No products in the cart.

News

Just TRUST Us

State Department logo

Unflipping believable! The US State Department is incredibly arrogant to expect us to believe anything they say without proof. Lies, lies and more lies. – Shorty Dawkins, Associate Editor

From Washingtons Blog:

Instead of Providing Evidence for Russian Guilt in Plane Shootdown, U.S. Says: Just TRUST Us … Because Those Iraq War Lies Are Ancient History.

U.S. State Department Says: We’re the Good Guys, and Russians Are Liars … So Just Take Our Word For It

In the following 5-minute clip from a question and answer session between State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf and the American press, the U.S. State Department more or less says:

We’re the good guys who tell the truth, and Russians are liars.

Forget Iraq … that’s ancient history.

So just trust us.

See the C-Span video here.

0

ldiffey


7 comments

  1. I have a better idea. Since there has not been the truth told since Bush 1 (and probably before), let’s REQUIRE those who serve within the federal government PROVIDE PROOF, preferably physical proof, at least video.

    Can anyone think of non lies told since bush 1 by any representative, especially those who serve within the executive branch. Because I know I have something like 62 plus pages of lies Obama siad since he was placed into the US presidency in 2008, and that is NOT adding the ones told since the 2012 MIS ELECTION (Election Fraud does not an election make). That is not including the crimes committed by just obama and his administration.

    Non Caps on “representatives names done on purpose. They deserve no respect in any way. Think about it, bill clinton was being impeached for lying about sexual escapades. obama has done worse like First Degree Murder, multiple ID Theft, they all committed election fraud and were placed in position, all are indicted War Criminals, etc.

    I guess I need to put the definition of each word of the Preamble to the Constitution of the United States of America down.

    Preamble: We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

    Key words here are ” We the People of the United States… do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

    Why don’t we do something unique in our world. Let’s actually FOLLOW the US Constitution as it defines our federal government, assigns the duties to the three branches, assigns duties that are under the jurisdiction put into it.

  2. “Why don’t we do something unique in our world. Let’s actually FOLLOW the US Constitution as it defines our federal government, assigns the duties to the three branches, assigns duties that are under the jurisdiction put into it.”

    That is actually up to us, it IS our government and they are those who are put into office or positions to carry out the constitutionally assigned duties of the branch they occupy. It is OUR duty to see to it that they do.

  3. your founding fathers left we the people with no effective way to enforce the Constitution. As one Englishman said to Thomas Jefferson Sir your constitution is all sail and no anchor .the bankers and politicians know this and they just do whatever they want and then they lie right to our faces and there is really nothing we can do about it. so far the people in America have been remarkably unsuccessful in holding back their government in any level state federal or local. Even the police now murder and brutalize the people they are sworn to protect. we have lost the Republic while we ate pizza and watched tv. Now we are being invaded by murderers from south america. And there is little that the average American can do. Write to your congressman and see what you get.as I write this I am sitting in a Mexican restaurant in Dallas surrounded by hundreds of illegals. Got any suggestions?

  4. If we could not stop one illegal from getting into the White House how are we going to get 30 million of them to go back home?

  5. the cry wolf is to old, and the proof is in the pudding, this administration can not be trusted.
    they lie, cheat, steal, and now they want to be trusted. don’t you think it’s a little to late,
    6 years they have to get this country in order, 6 years, to make things right. NO, this is on them,
    not bush, clinton, reagan, no one else but them. and if being right once, every dog has their day,
    just once, does not take away all the others and make it okay. i’m responsible for my actions, they
    are responsible for theirs. blaming others for one’s own mess, won’t work. it’s still your
    mess.

  6. @ Antonio Sucre Says: “your founding fathers left we the people with no effective way to enforce the Constitution.”

    You are incorrect. They left we the people in charge of doing just that as the Militia of the several states. Did you notice that there is NO provision in the US Constitution for governmental professional law enforcement?

    Were you aware that it was always “We the People” as the organized Militia that is charged with:
    – Enforcing the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution,
    – Enforcing and keep the “Laws of the Union” (which is constitutional laws ONLY),
    – Protecting the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
    – It is our constitutional duty “to suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”.

    You might think that the Militia is governmental organizations or military ones. They are
    not. The founders did NOT trust those who serve within governments to have that power to be used over, and possibly (as is being done today) against us. Not only that but standing military
    was, and is, forbidden for the same reasons.

    James Madison: “… large and permanent military establishments … are forbidden by the principles of free government, and against the necessity of which the militia were meant to be a constitutional bulwark.”

    Richard Henry Lee: “A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves …”

    George Mason, Co-author of the Second Amendment: “I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few public officials. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.”

    Thomas Cooley: “The right is general. It may be supposed from the phraseology of this provision that the right to keep and bear arms was only guaranteed to the militia; but this would be an interpretation not warranted by the intent. The militia, as has been explained elsewhere, consists of those persons who, under the law, are liable to the performance of military duty, and are officered and enrolled for service when called upon. . . . If the right were limited to those enrolled, the purpose of the guarantee might be defeated altogether by the action or the neglect to act of the government it was meant to hold in check. The meaning of the provision undoubtedly is, that the people, from whom the militia must be taken, shall have the right to keep and bear arms, and they need no permission or regulation of law for that purpose”.

    Samuel Adams: “It is always dangerous to the liberties of the people to have an army stationed among them, over which they have no control … The Militia is composed of free Citizens. There is therefore no danger of their making use of their Power to the destruction of their own Rights, or suffering others to invade them..”

    Patrick Henry: “If you have given up your militia, and Congress shall refuse to arm them, you have lost every thing. Your existence will be precarious, because you depend on others, whose interests are not affected by your infelicity.”

    Tench Coxe: “Who are the militia? are they not ourselves. Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American…The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.”

    The New Hampshire ratifiers called for a guarantee (the Second Amendment) that: Congress shall never disarm any Citizen…”.

    The Pennsylvania minority at its ratifying convention demanded a guarantee of a very broad right to arms, that: “the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and their own State or the United States, or for the purpose of killing game.”

    Joel Barlow, Revolutionary War veteran, wrote “Advice to the Privileged Orders, in the Several States of Europe”, clergyman, theologian, popular poet, successful diplomat, and American whose political writings were debated on the floor of Parliament said of the US Constitution: “… not only permitting every man to arm, but obliging him to arm.”

    Patrick Henry: “The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government.”

    Daniel Webster: “Where is it written in the Constitution, in what article or section is it contained, that you may take children from their parents and parents from their children, and compel them to fight the battles of any war in which the folly and wickedness of the government may engage itself? Under what concealment has this power lain hidden, which now for the first time comes forth, with a tremendous and baleful aspect, to trample down and destroy the dearest right of personal liberty? Who will show me any Constitutional injunction which makes it the duty of the American people to surrender everything valuable in life, and even life, itself, whenever the purposes of an ambitious and mischievous government may require it? … A free government with an uncontrolled power of military conscription is the most ridiculous and abominable contradiction and nonsense that ever entered into the heads of men”.

    So your next question should be where did the governmental professional law enforcement come from?

    It came about around the same time that Joseph Stalin in 1933 said, ”The United States should get rid of its militias”.

    It was based upon England’s law enforcement. Yes, the very one we declared our independence from, and refused to have any but limited government here. They have never accepted that all people are equal. Instead they have a class system there of “nobles, royalties, etc. We were called “ugly Americans” because we never recognized our “betters” there, and considered ourselves equal to any there whatever title they had. To them our nation was an abomination. Actually to most of the world, because we gave their regular people “ideas”.

    All modern federal and state law enforcement agencies violates our constitutional republic’s most firmly held conceptions of criminal justice which was written into the Constitution of the United States of America. Governmental professional police were unknown to the United States until close to a half-century AFTER the Constitution’s ratification. Law enforcement under our legitimate government was a duty of every citizen, not the duties of professional governmental law enforcement which is the direct opposite of a limited government. It was set up this way to protect the peoples liberty and natural rights, and to hold those who serve within the governments accountable to the people by the people. There is a reason that the Preamble to the US Constitution starts with: “We, the people of the United States… do ordain and establish this constitution for the United States of America”.

    As Dr Edwin Vieira states so well in his book “Constitutional “Homeland Security” Volume 1: the Nation in Arms”: “That means “that NONE of those tasks are assigned to the Army, to a Navy, to a (constitutionally unknown) National Guard, or least of all to any unnamed professional police, security, or intelligence agencies of the General Government or of any state or locality. Rather, the Constitution’s explicit emphasis on the Militia as the preeminent forces by politicians of a garrison, “national-security”, or police state…
    So those bound by Oath who “knowingly, with willful blindness, or in reckless disregard of the consequences of his/her action” votes for an unconstitutional act, bill, etc; when a “President or state governor refuses to veto it and instead executes it; or when a Judge, either of the supreme and inferior courts of the general government, or of any state knowingly declares such a statute valid and enforceable – each and every one of them violates his oath of office….”

    The duty of US citizens to enforce the law was, and still is, a duty assigned to the people by the US Constitution. Citizens were, and are still, expected to be armed, trained, and equipped to chase suspects by whatever means they had whenever summoned or needed. When the people are called upon to enforce the laws of the state or where ever needed, they were to respond “not faintly and with lagging steps, but honestly and bravely and with whatever implements and facilities [were] convenient and at hand.” Laws in pretty much every state still require their citizens, without being the trained Militia or at times even armed, to assist in capturing escaped prisoners, arrest or assist in arresting criminals who committed a crime, and executing the legal process.

    The ONLY type of “law enforcement” the framers considered was safest to maintain freedom of the people, and to enforce our constitutions was each state’s militia and that is what they put into the USA Constitution. The Second Amendment states it quite clearly: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    The duty of mostly private citizens (plus sheriffs and deputies) was as the state’s Militia. The Militia’s existence deters crime in and of itself. Knowing that each home has at least one person armed and trained living within stops a lot of crime before it is committed. The Militia’s keep those within the state and federal governments honest – or more so – because they know that they are held accountable for the constitutions, their oath and actions while serving, employed by, and / or contracted by them. The US Constitution contains NO other provisions for criminal and civil law enforcement, enforcement of the state and federal constitutions, protecting each state’s borders where needed, and defending the nation when attacked except for the Militia. It assigns those duties to the people themselves because of those benefits listed above, plus the Militia alone keeps us free.

    Law enforcement agents of the state or federal governments (professional governmental LEA’s) did not exist, they were not even contemplated, and they should NOT now exist here in America. The people should be training for a series of time at the beginning – of resurrecting the constitutionally required Militias of the several states (with pay) and then a few times a year (also with pay) to maintain that /training and no consequence from the workplace.
    Driver licenses and other licenses, plus armed police patrols were not a requirement to be able to move about in this country. There was no searches, or permits or licenses required, no being pulled over to be searched, no injuries or deaths by governmental professional law enforcement when traveling.
    Whichever way one wanted to travel such as by train, car, walking, bus, flying where one now endures illegal searches or being pulled over, and even arrests while traveling within a state, or state-to-state. Traveling out of the country where getting the “permits”, being “allowed” to travel and not being put on “refusal lists” which can all can interfere with or put a stop to your travel.
    Building your house, how you manage your property and what you do on it (except that whatever you do on your property cannot cause harm to another or to another’s property, etc) without governmental watchdogs telling you what you an or cannot do with your property, or even seizing it which they are not allowed to do. Nor can they tax your property and take it for “back taxes owed”. From one who would know, John Jay, first Chief Justice of the United States: “No power on earth has a right to take our property from us without our consent.”
    Then there are hunting, fishing, dog licenses, permits to keep “farm animals”, etc all things done by people – natural rights – before governments were created, and not legally under their auspices. Nor are they today, but they are used as a function of increasing governmental control and the registration of the populace. There is no need for a TSA, DHS, FBI, CIA, NSA, federal LEA, state LEA, etc because EVERY citizen and those lawfully allowed to be here are trained to deter and stop those very things from happening.

    The US Constitution flat out says that law enforcement was, and still is a universal duty that each person owed to the community and the nation as the Militia of the several states, rather than a power of the governmental agency. It states it here in the US Constitution, Article I, Section. 8, Clause 11:
    “To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water”.
    The congress has the duty to grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal when they are needed to enforce the US Constitution, the laws, or defend the people and the nation. This is using private citizens in their own privately owned crafts to defend the USA and her people, this is using the Militia.
    And again here in Clause 15:
    “To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel invasions.
    This clause is very straightforward. The militia of each state is taxed with the defense of the USA and her people, not just with the defense of their state; and they are to be armed with weapons that can repel any invasions bearing modern weapons of war, those weapons needed to do those duties. Notice that it does NOT say that those weapons are to go to any FOREIGN terrorist group or to any state law enforcement agency for whatever reason they may give that they “need” them. That is because they felt that an “standing army” is dangerous to the people of American so they forbid one to be formed and kept here on US soil in Clause 12 which specifies that there shall be no military beyond that of two years UNLESS war is declared by the congress.

    The Militia of each state is charged with our nations defense here within the USA until, and unless the congress has declared war and UNTIL a “standing” military is then raised – usually drawn from the Militia. Remember that all US presidents are Commander in Chief of the Militia when in service to the nation, and of the military “… WHEN CALLED INTO THE ACTUAL SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES” (Article II, Section 2, The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States…).

    Clause 12: “To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years”.
    (“To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years” is really straightforward, and no “misunderstanding” of the words can be used as an excuse for disobeying that lawfully required duty. The members of congress can, and should, be held personally responsible for that breach of trust. That is correct, they must pay back the funds used unlawfully out of their personal accounts as it is a “Misappropriation of Funds” – the intentional, illegal use of the property or funds of another person for one’s own use or other unauthorized purpose, particularly by a public official…, which is a felony, a crime committed against the American people. It is also theft.)

    Then again here in Clause 16 the congress is required to provide those military grade weapons for the militias. It makes it extremely clear that the ARMING OF THE MILITIA OF EACH STATE within the USA is a duty assigned to the congress that they are REQUIRED to carry out instead of giving those military arms to terrorists and state law enforcement agencies. Congress is required to provide those military grade weapons for the militias in Clause 16:
    “To provide for organizing, ARMING, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress”.

    Constitutions here in the USA addressed law enforcement from the standpoint of individual liberties and placed written barriers upon our governments. At the time of the US Constitution’s ratification, the office of sheriff was an appointed position, and when assistance was needed it was either elected or drafted from the community to serve as the Militia.

    For those of us who still believe that the U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of this land and is our legitimate government; it must be observed that the only crimes assigned to the federal government in the Constitution for law enforcement purposes are Treason, Piracy, Counterfeiting, and International law violations. That’s it! All other law enforcement matters are the purview of the individual states NOT the federal government

    Professional police as we know them today originated in American cities during the second quarter of the nineteenth century, when municipal governments drafted citizens to maintain order. Toward the end of the nineteenth century, police forces took on the role of crime-fighting. The goal of maintaining public order became secondary to chasing lawbreakers. The police cultivated a perception that they were public heroes who “fought crime” in the general, rather than individual sense.

    When Americans began to delegate their law enforcement duties to professionals, the law relaxed to allow police to execute warrantless felony arrests upon information received from third parties. For obvious reasons, constables could not be required to be “right” all of the time, so the rule of strict liability for false arrest was lost.

    Distinctions between the privileges of citizens and police officers grew more rapidly in the twentieth century. The modern disparity between the rights and powers of police and citizen shows up most in the modern law of “resisting arrest”. Any US citizen was privileged to resist arrest if probable cause for arrest did not exist or the arresting person could not produce a valid arrest warrant where one was needed as individual liberty is the bedrock of our constitutional republic. It wasn’t that long ago that the United States Supreme Court held that it was permissible (or defensible) to shoot an officer who displays a gun with intent to commit a warrantless arrest based on insufficient cause. Officers who executed an arrest without proper warrant were themselves considered trespassers, and the owners had a right to violently resist (or even assault and batter) an officer to evade such an unlawful arrest.

    Well into the twentieth century, violent resistance was considered a lawful remedy for Fourth Amendment violations. Even any third-party person who voluntarily assisted were lawfully able to forcibly liberate wrongly arrested persons from unlawful custody.

    By the 1980s many states had eliminated the common law right of resistance for the people in order to make it easier for professional governmental law enforcement to do the work of the state, plus criminalized the resisting arrest or anything else by the populace of any “officer” acting in his official capacity. Then they eliminated the requirement that an arresting officer present his warrant at the scene, PLUS drastically decreased the number and types of arrests for which a warrant is required. Basically destroying the basis of our legitimate government, and the level of protection given to us, and put into place, by the Framers into the US Constitution and state Constitutions.

    The right to resist unlawful arrest IS a constitutional one. It stems from the right of every person to his bodily integrity and liberty of movement, which are among the most fundamental of all natural rights. Substantive due process principles require that the government interfere with such a right ONLY to further a compelling state interest — and the power to arrest the citizenry unlawfully can hardly be characterized as a compelling state interest. The advent of governmental professional policing has endangered important rights, lives, and property of the American people. This” changing balance of power” between police and private citizens now revels itself by the unlawful power of modern police to easily use violence against the population, and to use unlawful arrest techniques with no consequences.

  7. My observation; we are being led by Saudis Arabia, Islam, terrorists and NWO activists.
    They have infiltrated our government at every level.
    They pull the jihadist puppet strings of Obom-in-hation.
    They groomed him for this job….and they want payback for financing
    His education. This was all planned out in his college yrs.
    GOP didn’t vet him, didn’t question ANYTHING in depth from
    his past 20 years from high school til today. They didn’t question why he went to Kenya
    and organized the ‘Ganster’ Peace Corps to cheat in the election to
    get the Shiria loving Odinga elected. He was a senator in Illinois at the time, and was illegal
    in doing so. Things so obvious it smacked of illegal…and Communistic.
    How do you win when other nations are running our country without contest?
    I can’t help but wonder how demoRats intend to live the next 50 years, raise their families, and
    provide their dreams….once the money runs out, which it will.
    Do they honestly want to live in the ghetto, picking and scratching in scorched dirt, to find a root
    To feed their 6 kids who are starving to death because there is no more govm’t handouts. And
    there is nothing left to steal. How do they expect to live? When their communist govm’t warlords are
    Saudi Arabia, China, and Russia? If they want that kind of govm’t …. Why don’t they
    pick one of those three….and leave!!! They cannot make the USA any better… They will never be
    Satisfied with anything less than dividing the USA…thinking they can now become the master, when in effect….
    Have only earned enslavemt.
    There is no cure for stupidity.

Comments are closed.