January 8th, 2013

Vietnam Vet Frank Giroux: And Here I Stand

Editor’s note: Frank Giroux is a Vietnam Veteran who was wounded in the Vietnam war and was awarded the Purple Heart. He is known to me personally and has my gratitude and respect as a brother at arms and a true American in the highest sense. Semper Fi!


Frank Giroux Fills His Elk Tag

Frank Giroux Fills His Elk Tag


And Here I Stand

We certainly live in trying times and every minute of every day requires a focus on “leadership”. The issue is, I believe, where we seek our “leadership”.

I come from a line of old war fighters…seems as though my DNA has sought absolute freedom all across Europe and the continent of America. My Father, a combat wounded WW II officer of combat engineers from North Africa, Sicily and Italy up to Monte Casino, sent me to my war in Viet Nam with the following admonishment… he said “Remember this, you will follow neither an illegal nor an immoral order and you will always remember that you answer to God for what ever you do.”

Patriots, I paid heed to my Father’s admonishment and it saved my life as well as my soul. There are consequences, and God knows that I frustrated and angered some in management along the way; both in and out of military service. I have been given both illegal and immoral orders and, some legal orders which were immoral. Always, I have remembered that I answer to God for all my actions and that whatever I do will ring forever in eternity.

My short coming has been in assuming that those with virtue would sit in seats of social responsibility and manage for the greater good. I should have read more history as a young man. I would have saved myself from years of confusion and disappointment. More importantly, I would have been more effective as a citizen. Such is altruism and youthful naivety in shaping focus in ones senior years.

Over time we have watched as those we have entrusted with the welfare of our Nation…those who have been afforded the opportunity through our service and sacrifice of time and blood…we have come to clearly see that they are undeserving and have no respect for the vision, work and sacrifice of our forbearers. We have erred in placing our trust…in assumption that well meaning men and women would respect and lead our Nation forward to the aspirations of individual liberty and justice.

Around about the evil and corrupt weave and work to subdue us who have carried the torch and kept bright the American Dream. I recall H. Ross Perot saying “every sacred and precious thing stands moment to moment on the razor’s edge and must be fought for”…and so it is and will always be.

Therefore, be it known that I, Frank W. Giroux, will never abandon my oath to my God and Country. That I hold fast to my Father’s admonishment and those of the Patriots and Heroes who taught me to be an American. I will not raise my hand against my fellow American and I will strive to vanquish all who seek to do harm to us and our Constitution. To this I pray and ask my God and Lord, Jesus Christ, to direct and sustain my fidelity, Amen.

Always in all things…Strength and Honor!

January 1, 2013

Placing billboards outside of military bases to remind service members of their oath

Please donate and support Oath Keepers mission, every little bit helps!

 Read More Posts

Comments posted belong to the commenter alone, and are not endorsed by Oath Keepers or the administrators for this site. We will remove offensive, racist, or threatening comments.

16 Responses to “Vietnam Vet Frank Giroux: And Here I Stand”

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

  1. 1
    Elias Alias Says:

    Frank has sent me another essay which I’d like to share with readers here. Thank you, Frank.

    - -


    As I wrestle with the concerns of many in dealing with the “gun issue”, I am perplexed.
    I have a problem and need someone to tell me why.

    My first memory of a firearm is seeing my Great Grand Father’s 38-40 colts hanging by his bed. I remember sitting on the floor and attempting to cock the hammer on another Great Grand Father’s Marlin 12 gauge pump and helping my Father clean it. This is back when I was being potty trained….long, long ago.

    From the age of 5 years to 8, my responsibilities revolved around fetching game for my Father…cleaning it and cleaning the weapons used in the taking. For several years I was expected to show that I could attend to my space in the home…my bed room quarters…without being told. My clothes hung up and put away…my bed made tight to bounce a quarter. The chores required to help Mother maintain the household be done without question, complaint nor asking. Once I had established a “positive” track record; my Father took me to the range and I got to fire a weapon.

    At 8 years of age I learned to shoot. It was with a Winchester 1902 single shot 22 cal rifle that had belonged to my Great Grandpa Pete. The drill was military…ready on the left…ready on the right…ready on the firing line…one each round of ball ammunition load and lock. I remember standing with my face to the target and my Father standing behind me…he said something, and I turned to face him as I did not hear clearly. As my body turned, the weapon was at port arms with my finger off the trigger…as the muzzle passed in front of my Father’s face…his right hand and arm came up and engaged the side of my head and knocked me over to the flat of my back…his boot came to rest on my chest and his voice was clean and clear…”Never point your weapon and something unless you intend to kill it!”.

    So, from a very early age I was taught to be careful and responsible. My work with firearms, as all tools, was to be safe and considerate of other people. My Father told me clearly that his effort to teach me had nothing to do with hunting…no, the hunt was another matter. My expertise with firearms was such that I could do my duty to my family, God and Country. That I would grow to become an American. My responsibility was to bring honor to all those who had sacrificed to provide me the opportunity to live in a wonderful country where liberty and justice were the paramount ambitions of citizens to be taken seriously. My fellow Americans were of many shades and tribes but always American in Nation.

    Now, here I am in my 66th year and all about me I hear screeching and thumping of chest from those who have promoted irresponsibility, profanity and decadence. All of this from “leaders” who have pushed equipment on the undisciplined and untrained as a right with no responsibility. Could these of liberal countenance be stupid and or ill-informed? No, I think not. I believe that the quagmire we find about us today was intently and carefully deployed over many decades to bring the American Nation to an end. They promote the killing of the unborn and tell the child that they care about child welfare…they promote entertainment that imbues violence, hate and degradation as the path of effective living. They manufacture and promote the medical art in psychotropic drug as the necessary mechanism to control the humble masses. They see a better world in sustainability and green policy which yields a population manageable and appreciable…ultimately no more than a few hundred million around the whole of the earth.

    So, here I stand, as the last of the Mohicans…with war club and long gun in hand and say to these sycophants, you advance no farther. I am your huckleberry…Molon Labe.

    Frank W. Giroux
    08 January 2013

  2. 2
    Patrick C. Says:

    I just read an article on here about “winning the war for your mind” – which had as a central theme being conscious of subtle manipulation. Then something Mr. Giroux said in his last paragraph made me think, are we all being subconsciously coaxed into a defeat mindset?

    I keep noticing patriots referring to themselves as a dying breed, identifying with vanquished good-guys of the past, and in general painting themselves into the archetypal role of the relic in a world that’s moved on. That may be a heroic way to look at one’s self, but it is still a defeatist attitude, and one I suspect is encouraged by the enemy.

    What I mean is – if we’re psychologically preparing for Pickett’s Charge, well that didn’t go so well, and neither would our repetition of it. If we think of ourselves as Mohicans, well that didn’t go so well for them either, just ask any Indian today. The Spartans put up one hell of a fight, but ultimately they just got snuck up on and slaughtered – and that was clearly the hight point in their culture’s existence. The Irish are notorious for singing songs of failed rebellions in the past, in order to inspire new ones (”Rising of the Moon,” “The Foggy Dew,” “Roddy McCorley,” hundreds more) and guess what happened each time?

    Failure, with several generations of poverty. For the Southland, for the Irish, for the Indians, and for the patriot movement if it’s intent on subconsciously repeating history.

  3. 3
    Cal Says:

    I agree with both of those comments, and as always ahve something to add.

    Has anyone else noticed that there are people calling for a “revolution”, or use the word “revolt”. Yet that is NOT what we are doing.

    We are DEFENDING our legitimate government from the domestic enemies, the traitors that have become entrenched within the 3 branches of our government, and in some state governments.

    How many are aware that the REQUIRED oath is legally binding? That not keeping it is a criminal offense? That the US Constitution is a legal document, the highest law of our land that ALL laws, bills, amendments, etc MUST “be in pursuance thereof” (follow – not deviate away from)?

    That the Patriot Act is not legal? That the NDAA is not legal? That all the warrant-less spying, tracking, searches – TSA, etc are all not legal here in the USA under our legtimate government? That Obama, Panetta, and Dempsey committed treason when they “gave” the UN authority over the USA and over the US Military? That the senate also committed treason when they did not request their arrest and prosecution under our treason laws? That Boehner committed treason when he did not require the investigation and prosecution of Obama when he received that letter declaring treason against the USA in favor of the UN?

    Obama and his adminstration said that it was NOT treason (though they used the word “unconstitutional”) because of our treaties with the UN. Let me show you why they are incorrect and that it is indeed Treason against the USA.

    Let’s start with Treaties, like those we have with the UN.

    Article 43 Paragraph 3 of the Charter of the United Nations provides that all resolutions or agreements of the United Nations Security Counsel “shall be subject to ratification by the signatory states in accordance with their respective constitutional processes.”

    All treaties are subservient to the exclusive congressional power to commence war.

    Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1, 18, the United States Supreme Court held: There is nothing in [the Constitution’s text] which intimates that treaties and laws enacted pursuant to them do not have to comply with the provisions of the Constitution. Nor is there anything in the debates which accompanied the drafting and ratification of the Constitution which even suggests such a result.

    November 19, 1919, in Section II of his Reservations with Regard to Ratification of the Versailles Treaty, TO PRESERVE THE BALANCE OF POWER ESTABLISHED BY THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION FROM EXECUTIVE USURPATION, Senator Henry Cabot Lodge resolved as follows:
    The United States assumes no obligation to preserve the territorial integrity or political independence of any other country or to interfere in controversies between nations – whether members of the League or not – under the provisions of Article 10, or to employ the military or naval forces of the United States under any article of the treaty for any purpose, unless in any particular case the Congress, which, under the Constitution, has the sole power to declare war or authorize the employment of the military or naval forces of the United States, shall by act or joint resolution so provide. (caps are mine)

    Geofroy v. Riggs, 133 U.S. 258, 267, the Supreme Court of the United States held: The treaty power, as expressed in the Constitution, is in terms unlimited except by those restraints which are found in that instrument against the action of the government or of its departments, and those arising from the nature of the government itself and of that of the States. It would not be contended that it extends so far as to authorize what the Constitution forbids, or a change in the character of the government, or in that of one of the States, or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter, without its consent.
    Unconstitutional usurpations by one branch of government of powers entrusted to a coequal branch are not rendered constitutional by repetition.

    Section 2(c) of the War Powers Resolution of 1973 clarifies Presidential authority to undertake military action as follows: The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.

    So the treaties themselves with the UN say that the president MUST do as our Constitution assigned.
    Next is the laws convering treason. Obama pardoned Bush, yet a president cannot pardon treason. Can they also pardon murder under our laws? Mass Murder under our laws? War Crimes?

    Clause 2 of Article VI of the Constitution: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”

    The Constitution of the United States of America IS the Supreme Law of this land, NOT those who serve within the federal government.

    Title 18 US code section 2381 – Treason: Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

    Comments surrounded by {} are mine. /grin
    {Those assisting in the cover-up and implementation of Agenda 21, supporting the UN laws applying here, etc}

    18 USC § 2382 – Misprision of treason: Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

    {That would be the Senate, congress, and Boehner, Holder, Pelosi, H. Clinton, and the rest of that adminstration. Don’t forget that both Bush’s, and Clinton and thier adminstrations also committed these crimes and need arrest and prosecution.}

    18 USC § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection: Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

    {That would be “change” and using propaganda, lies, misinformation, and a *corporate media cartel.
    Almost 100% of the mainstream media is owned by seven companies: Disney, NewsCorp, TimeWarner, CBS, Viacom, NBCUniversal, and Sony. They control everything: movies, television, all the major newspapers and news, and even music record labels.
    When one company dominates an industry, it is a monopoly. When a handful of companies cooperatively dominate an industry, it is a “Cartel.” This is what we have with our mainstream media – an elite group that is cooperatively and covertly controlling everything that comes through our television, radio, newspaper, and theater.

    “It is the purpose of the First Amendment to preserve an uninhibited marketplace of ideas in which truth will ultimately prevail, rather than to countenance monopolization of that market, whether it be by the Government itself or a private licensee. It is the right of the public to receive suitable access to social, political, esthetic, moral, and other ideas and experiences which is crucial here. That right may not constitutionally be abridged either by Congress or by the FCC.” Supreme Court, Red Lion v. FCC, 1969}

    18 USC § 2384 – Seditious conspiracy: If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

    {Fast and Furious – Press Releases about it in EARLY 2009, David Ogden the talking head for Obama; Benghazi, Giving the UN ‘authority’ over the USA – using UN laws, UN here to ‘monitor’ OUR USA elections, UN taxing us, UN Military on USA soil}

    Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof… assassination of any officer of any such government; or
    Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or
    Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof…

    {Giving the UN ‘authority’ over the USA, over the US Military – Obama, Panetta, Dempsey. UN & NATO with the assistance of this administration, the Bush administration, the Clinton administration, the Bush 1 administration… The UN does NOT LEGALLY have any authority over the USA, nor does anyone serving in any branch of our legitimate government have the power to give them any authority over the USA – Not to decide OUR gun laws, tax us, watch our elections, use our natural resources, put Agenda 21 here in the USA, use our military and any of “our” Generals, etc or representatives who allow it are committing treason – that would be Panetta, Dempsey, and Obama, Holder, (plus H. Clinton, J.Napolitano, David Ogden, N. Pelosi, etc) who said they do NOT represent the USA, they represent the UN. Obama said in a letter to Boehner, Panetta and Dempsey in front of the senate – on video. Foreign laws and Shariah laws used in US courts}

    On to the legality of oaths.

    Breaking their Oath means they no longer meet the legal REQUIREMENTS of the office or position they are occupying, plus is a criminal offense. Here are the laws applying:

    Clause 2 of Article VI of the Constitution: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”

    The Constitution of the United States of America IS the Supreme Law of this land, NOT the federal government.

    The first law statute of the United States of America, enacted in the first session of the First Congress on 1 June 1789, was Statute 1, Chapter 1: an act to regulate the time and manner of administering certain oaths, which established the oath required by civil and military officials to support the Constitution.

    The wording of the Presidential Oath was established in the Constitution in Article II, Section 1, Clause 8.

    Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

    The Framers placed the Oath of Office Clause between the beginning clauses that set forth the organization of the executive department and ending clauses that specify the contours of the President’s executive power. The President takes the oath after he assumes the office but before he executes it. The location and phrasing of the Oath of Office Clause strongly suggest that it is not empowering, but that it is limiting – the clause limits how the President’s “executive power” is to be exercised.

    The requirement for all Federal and State Civil officers to give their solemn and binding Oath is established in Article VI, Section 1, Clause 4.

    They are BOUND by their Oath to support the Constitution, and should they abrogate their Oath by their acts or inaction, are subject to charges of impeachment and censure.

    Once given, the Oath is binding for life, unless renounced, refused, and abjured. It does not cease upon the occasions of leaving office or of discharge.

    Solemn: “Legally binding, Common legal phrase indicating that an agreement has been consciously made, and certain actions are now either required or prohibited”, “The other requirement for an agreement or contract to be considered legally binding is consideration – both parties must knowingly understand what they are agreeing to”
    Bound – “Being under legal or moral obligation; to constitute the boundary or limit of; to set a limit to; confine”

    Legally Binding: Common legal phrase. Lawful action, such as an agreement consciously agreed to by two or more entities, establishing lawful accountability. An illegal action, such as forcing, tricking, or coercing a person into an agreement, is not legally binding. Both parties knowingly understand what they are agreeing to is the other requirement to legally establish an agreement or contract.

    Consideration: According to “Black’s Law Dictionary,” consideration in a contract is a bargained for exchange of acts or forbearance of an act.

    Require, Requirement, Required: “to claim or ask for by right and authority; Mandated under a law or by an authoritative entity. That which is required; a thing demanded or obligatory; something demanded or imposed as an obligation.”

    “Blacks Law Dictionary” states that a contract is
    1. An agreement between two or more parties creating obligations that are enforceable or otherwise recognizable at law.

    The Framers placed “Oaths of Office” in the Constitution. These Oaths are to function as “checks” on the powers of the federal government and protect us from usurpations.

    Each Branch of the federal government has “the check of the Oath” on the other two branches. The States, whose officials also take the Oath of Office, have the same check on all three branches of the federal government. And “We the People”, the “original fountain of all legitimate authority” (Federalist No. 22), have the Right to overrule violations of the Constitution by elected and appointed officials.

    Webster’s 1828 Dictionary says for “Constitution”: “…In free states, the constitution is paramount to the statutes or laws enacted by the legislature, limiting and controlling its power; and in the United States, the legislature is created, and its powers designated, by the constitution.”

    If any Branch fails to obey the “supreme Law”, then, in order to preserve the Rule of Law, the other Branches, or failing that, the States or THE PEOPLE, must overrule them”.

    Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order that further defines the law for purposes of enforcement.

    5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office.

    5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law,

    5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”.
    18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath of office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1) removal from office and; (2) confinement or a fine.

    The definition of “advocate” is further specified in Executive Order 10450 which for the purposes of enforcement supplements 5 U.S.C. 7311.
    One provision of Executive Order 10450 specifies it is a violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311 for any person taking the oath of office to advocate “the alteration … of the form of the government of the United States by unconstitutional means.”

    Our form of government is defined by the Constitution of the United States. Thus, according to Executive Order 10450 (and therefore 5 U.S. 7311) any act taken by government officials who have taken the oath of office prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 3331 WHICH ALTERS THE FORM OF GOVERNMENT OTHER THEN BY AMENDMENT, IS A CRIMINAL VIOLATION of the 5 U.S.C. 7311.

    President Truman relieved MacArthur because MacArthur did not support the requirements of the Constitution and did not faithfully discharge his duties. Precedent.

    Washington court-martialed Thomas Dewees, finding him guilty of two offenses: (1) not taking the oath of office… Another precedent.

    There are lots of military examples of those who followed unlawful orders which also support this.


    If there were never intended to be action to defend the Constitution from those who are DOMESTICALLY attempting to destroy its power and authority, why would each Oath require it of those who take the Oaths?

    What about Obama writing a EO to take our weapons? Is this okay also?

    Stay Safe and Detention Free ALL!

  4. 4
    SammyJar Says:

    People need to prepare for victory, and not to just go to your death based on principle for what you have already decided is a lost cause. We must utilize our full potential.

  5. 5
    Dennis Says:

    I agree with Cal the million dollar question is how do we enforce this?

  6. 6
    Patrick C. Says:

    I might get in trouble for writing this as a white guy, so if anybody asks I’m a Muslim and you can’t say anything to me because that’s racist. Okay? Okay, here goes…

    Sammy – fortunately for us, survival is not a condition for victory. Liberty prevails because it has to, of that I have no doubt. Can America still be saved without violence? Yes! Without anybody dying? Yes!

    Is violence being forced upon you impossible? No.

    We have only to name the objective and pursue it until it is accomplished. Right now the objective, necessarily, is civil disobedience. You MUST NOT COMPLY with gun registration, because registration is followed by confiscation, and confiscation by the unthinkable. They want you defenseless from themselves, not safe from crazy people in crowded places as they say. That which they seek to ban, obtain.

    1. Your guns were all stolen – after all, they are in high demand now that they’re banned. 2. You didn’t report it because you are afraid someone knows where you live, and knows that there are no guns in the house. After all, the police can’t protect you ALL the time. 3. You are a steadfast supporter of the regime, a proud patriot and willing ward of the state. After all, the state provides you with health care, education, re-education, and protects you from yourself. 4. None of that is of course true, but when the unthinkable happens, you and yours will not be sheep to the slaughter.

  7. 7
    Bob Giuda Says:

    Cal, are we allowed to print out your explanation of the laws governing oaths, treason, etc.? I believe it is imperative that we educate those in elected office with this information. I spent 6 years in the NH House as an elected Representative, and always lived up to my oaths – Naval Academy Midshipman, Marine Corps officer, FBI Agent, Town Selectman, State Representative and Town Moderator. Those in office are utterly devoid of their obligations under an oath, and most ultimately become apologists or worse – instruments of statism – while in office.

    Please advise, and thanks for your hard work.

    Semper Fidelis, and that means SEMPER FIDELIS.


  8. 8
    Big Al Says:

    Cal, as always, what a mouthful, but very informative indeed. The halls of politics are definitely overflowing with traitorous devils that would love to impose their model of what society should be like. It’s just arrogance, narcissism and being in total control. Defend our country and the Constitution we must, for all that have fought and died before us trying to preserve our freedoms would have been in vain. Keep up the good work, I like you sometimes find it difficult to put into words what I feel or want to say because my blood is boiling…Semper Fi to all my patriot brothers and sisters.

  9. 9
    Kevin Bear Says:

    26 million armed military veterans. I’d say that’s a pretty good formula for success. Molon Labe!

  10. 10
    Howard Nicholson Says:

    2nd chronicles 7:14 gives us the way that we are guaranteed victory over the satanist crowd, and they are many. We have the God given right to defend ourselfs as well as the Constitutional rights. We need to demand our elected leaders honor their oath and repent of their sins against us the American Citizenry. A few public wood stocks on public square and some executions of traitors would make some others flee to other counties. Conficate their money and properties as a fine they also pay. I dont condone evil but this is our right as godly patriots to defend our selves and families. We can make a big difference and with the Lord on our side gain victory.

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

Leave a Reply

© 2012 www.oathkeepers.org | Oath Keepers Corp Address: 5130 S. Fort Apache Rd - Las Vegas, NV 89148