No products in the cart.

News

Official CT State Police Spokesman Says That State Police Would Participate In Door To Door Gun Confiscations

Lt Vance

This article comes from topconservativenews.com

The State of Connecticut says that all citizens must register rifles and high capacity magazines, or be charged will a felony. As many as 100,000 people could face heavily armed police smashing down their doors and be charged with a felony.

The legislature of CT says that a registration is needed so they can know where the guns are. Yet at the same time, they are sending threatening letters to gun owners. So they already have records of who has purchased certain guns. The fact is, that the CT legislature fully intends to confiscate hundreds of thousands of firearms anyway. The registration process will simply make it easier to confiscate, because you acknowledge that you still own a firearm that the state already suspects that you own.

CT State Police Spokesman Lt. Vance says that state police would comply with an order from the state to conduct door to door gun confiscations.

Experts claim that as many as 350,000 people are in violation of the law, and over 100,000 of those people could face felony charges. That means over 3.6% of the entire adult population of Connecticut has been transformed into a felon by the new registration law. Roughly one in twenty Connecticut homes could have their doors smashed in by heavily armed law enforcement seeking to confiscate firearms.

CT State Police Spokesman Lt. Vance can be reached at at (860) 685-8290.

httpv://youtu.be/jUxjuz2o9Gk

0

ldiffey

Oath Keepers Merchandise

29 comments

  1. I am not sure, but I think this is going to be the litmus test for the rest of the nation. If CT. gun owners DO NOT stand up for their 2nd amendment rights and fight (Boy I hate the sound of that) then the rest of the country will soon follow. On the other hand if they do stand together and fight, this will be the beginning of the 2nd Revolution. Hey lets face it, we knew it was going to happen, and as Oath Keepers says, “Not on our watch”. Very scary situation, but it looks like it is our turn. Roll over and die or stand and fight. I hope “and I hate war”, but I hope that if it comes to door smashing that CT. will stand up and neighboring states will assist and that the military will stand down or join the patriots. Sad, very sad situation that our beloved country has come to this.

  2. There is going to be lots of death so needlessly because of the illegal attacking private homes and they have the God given rights of self protection. These are nothing more than high priced criminals and should be stopped. If found breaking into homes the home owner needs to shoot first and ask questions later, maybe if few hundred policemen killed the rest will run. This is highly immoral and legalized criminals at work. Many homeowners will be slaughtered needlessly and the murderous police criminals go scott free with rewards and pay raises. This is the procedure going on for several years. The people of that state and all states must make all politicians and so called public servants be held responsible for every crime against the general public. If not in this life, then God will render righteous judgment on all these evil men and women who do this evil. There is nothing right about our evil government so called leaders and bureaucrats and all will face serious judgment. Their reward they will not like, saw the state police spokesman and his mumbo jumbo knowing he was lying and showed up in his speaking so as to confuse his message, a sign of a lying man.

  3. I say keep watch CT and when they do many armed citizens come to their aid. to keep the high road let them shoot first then open fire!

  4. “The State of Connecticut says that all citizens must register rifles and high capacity magazines, or be charged will a felony.”

    Let’s call it what it really is, an ATTACK ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE by TRAITORS to the USA. Yes, TRAITORS.

    So what is a “traitor” or “treason” under our LEGITIMATE government, under our (LAWFUL, in PURSUANCE THEREOF THE US CONSTITUTION) laws?

    US Constitution: that “treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort: and that no person shall be convicted of treason, unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court”.

    Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 1856- TREASON, criminal law. “This word imports a betraying, treachery, or breach of allegiance. 4 Bl. Com. 75.”

    Black’s Law 6th Edition – “A breach of allegiance to one’s government, usually committed through levying of war against such government or by giving aid or comfort to the enemy.”
    [Note: The word, “usually” above is obviously used due to the fact that the current interpretation being used in U.S. jurisprudence does not coincide with traditional definitions, it excludes other specie of treason such as “constructive treason”, traitorous conspiracies and insurrections meant to alter the established law, or to render it ineffectual. All of which are mentioned in the founding documents.]

    Tucker’s Blackstone Vol. 1 Appendix Note B [Section 3] 1803 – “If in a limited government the public functionaries exceed the limits which the constitution prescribes to their powers, every such act is an act of usurpation in the government, and, as such, treason against the sovereignty of the people.”

    (http://www.barefootsworld.net/treason_by_public_officials.html )
    Tucker’s Blackstone Volume 1 — Appendix Note B [Section 3 — Of the several forms of government]
    If the constitution be founded upon the previous act of the people (the creation of the U.S. Constitution), the government is limited. If it have any other foundation, it is merely constructive, and the government arrogates to itself the sole right of making such a construction of it, as may suit with its own views, designs, and interests: and when this right can be successfully exercised, the government becomes absolute and despotic. In like manner, if in a limited government the public functionaries exceed the limits which the constitution prescribes to their powers, every such act is an act of usurpation in the government, and, as such, TREASON against the sovereignty of the people, which is thus endeavored to be subverted, and transferred to the usurpers.
    Inseparably connected with this distinction between limited and unlimited governments, is the responsibility of the public functionaries, and the want of such responsibility. Every delegated authority implies a trust; responsibility follows as the shadow does its substance. But where there is no responsibility, authority is no longer a trust, but an act of usurpation. And every act of usurpation is either an act of TREASON, or an act of WARFARE.
    In case of treason … the power of pardon is taken away from the governor by the act of 1794, c. 168, [66] nor can the executive now remit any fine or amercement assessed by a jury, or imposed by any court of record, court martial, or other power or authority authorized to assess or impose the same. [67]

    C. U. S. Art. 3. Sec. 3. The act of 1 Cong. 2 Sess. c. 9. accordingly declares, that the punishment shall be death, by hanging; and that no conviction or judgment for treason, shall work any forfeiture of estate.

    From the founding documents showing that:
    1. The Constitution of the United States IS the “Supreme Law of the Land” and any law that strays outside the boundaries enumerated in it are undeniably unconstitutional (not in Pursuance thereof it).
    2. The undeniable fact that ANY acts passed by Congress or by State legislatures which do not conform to the Constitution of the United States have been found by the Supreme Court to be “null and void and have no effect”.
    3. Enacting unconstitutional laws by legislators clearly violate their Oath to “SUPPORT AND DEFEND the Constitution of the United States”.
    4. That ANY AND all violations of this Oath by an elected official/public officer must therefore be construed as a “Treasonable Act.”

    Constitution U. S. Art. 2, 3: Any US President is the chief magistrate, but not the sole magistrate of the nation. He may nominate, but cannot make permanent appointments to office without the concurrence of the senate (except in certain listed instances). Many of those nominated and commissioned are not responsible to him, nor are they removable by him; but are responsible only to the people, and to the law, and removable only upon impeachment by their representatives, and upon conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

    Judge Tucker (regarding whether it was necessary for someone to have weapons or implements of war to constitute treason): “…If the party be in a condition to execute the purposed treason without the usual implements of war, I can perceive no reason for requiring those implements in order to constitute the crime.”

    United States v. Hoxie – 26 Fed. Cas. 397, no. 15,407 C.C.D.Vt.: “Treason, not only holds a conspicuous, and generally the first place in every catalogue of crimes, but is almost universally punished with death. Government is so high a blessing, and its preservation and support are so essential to the welfare of every member of the body politic, that to attempt its subversion, has ever been regarded a most aggravated offence.”

    Tucker’s Blackstone Vol I – Appendix A: “This constitution” is “the supreme law of the land.” This supreme law “all judicial officers of the United States are bound, by oath or affirmation, to support.”
    Tucker’s Blackstone Vol I – Appendix A [91] 20. … in America, the Constitutions, both of the individual States, and of the federal Government, being the acts of the people, and not of the Government, and the powers of Government being by those Constitutions, respectively, distributed into three distinct, and coordinate, branches; viz: the legislature, the executive, and the judiciary; all which are equally bound by Duty to their Constituents, the people; and by Oath, also, to support the Constitution; it follows, as has been already shewn [Appendix, Note A.] that the legislature can possess, no power, or obligation over the other Branches of Government, in any case, where the principles of the Constitution, may be in any degree infringed by an acquiescence under the authority of the legislative department… That all acts of the Congress of the United States, impairing, infringing or violating the principles of the federal Constitution; and all acts of the legislature of this Commonwealth, which violate, infringe or impair the same, or any law of the United States made pursuant to the powers granted to the Congress by the federal Constitution, or any Treaty made under the authority of the United States, or the Bill of Rights, and Constitution of this Commonwealth, are not binding upon any other branch of the federal or State-government: and any Citizen of the Commonwealth, who may be aggrieved by any such unconstitutional Act, hath an undoubted right to redress, by application to the judicial Courts of the State, or of the United States according to the nature of the case.”

    Tucker’s Blackstone Commentaries 1:App. 151–53, 378–79, 412–13, 416–17, 418–26, 428–33; 5:App. 3—10: “The people are not only not bound by them, but the several departments and officers of the governments, both federal, and state, are bound by oath to oppose them; for, being bound by oath to support the constitution, they must violate that oath, whenever they give their sanction, by obedience, or otherwise, to any unconstitutional act of any department of the government.”

    (On Judges) 1 Hayw. 28 N.C.: “The judges of the land are a branch of the government, and are to administer the constitutional laws, not such as are repugnant to the Constitution. It is their duty to resist an unconstitutional act. In fact, such an act made by the General Assembly, who are deputed only to make laws in conformity to the Constitution, and within the limits it prescribes, is not any law at all. Whenever the Assembly exceeds the limits of the Constitution, they act without authority, and then their acts are no more binding than the acts of any other assembled body.”

    “No man is to be deprived of his property or rights, but according to the law of the land, or the common law.”

    What is meant by the expression “levying war”? It means “insurrections” in order to alter the established law, or to render it ineffectual; “insurrections” to accomplish these ends, “by executive, legislative or judicial acts”, or by numbers and an open and armed force, are a levying of war against the United States.
    By whom may the war be levied? Those who owe obedience to the US Constitution and each state Constitution, who receive protection from it. Against whom must it be levied? It must be levied against the United States; against the Sovereignty of the People. Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution 3:§§ 1292, 1294–96, 1791–94, 1796 – 1833

    Thomas Jefferson: “…I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground: That ‘all powers not delegated to the United States, by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States or to the people.’ [10th amendment.] To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawn around the powers of Congress, is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible of any definition.” (Except treason!)

    Tucker’s Blackstone Volume I Chapter 10 Section 2 (Regarding the Oath)
    The members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, and all members of congress shall be bound by oath or affirmation to support the constitution of the United States. Constitution U. S. Art. 6, which oath must be taken by all persons, chosen or appointed after the first day of August, 1789, before they proceed to execute the duties of their office. Laws. U. S. 1 Cong. 1 Sess. c. I.

    The formal profession, therefore, or oath of subjection, is nothing more than a declaration in words of what was before implied in law. Which occasions Sir Edward Coke very justly to observe, that “all subjects are equally bounden to their allegiance, as if they had taken the oath; because it is written by the finger of the law in their hearts, and the taking of the corporal oath is but an outward declaration of the same.”

    The sanction of an oath, it is true, in case of violation of duty, makes the guilt still more accumulated, by the superaddition of perjury to treason…”

    For example: “Dare Call It Treason”, Edwin Vieira, Jr.
    “Congress’s power and duty “to provide for arming the Militia” cannot include a self-contradictory license “to provide for disarming the Militia”. And, just as obviously, no other powers of Congress – such as the powers “to lay and collect Taxes” and “to regulate Commerce”, the two legalistic props usually invoked for “gun control” – can interfere with, let alone negate, the power “to provide for arming the Militia”, because:
    (i) All constitutional powers are “of equal dignity” in all respects, such that none may ever be “enforced as to nullify or substantially impair [any] other”;
    (ii) The Militia are State governmental institutions – as the Constitution describes them, “the Militia of the several States” – not any form of Commerce”; and
    (iii) The General Government cannot impose a tax on any State, any State governmental institution, or the production, acquisition, possession, or use of any equipment necessary for the proper functioning thereof.

    The purpose and inevitable effect of “gun control” today is not:
    – To secure the existence of “well regulated Militia”, or
    – To provide “Arms” of any kind to “the people”, or
    – To train “the people” in the safe and effective use of firearms and related equipment, or
    – To regulate the use of firearms so as to minimize negligent, reckless, or criminal behavior while still maximizing the freedom of individuals to possess and employ firearms for Militia service and all other legitimate purposes

    Blackstone’s principle that “the highest civil crime… ought… to be the most precisely ascertained” the Constitution duly applied in its narrow definition of “Treason”: namely, “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort”.

    This definition contains an important amendment of Blackstone’s teachings: namely, that, there being no King in America (and under the Constitution no possibility of enthroning one22), the victims of “Treason” are “the United States” taken collectively, as the phrase “in levying War against them, or in adhering to their enemies” evidences.

    In keeping with Blackstone’s definition, as well as the common understanding at the time, “Treason” must always remain both in principle and practice a breach of allegiance to “the sovereign”. “In general, treason is the offense of attempting to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance”. Significantly, allegiance is not owed to “the government of the state”, which is no more than an instrumentality of “the state”, but instead to “the state” herself. In America under the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, WE THE PEOPLE have rightfully asserted and retained for themselves the position of the sole sovereigns.

    Perforce of the Declaration, “the good People of the American Colonies”, and no one else, took upon themselves and exercised sovereignty by: “dissolving the political bands which had connected them with Great Britain; “assuming among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitled them”; and exercising their “Right… to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them… seemed most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness”. Then, as it’s Preamble recites, “WE THE PEOPLE of the United States… did ordain and establish the Constitution”, by themselves and under their own authority.”

    That is, under the aegis of those “Laws” “the People” alone are the sovereigns, the “Form of Government” their creation, and public officials within that “Form of Government” subjects who necessarily owe allegiance to “the People”.

    The Constitution makes clear that none of “the several States” that make up “the United States” is to be confounded with her government. For it mandates that “the United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government”. This proves that a “State” is distinct from “a Republican Form of Government”. “A Republican Form of Government” is merely an establishment located within and dedicated to the service of a “State”.

    So, inasmuch as WE THE PEOPLE themselves are the true and only sovereigns in America – and inasmuch as WE THE PEOPLE alone are real beings physically, and the real parties in interest in the premises legally, “the several States” and “the United States” being no more than political and legal fictions – then “Treason against the United States” must entail “Treason against WE THE PEOPLE who comprise the United States”; “levying War against the United States” must always amount to “levying War against the PEOPLE”; and “levying War against the PEOPLE” must always amount to “levying War against the United States”.

    To be sure, although “‘some actual force or violence must be used, in pursuance of… a design to levy war’”, “‘it is altogether immaterial, whether the force used is sufficient to effectuate the object; any force connected with the intention will constitute the crime of levying war’”. Moreover, “levying War” can embrace more than simply the appearance of men under arms and actual fighting. For example, “if… the government established by the United States… is to be revolutionized by force, although merely as a step to, or a means of executing some greater projects, the design is unquestionably treasonable, and any assemblage of men for that purpose would amount to a levying of war”. Or “if… the subversion of the government of the United States… were a means clearly and necessarily, to be employed, if such means formed a substantive part of the plan, the assemblage of a body of men to effect it, would be levying war against the United States”.

    Therefore, any attack upon “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” through “gun control” enforced by “an assembly of armed men” is an attack upon “a free State”, upon popular self-government, upon popular sovereignty, and in the final analysis upon WE THE PEOPLE themselves. For that reason, “gun control” is the very worst manifestation of “Treason” imaginable, because it paves the way for every other sort of oppression that psychopathic “rulers” are capable of perpetrating…

    That is what treason is.

  5. This is just a ploy by the government to create 100,000 felons that will never be allowed to own a gun again simply by not complying with the law. People of this great liberal state now see the consequences of electing progressive officials. The Northeast states are all liberal states and they start all the liberal agendas there first to set precedence where the progressive judges are on there side. They need to go after the law makers first to change the way the system works. Remove the judges and politicians responsible for these unconstitutional laws and don’t allow progressives in power. This law is planned and will work as they want if people fall for this trap. The police are bound to enforce the laws that were created by the people you elected. Go after the root of the problem and don’t kill the messenger.

  6. It was all disturbing but “seriously” did he really say that?? he is the master ?? talk about being un-American unpatriotic he should be ashamed of himself.

  7. Well Cal, That was the longest sermon to the choir I’ve ever read.Belive it or not, most of us have educated ourselves and have a firm grounding in the principles you elucidate.I suggest that the situation in Ct. is past the point of scholarly debate and is now a matter of decision by the citizens there.I am sure Lt. Vance will mouth the usual moral bankrupcy “I don’t make the law, I just enforce it”. You could ask him if there is any law he would refuse to enforce, and you can do so by calling him……Lt. J Paul Vance, (860)685 8290

  8. A small town mayor published in a local small town of about 24k people said since NDAA passed, this was all last December, that people now have to prove they are out walking their dog. Four months later the police asked my daughters friend’s mom while she was in the yard why there was a truck in their drive way with two people sitting it. My kids truck! I told her what was going on, but she does not listen. She is a gov’t employee assisting with taking kids that really are abused and neglected. So gov’t is great and trains her well and all the retirement she gets, I said your own money they pulled from her check, like you can’t do it yourself. My work has been cut out for me since her birth. lol

  9. @Neil Wampler, “Well Cal, That was the longest sermon to the choir I’ve ever read.Belive it or not, most of us have educated ourselves and have a firm grounding in the principles you elucidate”

    If you know what treason is, then why are you not pushing for charges to be brought by those who are keeping their constitutional oaths? If you know what laws are broken then why are you not fighting to get them enforced?

    Getting the rest or most of the rest of our people on board is why I “lectured”, and do lecture. If YOU, and YOU, and you. and me will not enforce them (laws) in a lawful manner you lose a lot of the population. Notice that the federal government and the corrupted state governments PRETEND to have the backing of “law”. That is why they do it and get away with it!

    Lt. Vance has already broken many laws that make HIM a criminal, yet this is ignored. Bringing this out, pressing charges against those who are criminals and traitors in office brings this to the light of those who have kept their faces averted. Yes, there will be a few who will still do nothing, but there will be those who will raise THEIR voices for prosecution BECAUSE they believe in the law, because they know something is “rotten” within our governments – but do not want to do something THEY consider illegal.

    To get them (the rest of the people, or most of them) “on board”, one MUST use the law as our enemies and the enemies of our US Constitution and state Constitutions do. One MUST show the people that judges ONLY get to keep their position by using “Good Behaviour” in the courts. That those who hold offices MUST follow the state and US Constitution and keep their – lawfully required – oaths as the contract they are under requires. That those who are the enforcers of the law, specifically the ones that enforce unconstitutional laws, MUST be held accountable for their actions in a LAWFUL manner. Where a lot of the people are lost is they do not see what some are saying as lawful – though it is, except when it is NOT called “DEFENDING” our nation from enemies domestic and foreign.

    Does this make sense to you?

  10. Indeed. Step by step in State by State perhaps?? That ‘Peacetime Martial Law’ executive order and the NDAA seems to be on the verge of being carried out via alternate routes. Might be, that the term ‘designated Enemy Combatant’ is being reserved for the very near future. Could prove to be a cold summer regardless of location. Food and fuel shortages and keep the Military pre-occupied elsewhere while attempting to confiscate personal and private property. Unlike Greece, the Ukraine and etc, the Elite do know that Americans personal and private wealth and assets, property and etc won’t be surrendered to the Creditors very easily.

  11. Its Official this “Law” is for Probate proceedings.
    Public Acts Public Act 13-3 An Act Concerning Gun Violence Prevention and Children’s Safety.
    Administered through the Probate Court
    A *conservator is obligated to transfer or surrender firearms in the possession of a conserved person and to prevent the conserved person from having access to firearms owned by others. An ineligible person who fails to transfer or surrender a firearm or ammunition may be guilty of a Class C felony. (Effective October 1, 2013)

    Office of the Probate
    Court Administrator
    2013 Legislative Summary
    http://www.ctprobate.gov/Documents/2013%20Legislative%20Summary.pdf

    PUBLISHED BY
    OFFICE OF THE
    PROBATE COURT ADMINISTRATOR
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT
    The Probate Court system achieved a successful legislative session in 2013. Our two bills, both of which were joint proposals of the Probate Assembly and probate administration, were enacted. In addition, our budget request was fully funded, enabling us to implement much deserved raises for court employees and judges. I thank all of you who worked to develop and advocate for our bills. The material in this packet includes a summary of each bill, together with a copy of the public act. The summaries are not meant to replace the public acts and are offered only to present a general understanding of the legislation. Bracketed text in the public acts indicates deletions, and underlined text indicates additions. Please note the effective dates of each act. We will present continuing education seminars on the new legislation at the court staff training on October 16th and the Judges Institute on October 23rd.
    Table of Contents
    Public Acts Public Act 13-3 An Act Concerning Gun Violence Prevention and Children’s Safety.
    Public Act 13-220 An Act Concerning Revisions to the Gun Violence Prevention and Children’s Safety Act.
    Public Act 13-3 (SB 1160) An Act Concerning Gun Violence Prevention and Children’s Safety Effective Date: See individual sections SUMMARY This complex act contains several changes to laws that govern the possession, transfer and sale of firearms and addresses a variety of mental health and school safety issues. Relatively few of the act’s provisions involve the Probate Courts. Those that do are summarized below. Assault weapons and large capacity magazines Sections 23 through 31: The act prospectively prohibits the sale, transfer, and possession of assault weapons and large capacity ammunition magazines. A grandfather provision permits an individual who has legally owned assault weapons or large capacity magazines before May 4, 2013 to retain possession, provided that the owner files the necessary documents with the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection.
    Assault weapons and large capacity magazines may not be sold or transferred to anyone in Connecticut other than a licensed gun dealer. They may, however, be passed to others by bequest or intestate succession. The executor or administrator of the estate must obtain authorization from the Probate Court for the transfer, and the heir or beneficiary must file documentation with the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection. See Section 23 (large capacity magazines) and Section 26 (assault weapons). (Effective April 4, 2013) Ineligible persons Sections 34 and 44: Federal law prohibits an individual from purchasing or possessing firearms if he or she has been committed to an institution for treatment of a psychiatric disability or if a court has appointed a conservator for the person in an involuntary proceeding. The act codifies the same prohibitions as state law.
    In addition, the act prohibits an individual from possessing a firearm for 60 months following an involuntary commitment and for six months following a voluntary admission to a hospital for treatment of a psychiatric disability. A person who is ineligible to possess firearms or ammunition must, within two days of the event that triggered the prohibition, sell or transfer the firearms or ammunition to an eligible person or surrender them to the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection. A person who surrenders a firearm to the Department retains the ability to sell or transfer it within one year of the surrender.
    A *conservator is obligated to transfer or surrender firearms in the possession of a conserved person and to prevent the conserved person from having access to firearms owned by others. An ineligible person who fails to transfer or surrender a firearm or ammunition may be guilty of a Class C felony. (Effective October 1, 2013) Name change Section 21: Existing law requires that the court notify the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection when an application for a change of name is filed by a person who is required to register as a sexual offender. The commissioner has standing to object to the requested name change. The act amends C.G.S. section 45a-99 to make the same provisions applicable to individuals who are required to register as offenders convicted of committing a crime with a deadly weapon. (Effective January 1, 2014)
    Public Act 13-220 (SB 1094) An Act Concerning Revisions to the Gun Violence Prevention and Children’s Safety Act Effective date: See individual sections SUMMARY This act amends P.A. 13-3, discussed above. Again, only a few of the sections pertain to the Probate Courts. Sections 1 and 5 amend sections 23 and 26 of P.A. 13-3 to clarify that the exceptions to the law that allow large capacity magazines and assault weapons to pass to a party by bequest or intestate succession include bequests to a trust or transfers from a trust to a beneficiary under the terms of the trust. (Effective upon passage)
    Section 20 amends C.G.S. section 45a-100, which addresses applications to the Probate Courts from individuals seeking relief from federal firearms disability. Section 20 precludes the court from granting such relief if state law prohibits the petitioner from possessing firearms due to an involuntary commitment, within the preceding 60 months or a voluntary commitment within the preceding six months. (Effective October 1, 2013)

  12. How many have to die on both sides? Because this is what it’s going to come to. Those policemen swore an oath to the Constitution,and despite what Paul Vance says,he’s violating his oath,therefore he and every other cop participating in these door to door confiscations are more guilty of a crime, than the people supposedly breaking this bogus gun law!

    Take my word for it,Conn. is going to be the state,where it all began,and it will spread like wild fire,across this country. Are these anti gun people looking for a War?.Because if anyone is hurt killed,or arrested,this is going to be on their watch,not the gun owners.
    Just because the cops,and anybody else participating in their crimes of confiscating guns, has the equipment to try and enforce their campaign,it doesn’t mean they’ll win! Let me put that warning out there. Remember the Bigger they are the harder they fall.

    Vance and everybody else participating in confiscating guns better think twice,because they’re going to start a war,that they won’t be able to stop!

  13. where are the CT Oath keepers? Why aren’t they forming up? When your enemy states it is coming, you form up into battle groups. Where is the leadership? The state must see that free men will crush them if the state pursues its Marxist agenda. If the CT Oath keepers do not immediately organize those brave CT freemen, the Oath keepers will become a joke. The CT freemen will be left alone and unled when they need organized military leadership the most. Stop talking and start walking.

  14. To the one who said go after the root! Well isn’t that what the Cops Gestopo said in Nuremburg? Saying it my job wont fly any more or just doing your duty wont fly!
    Their duty as a human because as Washington said in a quote states we did not put off the citizen just because we put on a uniform! So as a human first then Cop.etc.. second you have the duty to judge what laws you enforce and what laws you don’t. If it’s unconstitutional and just because the supreme court rules it is doesn’t mean it is. Any dummy can read the bill of rights, or should be able to and understand it was a limit on GOv not just a sugestion or good things to hold onto, but can be infiringed upon or abridged whenever society says it can. No you can not, and to do so means your affirming your rols as Dictator, or as Vance told that lady Master!
    With statements like that from what Vance told that lady makes we wonder about the hoax bit of all that. Sorry but it does because if he’s willing to say he’s the master how far would he go to get it and hold that title?
    SO no they are preciseley the Root Those that follow This law and enforce it are the target and should be becuase in any dictoatorship it’s always been them!

  15. Very good Jerry, From the Movie Full Metal Jacket,”You can talk the talk, but can you walk the walk?”

  16. Hello Jerry,

    Who are the CT Freemen? , , , , and how does one contact them? IF time, please advise. Thanks.

  17. To the Governor and State Police of Connecticut, think very hard before you smash in the door of a American Citizen.Is this what you think is the right thing to do or is rewriting the law a better way to solve this problem. Remember you work for us not the other way around and if we decide to follow the Constitution like our country was set up well you have to do the same because again YOU WORK FOR US! I hope it doesn’t come to a shoot out but living here in New Jersey I know this State will be next to fall, they are now in the process here of passing a secret bill to lower magazines from 15 to 10 rounds. I will stand with my brother and sister gun owners in Connecticut and let the chips fall where thay may.

  18. Hello Peter

    Why do you think the State Police of Connecticut would be listening to your aforementioned post? IF we can connect with the CT Freeman as Jerry above hopes, then we Oathkeepers could back their six in support and defense of our Constitution as Amended

  19. So much for rights of possession and that of private property rights.
    Whether it be by stick or stone, tooth or nail, a man’s right to defend himself is a given, not having to rely upon another.
    It is an “Unalienable right!”
    Too, should you be walking through the woods and faced with an unanticipated danger, the staff that you have forged your way with is yours and not the possession of anyone faced with similar danger.
    It matters not whether your staff be a suitable limb from a tree or stave that you have fashioned, it is yours and may not be taken from you!
    The registry of firearms is a dangerous precedent!
    The Federalist papers #46 makes clear the only recourse citizens have against a despotic and tyrannical government are the people themselves!
    When the controversy arose should a federal military be established, the question immediately put forth was, shall its power ever be turned against the populace?
    That was assumed not possible for the States themselves and all the citizens would resist such violation with vigor.
    However, Benjamin Franklin correctly anticipated the event as not beyond the reach of possibility.
    “I THINK A GENERAL GOVERNMENT NECESSARY FOR US, AND THERE IS NO FORM OF GOVERNMENT BUT WHAT MAY BE A BLESSING TO THE PEOPLE IF WELL ADMINISTERED, AND BELIEVE FARTHER THAT THIS IS LIKELY TO BE WELL ADMINISTERED FOR A COURSE OF YEARS, AND CAN ONLY END IN DESPOTISM, AS OTHER FORMS HAVE DONE BEFORE IT, WHEN THE PEOPLE SHALL BECOME SO CORRUPTED AS TO NEED DESPOTIC GOVERNMENT, BEING INCAPABLE OF ANY OTHER.” Benjamin Franklin, Closing address to Constitutional Convention, September 17, 1787.
    Any law enforcement agency, any trooper or other agent acting under authority as indicated by the article under review above shall be engaged in a criminal conspiracy!
    If you do not recognize it, this is Obama’s “Civilian Security Force, just as powerful, just as well funded as our military!”
    These are no different than the “Young Turks,” of Armenia, or the fascist thugs of Hitlers era!
    There is nothing new under the sun!
    Once again we have a “Cult of personality,” and the avid followers of a tyrant.
    We are on the precipice of ruin and few acknowledge the disastrous consequences to follow.
    Ezra Stiles acknowledged the pins of freedom that founded us:
    The right of conscience and private judgment is unalienable, and it is truly the interest of all mankind to unite themselves into one body for the liberty, free exercise, and unmolested enjoyment of this right.”
    Thomas Jefferson aided in fueling the engine of thought that underscores our most cherished possession of mankind, our natural rights:
    “Nothing is unchangeable but the inherent and unalienable rights of man.” – Thomas Jefferson”

  20. Lt. Vance has betrayed his true motive. He shall act under authority, should it be lawful or not. He has lost all discernment. For Lt. Vance’s purpose to act, it only need be an authority.
    Our government is almost wholly corrupt.

  21. Has not this traitor been convicted yet over the Sandy Hook false story? He was an accomplice and based on that false story like many others (Boston just came to my mind) the establishment want to disarm the American people…
    I hope HIS door gets smashed really soon…

  22. What these legislators and police who are behind this ‘law’ and who take part in enforcing this ‘law’ don’t realize is that door kicking works both ways. There are people out there who will no doubt take the fight to them if they start confiscating guns. I’m not condoning it, I’m not hoping for it, quite the opposite, I am just making a very educated prediction. There are thousands of veterans who have executed no-knock’s and snatches in a war zone. Going into a house in suburbia or hitting a target in a vehicle on a back road in CT will be a cakewalk. These police and these legislators go home in the evening, they sleep at home, they go drink at bars, they go to restaurants, they don’t live in fortresses, they live in the same types of homes as the citizens. There will be tit for tat retribution. It will be in response to bloodshed initiated by the ‘authorities’. It’s not the guns raids that they will have to worry about, sure they’ll win, people will die, but they’ll get in the house and get the guns in the end, but when they are snoring at 0430… or driving home buzzed or drunk as they do… if they realized what will happen if they do this, they wouldn’t start it.

  23. Thank you for that cal.
    You should send this post to a few of the NH members. They bashed the hell out of me for saying that senator jean shaheen was a traitor for voting for the UN GUN BAN.

    Needless to say…I do not participate in the NH chapter any longer. All these people want to do is call and write a bunch of elected criminals who don’t listen to them.

    I’m going to Lexington green april 19th. I will be wearing all my oathkeepers goodies and carrying a camera to record images of that hallowed ground. I hope to see thousands of you there.

  24. So let’s suppose the CT state police go door-to-door and confiscate all of the “illegal” guns. The next step is to outlaw the “legal” guns and take them. As soon as all of the guns are confiscated, I am sure the state police and all city/county police will turn theirs in since CT will now be a “Gun Free Zone” and no firearm violence will ever happen again…………I also have that magical unicorn you are looking for in my backyard.

  25. Maybe it is time to formally charge these people with treason ? Or at least put up wanted posters on every telephone pole in the State ? How about marching in the upcoming Memorial Day parades carrying large posters with a strong message ?

  26. It is for this Very Reason Why I Am NOT A Federalist!! Its not just Federal causing problems, It Is ALSO State And Local Governments That Cause Problems!!! Many Many Times State And Local Governments Cause Even MORE Problems For WE THE PEOPLE then the Federal Government Does!! Our Military Took An OATH Of Office To Uphold And Protect Our Great Constitution!! They need to Take Charge And STOP These Rogue States!! We ARE Living Thru Totalitarianism!! Read George Orwell Book “1984”
    Notice how Federalists always bring up the 10th Amendment and cleverly mention States Rights While Leaving Out The Most Important Part Of The 10th Amendment Which Says The RIGHTS ARE GIVEN TO THE PEOPLE!! The 10th Amendment is about WE THE PEOPLE’S RIGHTS!! NOT The States Rights!! I took an Oath Of Office To Uphold, Protect, And Defend The Constitution Of The United States Of America!! And employed or not, That Oath Stays With Me Till The Day I Die!!!! And I Abide By That Oath, And ANYBODY Who Interferes With That Oath I Have Taken IS A Criminal!! GOD Be With You My Friends!! Today Is Our Lords Day – 3/16
    Why?? John 3:16 and Genesis 3:16 in Our Holy Bible!! Today, Sunday 3/16/2014, Is A BLESSED DAY!! – NRII

  27. Nick,

    Precisely!! That is why the people figure so heavily in Federalist paper #46. Were there to be any over reach by the federal government, the states were anticipated to resist and if not the states themselves than the people. That seems to have been lost on most of our legislators.
    It remains as having been once said, “This form of government is for a moral and virtuous people, it is suitable for no other!”
    Our leaders have demonstrated themselves corrupt for one reason only. We ourselves have become corrupt.
    “A bad tree cannot bring forth good fruit…”
    We have left off the principles that made us great, indeed, the fundamental principles we have ever been encouraged to frequently resort to. Those words were penned in the late 1700’s, the early 1800’s and are just as relevant today as they were then.
    The only problem is, no one has any idea what those fundamental principles were/ Should they have the slightest inkling of that which they may be, the people in their present state will refuse them!
    The source of them comes from the same one who said, “A bad tree cannot bring forth good fruit.”
    He is just not being listened to anymore in large part.

Comments are closed.