February 16th, 2013

A Letter From Putnam County, Georgia, Sheriff Howard Sills

Sheriff Sills

This is a letter from Putnam County, Georgia Sheriff Howard Sills to US Senator Saxby Chambliss. It was taken from the Putnam County Sheriff’s website. – Shorty Dawkins Associate Editor

Dear Senator Chambliss,

I write you today at a point in my life where I have grave concerns about the future of our nation.  Come this April, I will begin my 40th year in the field of public safety.  I have been very fortunate in my career to have worked in almost every aspect of law enforcement, both in rural and urban areas, along with a stint in corporate security for one of the largest banks in the country.  I have just been reelected to my fifth term of office, and I serve as the Director of my county’s Emergency Management Agency.  I am also the President of the Georgia Sheriffs’ Association, but this letter is written from me individually as the Sheriff of Putnam County and in my capacity as an American citizen.

The recent incident where children and staff were murdered by a deranged individual at the school in Newtown, Connecticut and the many similar incidents that have occurred in the past are horrific tragedies, and they most assuredly warrant measures and policies to prevent such acts in the future.  While I may have never had personal experience with an incident of mass murder, I have unfortunately responded to and investigated untold numbers of assaults and murders during my long career.  All of those incidents were also tragic and often senseless, but I know that firearms were not the cause of these crimes.

Erroneously, the national media immediately focused on guns as the cause of the crimes at Sandy Hook.  In addition, from much of what I have heard and read, it appears Congress seems to be going in that same direction.  This is what precipitated my fears for the country.  In my county, and in every community where I have served as a police officer, I have found the most patriotic responsible citizens are those who own firearms.  These people are the first to stand at attention and pledge allegiance to our flag, the first to bow their heads in prayer, the first to pay their taxes, and the first in line to vote on Election Day.  They know the 2nd Amendment of our Constitution, and they know that their right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed upon.

I expect my citizens to defend themselves from harm until we arrive on the scene, and I have a sense of comfort in knowing the vast majority of them are well armed and have the ability to protect themselves.  I also find great solace in the fact that they have the ability to come to the aid of me and my deputies should some circumstance warrant it.

It is very clear to me that the public has little faith in most of its elected officials at the present time.  Polls related to confidence in Congress glaringly reflect this, and I believe the same attitude trickles down even to the local level.  Should Congress enact laws that ban, or even require the registration of firearms, it WILL NOT keep guns out of the hands of criminals.  The end result of such legislation will make criminals out of our best citizens, as I am absolutely certain that the vast majority of Georgians WILL NOT surrender any of their firearms, magazines, or ammunition, nor will they comply with any law that mandates they register their weapons with any entity of government.

The functionality of our government is completely dependent upon the majority voluntarily abiding by the law.  It is my greatest fear that legislation banning or requiring the registration of guns the public can now legally posses will force our best citizens to a precipice where they will turn their backs to the law.  Beyond that point, there will only be a slippery slope where only more laws will be ignored and not complied with.

I find it absolutely incredulous that there seems to be little discussion about the real issues that are at the root of people who commit crimes with firearms.  Although a general decline in morality coupled with an insatiable appetite for illicit drugs are contributing factors, I believe the primary causal components of most violent crimes are a combination of mental health issues and our failure to prosecute, punish, and keep recidivist criminals in confinement.

When it comes to mentally deranged people, the State of Georgia has simply abandoned its responsibility to protect them or the public they endanger.  I can explain the mental health problem in three sentences.  When I went away to college some forty years ago there were about 4 and a half million people living in Georgia and there were 17,000 people institutionalized at Central State Hospital in Milledgeville.  Today there are 10 million people in Georgia and there is virtually no one confined in Central State.  The sheriffs of Georgia have evolved into being the largest providers of mental health services in the state as a significant proportion of the inmates in our jails suffer from a myriad of mental problems.  This shouldn’t be our duty, and it is something we are not equipped nor funded for.

As for the failure to appropriately deal with recidivist criminals, I will offer you just a few recent examples.  On December 17, 2012 a young Clayton County Police Officer named Sean Callahan was murdered in the line of duty as he responded to a domestic disturbance call.  Tremaine Lebis, the hoodlum who murdered Officer Callahan, was out of prison on parole at the time of the crime.  He, of course, had several weapons in his possession (including a so-called dreaded “Assault Rifle”) and had been released from prison early after being convicted of Aggravated Assault in Gwinnett County in 1992 where he brutally shot a man in the head with a handgun.  He got 20 years to serve for that crime and escaped while in a prison in Baldwin County in 1995.  He got three more years for the Escape charge in Baldwin and was paroled in May 2008.  He was to remain under supervision of Parole until April 2016.

Lebis was arrested, yet again, in Henry County for Possession of a Firearm by a Convicted Felon and some other charge in April 2011.  He pleaded guilty to Possession of a Firearm by a Convicted Felon and False Report of a Crime in November 2011.  I don’t know what kind of sentence he received for that conviction, but the Clayton News Daily said he was given credit for time served since May 26, 2011.  Nonetheless, Lebis was released on parole yet again on May 21, 2012.  His next appearance at the rodeo of crime resulted in the murder of Officer Callahan.  If Lebis had not been released on parole in May 2008, Officer Callahan would still be alive.  If Lebis had not been released on parole AGAIN in May 2012, Officer Callahan would still be alive.  It was already a violation of both state and federal law for Lebis to possess any type of firearm long before he murdered Officer Callahan.

Seven days after the murder of Officer Callahan, an individual named William Spengler shot four firefighters, murdering two of them, in Webster, New York.  It now appears he may have also murdered his sister and been responsible for burning seven houses in his neighborhood.  He, too, was a convicted felon and had previously served a whopping 17 years in prison for beating his own grandmother to death with a hammer.  Again, it was already a violation of both state and federal law for Spengler to possess any type of firearm when he shot and killed the firefighters.

Three days ago Atlanta Police Officer Reggie Robinson was shot in the face while he investigated a complaint regarding illicit drug dealing.  The individual who shot him was 20 year old Frank Emmitt Nance.  Nance had a pending case of Battery against him from an arrest in April 2012 and was also on probation after being convicted of Aggravated Assault, Terroristic Threats, and Possession of a Firearm by a Convicted Felon in Fulton County on January 10, 2012.  Nance had been released from state prison on March 28, 2011 after completing an arduous 8 months of incarceration from a previous conviction for Burglary, Theft by Taking, and, of course, yet another count of Possession of a Firearm by a Convicted Felon. Yet again, it was already a violation of both state and federal law for Nance to possess any type of firearm when he shot Officer Robinson.

You might think that the three aforementioned examples are exceptions, but I must unfortunately tell you that similar cases are routine and prolific all over Georgia and throughout the nation.  The media very rarely even makes mention of a criminal’s previous arrest record.  Last year our General Assembly rammed through legislation that they called “Criminal Justice Reform”.  In reality it was nothing more than a statutory degradation of morality, as its primary component did nothing more than change a litany of felony crimes, making them misdemeanors and shifting the burden of cost from the state government back to the counties.

Governor Deal touted that it was simply too expensive to keep criminals in prison because we were mad at them.  I believe we should be nothing less than furious with recidivist criminals.  The emotional and financial expenses that victims and others are left with in the wake of their incessant pernicious voyages far exceeds the cost of keeping the savages caged and away from society.

Senator, we have a plethora of laws already in existence that can effectively deal with the unlawful possession and use of firearms of any kind by criminals.  I would support any legislation that mandated a sure, swift, and severe penalty for any criminal possession and use of a gun, but I will not support, aid, enforce, nor condone, any effort or legislation that will infringe upon the right of a law abiding citizen’s right to bear firearms.  You took the same oath as I did, and it was to support and defend our Constitution. I implore you to do so at this crucial point in time.


Howard R. Sills


Placing billboards outside of military bases to remind service members of their oath

Please donate and support Oath Keepers mission, every little bit helps!

 Read More Posts

Comments posted belong to the commenter alone, and are not endorsed by Oath Keepers or the administrators for this site. We will remove offensive, racist, or threatening comments.

4 Responses to “A Letter From Putnam County, Georgia, Sheriff Howard Sills”

  1. 1
    Darin Bowers Says:

    Very well said Sheriff Sills. I salute you sir. Common sense seems to just bounce right off their heads. Willful ignorance is no excuse for breaking the law, and what they are attempting to do is AGAINST THE LAW. Anyone who tries to infringe on our rights to firearms needs to be arrested. This is not about safety with them, this is about control, they want to control us. PERIOD. That is obviously the opposite of freedom. We will not be controlled and regulated, especially not by a bunch of willfully ignorant, sold out, traitorous politicians. April 19th…..

  2. 2
    Cal Says:

    Awesome letter Sheriff Sills! God Bless you and keep you and yours, and those who stand with you safe!

    Thank you for standing up for our legitimate government. Unfortunately many are saying they are and will keep the lawfully required and legally binding oath (Feinstein, for example) yet it is all lies.

    There is not one lawful Sheriff, Governor, lawyer, etc who will take the step to stop criminals who are also “representatives”. They can say that they did not realize that not keeping the lawfully required and legally binding oath is a criminal offense, but not that they did not realize that is is a civil offense because the US Constitution IS the supreme law of THIS land and it makes that clear.

    It is also hard for them to make the argument that since it is a LAWFUL and LEGALLY binding REQUIREMENT to get into, and TO BE ABLE to LAWFULLY KEEP, an office or position within the federal and state governments, all law enforcement agencies, all military, and for all federal employees.

    But what it seems that they do not realize is that not taking, or keeping the lawfully required Oath is also a criminal offense requiring removal from office and prosecution.

    Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order that further defines the law for purposes of enforcement.

    5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office.

    5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 AND HAVE NOT OR WILL NOT VIOLATE THAT OATH OF OFFICE DURING THEIR TENURE OF OFFICE as defined by the third part of the law,

    5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense for anyone employed in the United States Government to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”.

    18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath of office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1) REMOVAL FROM OFFICE AND; (2) confinement or a fine.

    The definition of “advocate” is further specified in Executive Order 10450 which for the purposes of enforcement supplements 5 U.S.C. 7311.

    Executive Order 10450 provision specifies it is a violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311 FOR ANY PERSON TAKIG THE OATH OF OFFICE TO ADVOCATE “THE ALTERATION… OF THE FORM OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES BY UNCONSTITUTIONAL MEANS.” (caps are mine for emphasis)

    Our form of government is defined by the Constitution of the United States; and according to Executive Order 10450 plus 5 U.S. 7311 ANY ACT TAKEN BY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS WHO HAVE TAKEN THE OATH OF OFFICE PRESCRIBED BY 5 U.S.C. 3331 WHICH ALTERS THE FORM OF GOVERNMENT OTHER THEN BY AMENDMENT, IS A CRIMINAL VIOLATION OF 5 U.S.C. 7311.

    Yet it seems that there is no way to enforce any of these laws against any “political” office – be it state, or federal. WHY NOT? (to all those legal ‘eagles’ out there)


    I know here in California they refuse to do anything to enforce those (and other) laws. Does this have to do with “contempt” of the laws if it applies to them or to those in political offices?

  3. 3
    Z00mer11 Says:

    I too am sorrowful for the loss of life by criminals. However, please go back to the US Constitution, 2nd Ammendment. What part of shall not be infringed do people NOT understand? By what authority can Congress write a statute that overrides the Constitution? Where do law enforcement peronnel set themselves up as arbiters of what the Constitution says? Apply what the whole Constitution says, not just the sections you want.

  4. 4
    Jane Scroggins Says:

    Very well said!!! Maybe you should run for Governor! We certainly need a candidate with some sense!!

Leave a Reply

© 2012 www.oathkeepers.org | Oath Keepers Corp Address: 5130 S. Fort Apache Rd - Las Vegas, NV 89148