No products in the cart.

News

Rule from the Shadows – The Psychology Of Power – Part 1

storm clouds gathering

This video comes from Storm Clouds Gathering. It is another fact-filled, and powerful video. If you are just waking up, I would definitely encourage you to see this. If you think you are really awake, then definitely watch it, as it will surprise you. – Shorty Dawkins, Associate Editor

httpv://youtu.be/p8ERfxWouXs

0

ldiffey

Oath Keepers Merchandise

10 comments

  1. “It’s good to be back at the Council on Foreign Relations.
    As Pete mentioned I have been a member for a long time. And
    was actually a director for some time. I never mentioned
    that when I was campaigning for reelection back home in
    Wyoming.”

  2. P.S.:

    The quote in Post 1 comes from 17:39 of “Rule from
    the Shadows – The Psychology Of Power – Part 1”.

    They truly do “rule” from the shadows, the dark
    places of their minds. –And to think that they
    can spend their lifetimes there, developing and
    pursuing their psychology and rule of power.

  3. Outstanding work.
    This presentation covers what it took me 15 years to figure out.
    Thank you for posting video.
    If only we could get 20% of the population to Pay Attention.
    It is like many people just don’t want to know.
    Like when a Man has a loose whore for a wife.
    Everyone on base knows it.
    He knows, but doesn’t want situation acknowledged.
    Acknowledge problem. Form up. Deal with threat.
    Impeach and send the political harlots packing.
    They have not only sold us out. They sold out the country.
    They have sold out our children’s future. Understand.
    IMPEACH all of them. Bring to trial the criminals.

  4. Have some self respect.
    Stop putting up with gutter rats.
    Criminal Bankers. Criminal Politicians.
    Criminal Jester in Cheif Czar.
    You get what you are willing to tolerate.
    Enough is Enough.
    Stop these idiots before we have WW3 and no civilization.
    They are criminally insane.

  5. The Storm Clouds Gathering video is correct.

    It is past time that we “wake up our people as we can. One way is to “change the brainwashing”. Another is to start charging those in state and federal positions of “power” with the crimes they have committed.

    Alexander Hamilton, New York convention: “I maintain that the word supreme imports no more than this – that the Constitution, and laws made in pursuance thereof, cannot be controlled or defeated by any other law. The acts of the United States, therefore, will be absolutely obligatory as to all the proper objects and powers of the general government…but the laws of Congress are restricted to a certain sphere, and when they depart from this sphere, they are no longer supreme or binding”.

    In Fed 33, Hamilton also said: “It will not, I presume, have escaped observation that it expressly confines this supremacy to laws made pursuant to the Constitution….”.

    Thomas McKean, Pennsylvania convention: “The meaning [of the Supremacy Clause] which appears to be plain and well expressed is simply this, that Congress have the power of making laws upon any subject over which the proposed plan gives them a jurisdiction, and that those laws, thus made in pursuance of the Constitution, shall be binding upon the states”.

    James Iredell, 1st North Carolina convention: “When Congress passes a law consistent with the Constitution, it is to be binding on the people. If Congress, under pretense of executing one power, should, in fact, usurp another, they will violate the Constitution.”

    Tucker’s Blackstone, Vol I, Chap 1 regarding how the Oath applies to the judiciary: “But here a very natural, and very material, question arises: how are these customs or maxims to be known, and by whom is their validity to be determined? The answer is, by the judges in the several courts of justice. They are the depositaries of the laws; the living oracles, who must decide in all cases of doubt, and who are bound by an oath to decide according to the supreme law of the land, the U.S. Constitution.
    Now this is a positive law, fixed and established by custom, which custom is evidenced by judicial decisions; and therefore can never be departed from by any modern judge without a breach of his oath and the law. For herein there is nothing repugnant to natural justice;…”

    The problem is NOT the judges, because judges LAWFULLY are ONLY allowed to keep their position while using “Good Behaviour”. They do NOT lawfully “interpret” the US Constitution, they are to see that all that comes before them is in “Pursuance thereof” it.

    ucker’s Blackstone, Volume I, Chapter 1 regarding how the Oath applies to the judiciary:

    “But here a very natural, and very material, question arises: how are these customs or maxims to be known, and by whom is their validity to be determined? The answer is, by the judges in the several courts of justice. They are the depositaries of the laws; the living oracles, who must decide in all cases of doubt, and who are bound by an oath to decide according to the supreme law of the land, the U.S. Constitution.
    Now this is a positive law, fixed and established by custom, which custom is evidenced by judicial decisions; and therefore can never be departed from by any modern judge without a breach of his oath and the law. For herein there is nothing repugnant to natural justice;…”

    James Madison, Federalist 39: “According to the provisions of most of the constitutions, again, as well as according to the most respectable and received opinions on the subject, the members of the judiciary department are to retain their offices by the firm tenure of good behaviour.”

    Remember that the courts are kept separate from the executive and the legislative branch so that their “decisions” would be in Pursuance thereof” the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution – where it applies. But in the courts the juries, the PEOPLE, make the decisions of guilt or innocence of the person charged – not the judges. What was “taken out” of the courts and hidden from juries for obvious reasons is that they also decide if the “law” or charge” was a lawful one. If not it is supposed to be dumped when they find it not lawful.

    It is the PEOPLE who decide if a judge – state or federal – is using “Good Behaviour” in the courts. WE decide if they lawfully stay or leave the position they are occupying.

    Article VI says that only the laws that are made in Pursuance thereof the US Constitution are lawful here in the USA. Anything else disguised as “law” is not legal or binding on US Citizens.

    It also says that anyone serving within the federal or state governments MUST support the US Constitution or no longer meet the qualifications of the position or office they are occupying when it says this about qualifying for office or public trust:

    “The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”

    The justices no longer using “Good Behaviour” can be fired because they have broken the contract by not using the lawful authority assigned to the third branch of the federal government and to all justices within the states. They are REQUIRED to make sure that ALL laws – “The Laws of the United States, all Treaties made, or which shall be made – are IN PURSUANCE THEREOF” the US Constitution, and keep their oath to be in “Good Behaviour” and to remain lawfully a justice within the federal or state governments.

    Thomas Jefferson: “…To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions is a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so. They have with others the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps…and their power is more dangerous as they are in office for life and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruption of time and party, its members would become despots….”

    Thomas Jefferson: “The government created by this compact (the Constitution) was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among powers having no common judge, each party (the people of each state) has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress.”

    Early in US history, judges informed jurors of their nullification right. The first Chief Justice, John Jay, told jurors:
    “You have a right to take upon yourselves to judge both the facts and law.”
    And “The jury has the right to judge both the law as well as the fact in controversy.”

    Thomas Jefferson, in a letter to Thomas Paine:
    “I consider [trial by jury] as the only anchor ever yet imagined by man by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution.”

    John Adams:
    “Representative government and trial by jury are the heart and lungs of liberty. Without them we have no other fortification against being ridden like horses, fleeced like sheep, worked like cattle, and fed and clothed like swine and hounds.”

    John Adams: “It is not only his [the juror’s] right, but his duty…to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgment, and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court.”

    “though in direct opposition to the direction of the court” is “We the people” deciding the court, prosecutors, lawmakers were all wrong. So why would anyone think that the final decisions over a judge using “Good Behaviour” would be left to anyone else?

    Samuel Chase: “The jury has the right to determine both the law and the facts.”

    Patrick Henry: “Why do we love this trial by jury? Because it prevents the hand of oppression from cutting you off…This gives me comfort, that, as long as I have existence, my neighbors will protect me.”

    James Madison, Federalist 46, 315-23:
    “The Foederal and State Governments are in fact but different agents and trustees of the people, instituted with different powers, and designated for different purposes… They must be told that the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone; and that it will not depend merely on the comparative ambition or address of the different governments, whether either, or which of them, will be able to enlarge its sphere of jurisdiction at the expence of the other. Truth no less than decency requires, that the event in every case, should be supposed to depend on the sentiments and sanction of their common constituents.”

    Fire all who are not using “Good Behaviour” in the courts. If they disagree they can take “WE the people” to court. Then start prosecuting the rest of the criminal class.

    Ask yourself how many felonies does the US Constitution recognize? Three. That is correct, only three. How did we allow them to create books of them to be used against us when they are NOT lawful, but are only “Color of Law”, PRETEND laws to be used against us.

  6. Cal. Get yourself a website. Put up your 3 page rants there.
    Shorter comments better to understand. Better yet, learn to make videos.
    Make some videos with charts, diagrams, pictures,that even ground
    pounding grunts can understand.If we were smart we wouldn’t be
    humping 85 lb plus rucks.
    love you man. make the videos and i’ll watch.
    Be short. Concise. Clear. 7th grade level.
    Not all of us are sharpest pencils in the cup.
    We are better at being tip of the spear and breaking things quickly.
    These Storm Cloud Gathering videos are great.
    Interesting. Send copies to your friends and neighbors. Wake Them Up.

  7. Arrest Obamunista Regime.
    This is America.
    Not a banana Republic.
    We have the office of President.
    Not a Czar.
    Impeach. Arrest this traitor.
    These thugs have gone too far. ARREST.
    Where are the Military leaders?
    Imeach. Arrest these criminal traitor obamunista.

Comments are closed.