March 1st, 2014

Official CT State Police Spokesman Says That State Police Would Participate In Door To Door Gun Confiscations

Lt Vance

This article comes from

The State of Connecticut says that all citizens must register rifles and high capacity magazines, or be charged will a felony. As many as 100,000 people could face heavily armed police smashing down their doors and be charged with a felony.

The legislature of CT says that a registration is needed so they can know where the guns are. Yet at the same time, they are sending threatening letters to gun owners. So they already have records of who has purchased certain guns. The fact is, that the CT legislature fully intends to confiscate hundreds of thousands of firearms anyway. The registration process will simply make it easier to confiscate, because you acknowledge that you still own a firearm that the state already suspects that you own.

CT State Police Spokesman Lt. Vance says that state police would comply with an order from the state to conduct door to door gun confiscations.

Experts claim that as many as 350,000 people are in violation of the law, and over 100,000 of those people could face felony charges. That means over 3.6% of the entire adult population of Connecticut has been transformed into a felon by the new registration law. Roughly one in twenty Connecticut homes could have their doors smashed in by heavily armed law enforcement seeking to confiscate firearms.

CT State Police Spokesman Lt. Vance can be reached at at (860) 685-8290.

Placing billboards outside of military bases to remind service members of their oath

Please donate and support Oath Keepers mission, every little bit helps!

 Read More Posts

Comments posted belong to the commenter alone, and are not endorsed by Oath Keepers or the administrators for this site. We will remove offensive, racist, or threatening comments.

29 Responses to “Official CT State Police Spokesman Says That State Police Would Participate In Door To Door Gun Confiscations”

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All

  1. 1
    Charlie BROWN Says:

    IT’S TIME!!!

  2. 2
    Charlie BROWN Says:

    I am not sure, but I think this is going to be the litmus test for the rest of the nation. If CT. gun owners DO NOT stand up for their 2nd amendment rights and fight (Boy I hate the sound of that) then the rest of the country will soon follow. On the other hand if they do stand together and fight, this will be the beginning of the 2nd Revolution. Hey lets face it, we knew it was going to happen, and as Oath Keepers says, “Not on our watch”. Very scary situation, but it looks like it is our turn. Roll over and die or stand and fight. I hope “and I hate war”, but I hope that if it comes to door smashing that CT. will stand up and neighboring states will assist and that the military will stand down or join the patriots. Sad, very sad situation that our beloved country has come to this.

  3. 3
    Howard Nicholson Says:

    There is going to be lots of death so needlessly because of the illegal attacking private homes and they have the God given rights of self protection. These are nothing more than high priced criminals and should be stopped. If found breaking into homes the home owner needs to shoot first and ask questions later, maybe if few hundred policemen killed the rest will run. This is highly immoral and legalized criminals at work. Many homeowners will be slaughtered needlessly and the murderous police criminals go scott free with rewards and pay raises. This is the procedure going on for several years. The people of that state and all states must make all politicians and so called public servants be held responsible for every crime against the general public. If not in this life, then God will render righteous judgment on all these evil men and women who do this evil. There is nothing right about our evil government so called leaders and bureaucrats and all will face serious judgment. Their reward they will not like, saw the state police spokesman and his mumbo jumbo knowing he was lying and showed up in his speaking so as to confuse his message, a sign of a lying man.

  4. 4
    Deborah Says:

    Six minute live footage of the 1932-33 veterans on DC for Bonus as promised in 1917. Patton, MacArthur, infantry men actually attack, injure and kill these men after the senate rejects their request.

  5. 5
    csaaphill Says:

    I say keep watch CT and when they do many armed citizens come to their aid. to keep the high road let them shoot first then open fire!

  6. 6
    Cal Says:

    “The State of Connecticut says that all citizens must register rifles and high capacity magazines, or be charged will a felony.”

    Let’s call it what it really is, an ATTACK ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE by TRAITORS to the USA. Yes, TRAITORS.

    So what is a “traitor” or “treason” under our LEGITIMATE government, under our (LAWFUL, in PURSUANCE THEREOF THE US CONSTITUTION) laws?

    US Constitution: that “treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort: and that no person shall be convicted of treason, unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court”.

    Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 1856- TREASON, criminal law. “This word imports a betraying, treachery, or breach of allegiance. 4 Bl. Com. 75.”

    Black’s Law 6th Edition – “A breach of allegiance to one’s government, usually committed through levying of war against such government or by giving aid or comfort to the enemy.”
    [Note: The word, "usually" above is obviously used due to the fact that the current interpretation being used in U.S. jurisprudence does not coincide with traditional definitions, it excludes other specie of treason such as "constructive treason", traitorous conspiracies and insurrections meant to alter the established law, or to render it ineffectual. All of which are mentioned in the founding documents.]

    Tucker’s Blackstone Vol. 1 Appendix Note B [Section 3] 1803 – “If in a limited government the public functionaries exceed the limits which the constitution prescribes to their powers, every such act is an act of usurpation in the government, and, as such, treason against the sovereignty of the people.”

    ( )
    Tucker’s Blackstone Volume 1 — Appendix Note B [Section 3 — Of the several forms of government]
    If the constitution be founded upon the previous act of the people (the creation of the U.S. Constitution), the government is limited. If it have any other foundation, it is merely constructive, and the government arrogates to itself the sole right of making such a construction of it, as may suit with its own views, designs, and interests: and when this right can be successfully exercised, the government becomes absolute and despotic. In like manner, if in a limited government the public functionaries exceed the limits which the constitution prescribes to their powers, every such act is an act of usurpation in the government, and, as such, TREASON against the sovereignty of the people, which is thus endeavored to be subverted, and transferred to the usurpers.
    Inseparably connected with this distinction between limited and unlimited governments, is the responsibility of the public functionaries, and the want of such responsibility. Every delegated authority implies a trust; responsibility follows as the shadow does its substance. But where there is no responsibility, authority is no longer a trust, but an act of usurpation. And every act of usurpation is either an act of TREASON, or an act of WARFARE.
    In case of treason … the power of pardon is taken away from the governor by the act of 1794, c. 168, [66] nor can the executive now remit any fine or amercement assessed by a jury, or imposed by any court of record, court martial, or other power or authority authorized to assess or impose the same. [67]

    C. U. S. Art. 3. Sec. 3. The act of 1 Cong. 2 Sess. c. 9. accordingly declares, that the punishment shall be death, by hanging; and that no conviction or judgment for treason, shall work any forfeiture of estate.

    From the founding documents showing that:
    1. The Constitution of the United States IS the “Supreme Law of the Land” and any law that strays outside the boundaries enumerated in it are undeniably unconstitutional (not in Pursuance thereof it).
    2. The undeniable fact that ANY acts passed by Congress or by State legislatures which do not conform to the Constitution of the United States have been found by the Supreme Court to be “null and void and have no effect”.
    3. Enacting unconstitutional laws by legislators clearly violate their Oath to “SUPPORT AND DEFEND the Constitution of the United States”.
    4. That ANY AND all violations of this Oath by an elected official/public officer must therefore be construed as a “Treasonable Act.”

    Constitution U. S. Art. 2, 3: Any US President is the chief magistrate, but not the sole magistrate of the nation. He may nominate, but cannot make permanent appointments to office without the concurrence of the senate (except in certain listed instances). Many of those nominated and commissioned are not responsible to him, nor are they removable by him; but are responsible only to the people, and to the law, and removable only upon impeachment by their representatives, and upon conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

    Judge Tucker (regarding whether it was necessary for someone to have weapons or implements of war to constitute treason): “…If the party be in a condition to execute the purposed treason without the usual implements of war, I can perceive no reason for requiring those implements in order to constitute the crime.”

    United States v. Hoxie – 26 Fed. Cas. 397, no. 15,407 C.C.D.Vt.: “Treason, not only holds a conspicuous, and generally the first place in every catalogue of crimes, but is almost universally punished with death. Government is so high a blessing, and its preservation and support are so essential to the welfare of every member of the body politic, that to attempt its subversion, has ever been regarded a most aggravated offence.”

    Tucker’s Blackstone Vol I – Appendix A: “This constitution” is “the supreme law of the land.” This supreme law “all judicial officers of the United States are bound, by oath or affirmation, to support.”
    Tucker’s Blackstone Vol I – Appendix A [91] 20. … in America, the Constitutions, both of the individual States, and of the federal Government, being the acts of the people, and not of the Government, and the powers of Government being by those Constitutions, respectively, distributed into three distinct, and coordinate, branches; viz: the legislature, the executive, and the judiciary; all which are equally bound by Duty to their Constituents, the people; and by Oath, also, to support the Constitution; it follows, as has been already shewn [Appendix, Note A.] that the legislature can possess, no power, or obligation over the other Branches of Government, in any case, where the principles of the Constitution, may be in any degree infringed by an acquiescence under the authority of the legislative department… That all acts of the Congress of the United States, impairing, infringing or violating the principles of the federal Constitution; and all acts of the legislature of this Commonwealth, which violate, infringe or impair the same, or any law of the United States made pursuant to the powers granted to the Congress by the federal Constitution, or any Treaty made under the authority of the United States, or the Bill of Rights, and Constitution of this Commonwealth, are not binding upon any other branch of the federal or State-government: and any Citizen of the Commonwealth, who may be aggrieved by any such unconstitutional Act, hath an undoubted right to redress, by application to the judicial Courts of the State, or of the United States according to the nature of the case.”

    Tucker’s Blackstone Commentaries 1:App. 151–53, 378–79, 412–13, 416–17, 418–26, 428–33; 5:App. 3—10: “The people are not only not bound by them, but the several departments and officers of the governments, both federal, and state, are bound by oath to oppose them; for, being bound by oath to support the constitution, they must violate that oath, whenever they give their sanction, by obedience, or otherwise, to any unconstitutional act of any department of the government.”

    (On Judges) 1 Hayw. 28 N.C.: “The judges of the land are a branch of the government, and are to administer the constitutional laws, not such as are repugnant to the Constitution. It is their duty to resist an unconstitutional act. In fact, such an act made by the General Assembly, who are deputed only to make laws in conformity to the Constitution, and within the limits it prescribes, is not any law at all. Whenever the Assembly exceeds the limits of the Constitution, they act without authority, and then their acts are no more binding than the acts of any other assembled body.”

    “No man is to be deprived of his property or rights, but according to the law of the land, or the common law.”

    What is meant by the expression “levying war”? It means “insurrections” in order to alter the established law, or to render it ineffectual; “insurrections” to accomplish these ends, “by executive, legislative or judicial acts”, or by numbers and an open and armed force, are a levying of war against the United States.
    By whom may the war be levied? Those who owe obedience to the US Constitution and each state Constitution, who receive protection from it. Against whom must it be levied? It must be levied against the United States; against the Sovereignty of the People. Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution 3:§§ 1292, 1294–96, 1791–94, 1796 – 1833

    Thomas Jefferson: “…I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground: That ‘all powers not delegated to the United States, by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States or to the people.’ [10th amendment.] To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawn around the powers of Congress, is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible of any definition.” (Except treason!)

    Tucker’s Blackstone Volume I Chapter 10 Section 2 (Regarding the Oath)
    The members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, and all members of congress shall be bound by oath or affirmation to support the constitution of the United States. Constitution U. S. Art. 6, which oath must be taken by all persons, chosen or appointed after the first day of August, 1789, before they proceed to execute the duties of their office. Laws. U. S. 1 Cong. 1 Sess. c. I.

    The formal profession, therefore, or oath of subjection, is nothing more than a declaration in words of what was before implied in law. Which occasions Sir Edward Coke very justly to observe, that “all subjects are equally bounden to their allegiance, as if they had taken the oath; because it is written by the finger of the law in their hearts, and the taking of the corporal oath is but an outward declaration of the same.”

    The sanction of an oath, it is true, in case of violation of duty, makes the guilt still more accumulated, by the superaddition of perjury to treason…”

    For example: “Dare Call It Treason”, Edwin Vieira, Jr.
    “Congress’s power and duty “to provide for arming the Militia” cannot include a self-contradictory license “to provide for disarming the Militia”. And, just as obviously, no other powers of Congress – such as the powers “to lay and collect Taxes” and “to regulate Commerce”, the two legalistic props usually invoked for “gun control” – can interfere with, let alone negate, the power “to provide for arming the Militia”, because:
    (i) All constitutional powers are “of equal dignity” in all respects, such that none may ever be “enforced as to nullify or substantially impair [any] other”;
    (ii) The Militia are State governmental institutions – as the Constitution describes them, “the Militia of the several States” – not any form of Commerce”; and
    (iii) The General Government cannot impose a tax on any State, any State governmental institution, or the production, acquisition, possession, or use of any equipment necessary for the proper functioning thereof.

    The purpose and inevitable effect of “gun control” today is not:
    – To secure the existence of “well regulated Militia”, or
    – To provide “Arms” of any kind to “the people”, or
    – To train “the people” in the safe and effective use of firearms and related equipment, or
    – To regulate the use of firearms so as to minimize negligent, reckless, or criminal behavior while still maximizing the freedom of individuals to possess and employ firearms for Militia service and all other legitimate purposes

    Blackstone’s principle that “the highest civil crime… ought… to be the most precisely ascertained” the Constitution duly applied in its narrow definition of “Treason”: namely, “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort”.

    This definition contains an important amendment of Blackstone’s teachings: namely, that, there being no King in America (and under the Constitution no possibility of enthroning one22), the victims of “Treason” are “the United States” taken collectively, as the phrase “in levying War against them, or in adhering to their enemies” evidences.

    In keeping with Blackstone’s definition, as well as the common understanding at the time, “Treason” must always remain both in principle and practice a breach of allegiance to “the sovereign”. “In general, treason is the offense of attempting to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance”. Significantly, allegiance is not owed to “the government of the state”, which is no more than an instrumentality of “the state”, but instead to “the state” herself. In America under the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, WE THE PEOPLE have rightfully asserted and retained for themselves the position of the sole sovereigns.

    Perforce of the Declaration, “the good People of the American Colonies”, and no one else, took upon themselves and exercised sovereignty by: “dissolving the political bands which had connected them with Great Britain; “assuming among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitled them”; and exercising their “Right… to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them… seemed most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness”. Then, as it’s Preamble recites, “WE THE PEOPLE of the United States… did ordain and establish the Constitution”, by themselves and under their own authority.”

    That is, under the aegis of those “Laws” “the People” alone are the sovereigns, the “Form of Government” their creation, and public officials within that “Form of Government” subjects who necessarily owe allegiance to “the People”.

    The Constitution makes clear that none of “the several States” that make up “the United States” is to be confounded with her government. For it mandates that “the United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government”. This proves that a “State” is distinct from “a Republican Form of Government”. “A Republican Form of Government” is merely an establishment located within and dedicated to the service of a “State”.

    So, inasmuch as WE THE PEOPLE themselves are the true and only sovereigns in America – and inasmuch as WE THE PEOPLE alone are real beings physically, and the real parties in interest in the premises legally, “the several States” and “the United States” being no more than political and legal fictions – then “Treason against the United States” must entail “Treason against WE THE PEOPLE who comprise the United States”; “levying War against the United States” must always amount to “levying War against the PEOPLE”; and “levying War against the PEOPLE” must always amount to “levying War against the United States”.

    To be sure, although “‘some actual force or violence must be used, in pursuance of… a design to levy war’”, “‘it is altogether immaterial, whether the force used is sufficient to effectuate the object; any force connected with the intention will constitute the crime of levying war’”. Moreover, “levying War” can embrace more than simply the appearance of men under arms and actual fighting. For example, “if… the government established by the United States… is to be revolutionized by force, although merely as a step to, or a means of executing some greater projects, the design is unquestionably treasonable, and any assemblage of men for that purpose would amount to a levying of war”. Or “if… the subversion of the government of the United States… were a means clearly and necessarily, to be employed, if such means formed a substantive part of the plan, the assemblage of a body of men to effect it, would be levying war against the United States”.

    Therefore, any attack upon “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” through “gun control” enforced by “an assembly of armed men” is an attack upon “a free State”, upon popular self-government, upon popular sovereignty, and in the final analysis upon WE THE PEOPLE themselves. For that reason, “gun control” is the very worst manifestation of “Treason” imaginable, because it paves the way for every other sort of oppression that psychopathic “rulers” are capable of perpetrating…

    That is what treason is.

  7. 7
    Ron T Says:

    This is just a ploy by the government to create 100,000 felons that will never be allowed to own a gun again simply by not complying with the law. People of this great liberal state now see the consequences of electing progressive officials. The Northeast states are all liberal states and they start all the liberal agendas there first to set precedence where the progressive judges are on there side. They need to go after the law makers first to change the way the system works. Remove the judges and politicians responsible for these unconstitutional laws and don’t allow progressives in power. This law is planned and will work as they want if people fall for this trap. The police are bound to enforce the laws that were created by the people you elected. Go after the root of the problem and don’t kill the messenger.

  8. 8
    Glen Says:

    It was all disturbing but “seriously” did he really say that?? he is the master ?? talk about being un-American unpatriotic he should be ashamed of himself.

  9. 9
    Neil Wampler Says:

    Well Cal, That was the longest sermon to the choir I’ve ever read.Belive it or not, most of us have educated ourselves and have a firm grounding in the principles you elucidate.I suggest that the situation in Ct. is past the point of scholarly debate and is now a matter of decision by the citizens there.I am sure Lt. Vance will mouth the usual moral bankrupcy “I don’t make the law, I just enforce it”. You could ask him if there is any law he would refuse to enforce, and you can do so by calling him……Lt. J Paul Vance, (860)685 8290

  10. 10
    Deborah Says:

    A small town mayor published in a local small town of about 24k people said since NDAA passed, this was all last December, that people now have to prove they are out walking their dog. Four months later the police asked my daughters friend’s mom while she was in the yard why there was a truck in their drive way with two people sitting it. My kids truck! I told her what was going on, but she does not listen. She is a gov’t employee assisting with taking kids that really are abused and neglected. So gov’t is great and trains her well and all the retirement she gets, I said your own money they pulled from her check, like you can’t do it yourself. My work has been cut out for me since her birth. lol

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All

Leave a Reply

© 2012 | Oath Keepers Corp Address: 5130 S. Fort Apache Rd - Las Vegas, NV 89148