April 29th, 2014

Bundy Ranch Advisory for April 29 2014_Updated May 06 2014


-

This official advisory is from Elias Alias, your friendly editor at http://www.oathkeepers.org/

This advisory will be an encapsulation of a much larger story with numerous feature or peak points to reveal in coming weeks and months. The Bundy Ranch Revolution against federal land management within the several States is positively huge. My comment to Stewart Rhodes regarding the gravity and significance of the Bundy stand is that it is a watershed moment in Twenty-first Century American history, and I am totally proud of Oath Keepers for jumping in with the Bundy family and their good neighbors.

And that is true. And that is why Oath Keepers is being kicked in the teeth by people purporting to be pillars of the patriot community. Justice will arise from the smoke of this obvious fray, and it won’t take very long. Oath Keepers would seriously like to thank Sheriff Mack and his CSPOA and Mike Vanderboegh and his national Three Percenters movement.

But this advisory is not the place to develop themes which can reveal who and what is trying to sabotage the Bundy stand against federal land management. This advisory is just to let our members know that we’re all over this. Regarding your humble servant, I’ve been so heavily inundated with articles, videos, audio files, phone calls and emails – all relative to this affair – that I’ve been unable to even crystalize a simple concise report with which to update our people on what’s really been happening there at the ranch. I also have not been able to talk with Stewart to wish him a happy birthday. Stewart is traveling home to Montana with Renn and company so Stewart can be home with his family for his birthday. I shall get to other details as they can be assimilated – there is much material to share with our readers, and some of it is quite remarkable. Some follows in this advisory.

Meanwhile, please read the following.

Thank you!

Bundy Ranch Advisory for April 29, 2014

Yes, it is true: Oath Keepers received a bizarre bit of leaked info which could not be verified but which also could not be ignored. Our contact is connected with the Department of Defense – or “was”. The info we received stated that Eric Holder of the Department of Justice had okayed a drone strike on the Bundy ranch near Bunkerville, Nevada, within a 48 hour period over the weekend of April 26/27, 2014.

We cannot ever know if it were a valid leak and our knowing about it caused someone to halt the plan, or if it was a ruse. There is no way to know. And though it came from a trusted source, Oath Keepers could neither prove nor disprove it. Oath Keepers is thankful that no one got hurt. Oath Keepers also is aware that the source of that rumor requires debriefing, which would hopefully lead to the author of that operation. It was a directed attack on Oath Keepers to do several things including gauging our comms depth, our speed in Intel, and study how we responded.

This mis-info came from a trusted source, a former Special Forces soldier with significant connections inside DOD. Though the info was unbelievable, in the present climate generated by the BLM and Senator Harry Reid (who called the ranchers and their friends “domestic terrorists”), Oath Keepers decided that the info must be regarded as indicating that a drone attack was at least “possible”.

Knowing that this sort of info is at least bizarre, Stewart and our Board members who were there at the ranch finally, after painstakingly going over all possible angles, decided that this should be handled just as the authorities would handle a bomb threat at a school – evacuate the kids from the school immediately and then sift for the bomb, if indeed one turned out to exist there. Stewart knew this was a potential trap for Oath Keepers, but felt that he could not remain quiet about the info which had come to us. Better safe than sorry, in a nutshell, defines his thinking on this. Oath Keepers is tremendously happy that nothing happened and that this was a bad tip, a piece of “dis-info”, a “psy-op”, or even the possibility that it was a genuine leak but once it was announced the authorities decided to cancel it. We will never really know.

On the basis of that, Oath Keepers alerted the Bundy ranch and all who were working there this past weekend.  Now we’re being attacked on many fronts in the backwash.

Oath Keepers were doing excellent work at the ranch. We were in touch with the family and they wish to continue working with us. We will see what develops, but at the moment Oath Keepers is standing down.We intend to be helpful in whatever way we can but we are now off the Ranch

All Oath Keepers are encouraged to donate or send checks directly to Cliven and Carol Bundy -

Cliven and Carol Bundy * 7175 Gold Butte Rd * Bunkerville, NV 89007

Let’s take a moment to assess the psychological environment in which this rumor was active. The BLM had already accosted members of the Bundy ranch on the road, tackling a woman roughly, letting one of their combat dogs loose on Ammon Bundy (Cliven’s son), and tasing him in a confrontation brought about when armed fedgov troops accompanied a BLM effort to round up the Bundys’ cattle and the Bundy family came out to protest. Ensuing days saw rising tensions and a build-up of troop levels by the BLM, which had finally amassed a veritable army which included S.W.A.T. units and helmeted combat agents and snipers. The Bundy’s children could look up and see snipers aiming rifles at them from ridge-lines. There was much fear, much agitation, and much tense concern, as we might imagine each of us would feel if a federal agency sent troops into our own yard.

So that was the temperature on the ground leading into last weekend. But in the national political environment we saw a very damning picture presented by a Nevada Senator named Harry Reid. Senator Harry Reid greatly fueled the tensions nationwide, deliberately. Reid, as the whole world knows, publicly declared that the Bundy family and their neighbors and supporters were “domestic terrorists”. Yes, believe it or not, a sitting U.S. Senator actually said that. His statement is now coming home to roost. Here is why.

All Oath Keepers know that President Obama signed into “law” the infamous NDAA-2012, which placed American citizens under military jurisdiction. Under the NDAA-2012 any American citizen may be picked up by the military and placed in custody under a military tribunal – without even being charged with a crime – and – without benefit of a lawyer – and – may be held indefinitely until the so-called “war on terror” is finally over, which some politicians have said could last a hundred years or more. We also know that the USA PATRIOT ACT of 2001 greatly released restrictions on government enforcement agents and permitted them to violate American citizens’ unalienable rights. We all know that the NSA is collecting all of our communications. We know that dissent against current policy in government is being targeted by government agencies including the IRS and DHS.

Additionally, our situation includes the observation that Americans now bear the brunt of more than 70,000 S.W.A.T. raids a year, mostly over victimless so-called “crimes” or just to serve warrants. Our police are being militarized and under the command of the US Department of Homeland Security are now in effect an extension of a standing army being readied to control mass dissent among the people. (See: NORTHCOM in Colorado, which is now home of the first US military deployment of combat troops on US soil. Worse, we note that federal agents are now militarized and are extensions of the military, same as are our local police. All are interfaced under DHS authority. We notice that the BLM placed combat troops online against the Bundy family, pointing military guns at our cowboy citizens in an unacceptable and unforgiveable portrait of enforced tyranny. The fedgov cannot take back the fact that they brought a ghastly army down to bear on an American ranching family and their friends. They did it.

Further, we also know for fact that the President has a private, secret “kill list” of people his Administration may consider killing on sight, sans any due process, simply on the President’s word.

So all of that is in the picture here as we look at the “leak” which got everyone excited. Considering how bizarre that listing of government sins-against-the-people really is, it’s not such a far reach to understand why a threat of a war-on-terror-styled attack in retribution for the Bundy cowboy defeat of the BLM gov-thug soldiers earlier this month is not such a far-fetched idea after all. At the very least, and under current environment terms, letting people know the nature of the alleged threat was the right thing to do.

In the wake of this remarkable anomaly, I see that some so-called “patriots” have gone to exaggerated extents to attack Oath Keepers. The hysteria levels are up past flood-stage markings. We have people accusing Oath Keepers of many different offenses, including stealing money we collected for the Bundy family. Oath Keepers has resources and attorneys and a good name to protect. Regarding the money-related accusation, the Oath Keepers book-keeper just informed me that we have raised more than forty thousand dollars for the Bundy Ranch operation, and of that sum we have presented a check for $12,500.00 to the Bundy family – not cash, a check. Here is part of the statement I just got from our book-keeper:

“Here are the things I know we bought, food, water, ice, clothing, tents, field equipment/supplies, port-o-potties and travel expenses for the OK BODs and anybody willing to take rotating shifts out at the Bundy Ranch. We also gave the Bundy’s $12,500.00 via a check, not cash.”

She told me that we’ve taken in more than forty thousand dollars.

Please allow me to explain something in better detail. First, Oath Keepers raised that money from sympathetic members and supporters. We are very proud of everyone who shouldered the cost of doing this at the Bundy Ranch. We presented the Bundys with the check for $12,500.00 without any stipulation – it is their money to do with as they choose, and we need no accounting from them regarding that money. We will be able to account for all monies we’ve taken in. Oath Keepers is grateful to every member and supporter who sent money to this project, and we stand honorably to account for that money.

Also regarding the money part of this operation: The following is a video showing part of what that money accomplished at the Bundy ranch. Oath Keepers has played a powerful role in how the public came to see the justice in Cliven Bundy’s battle for his State’s right to own and manage its own land. We work with People Against the NDAA, and we work with the Tenth Amendment Center, among other fine organizations including the Fully Informed Jury Association.

We understand that the Bundy affair is classic and that Mr. Bundy himself is a patriarch of our American heritage and as such he is to be protected by the people at all costs. His vision is in harmony with that of the founders, and we all know it. When Oath Keepers brings in to the Bundy Ranch out-of-State legislators, and when CSPOA and Oath Keepers bring in men and women from our Peace Officer community to stand by Mr. Bundy, the power in the unique outreach style of Oath Keepers becomes clear. Please enjoy this brief example of the good that came from our members’ and friends’ financial support, and, again, please accept Oath Keepers thanks to each of you who have contributed to make this sort of moment possible:

All Oath Keepers may be proud that we were part of that moment and that we indeed helped that moment to happen by our activism. 

We understand the principles on which Cliven Bundy stands, and the direness of the hour in our Republic’s history, and the need to overcome the UN’s Agenda 21 domestic usurpations carried via now-stolen “federal agencies and departments” such as the Forest Service and the BLM. The BLM’s policy is mirrored in Agenda 21, and the entire Bundy Ranch affair traces back to corruption in internationalist-federal deal-making in the name of the People’s government. Chinese management of Nevada land is at the bottom of this, as Alex Jones exposed Senator Reid’s connections with a Chinese firm wanting to operate a solar energy farm on land related to the eco-plans for developing that site, which included moving a population of desert tortoise from that site to the area where Bundy’s cows graze – and that was a problem for EPA as well as the Endangered Species Act, which caused seriously-armed federal force to move in to make sure that the Bundy cattle were removed from the new home of the tortoise – correct me if I’m wrong. This is United Nations covert activity inside the United States and it involves the planet’s largest Communist nation, China. The Bundy connection connects also the relationship of the BLM to the Reid family. It is deep stuff.

And that is why suddenly, as Oath Keepers is getting into gear to ramp up and build upon this defense of the people against the BLM’s tyrannical forces, and as we are making awesome strides, all hell suddenly breaks loose and we were being attacked by people working their own agenda, who in a surprising twist of fate, have decided to destroy Oath Keepers.

Other accusations bordering on the absurd are being passed around, and it appears to be a concerted or choreographed Internet activity as if designed by anyone wanting to discredit Oath Keepers. There are pieces to our puzzle which are not yet on the table, but it is obvious that somebody wants us shut down and will use what national media coverage exists to smear us to a progressive audience we would not otherwise know existed.

A typical FBI psy-op would plant “leaders” in every militia they could infiltrate. What those sorts of FBI agents or surrogates do is always “handled”. Did you notice the massive ego about who is going to command who? Did you notice the drama in the tendency to speak of Oath Keepers as if we were a militia, which we are not? These mal-formed egos would judge us by battlefield standards even though there has not been a “battlefield” since April 12, 2014? They would shoot us for desertion? Really? That is amazing, and is the kind of bumbling consciousness which a conditioned and programmed special warfare officer or a federal agent would offer if he had to think on his feet of a sudden.

I’ll confide something with you. Let us not be deceived about the real strength and power of the true American militia. Let us examine any militia which opposes the historic role of the Constitutional militia of the several States. Yesterday I had a longish phone conversation with Mike Vanderboegh, who was wanting to think-tank some stuff with me for concurrence in what we might do next to combat the idiocy being circulated presently. All you III%ers listen-up. As Mike and I were talking about the situation I said something to which he replied, “Well, how do we know that *they* are *the* militia of the people?” I pondered that and thanked him for bringing it up.

We were suggesting that the FBI (and other related groups) firmly believes in creating its own opposition for purposes of controlling it from atop and within. The model is searchable online as “COINTELPRO”. The fedgov infiltrates all social and cultural segments of America’s population.  If you want to see the self-appointed leaders currently at the Bundy ranch, you will have to search for a video put out to smear Oath Keepers.  The video of a circle of men denouncing Oath Keepers and threatening Oath Keepers with being shot in the back as “deserters”, and accusing Oath Keepers of stealing from the Bundy family, will give you the true insight into the steroidal psycho-pathic dreamwish of little boys playing “Army” in the fields near the house forty and fifty years ago. If just one of those self appointed leaders’ personal scenarios, isolated into private little spheres of command and control as they may be, could be synthesized and condensed for distribution to the vast majority of thinking Americans – if these aberrations were not so sad, they would be funny, and I might have more to say to and about the mental states possessed by such “patriots” in coming times.  We merely support the idea of reinstating the Constitutional Militia of the several States as revealed by Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr.

This much is certain: The federal government has many agencies and contracting private-sector corps to which it can send requests for certain clandestine or covert actions in the public sector. All Oath Keepers officers are aware of that, and we stand strongly and without fear, to oppose the tyranny which has gripped our nation. In the face of personal hardship, discomfort, and deep-seated concerns about personal safety, our officers, myself included, actually live the fight for liberty every day. We have noticed that the more successful our mission becomes, the more flak is thrown at us. My comment today is, “When we look about, who today is tossing slings and arrows at Oath Keepers? To see who is trying to destroy Oath Keepers, we see those who make wild accusations, unfounded charges, and imaginary scenaric situations glossed over by their berserk egoism which presupposes that the rest of the world can’s see their motivation and their jealousy and their fear.

And Sheriff Mack sends me this word regarding the continuing stream of Sheriffs who will come to the ranch to stand with the Bundys:

I spoke with SR yesterday. There were no wounded. Bundys are still happy with all help. Yes, we are still
sending in Sheriffs. Christopher will be there tomorrow.
- Sheriff Mack to Elias Alias April 28 2014

Oath Keepers, with the cooperation of Paul Stramer of Montana, placed a comms van in action during our last week at the Ranch. Oath Keepers will keep abreast of the situations at the Bundy Ranch and respond as needed in coming times, but for the moment we are withdrawn from the Ranch.

We wish to remind all Oath Keepers that the Cliven Bundy stand against Federal land ownership and/or federal land management is a truly serious and grave causes and all patriots should be supportive of that stand. The Bundy family is remarkably traditional and represent a very large segment of a silent America which may even now be stirring into awareness of federal sins, many of them long-standing. We encourage everyone who can to send material support directly to the Bundys. Supplies and gifts, letters and checks, should be mailed or delivered to -

Cliven and Carol Bundy * 7175 Gold Butte Rd * Bunkerville, NV 89007

Salute!

Elias Alias, editor, Oath Keepers

Yours truly giving the Oath at the Bundy Ranch April 19 2014

Yours truly giving the Oath at the Bundy Ranch April 19 2014

Note: This article may be updated at any time. Most recent update is May 06 2014. Edited by Elias Alias and Stewart Rhodes.




SUPPORT OUR BILLBOARD CAMPAIGN
Placing billboards outside of military bases to remind service members of their oath


Please donate and support Oath Keepers mission, every little bit helps!



 Read More Posts

Comments posted belong to the commenter alone, and are not endorsed by Oath Keepers or the administrators for this site. We will remove offensive, racist, or threatening comments.

113 Responses to “Bundy Ranch Advisory for April 29 2014_Updated May 06 2014”

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 … 12 » Show All

  1. 1
    sons of liberty riders Says:

    Sons of Liberty Riders stands with Oathkeepers.

    [Editor's Note: SOLR, Thank You! You've got our best Salute and our support! Thanks Brothers,
    Salute!
    Elias Alias, editor, and member, Montana chapter of SOLR.]

  2. 2
    Leanne Says:

    That’s the way it’s DONE!

  3. 3
    Franz Glaus Says:

    Thanks for the update. Salute!

  4. 4
    WolfK4GHL Says:

    Thank you for the info… there has been a LOT of speculation going on as seen by the threads in Scuttlebutt and elsewhere on the net.

    This type of op shows the need for a Public Information Officer and how they need to be sending out at least daily updates to keep folks informed on both needs as well as the situation on the ground.

    Peace and Fair Journeys

  5. 5
    Mulle Noorlun Says:

    Thank you.

  6. 6
    Jay Stang Says:

    Go Charlie Daniels..I mean Elias!

    Patience will reward everyone clamoring for answers. I hope this will be regarded as a good start to informing every member of the goings on at the ranch, but also our determined adversary.

  7. 7
    conrad muise Says:

    I have read and understood sir, God Bless you Elias Alias.

  8. 8
    Toby Says:

    Sounds like the Oath Keepers were at the ranch for p.r. reasons. As soon as you thought there was a possible attack you left? As a civilian I have had respect for and followed the Oath Keepers for years. I make less then $25k a year and sent a donation for your support of the Bundy Ranch. I don’t blame the militia. This is a serious situation where someones life might depend on the guy next to them. Wait, the guy next to them just left because there might be an attack coming. Again, I am just a civilian but that sounds like a deserter to me.

    If you are going to talk the talk, you need to walk the walk. Otherwise, pack up and go home to your wives and girlfriends.

  9. 9
    jay nowman Says:

    What i am seeing demonstrates a major oversight in the security structure. THE THREE have accused the Oathkeepers of desertion and banned them from the compound.(fact) The possibility exists that what i am saying is true. (fact) The possibility exists that the oathkeepers may have only intended to leave the compound temporarily for a very valid reason. (fact) The possibility exists that THE THREE have used the temporary absence as an opportunity to create a permanent division in the forces. (fact) The result of this scenario WOULD be a division of the forces (fact) The result of what was done IS a division of the forces (fact). Division of the forces works to the gov’t advantage… (fact). Given all of the above, the rest of the militia should remove them as a matter of protocol (as much as i hate that word) anyway. Good security never leaves people in the same place too long lest they become too comfortable, lax, or really are the enemy. So there IS a valid reason for them to be relieved of command that could bring it up for a vote. In fact, it’s a very good reason for them to voluntarily participate in “changing of the guard”. The defining question is- will they ALLOW it to come up for a vote. >>> If they dont – they are feds! Everyone should look a little closer at anyone who opposes raising the issue to a vote.

  10. 10
    Rick Morrow Says:

    Ive been there trying to send this very same message to everyone i can but in a shortened version. LoL thanks Elias.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 … 12 » Show All

Leave a Reply

© 2012 www.oathkeepers.org | Oath Keepers Corp Address: 5130 S. Fort Apache Rd - Las Vegas, NV 89148