February 9th, 2013

Accused Cop Killer Is For Gun Control

Loves Obama, hates the NRA, worships Biden. Media blacks out much of his “manifesto”.




The Blaze has a very interesting article questioning *why* news media has censored major parts of the manifesto written by the ex-LAPD cop killer. Please read entire article there -


Questions arise instantly – Could it be that this guy is a “Left-wing Gun Nut”, a “Violent Left Wing Extremist”?  Thanks to The Blaze we can learn about LAPD policy in asking news media to remove parts of the man’s “manifesto” for political purposes.


Why Did Some Local Media Edit Out Anti-NRA, Pro-Obama Portions of Accused Cop-Killer’s Supposed Manifsto?

Feb. 7, 2013 3:43pm * Madeleine Morgenstern

The supposed manifesto of a fired Los Angeles police officer being sought in several slayings contained praise for President Barack Obama and gun control and disdain for the National Rifle Association in portions apparently redacted at the request of the LAPD.

L.A. Fox affiliate KTTV-TV published a portion of Christopher Dorner’s writing that left out his political views. Other local news outlets including KTLA-TV and KFI AM 640 did the same.

KTTV did originally publish a full version but removed it from their website after a request from police, a spokesman told BuzzFeed. Reached for comment, a KTTV assistant news director told TheBlaze only that, “The LAPD put out a request that a lot of the stuff be redacted.”

An LAPD spokeswoman refused to comment to TheBlaze about the request, saying the department would have nothing to say on the matter until Dorner was captured.

Below are portions of the redacted version of the manifesto. The entire thing is available at Gawker (content warning — strong language):

On Obama:

You disrespect the office of the POTUS/Presidency and Commander in Chief. You call him Kenyan, mongroid, halfrican, muslim, and FBHO when in essence you are to address him as simply, President. The same as you did to President George W. Bush and all those in the highest ranking position of our land before him. Just as I always have. You question his birth certificate, his educational and professional accomplishments, and his judeo-christian beliefs. You make disparaging remarks about his dead parents. You never questioned the fact that his former opponent, the honorable Senator John McCain, was not born in the CONUS or that Bush had a C average in his undergrad. Electoral Candidates children (Romney) state they want to punch the president in the face during debates with no formal repercussions. No one even questioned the fact that the son just made a criminal threat toward the President. You call his wife a Wookie. Off the record, I love your new bangs, Mrs. Obama.

On Vice President Biden:

Mr. Vice President, do your due diligence when formulating a concise and permanent national AWB plan. Future generations of Americans depend on your plan and advisement to the president. I’ve always been a fan of yours and consider you one of the few genuine and charismatic politicians. Damn, sounds like an oxymoron calling you an honest politician. It’s the truth.

On former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton:

Hillary Clinton. You’ll make one hell of a president in 2016. Much like your husband, Bill, you will be one of the greatest. Look at Castro in San Antonio as a running mate or possible secretary of state. He’s (good people) and I have faith and confidence in him. Look after Bill. He was always my favorite President. Chelsea grew up to be one hell of an attractive woman. No disrespect to her husband.

On LaPierre:

Wayne LaPierre, President of the NRA, you’re a vile and inhumane piece of sh-t. You never even showed 30 seconds of empathy for the children, teachers, and families of Sandy Hook. You deflected any type of blame/responsibility and directed it toward the influence of movies and the media. You are a failure of a human being. May all of your immediate and distant family die horrific deaths in front of you.


Read entire article with embedded links:



Placing billboards outside of military bases to remind service members of their oath

Please donate and support Oath Keepers mission, every little bit helps!

 Read More Posts

Comments posted belong to the commenter alone, and are not endorsed by Oath Keepers or the administrators for this site. We will remove offensive, racist, or threatening comments.

18 Responses to “Accused Cop Killer Is For Gun Control”

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

  1. 1
    BlackHorseVet Says:

    This idiot is an embarrassment to every self respecting law enforcement officer and veteran that ever lived. He had a mediocre military career (in spite of what the media tries to spin) in a non-combat station, a dismal failure of a law enforcement career and is a complete failure as a human being. He is a cowardly murderer and a scumbag. The LAPD can redact his moronic “manifesto” all they want, it’s all over the net in it’s original form. I have a copy.

    This guy is going to get exactly what he deserves, prison time with inmates that will just love to get their hands on him. He is likely too cowardly to go out in a blaze of stupidity.

    He’s getting way too much coverage. The next report on this I want to see is that he’s caught or dead. I also don’t want to hear anything about his trial.

  2. 2
    Ed Warden Says:

    These are the people that this govt both state and federal,(don’t forget the local govt”s) want to have firearms. These are the ones who could NEVER FLY OFF THE HANDLE AND START KILLING PEOPLE OH NO NOT THEM. Just the average AMERICAN gun owner could ever do a thing like that. I trust many LEO’s but not all i have met are worthy of my trust.

  3. 3
    dave Says:

    all you can say is sick minds think alike! theves walk aroung thinking everyone wants to rob them because thats what they do! conmen walk around thinking everyone is out to con them! killers walk around hoping no one around them has a gun to shoot them!

  4. 4
    Leslie Says:

    BlackHorseVet ~

    Do you have proof that he killed people? Before they found his “manifesto” posted on “his” facebook page, they reported no suspects in the first murders. In other words, they had no evidence.

    Do you have proof that he wrote that “manifesto?” There are about 20 facebook pages bearing his name right now, so obviously anyone can open a page there under any name. What that tells me is that there is no proof he wrote it, yet.

    I believe in our Constitution and all that it guarantees us, and according to the fifth and sixth amendments, and the principles we stand on in this country, he is innocent until proven guilty. The media is trying and convicting him, and the LEOs in CA are now acting like vigilantes by shooting to kill rather than trying to apprehend him.

    I believe, as Oath Keepers, that we have no right to try him based on the hearsay we see in the media. Our courts are the only rightful place for judgement. Until then, we should be supporting his right to a fair trial where all evidence can be heard, IMO.

  5. 5
    Austrian Economics is Color Blind Says:

    I’ve read the Christopher Dorner manifesto, and let me first say that people should read it.

    It’s not a rambling manifesto, as some of the media would have us believe – he talks about different issues in their own sections. Remember: Dorner expects to die, so he has a number of things he wants to share.

    Dorner is a competent writer. He’s not crazy.

    He tells journalists to look up the information regarding the kicking incident which lead to him being fired, so we’ll just have to wait and see whether another cop threw him under the bus, as it were.

    He talks about officers helping other officers cover up rights violations of citizens. He’s right about that.

    He believes he has a right to use force to restrict racist language directed at him; So he’s wrong about that – people do have a right to say what they want, when they want to, on their own property (or a commons). But he elsewhere talks about how people have a right to express their beliefs, and that destroying people’s places of business does not help any cause. So, he is inconsistent on matters of race/discrimination.

    He is wrong on the gun control issue, as Dorner is actually a reason that people – especially innocent family members of those he has problems with – should want to protect themselves from government. There’s also that incident with the two ladies in that truck that were fired at.

    He speaks well of Chris Christie.

    He thinks Fareed Zakaria should be deported.

    He speaks well of George H. W. Bush.

    He doesn’t like Westboro Baptist Church.

    All this to say that, while Dorner deserves to die for killing innocents, his motivations for killing come from a skewed sense of justice on some issues.

    But he is not wrong on every issue.

  6. 6
    Deborah Says:

    Unless I walk in someone’s shoes I can’t begin to understand how deep their pain is, the slander, a ruined career, the mocking, the calling of names; the evil against him is what pushed him, and doing the right thing whistleblower, cost him. Wasn’t he military before police and military again and just lost his job 9 days ago. Was it due to the LAPD?
    I’m not to judge anyway. However, he is military, knows the corruption as far the LAPD and abuse of civilians, but doesn’t seem to know about Agenda 21 yet. The families he should leave out of his dispute, they are innocent. It is his private war and shedding light for people to look into something instead of ignoring it, and may still be ignored. He did say I recall he wasn’t really into God or christian much, that is where he failed to learn to turn the other cheek. He is on a suicide mission.

  7. 7
    Austrian Economics is Color Blind Says:

    I need to add that slander is not a crime. Nobody is entitled to require others to hold a particular perception of him, so a slanderer violates no one’s rights:

    Defending the Undefendable (Chapter 7: The Slanderer and Libeler) by Walter Block

    Also, no one is entitled to a job:

    Defending the Undefendable (Chapter 30: The Scab) by Walter Block

  8. 8
    Richard Says:

    Having a grievence is one thing. Killing people because your upset is a whole different ballgame.

  9. 9
    Chuck Says:

    Not particularly surprising. Most criminals prefer more “gun control” laws since such laws don’t apply to them, and serve to make their “profession” safer and easier.

  10. 10
    john franceschi Says:

    I have read the manifesto and one thing for sure is that this man,assuming he wrote it, is not crazy. He exhibiys extreme intelligence,lucid thought and precision. That is where it gets interesting. The manifesto gors on for thousands of words in a clear,methodical and precise manner; “facts” figures,dates,times,names,specifics out the wazoo. No superfluos stuff until the part that begins just after the sentace about orphanages. Then, he sounds like a completely different guy, a different author,I think. The writing style completely changes and becomes incoherent and rambling with all kinds of incongruence from the previous thousands of words. I think it is a doctored document at the very least. Either that or he was trying to frame the left as being kooks of the type that would spawn such a freak,as he knows the world will view him. Just sayin…

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

Leave a Reply

© 2012 www.oathkeepers.org | Oath Keepers Corp Address: 5130 S. Fort Apache Rd - Las Vegas, NV 89148