No products in the cart.


NASA Models Predict Total Societal Collapse: “Irreversible”

simple folks

This article comes from

by Mac Slavo

The end of the world as we know it is coming.

You’ve likely heard this before, especially from the growing number of voices in the alternative news and preparedness communities. Often dismissed as conspiracy theory or outright lunacy, there is a growing body of evidence that suggests these fringe thinkers may well be on to something.

Despite assurances from most political leaders, experts and researchers who argue that we live in a stable and sustainable world, a new study utilizing mathematical models developed by NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center may confirm our worst fears.

According to the Socio Economic Synthesis Center, which led the study’s research team and was made up of well respected natural and social scientists from various U.S.-based universities, society as it exists today is decades, perhaps just years, from a complete collapse of our way of life.

Given economic strati cation, collapse is very difficult to avoid and requires major policy changes, including major reductions in inequality and population growth rates. Even in the absence of economic strati cation, collapse can still occur if depletion per capita is too high. However, collapse can be avoided and population can reach equilibrium if the per capita rate of depletion of nature is reduced to a sustainable level, and if resources are distributed in a reasonably equitable fashion. (SESC)

The study cites scores of historical examples of civilization collapse dating back thousands of years. Given the facts it is clear that humanity’s long sought after Utopian society is a goal that is simply unachievable. Every five hundred years or so, the whole system simply falls apart.

There are widespread concerns that current trends in population and resource-use are unsustainable, but the possibilities of an overshoot and collapse remain unclear and controversial.

How real is the possibility of a societal collapse?

Can complex, advanced civilizations really collapse?

It is common to portray human history as a relentless and inevitable trend toward greater levels of social complexity, political organization, and economic specialization, with the development of more complex and capable technologies supporting ever-growing population, all sustained by the mobilization of ever-increasing quantities of material, energy, and information. Yet this is not inevitable.

In fact, cases where this seemingly near-universal, long-term trend has been severely disrupted by a precipitous collapse often lasting centuries have been quite common.

This brings up the question of whether modern civilization is similarly susceptible. It may seem reasonable to believe that modern civilization, armed with its greater technological capacity, scientific knowledge, and energy resources, will be able to survive and endure whatever crises historical societies succumbed to.

But the brief overview of collapses demonstrates not only the ubiquity of the phenomenon, but also the extent to which advanced, complex, and powerful societies are susceptible to collapse.

In short, the mathematical models utilized to determine the results of the study indicate that there are two key causes for what the authors call an “irreversible” collapse.

First, with the earth’s population now over 7 billion people our civilization is burning through resources faster than they can be replenished, and the burden of paid “non-workers” (i.e. those who are given resources for performing no actual function in society) leads to a complete break down in the system.

We can see how an irreversible Type-N (full) collapse of Population, Nature, and Wealth can occur due to over-depletion of natural resources as a result of high depletion per capita.

Workers and Non-Workers with the same level of consumption, i.e., with no economic strati cation. The Non-Workers in these scenarios could represent a range of societal roles from students, retirees, and disabled people, to intellectuals, managers, and other non-productive sectors. In this case, the Workers have to deplete enough of Nature to support both the Non-Workers and themselves.

Read more here.





  1. NASA is a government agency.
    “According to the Socio Economic Synthesis Center, which led the study’s research team and was made up of well respected natural and social scientists from various U.S.-based universities…” Again owned or PAID for by the federal government spouting governmental lies.
    “First, with the earth’s population now over 7 billion people our civilization is burning through resources…” Corporations use MORE resources then the rest of us. They pollute more then the res of us combined and when they have a “catastrophe” they do NOT clean it up as lawfully required. US Military pollutes and kills more wildlife, flora, then all the “average” people do. They deliberately poison our air, earth, water mostly through weather modification which they even use as warfare
    – Operation Popeye, secret highly classified weather modification program in Southeast Asia 1967 – 1972. They used a cloud seeding operation during the Vietnam war from about March 20, 1967 until around July 5, 1972 where the operation seeded clouds with both silver iodide and lead iodide… both known poisonous substances that does KNOWN harm to people.
    – The Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques – Geneva: May 18,1977, Entered into force: October 5, 1978 – which supposedly prohibits “widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or injury”.
    – There was a research paper produced for the USAF, 1996, that speculated about the future use of nanotechnology to produce “artificial weather”, clouds of microscopic computer particle all communicating with each other to form an intelligent fog that could be used for various purposes
    – “HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction, capable of destabilising agricultural and ecological systems globally.”

    “‘Climatic warfare’ potentially threatens the future of humanity, but has casually been excluded from the reports for which the IPCC received the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize.”

    – While the substance of the 1977 Convention was reasserted in the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) signed at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio, debate on weather modification for military use has become a scientific taboo.

    -article on Weather Warfare by Michel Chossudovsky, The Ecologist, December 2007: Rarely acknowledged in the debate on global climate change, the world’s weather can now be modified as part of a new generation of sophisticated electromagnetic weapons. Both the US and Russia have developed capabilities to manipulate the climate for military use.

    Environmental modification techniques have been applied by the US military for more than half a century. US mathematician John von Neumann, in liaison with the US Department of Defense, started his research on weather modification in the late 1940s at the height of the Cold War and foresaw ‘forms of climatic warfare as yet unimagined’. The US military has developed advanced capabilities that enable it selectively to alter weather patterns. The technology, which is being perfected under the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP), is an appendage of the Strategic Defense Initiative – ‘Star Wars’. From a military standpoint, HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction, operating from the outer atmosphere and capable of destabilising agricultural and ecological systems around the world.

    Weather-modification, according to the US Air Force document AF 2025 Final Report, ‘offers the war fighter a wide range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary’, capabilities, it says, extend to the triggering of floods, hurricanes, droughts and earthquakes: ‘Weather modification will become a part of domestic and international security and could be done unilaterally… It could have offensive and defensive applications and even be used for deterrence purposes. The ability to generate precipitation, fog and storms on earth or to modify space weather… and the production of artificial weather all are a part of an integrated set of [military] technologies.’

    In 1977, an international Convention was ratified by the UN General Assembly which banned ‘military or other hostile use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects.’ It defined ‘environmental modification techniques’ as ‘any technique for changing –through the deliberate manipulation of natural processes – the dynamics, composition or structure of the earth, including its biota, lithosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere, or of outer space.’

    Established in 1992, HAARP, based in Gokona, Alaska, is an array of high-powered antennas that transmit, through high-frequency radio waves, massive amounts of energy into the ionosphere (the upper layer of the atmosphere). Their construction was funded by the US Air Force, the US Navy and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Operated jointly by the Air Force Research Laboratory and the Office of Naval Research, HAARP constitutes a system of powerful antennas capable of creating ‘controlled local modifications of the ionosphere’. According to its official website, , HAARP will be used ‘to induce a small, localized change in ionospheric temperature so physical reactions can be studied by other instruments located either at or close to the HAARP site’.

    Rosalie Bertell, president of the International Institute of Concern for Public Health, says HAARP operates as ‘a gigantic heater that can cause major disruptions in the ionosphere, creating not just holes, but long incisions in the protective layer that keeps deadly radiation from bombarding the planet’.

    Physicist Dr Bernard Eastlund called it ‘the largest ionospheric heater ever built’. HAARP is presented by the US Air Force as a research programme, but military documents confirm its main objective is to ‘induce ionospheric modifications’ with a view to altering weather patterns and disrupting communications and radar.

    An analysis of statements emanating from the US Air Force points to the unthinkable: the covert manipulation of weather patterns, communications and electric power systems as a weapon of global warfare, enabling the US to disrupt and dominate entire regions. Weather manipulation is the pre-emptive weapon par excellence. It can be directed against enemy countries or ‘friendly nations’ without their knowledge, used to destabilise economies, ecosystems and agriculture. It can also trigger havoc in financial and commodity markets. The disruption in agriculture creates a greater dependency on food aid and imported grain staples from the US and other Western countries. (article on Weather Warfare by Michel Chossudovsky, The Ecologist)

    It is NOT the people of the planet that is polluting our earth and using all the antural and unnatural resources. It is the corporations and the military who are deliberately and secretly – mostly – destroying our planet and the life upon it. Control them, our destructive, treasonous government who do the bidding of the corporations/banking/military, and plant crops as the planet grows things naturally we would be fine. The planet would be healthier.

  2. If you are interested to learn more about Geo Engineering weather modification and what is going on today there are lots of sites that have information that can be verified; patents, etc.

    The aluminization of our soils here which is making it here in California where we cannot grow food, where ALL of our trees are dying, wildlife, etc.

    Animal/Plant Die-Offs – Various Articles


    No live planet, no humans. Easy way to democide most of us.

  3. Down in Peru, there is a cemetery where they dug up 300 skeletons. Recently the PRELIMINARY DNA testing was done on them, and they are not human. If they were to mate with a human, only a small percentage would produce offspring, and that offspring would be sterile. The skulls of these creatures are much thicker and heavier than humans, and contain a cranial size almost 1.5 times the size of humans. And they have a distinctive shape that has given them the nickname of “conehead”.
    Instead of 3 cranial plates, they only have 2 plates. These skeletons have also been found in other sections of the world, such as Egypt. Check out the documentary on Queen Nefertini, and get a glimpse of her skull profile. Anyway, some think that these creatures are still alive today, running things from the background. Perhaps they would like to see less humans in the world, and like a high radiation level, and “massive amounts of aluminum”. Do a Google search for “Peruvian Coneheads”, and you will see what I mean.

  4. Greetings:

    Why when I enter my e-mail address in the space on this webpage:

    Sign Up For Our Free E-Mail List

    and after depressing the GO button the first page appearing contains the following:

    Access to the requested page has been denied

    Panda IS 2013 has cataloged this page as a Malware page.

    © Panda Security 2012

    Why is your site identified as being a “Malware page.”

    [Editor’s Note: Robert, we have never heard of this happening before. Perhaps it’s your browser? Whatever it may be (or not be), I will have our webmaster look into your query and we’ll make a response to your question here as soon as we know. Thanks.
    Elias Alias, editor]

Comments are closed.