and Art. 1 § 10 regarding ex post facto laws. ( Latin for “from a thing done afterward.) Ex post facto is most typically used to refer to a criminal law that applies retroactively, thereby criminalizing conduct that was legal when originally performed. Two clauses in the US Constitution prohibit ex post facto laws: Art 1, § 9 and Art. 1 § 10.

    They cannot change the law and then hold against a person what was legal before. Make sense?

    “Your comment in ‘Boarder Wide Open’ and your thinking on OTM’s, seem inconsistent with you post here??”

    I was trying to not be so wordy (sorry Elias, I went back and added), but when I do I leave out so much important information and it nags at me until I come back and post it.

    I believe that “we the People” are the Militia of the several states. That the Militia is charged with enforcing the US Constitution and all state Constitutions, the laws of OUR land (“in Pursuance thereof), protect the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
    “to suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”.

    It is *in our US Constitution which is the agreement (contract) that all who serve within the federal government in any way are under.

    *US Constitution, Article I, Section. 8, Clause 11: “To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water”. This is using private citizens in their own privately owned crafts to defend the USA and her people, this is using the Militia.
    Clause 15: “To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel invasions.
    Clause 16: “To provide for organizing, ARMING, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress”.

    Thomas Jefferson, 1st inaugural, explained that: “a well-disciplined militia” is “our best reliance in peace and for the first moments of war, till regulars may relieve them” and also a guarantee of “the supremacy of the CIVIL over the military authority; [and] economy in the public expense.” (caps are mine)

    Samuel Adams : “It is always dangerous to the liberties of the people to have an army stationed among them, over which they have no control … The Militia is composed of free Citizens. There is therefore no danger of their making use of their Power to the destruction of their own Rights, or suffering others to invade them..”

    Richard Henry Lee: “A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves …”

    George Mason, Co-author of the Second Amendment: “I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few public officials. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.”

    We were not attacked here on US soil before BECAUSE almost every person was armed and trained in the use of those arms, not militarily or police but by using them. WE are here where Patrick Henry warned us would make it very dangerous to all of us.

    Patrick Henry: “If you have given up your militia, and Congress shall refuse to arm them, you have lost every thing. Your existence will be precarious, because you depend on others, whose interests are not affected by your infelicity.”

    William Rawle, whose work was adopted as a constitutional law textbook at West Point and other institutions, and was United States Attorney for Pennsylvania, describes the scope of the Second Amendment’s right to keep and bear arms:
    “The prohibition is general. No clause in the constitution could by any rule of construction be conceived to give congress a power to disarm the people. Such a flagitious attempt could only be made under some general pretence by a state legislature. But if in any blind pursuit of inordinate power, either should attempt it, this amendment may be appealed to as a restraint on both.”

    Justice Story, Associate Justice, Supreme Court wrote: “The next amendment is: “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
    The importance of this article will scarcely be doubted by any persons, who have duly reflected upon the subject. The militia is the natural defence of a free country against sudden foreign invasions, domestic insurrections, and domestic usurpations of power by rulers. It is against sound policy for a free people to keep up large military establishments and standing armies in time of peace, both from the enormous expenses, with which they are attended, and the facile means, which they afford to ambitious and unprincipled rulers, to subvert the government, or trample upon the rights of the people. The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them”.

    Tench Coxe: “Who are the militia? are they not ourselves. Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American…The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.”

    Tench Coxe, on the Second Amendment where he asserts that it’s the people with arms, who serve as the ultimate check on government: “As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people duly before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow-citizens, the people are confirmed by the next article in their right to keep and bear their private arms”.

    That the people are charged with this duty by the US Constitution that had already been theirs in our history before our nation was founded. The “organized” Militia are those constitutionalists who are trained militarily and ex LE’s, etc as ALL Americans and those legally allowed to be here are constitutionally REQUIRED to be trained by the states. Those serving abdicated their assigned duty and it must be taken up by the people to carry it out so that we all can defend our nation.
    That we need to get “legitimacy” in the eyes of the regular “dumbed down” people so that they cannot be used against us as much as we can. We can do so through the court because it is our accepted way of doing things in their eyes.

    I also believe that judges are NOT put in office for life because the US Constitution says itself that they are ALLOWED to serve as long as they use **”Good Behaviour” while in office.

    **US Constitution, Article III. Section. 1: The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.

    James Madison, Federalist 39: “According to the provisions of most of the constitutions, again, as well as according to the most respectable and received opinions on the subject, the members of the judiciary department are to retain their offices by the firm tenure of good behaviour.”

    I believe that “Good Behaviour: of judges – state and federal is decided by the People because the judges were to NOT be under the influence of the legislative or executive branch so that they could judge solely by the US Constitution and laws/precedent that were constitutional.

    Tucker’s Blackstone, Volume I, Chapter 1 regarding how the Oath applies to the judiciary: “But here a very natural, and very material, question arises: how are these customs or maxims to be known, and by whom is their validity to be determined? The answer is, by the judges in the several courts of justice. They are the depositaries of the laws; the living oracles, who must decide in all cases of doubt, and who are bound by an oath to decide according to the supreme law of the land, the U.S. Constitution.
    Now this is a positive law, fixed and established by custom, which custom is evidenced by judicial decisions; and therefore can never be departed from by any modern judge without a breach of his oath and the law. For herein there is nothing repugnant to natural justice;…”


    I believe that WE did not do our duty as we were talked out of it within the 1930’s or so when Joseph Stalin in 1933 said: ”The United States should get rid of its militias”; and those serving within the federal government started doing just that. I have been spending weeks researching when and why we now have governmental professional law enforcement within and throughout our nation instead of still using the Militias.

    They go back to England and their way of enforcing law which is where we declared our Independence from making us always a thorn in the side of the upper English classes (and others) because we recognized NO classes, everyone as equals in their chances to build their lives.

    I believe if we ENFORCE THE US CONSTITUTION AND EACH STATE’S CONSTITUTION (being aware that they have been changed online – which is why they are trying to do away with writing and books, much easier to change facts), enforce the laws of our land, enforce our borders state by state, we will be less in peril then before. We need, and have the authority to, remove the traitors who are serving within each state’s government – which since each state Constitution has somewhere within it words similar or exactly like these: “We, the People of the State of … do establish this Constitution.” Plus “All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for their protection, security, and benefit, and they have the right to alter or reform it when the public good may require” is located within them.

  6. This ‘Tench Coxe: “Who are the militia? are they not ourselves. Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American…The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.””


    “CONGRESS HAVE NO POWER…” is in reference to that within the US Constitution ONLY the
    congress can create legislation (laws, etc), NOT the other two branches, and that since the congress is DENIED that authority (power) it is also denied to the other two branches – since ONLY the congress is given the authority to create laws, etc in the words “Article I, Section 1:
    “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.” No mention of executive or legislative branches here which means those powers are DENIED to them.

    “… AND EVERY OTHER TERRIBLE IMPLEMENT OF THE SOLDIER, ARE THE BIRTH-RIGHT OF AN AMERICAN…” is in reference to the Second Amendment which means that EVERY WEAPON A SOLDIER USES every American must be trained on and able to use in defense of our nation when called upon as the Militia. I know that many of modern weaponry were not foreseen, but it matters not since those selfsame weapons can be used against us or in an attack upon us by foreign and/or domestic enemies of the USA.

    I believe that they would say that the crackpots who created and are using Geo Engineering, Climate and others; plus many that DARPA is creating would be denied as the harm they could commit could destroy our planet. The patents are there, it is real. Geo Engineering climate has been used sicne around 1938 or so, do you really think they have gotten no better at it then “cloud seeding” or that it would not be used as a weapon of war (*Popeye, and others)

    *Operation Popeye  (also known as Operation Intermediary or Operation Compatriot) was a top secret campaign of weaponized weather modification during the Vietnam War, from March 20th 1967 until July 5th 1972. It got its beginnings three years after the enactment of Project Stormfury (1962 – 1983) and 30 years after the first known US weather modification operations called Project Cirrus, which began in February 1947.

    From the 1974 Senate hearings on weather modification

    A classified rainmaking program was conducted in SEASIA from 1967 to 1972 which employed air dropped silver and lead iodide seeding units to increase normal monsoon rainfall. (US Senate, Subcommittee on Oceans and International Environment; 20 March 1974; p. 88)

    Objective: Increase rainfall sufficiently in carefully selected areas to deny the enemy the use of roads by: 1. Softening road surfaces 2. Causing landslides along roadways 3 Washing out river crossings 4. Maintain saturated soil conditions beyond the normal time span. (US Senate, Subcommittee on Oceans and International Environment; 20 March 1974; p. 89)

    … Secret 1967 memo from the Joint Chiefs of Staff to President Johnson. The memo read: “Laos operations – Continue as at present plus Pop Eye to reduce the trafficability [sic] along infiltration routes & Authorization requested to implement operational phase of weather modification process previously successful tested and evaluated in some area“. From the declassified top secret Pentagon Papers

    In 1974 The US Senate was able to investigate Operation Popeye in detail at: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Oceans and International Environment of the Committee on Foreign Relations United States Senate Ninety-Third Congress, second session on the need for an international agreement prohibiting the use of environmental and geophysical modification as weapons of war, and briefing on Department of Defense weather modification activity, January 25 and March 20, 1974.

    (Off topic) So those of you who do not bother to research, please do NOT call those who talk about “Chem Trails” as if they were idiots – like much of the conspiracy “theories are.
    of what used to be considered conspiracy, they are fact and derision is a useful tool of propagandists.

    So things like the NSA which is already DENIED to ALL who serve in every branch of the federal and state governments must be stopped and those who “followed orders”, “just did their jobs” be arrested and prosecuted for the crimes they committed against American and her people; with those at the top being tried with the end being the death penalty if found guilty in a Constitutional court of law. The others must be punished because it could not have happened if they did not do “their job” like all the bad things that happen at the orders of a few who truly do not have that power or authority unless some IDIOT follows their orders..

  7. Cal;

    Thank you for all your time and effort to present all of the valuable information in most all thread you post in. You are very complete and accurate (although I am far from well versed) in what you bring forth to understand our options and position.

    I have one final thing to say and I say it often; NO ONE WILL RISE TO CORRECT OR SUPPORT A CORRECTION UNTIL **THEY FEEL THE PAIN OR SEE A GAIN**. Now what I mean is our majority generation has been so dumbed down and place in benefit receivership that they will not act until its cut off. The illegals stand to gain (HA! Catch 22 Here) so they have the guts to protest that they have rights…

    The older minority that knows the truth and how it was, is indeed to old to support a change without support. I doubt the general support is there.

    I respect NO Politician, period, once obtaining power their minds go haywire.

  8. Cal , my friend I know what is coming and what will have to be done I was testing the waters so to speak.It all pointing toward plan B not just in immigration but all our freedoms 2nd Amendment as well though I had hoped it could be done at the ballot box we do what we have to do

  9. usurper continues his fundamental transformation of our country
    muslim brotherhood using blacks and illegals to put an end to America
    Guardians of the Republic waiting until it’s too late
    where the fvck is Sheriff Joe

  10. CAL. for president.
    I swear dude, You are the number one most constitutionally educated person in America.
    What say you…??? Will ye serve…???
    You got my vote.

Comments are closed.